1.OIV: Statistical report on world vitiviniculture. 2018.
2.Haider MS, Kurjogi MM, Khalil-Ur-Rehman M, Fiaz M, Pervaiz T, Jiu S, Haifeng J, Chen W, Fang J: Grapevine immune signaling network in response to drought stress as revealed by transcriptomic analysis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 2017, 121:187–195.
3.Jiménez S, Dridi J, Gutiérrez D, Moret D, Irigoyen JJ, Moreno MA, Gogorcena Y: Physiological, biochemical and molecular responses in four Prunus rootstocks submitted to drought stress. Tree physiology 2013, 33(10):1061–1075.
4.Haider MS, Zhang C, Kurjogi MM, Pervaiz T, Zheng T, Zhang C, Lide C, Shangguan L, Fang J: Insights into grapevine defense response against drought as revealed by biochemical, physiological and RNA-Seq analysis. Scientific reports 2017, 7(1):13134.
5.Giovannoni JJ: Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. The plant cell 2004, 16(suppl 1):S170-S180.
6.Kleemann J, Rincon-Rivera LJ, Takahara H, Neumann U, van Themaat EVL, van der Does HC, Hacquard S, Stüber K, Will I, Schmalenbach W: Sequential delivery of host-induced virulence effectors by appressoria and intracellular hyphae of the phytopathogen Colletotrichum higginsianum. PLoS pathogens 2012, 8(4):e1002643.
7.Reglinski T, Elmer P, Taylor J, Wood P, Hoyte S: Inhibition of Botrytis cinerea growth and suppression of botrytis bunch rot in grapes using chitosan. Plant pathology 2010, 59(5):882–890.
8.Pezet R, Viret O, Perret C, Tabacchi R: Latency of Botrytis cinerea Pers.: Fr. and biochemical studies during growth and ripening of two grape berry cultivars, respectively susceptible and resistant to grey mould. Journal of Phytopathology 2003, 151(4):208–214.
9.Cabrera JC, Messiaen J, Cambier P, Van Cutsem P: Size, acetylation and concentration of chitooligosaccharide elicitors determine the switch from defence involving PAL activation to cell death and water peroxide production in Arabidopsis cell suspensions. Physiologia plantarum 2006, 127(1):44–56.
10.Wang Y, He H, Zhou Y: Effect of different molecular weight chitosan on several physiological and biochemical characteristics related with plant defense reaction. Plant Physiology Communications 2006, 42(6):1109.
11.Mhurchu CN, Dunshea‐Mooij C, Bennett D, Rodgers A: Effect of chitosan on weight loss in overweight and obese individuals: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Obesity reviews 2005, 6(1):35–42.
12.Kao C-H, Hsiang C-Y, Ho T-Y: Assessment of chitosan-affected metabolic response by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor bioluminescent imaging-guided transcriptomic analysis. PloS one 2012, 7(4):e34969.
13.Romanazzi G, Nigro F, Ippolito A, Divenere D, Salerno M: Effects of pre‐and postharvest chitosan treatments to control storage grey mold of table grapes. Journal of Food Science 2002, 67(5):1862–1867.
14.Romanazzi G, Feliziani E, Baños SB, Sivakumar D: Shelf life extension of fresh fruit and vegetables by chitosan treatment. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition 2017, 57(3):579–601.
15.Li P, Linhardt R, Cao Z: Structural characterization of oligochitosan elicitor from Fusarium sambucinum and its elicitation of defensive responses in Zanthoxylum bungeanum. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2016, 17(12):2076.
16.Pinu F: Grape and wine metabolomics to develop new insights using untargeted and targeted approaches. Fermentation 2018, 4(4):92.
17.Silva P, Gerós H: Regulation by salt of vacuolar H+-ATPase and H+-pyrophosphatase activities and Na+/H+ exchange. Plant signaling & behavior 2009, 4(8):718–726.
18.Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Brown GR, Maglott DR: NCBI Reference Sequences (RefSeq): current status, new features and genome annotation policy. Nucleic acids research 2011, 40(D1):D130-D135.
