Cultivation of the strain
Acanthamoeba castellanii Neff strain ATCC 30010 type was cultured axenically in 25 cm2 culture tissue flasks, without shaking, at 27 °C in PYG medium [0.75% (w/v) proteose peptone, 0.75% (w/v) yeast extract and 1.5% (w/v) glucose] containing gentamicin 10 mg/ml, in the Department of Medical Biology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland. The culture was sub-cultured twice a month and the growth was observed under direct light microscope using a Bürker chamber (haemocytometer).
Nanoparticles
AgTANPs were synthesized by a chemical reduction method using silver nitrate (AgNO3) purity 99.999% (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). AgTANPs were prepared by mixing the heated aqueous solution of AgNO3 (95.2 g, 0.017%) with the aqueous solution of a tannic acid (0.6 g, 5% C76H52O46 Sigma-Aldrich). The long-term stability of the colloidal dispersions of all tested NPs (zeta potential) was measured and confirmed by the electrophoretic light-scattering method with a Zetasizer Nano ZS, model ZEN3500 (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK) [26,28]. The size and shape of AgTANPs were determined by using the high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (HR-STEM) technique (Fig. 1). Measurements were taken with a scanning electron microscope (Nova NanoSEM 450, FEI) using a transmission mode (STEM II) at an accelerating voltage of 30 kV. Samples for HR-STEM investigations were prepared as follows: a drop of colloid was deposited onto carbon-coated copper grids (300 mesh) and left for 2 h for solvent evaporation. The well-dispersed nanofluids were used as a stock solution and were appropriately diluted to various concentrations ranging between 0.25–2.5 ppm and used in a subsequent activity and cytotoxicity assays.
Contact lens solutions
The multipurpose solutions used in this study, represent the three most common types of solutions used for contact lens care in Poland, namely: Solo Care Aqua (SCA), Opti-Free (O-F) and ReNu MultiPlus (ReNu). The tested contact lens care solutions and their ingredients are included in Table 1. All multipurpose solutions used in the study were purchased from authorized agents.
Activity assays
Pure contact lens solutions and nanoparticles at concentrations of 0.25, 0.5, 1.25 and 2.5 ppm conjugated with the contact lens care solutions were examined in vitro and assessed for their anti-amoebic activity. To determine the anti-amoebic efficacy on trophozoites (log growth phase after 6 days following sub-culturing), the previously described colorimetric 96-well microtitre plate assay, based on the oxido-reduction of AlamarBlue was used [29]. Subsequently, the plates were analysed over a period of 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 96 h in the Synergy HTX Multi mode plate reader (BioTek) using the Gen5 software programme, a test wavelength of 570 nm and a reference wavelength of 630 nm in order to calculate the inhibition curves of the analysis. All experiments were performed three times, in triplicate. Amoebae growth and viability (trophozoites movement and presence of acanthopodia) in both control and tested assays were visualized by Microscope Evos fl Cell Imaging System.
Cytotoxicity
Briefly, the cytotoxicity assays were performed using a fibroblast HS-5 (ATCC CRL-11882) cell line as described in our previous studies [24]. A commercial kit for the evaluation of drug-induced cytotoxic effects based on the measurement of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity released to the media (Pierce LDH cytotoxicity assay kit 88953, 88954) was used as per protocol. The fibroblasts were incubated with each of the contact lens solution separately and the contact lens solution + nanoparticles added in the same concentration as in the activity assays. To calculate the percent cytotoxicity, absorbance was measured at 490 nm and 680 nm.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed three times in triplicate. For all activity and cytotoxicity detailed results standard deviation (SD) and mean values were calculated. The results were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests using the P < 0.05 level of a statistical significance. For statistically insignificant results, “no activity” comment was added in Table 2.