Demographics of respondents
Overall, there were 545 responses from pharmacy professionals (486 pharmacists and 59 pharmacy technicians) across 37 countries; 31 of which are Commonwealth countries (Table 1). Additionally, there were responses from 111 pharmacy students from 7 countries. India (76), Tanzania (27), Bangladesh (2), Uganda (2), Zambia (2), Pakistan (1) and the UK (1). Over half of the respondents were in the age range of 25-44 years old, with the majority having less than 10 years of experience. Most respondents also worked in either a hospital or in a community setting.
Table 1: Country distribution of responses from pharmacy professionals (pharmacists and pharmacy technicians), (n=545)
Country
|
Pharmacist & Pharmacy Technician
|
%
|
Rwanda
|
66
|
12.1
|
Tanzania
|
60
|
11.0
|
Malaysia
|
59
|
10.8
|
Ghana
|
46
|
8.4
|
India
|
39
|
7.2
|
Zambia
|
34
|
6.2
|
Uganda
|
30
|
5.5
|
New Zealand
|
22
|
4.0
|
United Kingdom
|
22
|
4.0
|
Nigeria
|
16
|
2.9
|
Saint Lucia
|
16
|
2.9
|
Singapore
|
15
|
2.8
|
Pakistan
|
13
|
2.4
|
Canada
|
12
|
2.2
|
Kenya
|
11
|
2.0
|
Cameroon
|
10
|
1.8
|
Malawi
|
9
|
1.7
|
Australia
|
8
|
1.5
|
South Africa
|
8
|
1.5
|
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
|
6
|
1.1
|
Dominica
|
5
|
0.9
|
Mauritius
|
5
|
0.9
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
5
|
0.9
|
Fiji
|
4
|
0.7
|
Malta
|
4
|
0.7
|
Guyana
|
3
|
0.6
|
Sri Lanka
|
3
|
0.6
|
Samoa
|
2
|
0.4
|
Swaziland
|
2
|
0.4
|
United Arab Emirates*
|
2
|
0.4
|
Afghanistan*, Grenada, Republic of Ireland*, Jordan*, Nepal*, Zimbabwe, United States*, Unknown
|
1 respondent each
|
0.2
|
*Indicates non-Commonwealth countries
Age (years)
|
Number of respondents
|
(%)
|
18 to 24
|
43
|
7.9
|
25 to 34
|
188
|
34.5
|
35 to 44
|
132
|
24.2
|
45 to 54
|
50
|
9.2
|
55 to 64
|
24
|
4.4
|
>65
|
8
|
1.8
|
No response
|
98
|
18.0
|
Gender
|
Number of respondents
|
(%)
|
Male
|
272
|
50.0
|
Female
|
254
|
46.1
|
No response
|
18
|
3.3
|
Prefer not to say
|
1
|
0.2
|
Years in profession
|
Number of respondents
|
(%)
|
<1
|
37
|
6.8
|
1-3
|
96
|
17.6
|
4-10
|
143
|
26.2
|
11-15
|
75
|
13.8
|
>15
|
108
|
19.8
|
No response
|
86
|
15.8
|
Professional setting
|
Number of respondents
|
(%)
|
Community
|
216
|
39.6
|
Hospital
|
172
|
31.6
|
Academia (University (as an academic) or research institute)
|
77
|
14.1
|
Government (local, regional or nationally)
|
23
|
4.2
|
Industry
|
18
|
3.3
|
Public Health Institute
|
17
|
3,1
|
Professional body
|
10
|
1.8
|
Others (Post grad students, military, did not specify)
|
8
|
1.5
|
Non-governmental organisation
|
3
|
0.6
|
No response
|
1
|
0.2
|
Survey findings
Level of concern about COVID-19 and ability to work effectively during the pandemic.
Figure 1 illustrates the level of worry from respondents about the impact of COVID-19 on them personally and the pharmacy profession. More than 90% of people reported at least being somewhat worried, with nearly two-thirds reporting being ‘very worried’ or ‘extremely worried’. Extreme worry was observed to be higher on a personal level than on a professional level.
Impact on effective working and need for remote working
Nearly two-thirds of respondents stated finding it somewhat difficult or very difficult to work effectively during the COVID-19 pandemic. Figure 2 illustrates the percentage breakdown of respondents who have needed to work remotely, by work setting. This shows that respondents working in academia, professional bodies and industry are more likely to work remotely compared to those in government and patient-facing roles such as community and hospital.
Key challenges with remote working
The most common challenges that pharmacy professionals selected with remote working (Table 2) were: general anxiety about the impact of coronavirus on their life, and difficulties with communication with their co-workers (each selected by 12% of respondents), issues with internet connectivity, social isolation, keeping a regular schedule, no access to tools or information needed to job at home, and issues with physical work space (each selected by 11% respondents). Challenges that were least faced were childcare (4.5%), getting enough food (1.8%) and being sick, or helping the sick (1.4%).
Table 2: Top three challenges facing pharmacy professionals with remote working (n=545)
Challenges currently faced by pharmacy professionals with remote working
|
%
|
General anxiety about the impact of coronavirus on my life
|
173
|
12.2
|
Communication with co-workers is harder
|
170
|
12.0
|
Internet connectivity
|
158
|
11.2
|
Social isolation
|
156
|
11.0
|
Keeping a regular schedule
|
155
|
11.0
|
I don’t have access to the tools or information I need to do my job at home
|
153
|
10.8
|
My physical workspace
|
149
|
10.5
|
Too many distractions at home
|
141
|
10.0
|
Childcare
|
64
|
4.5
|
Other (please specify)
|
48
|
3.4
|
Getting enough food
|
26
|
1.8
|
I’m sick or helping others who are sick
|
20
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
1413
|
|
Impact of social distancing on work
There was a mixed response on the impact of social distancing on the pharmacy profession with 28% of respondents stating it had significantly increased workload and visits to the pharmacy, yet a similar proportion reported a reduced workload and visits to the pharmacy (Table 3).