19.Fortes AM, Agudelo-Romero P, Silva MS, Ali K, Sousa L, Maltese F, Choi YH, Grimplet J, Martinez-Zapater JM, Verpoorte R: Transcript and metabolite analysis in Trincadeira cultivar reveals novel information regarding the dynamics of grape ripening. BMC plant biology 2011, 11(1):149.
20.Du Z, Zhou X, Ling Y, Zhang Z, Su Z: agriGO: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic acids research 2010, 38(suppl_2):W64-W70.
21.Sweetman C, Wong DC, Ford CM, Drew DP: Transcriptome analysis at four developmental stages of grape berry (Vitis vinifera cv. Shiraz) provides insights into regulated and coordinated gene expression. BMC genomics 2012, 13(1):691.
22.Gutiérrez-Martínez P, Chacón-López A, Xoca-Orozco LA, Ramos-Guerrero A, Velázquez-Estrada R, Aguilera-Aguirre S: Chitosan and Changes in Gene Expression During Fruit–Pathogen Interaction at Postharvest Stage. In: Chitosan in the preservation of agricultural commodities. Elsevier; 2016: 299–311.
23.Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A: Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome biology 2010, 11(2):R14.
24.Kanehisa M, Araki M, Goto S, Hattori M, Hirakawa M, Itoh M, Katayama T, Kawashima S, Okuda S, Tokimatsu T: KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic acids research 2007, 36(suppl_1):D480-D484.
25.Pervaiz T, Haifeng J, Haider MS, Cheng Z, Cui M, Wang M, Cui L, Wang X, Fang J: Transcriptomic analysis of grapevine (cv. Summer black) leaf, using the illumina platform. PloS one 2016, 11(1):e0147369.
26.Upadhyay S, Phukan UJ, Mishra S, Shukla RK: De novo leaf and root transcriptome analysis identified novel genes involved in Steroidal sapogenin biosynthesis in Asparagus racemosus. BMC genomics 2014, 15(1):746.
27.Devarenne TP, Martin GB: Manipulation of plant programmed cell death pathways during plant-pathogen interactions. Plant signaling & behavior 2007, 2(3):188–190.
28.Blanco-Ulate B, Morales-Cruz A, Amrine KC, Labavitch JM, Powell AL, Cantu D: Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of Botrytis cinerea genes targeting plant cell walls during infections of different hosts. Frontiers in plant science 2014, 5:435.
29.Davies PJ: The plant hormones: their nature, occurrence, and functions. In: Plant hormones. Springer; 2010: 1–15.
30.Doares SH, Syrovets T, Weiler EW, Ryan CA: Oligogalacturonides and chitosan activate plant defensive genes through the octadecanoid pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1995, 92(10):4095–4098.
31.Feliziani E, Landi L, Romanazzi G: Preharvest treatments with chitosan and other alternatives to conventional fungicides to control postharvest decay of strawberry. Carbohydrate Polymers 2015, 132:111–117.
32.Landi L, De Miccolis Angelini RM, Pollastro S, Feliziani E, Faretra F, Romanazzi G: Global transcriptome analysis and identification of differentially expressed genes in strawberry after preharvest application of benzothiadiazole and chitosan. Frontiers in plant science 2017, 8:235.
33.Landi L, Feliziani E, Romanazzi G: Expression of defense genes in strawberry fruits treated with different resistance inducers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2014, 62(14):3047–3056.
34.van Loon LC, Rep M, Pieterse CM: Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2006, 44:135–162.
35.Kong W, Chen N, Liu T, Zhu J, Wang J, He X, Jin Y: Large-scale transcriptome analysis of cucumber and Botrytis cinerea during infection. PloS one 2015, 10(11):e0142221.
36.Lopez-Moya F, Kowbel D, Nueda MJ, Palma-Guerrero J, Glass NL, Lopez-Llorca LV: Neurospora crassa transcriptomics reveals oxidative stress and plasma membrane homeostasis biology genes as key targets in response to chitosan. Molecular BioSystems 2016, 12(2):391–403.
