The state of NSW is Australia’s most populous with 8 million residents accounting for 31% of the Australian population, 65% of whom live in Greater Sydney. Since the Australian border was closed to all non-Australian travellers on March 15th and Australians returning from overseas have been required to complete a mandatory 14-day quarantine in designated hotels since March 28th, NSW has accommodated over half of the travellers returning to Australia by air. Despite this and at the time of writing (March 28th, 2021), NSW accounted for just 17% (n = 5094) of Australia’s confirmed COVID-19 cases with no extensive local transmission of any strains linked to foreign travellers returning after March 15th. In total, overseas acquired cases restricted to hotel quarantine outweighed locally acquired cases, accounting for 59% and 41%, respectively. The multidisciplinary public health response to COVID-19 implemented in NSW is co-ordinated by the Public Health Emergency Operations Centre within the NSW Ministry of Health (NSW Health) [4]. Key to terminating local SARS-CoV-2 transmission chains has been the active case finding and contract tracing conducted by NSW Health for each laboratory-confirmed case, which includes generating a SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequence to monitor its spread.
The integration of genomics into routine public health response has addressed key limitations of conventional epidemiological methods including poor or incorrect case recall, and confirmation of contentious or tenuous links. Furthermore, genomics has been instrumental in the timely identification of links between cases for which epidemiological links were not immediately apparent, supplementing conventional contact tracing methods and informing targeted public health resource allocation. In NSW, the integration of genomics into routine public health practice includes prioritisation of clinical samples for rapid sequencing, weekly verbal and written reports to NSW Health and customised on-demand reports for urgent, high-priority cases. To date, the Pathogen Genomics Team has generated and shared 1144 complete SARS-CoV-2 genomes representing 28% of all confirmed COVID-19 cases in NSW. On the basis of epidemiological information provided by NSW Health and specific single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) profiles [1], these genomes have been classified into 53 genomic clusters. The median duration, i.e. circulation in the community, of identified genomic clusters was two weeks, although this was highly variable (range: 1–16 weeks) with clusters consisting of a median of three cases (range: 2-204 cases; Fig. 1). Epidemiological data also enabled the Pathogen Genomics Team to report which cases belong to specific transmission chains, the detail of which is described in regular reports that overlay conventional phylogenetic trees with infographics representing the supplied epidemiological data. An epi-fishplot is generated as part of the report to provide a population-level overview of SARS-CoV-2 clusters co-circulating in the community, illuminating the effectiveness of public health measures on the emergence, spread and eventual elimination of transmission chains within the local population (Fig. 1) [4].
Our data illustrates the two epidemiologically distinct waves of SARS CoV-2 infections experienced in NSW to date, the peaks of which occurred in late March and July, respectively. The first wave resulted from multiple independent introductions of genomically distinct viruses by overseas travellers prior to the closure of international borders on March 15th. Sustained local transmission of introduced strains was the exception and the median duration in weeks for the 17 first wave clusters identified (≥ 5 cases) was 4 (range: 1–10: Fig. 1). By mid-May, local transmission of all clusters identified in the first wave had been eliminated, despite continued importation of overseas acquired cases into the NSW hotel quarantine system. This state of elimination, without significant or sustained local transmission (no clusters consisting of ≥ 5 cases) was maintained for the following two months (Fig. 1).
Genome sequencing confirmed that the second wave was seeded by a domestic importation from neighbouring state, Victoria, in early July. The interstate resident travelled to NSW immediately prior to the border between the two states closing for the first time in 100 years in order to prevent spill-over from Victoria into NSW. Confirming that importation was the source of the initial second wave cluster (NSW33.0: Fig. 1), and not undetected community transmission, provided important reassurance that the public health measures in place were effective. The initial infection event occurred at a large licensed venue situated in close proximity to a highway traversing the east coast of Australia, which facilitated infection of multiple individuals and enabled this strain to initiate multiple transmission chains amongst the local population (Fig. 1). Genome sequencing confirmed that public health measures had eliminated the NSW33.0 cluster by mid-September, and the NSW33.1 subcluster by early November.
Globally, the COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated extraordinary and often innovative public health responses to prevent widespread virus transmission. The high frequency of asymptomatic infections or subclinical disease and comparatively limited genomic diversity of circulating strains has exposed limitations of conventional epidemiological and genomic approaches when deployed in isolation to contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Our experience of rapidly integrating epidemiological and genomic data into actionable information demonstrates that local elimination is achievable if stringent public health measures are maintained.
Genomic sequencing is a powerful public health tool that provides a unique level of oversight and addresses critical limitations of conventional epidemiological methods [5]. The epi-fish approach described above can be equally applied to other pathogens of public health importance subjected to integrated genomic surveillance. The successful integration of genomics into routine public health response relies on a strong working partnership between public health practitioners and laboratory professionals, with evidence synthesis and visualisation in order to distil complex genomic data into the information which can guide and benchmark public health actions.