Table 3: Impact of social distancing on workload of pharmacy profession (n=440).
Impact of social distancing on pharmacy
|
Number
|
%
|
A slight increase in workload and visits to the pharmacy
|
76
|
17.3
|
Don't know
|
28
|
6.4
|
Not much impact on workload or visits to the pharmacy
|
48
|
10.9
|
Other (please specify)
|
38
|
8.6
|
Reduced workload and visits to the pharmacy
|
127
|
28.9
|
Significantly increased workload and visits to the pharmacy
|
123
|
28.0
|
Work done by pharmacy professional and /or professional bodies in response to the pandemic
The majority of the respondents (n=479) were aware of pharmacy organisation or a pharmacist who was involved/consulted in COVID-19 response or preparation directly (40%) or indirectly (30%). In contrast, 16% stated that they were not aware of a pharmacist or pharmacy organisation being involved/consulted in COVID-19 response; 13% did not know and 1% selected other for contributions e.g. developing new workflow for medication extension, home delivery, managing adequacy of drug supplies due to global supply chain disruption and supporting/implementing tele-counselling.
More than a third of respondents (40%) stated that one or more COVID-19 responses had been spearheaded or proposed by pharmacy organisation in their country, a third were unsure (31%), 23% stated no responses had been spearheaded by pharmacy organisations and 6% selected sort of.
Most of the pharmacy professionals had not previously been actively involved in a global health emergency (82%) nor had training on emergency preparedness global/public health emergency preparedness (62%). (Figure 3).
Support to better equip profession to respond to the pandemic
When asked what kind of support respondents would find helpful from the CPA, most selected from the suggested list of options webinars (28%), and access to community of support to share questions and concerns (26%) (Table 4). Signposting to information was only selected by 17% of respondents and 6% of respondents provided other suggestions which included e.g. access to Protective Personal Equipment, training, guidance on tele-consults by pharmacists for therapy management, support in conducting research and literature review.
Table 4: Support needed to better equip the pharmacy profession to respond to COVID-19 pandemic (n=545)
Support required
|
Number
|
%
|
Webinars on Covid-19
|
150
|
27.5
|
Access to a community of support to share questions and concerns
|
140
|
25.7
|
Signposting to information
|
90
|
16.5
|
Other suggestions
|
32
|
5.9
|
COVID-19 webinar:
The first webinar on COVID-19 organised by the CPA held on 7 May 2020. It was an opportunity to discuss resources already available to support the COVID-19 response throughout the Commonwealth. Easy access to these resources collated from the World Health Organisation (WHO), International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP), Africa Centres for Disease Control (Africa CDC), Ministries of Health, and National Pharmacy Associations was provided through the Commonwealth Partnerships for Antimicrobial Stewardship (CwPAMS) App. Future webinars are planned to provide a discussion forum and an opportunity to share learning based on experiences. This will be particularly important when testing, vaccination and treatment options are rolled out.
The webinar had 620 registrations from 38 countries. Top five registrations were from Nigeria (20%), Kenya (17%), Malaysia (11%), India (8%) and Pakistan (7%). A post webinar feedback questionnaire was completed by 264 individuals; 71% were pharmacists and 19% pharmacy students. 75% watched the live session while 23% watched the recording. Majority of the respondents found the webinar very useful (64%) and useful (29%) (n=259).
The feedback also included six knowledge quizzes (Table 5). One of which was on organisations that have developed international recommendations/guidelines on COVID-19. Responses revealed that 97%, 53% and 45% correctly identified that the World Health Organisation, International Pharmaceutical Federation and Africa Centres for Disease Control have developed international recommendations/guidelines on COVID-19. 24% of respondents correctly answered the question on relevant COVID-19 resources that have been developed or in development as part of the Commonwealth Partnerships for Antimicrobial Stewardship (CwPAMS) with ‘hand rub formulation training video’ and ‘app’ selected by 78% and 73% of respondents respectively. In addition, some respondents incorrectly selected ‘COVID-19 Treatment guidelines’ (59%), ‘COVID-19 treatment’ (0.4%) and ‘hand rub formulation’ (0.4%). A total of 49% respondents correctly answered the question on the spread of COVID-19 identifying that COVID-19 is spread by droplets (96%) and surfaces (82%) while 34% incorrectly selected that the coronavirus is airborne.
Table 5: Percentage of respondents who answered each key knowledge question correctly (n=264).
Key knowledge question (n)
|
Correct
answer
|
Correct (%)
|
Incorrect (%)
|
1. Which organisations have developed international recommendations/guidelines on COVID-19?
|
WHO, FIP, Africa CDC
|
39
|
61
|
2. There are currently one or more treatments for COVID-19 that have been fully tested for safety and efficacy (False)
|
False
|
86
|
14
|
3. Chloroquine and hydroxychlorine can be used to treat COVID-19 outside of clinical trials
|
False
|
59
|
41
|
4. The CwPAMS app, currently piloted in Ghana, Uganda, Tanzania and Zambia has other international resources for AMR and COVID-19? (n=18 356)
|
True
|
87
|
13
|
5. What COVID-19 relevant resources have been developed or in development as part of CwPAMS?
|
Hand rub formulation training video, App
|
24
|
76
|
6. Spread of Coronavirus is via?
|
Droplet, Surface.
|
49
|
51
|