37.Jaime MD, Lopez-Llorca LV, Conesa A, Lee AY, Proctor M, Heisler LE, Gebbia M, Giaever G, Westwood JT, Nislow C: Identification of yeast genes that confer resistance to chitosan oligosaccharide (COS) using chemogenomics. BMC genomics 2012, 13(1):267.
38.Boller T, Felix G: A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annual review of plant biology 2009, 60:379–406.
39.Malerba M, Crosti P, Cerana R: Defense/stress responses activated by chitosan in sycamore cultured cells. Protoplasma 2012, 249(1):89–98.
40.Lapointe G, Luckevich MD, Cloutier M, Séguin A: 14‐3‐3 gene family in hybrid poplar and its involvement in tree defence against pathogens 1. Journal of experimental botany 2001, 52(359):1331–1338.
41.Lozano-Durán R, Robatzek S: 14–3–3 proteins in plant-pathogen interactions. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 2015, 28(5):511–518.
42.Lozano‐Durán R, Bourdais G, He SY, Robatzek S: The bacterial effector HopM1 suppresses PAMP‐triggered oxidative burst and stomatal immunity. New Phytologist 2014, 202(1):259–269.
43.Liu J, Ding P, Sun T, Nitta Y, Dong O, Huang X, Yang W, Li X, Botella JR, Zhang Y: Heterotrimeric G proteins serve as a converging point in plant defense signaling activated by multiple receptor-like kinases. Plant physiology 2013, 161(4):2146–2158.
44.Liu X, Yang S, Zhao M, Luo M, Yu C-W, Chen C-Y, Tai R, Wu K: Transcriptional repression by histone deacetylases in plants. Molecular plant 2014, 7(5):764–772.
45.Clarke CR, Chinchilla D, Hind SR, Taguchi F, Miki R, Ichinose Y, Martin GB, Leman S, Felix G, Vinatzer BA: Allelic variation in two distinct Pseudomonas syringae flagellin epitopes modulates the strength of plant immune responses but not bacterial motility. New Phytologist 2013, 200(3):847–860.
46.Albert M, Jehle AK, Lipschis M, Mueller K, Zeng Y, Felix G: Regulation of cell behaviour by plant receptor kinases: Pattern recognition receptors as prototypical models. European journal of cell biology 2010, 89(2–3):200–207.
47.Asai T, Tena G, Plotnikova J, Willmann MR, Chiu W-L, Gomez-Gomez L, Boller T, Ausubel FM, Sheen J: MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature 2002, 415(6875):977.
48.Zipfel C, Robatzek S, Navarro L, Oakeley EJ, Jones JD, Felix G, Boller T: Bacterial disease resistance in Arabidopsis through flagellin perception. Nature 2004, 428(6984):764.
49.Abramovitch RB, Anderson JC, Martin GB: Bacterial elicitation and evasion of plant innate immunity. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2006, 7(8):601.
50.Sanchez-Vallet A, Mesters JR, Thomma BP: The battle for chitin recognition in plant-microbe interactions. FEMS microbiology reviews 2015, 39(2):171–183.
51.Pusztahelyi T: Chitin and chitin-related compounds in plant–fungal interactions. Mycology 2018, 9(3):189–201.
52.Cord-Landwehr S, Melcher RL, Kolkenbrock S, Moerschbacher BM: A chitin deacetylase from the endophytic fungus Pestalotiopsis sp. efficiently inactivates the elicitor activity of chitin oligomers in rice cells. Scientific reports 2016, 6:38018.
53.Aranda-Martinez A, Grifoll-Romero L, Aragunde H, Sancho-Vaello E, Biarnés X, Lopez-Llorca LV, Planas A: Expression and specificity of a chitin deacetylase from the nematophagous fungus Pochonia chlamydosporia potentially involved in pathogenicity. Scientific reports 2018, 8(1):2170.
