TALBE 1
Basic information of residents’ trainers
Classification
|
number
|
percentage
|
Gender
|
|
|
Male
|
13
|
26
|
Female
|
37
|
74
|
Education degree
|
|
|
Below Bachelor
|
6
|
12
|
Bachelor
|
40
|
80
|
Master or above
|
4
|
8
|
Professional title
|
|
|
Senior title
|
5
|
10
|
Vice Senior title
|
26
|
52
|
Middle title
|
19
|
38
|
Registered Practice General Practice
|
|
|
Yes
|
38
|
76
|
No
|
12
|
24
|
Participate in the general teacher training level
|
|
|
Province level
|
31
|
62
|
National level
|
18
|
36
|
Province and National level level
|
1
|
2
|
Exploratory factor analysis After statistical analysis, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the questionnaire is 0.90, and the KMO value is 0. 853, the data supports factor analysis, which is relevant and statistically significant. The principal component analysis method is used for exploratory factor analysis. After multiple orthogonal rotations, 3 items with two-factor loading greater than 0.4, independent factor loading less than 0.4, and content inconsistent are deleted, and the characteristic root is greater than 1. For 20 items with factor loading greater than 0.5, the factor analysis results are shown in Table 2 and Table 3.
Table 2
Factor variance contribution rate
Total variance explained
|
|
|
Initial eigenvalue
|
Extract the sum of squares of the load
|
Rotating load sum of squares
|
|
SUM
|
Percentage of Variance
|
Cumulative percentage
|
SUM
|
Percentage of Variance
|
Cumulative percentage
|
SUM
|
Percentage of Variance
|
Cumulative percentage
|
1
|
11.405
|
57.027
|
57.027
|
11.405
|
57.027
|
57.027
|
4.412
|
22.062
|
22.062
|
2
|
1.712
|
8.558
|
65.586
|
1.712
|
8.558
|
65.586
|
4.296
|
21.480
|
43.542
|
3
|
1.365
|
6.827
|
72.412
|
1.365
|
6.827
|
72.412
|
3.550
|
17.750
|
61.292
|
4
|
1.124
|
5.618
|
78.031
|
1.124
|
5.618
|
78.031
|
3.348
|
16.739
|
78.031
|
5
|
0.780
|
3.898
|
81.929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
0.629
|
3.143
|
85.072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
0.511
|
2.553
|
87.625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
0.390
|
1.949
|
89.573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
0.342
|
1.711
|
91.284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
0.329
|
1.643
|
92.927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
0.258
|
1.288
|
94.215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
0.225
|
1.125
|
95.340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
0.194
|
0.968
|
96.308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
0.171
|
0.853
|
97.161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
0.166
|
0.829
|
97.990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
0.125
|
0.625
|
98.615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
.104
|
0.519
|
99.134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
0.086
|
0.431
|
99.565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
0.053
|
0.263
|
99.827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
0.035
|
0.173
|
100.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total variance explained
|
|
|
Initial eigenvalue
|
Extract the sum of squares of the load
|
Rotating load sum of squares
|
|
SUM
|
Percentage of Variance
|
Cumulative percentage
|
SUM
|
Percentage of Variance
|
Cumulative percentage
|
SUM
|
Percentage of Variance
|
Cumulative percentage
|
1
|
11.405
|
57.027
|
57.027
|
11.405
|
57.027
|
57.027
|
4.412
|
22.062
|
22.062
|
2
|
1.712
|
8.558
|
65.586
|
1.712
|
8.558
|
65.586
|
4.296
|
21.480
|
43.542
|
3
|
1.365
|
6.827
|
72.412
|
1.365
|
6.827
|
72.412
|
3.550
|
17.750
|
61.292
|
4
|
1.124
|
5.618
|
78.031
|
1.124
|
5.618
|
78.031
|
3.348
|
16.739
|
78.031
|
5
|
.780
|
3.898
|
81.929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
.629
|
3.143
|
85.072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
.511
|
2.553
|
87.625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
.390
|
1.949
|
89.573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
.342
|
1.711
|
91.284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.329
|
1.643
|
92.927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
.258
|
1.288
|
94.215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
.225
|
1.125
|
95.340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
.194
|
.968
|
96.308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
.171
|
.853
|
97.161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
.166
|
.829
|
97.990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
.125
|
.625
|
98.615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
.104
|
.519
|
99.134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
.086
|
.431
|
99.565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
.053
|
.263
|
99.827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
.035
|
.173
|
100.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3
Factor analysis results.
Common factor variance
|
|
initial
|
extract
|
Able to integrate teaching goals
|
1.000
|
.747
|
Teaching organization ability
|
1.000
|
.902
|
Teaching awareness
|
1.000
|
.827
|
Teaching reflection
|
1.000
|
.740
|
Ability of giving lectures
|
1.000
|
.719
|
Teaching method selection
|
1.000
|
.811
|
Academic achievements
|
1.000
|
.783
|
Teacher-student interaction effect
|
1.000
|
.735
|
Team leadership
|
1.000
|
.783
|
Professional theoretical knowledge
|
1.000
|
.803
|
Rich clinical experience
|
1.000
|
.768
|
Proficient clinical operation skills
|
1.000
|
.626
|
Familiar with national health policy
|
1.000
|
.718
|
Grasp the requirements for the evaluation of the training base
|
1.000
|
.777
|
Effectively interact with clinical bases
|
1.000
|
.726
|
Familiar with the operation mode of primary medical institutions
|
1.000
|
.799
|
Affinity
|
1.000
|
.809
|
Sense of responsibility
|
1.000
|
.875
|
Understand and respect students
|
1.000
|
.918
|
Science and Humanities
|
1.000
|
.739
|
Common factor naming
Common factor 1 contains three items, reflecting some of the personal characteristics of teachers, including affinity, tolerance and sense of responsibility, understanding and respect for trainees, etc. [7-8].
Common factor 2, including six main items, reflecting the teaching ability requirements and research capabilities that teachers of the general practice community practice base should have: a certain teaching organization ability, reasonable arrangement of teaching content, teaching reflection, and teaching reform [9- 10], including teaching awareness, teaching ability, teaching reflection, selection of teaching methods, professional theoretical knowledge and ability to combine goals, etc.
Common factor 3, containing six items, reflects the requirements for community teachers in the basic-level clinical practice capabilities: Have certain clinical capabilities and be able to apply practice at the basic-level, including familiarity with the operation mode of basic-level institutions, mastering the requirements of the evaluation of the training base, and effective Interact with clinical bases, have rich clinical experience, scientific and humanistic literacy, and proficient clinical skills operation, etc. [7].
Common factor 4 contains five items, reflecting the ability of community teachers in the construction and management of grassroots teaching bases [5,11], including: teaching organization ability, team leadership ability, effective organization of teacher-student interaction, familiarity with national health policies, and Corresponding academic achievements.