Shortlisted Criteria
This study is a retrospective observational study. From April 2017 to May 2018, a total of 118 patients (male: female = 67:51, age 18–79) were examined in the Department of Nephrology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, and 36 normal volunteers with healthy physical examination during the same period As a control group.
These patients were recruited according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) Patients met the guidelines formulated by the National Kidney Foundation of the United States in 2002 under the Kidney Disease Prognosis Quality Initiative (K/DPQI). Under this initiative, CKD was defined as kidney injured for any reason or estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) below 60 ml/min/1.73 m for more than 3 months. (2) Patients agreed to receive ARFI, 3D imaging and renal biopsy. (3) Patients had one of the following indications: proteinuria, hematuria, nephrotic syndrome or injured renal function. Tips: Patients with hyperlipidemia, uric acid, or hypertension should be carefully selected.
The exclusion criteria was as follows: patients (1) who had other kidney diseases, such as renal cysts, tumors, stones, hydronephrosis and other lesions; (2) whose spectrum of renal interlobar artery could not be accurately detected; and (3) who showed a difference between the highest and lowest ARFI values greater than 3m/sin in the multiple ARFI inspections. After obtaining the intrarenal artery spectrum, the RI and AT values are automatically obtained by the instrument.
In addition, the study recruited 36 healthy volunteers (male: female = 17:19, age range: 16–72 years old) as the normal control group. None of the volunteers in the normal control group were found to have any kidney-related diseases or related clinical symptoms after laboratory and imaging examinations.
This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University. Medical ethics committee ethics approval certificate number YJ-KY-FB-2019-75.
Ultrasonic Image Acquisition
First, the Siemens ACUSON S2000 ultrasonography instrument (Siemens Medical Solutions, Mountain View, CA, USA), equipped with a convex array probe of 1–6mhz, was used for ARFI.
Second, the PHILIPS IU Elite ultrasonography diagnostic instrument (PHILIPS Medical Systems, Bothell, USA) was used for 2D and 3D ultrasonography imaging. The C5-1 ventral probe was configured for 2D imaging, and the X6-1 ventral probe was configured for 3D imaging.
Before examination, all patients waited in a quiet room with a temperature of 25 degrees Celsius for 15 minutes. First, ARFI was performed. The patient was asked to lie in the right lateral position, and the kidney was scanned using a convex probe. Patients were asked to hold their breath after calm breathing, and virtual touch quantification was enabled. During ARFI assessment, for standardization, Renal medulla and sinus were carefully excluded from the sample volume. The sample line was perpendicular to the surface of the kidney. Besides, the transducer was located as close to the kidney as possible, with a depth limitation of 8.0 cm. Once the location of transducer and sample volume had been determined, the operator maintained the same position during examination. The applied transducer pressure was minimized as much as possible during imaging to avoid mechanical compression on the kidney. This ARFI protocol was designed to minimize the potential impact of variation of transducer force, sampling error of non-cortical tissue and structural anisotropy of the kidney (12Wang et al., 2014).
The region of interest (ROI) was placed in the middle of the kidney and as perpendicular to the renal cortex as possible. The ROI was fixed at 10*6mm2 and SWV measurements were expressed in meters per second (13Hu et al., 2014). The shear wave velocity of the renal cortex was measured (Fig. 1-b). Five effective measurements were taken for each kidney, and the mean value was obtained. Subsequently, a conventional two-dimensional ultrasound examination was performed using a C5-1 abdominal probe of the PHILIPS IU Elite instrument to record the length of the kidney, the thickness of the cortex, and the internal echo. Effective measurement of interlobular artery spectrum in patients(The angle between the sound beam and the blood flow < 60°),And record the values of RI and AT (Fig. 1-a).
Finally, switch to the X6-1 abdominal probe, scan the patient's longitudinal section of the kidney, obtain a three-dimensional image of the kidney, and collect two effective three-dimensional images from all patients. Subsequently, two experienced ultrasound doctors performed a three-dimensional reconstruction of the patient's kidney image, dividing the long axis of the kidney into 15 sections, drawing the kidney boundaries of each layer one by one, and then calculating the volume (Fig. 1-c),the final result takes the average of four measurements.
Pathological Assessment
One day later, an ultrasound-guided needle biopsy was performed on the left lower pole of the patient's renal parenchyma. Biopsy specimens were fixed in 4% formaldehyde solution and embedded in paraffin. Then, 2µm thick serial sections were cut and applied with hematoxylin-eosin staining method, silver periodate method and Masson-Goldner tricolor method according to standards Dyeing. Each specimen contains at least 10 glomeruli. The pathology assessment was scored by two experienced pathologists who were unaware of the patient's clinical and ultrasound findings. If there is any objection, Follow the principle of negotiation (14Li et al., 2014; 15Katafuchi et al., 1998; 16Hu et al., 2014). The glomerular, tubulointerstitial, and vascular lesions of patients with CKD were scored 12–14 according to the scoring method described by Li et al. According to the pathological score of CKD patients, they were divided into three groups: group 1 was mildly injured group (score ≦ 9), group 2 was moderately injured group (9 < score ≦ 18), and group 3 was severely injured group. (score > 19) (Table 1).
The pathology was assessed by two experienced pathologists who were unaware of the patients’ clinical status and ultrasonography examination. Any discrepancy was resolved by consensus. According to the grading method described by Li et al. the renal glomeruli, renal tubular interstitial and vascular injured in CKD patients were graded. CKD patients were then divided into three groups according to their pathological scores: group 1, the mildly impaired group (score: 9); group 2, the moderately impaired group (score: 9–18); and group 3, the severely impaired group (score: ≥19).
Statistical processing method
In this study, the categorical variable was expressed as frequency and percentage, and the continuous variable was expressed as mean and standard deviation. The clinical characteristics of the patients and control group were compared using the Mann-Whitney test for the continuous variable and the chi-square test for the categorical variable. A multiple logistic regression model was used to evaluate the correlation between various ultrasonography indicators and renal pathology scores, to calculate the unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95 percent confidence interval, and to use a ROC diagnostic curve to diagnose the accuracy of various ultrasonography indicators in diagnosing renal diseases. All analysis used statistical package R (http://www.R-project.org, The R Foundation) and statistical software (http://www.empowerstats.com, X&Y Solution, Inc Boston, MA).