54.Lopez-Moya F, Suarez-Fernandez M, Lopez-Llorca LV: Molecular Mechanisms of Chitosan Interactions with Fungi and Plants. International journal of molecular sciences 2019, 20(2):332.
55.Robert-Seilaniantz A, Navarro L, Bari R, Jones JD: Pathological hormone imbalances. Current opinion in plant biology 2007, 10(4):372–379.
56.Iriti M, Faoro F: Abscisic acid is involved in chitosan-induced resistance to tobacco necrosis virus (TNV). Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 2008, 46(12):1106–1111.
57.Heinonen IM, Meyer AS, Frankel EN: Antioxidant activity of berry phenolics on human low-density lipoprotein and liposome oxidation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1998, 46(10):4107–4112.
58.Rahman M, Mukta JA, Sabir AA, Gupta DR, Mohi-Ud-Din M, Hasanuzzaman M, Miah MG, Rahman M, Islam MT: Chitosan biopolymer promotes yield and stimulates accumulation of antioxidants in strawberry fruit. PloS one 2018, 13(9):e0203769.
59.He Y, Bose S, Wang W, Jia X, Lu H, Yin H: Pre-Harvest treatment of chitosan oligosaccharides improved strawberry fruit quality. International journal of molecular sciences 2018, 19(8):2194.
60.Buratowski S, Zhou H: Functional domains of transcription factor TFIIB. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1993, 90(12):5633–5637.
61.Zakrzewska A, Boorsma A, Brul S, Hellingwerf KJ, Klis FM: Transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the plasma membrane-perturbing compound chitosan. Eukaryotic Cell 2005, 4(4):703–715.
62.Boorsma A: Dissection of transcriptional regulation networks and prediction of gene functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 2008.
63.Landberg T, Greger M: Differences in oxidative stress in heavy metal resistant and sensitive clones of Salix viminalis. Journal of Plant Physiology 2002, 159(1):69–75.
64.Verma S, Dubey R: Lead toxicity induces lipid peroxidation and alters the activities of antioxidant enzymes in growing rice plants. Plant Science 2003, 164(4):645–655.
65.Haider MS, Kurjogi MM, Khalil-ur-Rehman M, Pervez T, Songtao J, Fiaz M, Jogaiah S, Wang C, Fang J: Drought stress revealed physiological, biochemical and gene-expressional variations in ‘Yoshihime’peach (Prunus Persica L) cultivar. Journal of Plant Interactions 2018, 13(1):83–90.
66.O’CONNELL R, Chen Y, Zhang H, Zhou Y, Fox D, Maguire P, Wang JJ, Rodenburg C: Comparative study of image contrast in scanning electron microscope and helium ion microscope. Journal of microscopy 2017, 268(3):313–320.
67.Xie C, Mao X, Huang J, Ding Y, Wu J, Dong S, Kong L, Gao G, Li C-Y, Wei L: KOBAS 2.0: a web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic acids research 2011, 39(suppl_2):W316-W322.
68.Li Y, Fang J, Qi X, Lin M, Zhong Y, Sun L, Cui W: Combined Analysis of the Fruit Metabolome and Transcriptome Reveals Candidate Genes Involved in Flavonoid Biosynthesis in Actinidia arguta. International journal of molecular sciences 2018, 19(5):1471.
69.Kuhl C, Tautenhahn R, Bottcher C, Larson TR, Neumann S: CAMERA: an integrated strategy for compound spectra extraction and annotation of liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry data sets. Analytical chemistry 2011, 84(1):283–289.
70.Wen B, Mei Z, Zeng C, Liu S: metaX: a flexible and comprehensive software for processing metabolomics data. BMC bioinformatics 2017, 18(1):183.
71.Khan N, Bano A, Rahman MA, Rathinasabapathi B, Babar MA: UPLC‐HRMS‐based untargeted metabolic profiling reveals changes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) metabolome following long‐term drought stress. Plant, cell & environment 2019, 42(1):115–132.