Materials
Five rice varieties (Inpari 42, Inpari 43, Situ Bagendit, Inpari 17, and Inpara 3) were obtained from Indonesian Center for Rice Research (Subang, Indonesia), while IPB 3S variety was obtained from Seed Center, IPB University (Bogor, Indonesia). These rice varieties are certified paddy seeds. Ethanol, methanol, chloroform, 2-propanol, phenol, sodium hydroxide, folin-ciocalteu’s phenol reagent, 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), gallic acid, ascorbic acid, γ-oryzanol, and BF3-methanol were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Fatty acid methyl esters C8-C22 (CRM 18920) and BHT were from Sigma Aldrich (USA). Boric acid was purchased from Kanto Chemical Co. Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) was from Acros Organics (New Jersey, US). Other chemical reagents used were analytical grade.
Brown rice preparation
Brown rice samples were prepared by the hulling process (Yanmar, Japan). The whole kernels were separated from broken rice using rice grader (Ogawa Seiki.Co.Ltd, Japan) and followed by manual sortation. Brown rice samples were vacuum sealed and stored at 4 °C for the further germination process.
Germination procedure
Germination procedure of brown rice followed the method of Ohtsubo et al. (2005) with a modification. Brown rice was sanitized using 0.1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 30 minutes and followed by rinsing in tap water. The sample was taken as 0 h treatment (ungerminated). The production of GBR was performed by soaking the sanitized brown rice in water (1:10, w/v) and incubated it in hot air sterilizer to maintain the water temperature at 33 ± 2 °C. The soaking water was removed and changed every four hours. The samples were removed after 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h and washed by using tap water before dried into a freeze dryer (Labconco, US). The dried GBR was ground using a blender (Miyako, Indonesia), sieved (40 mesh), vacuum sealed, and stored at − 20 °C before analysis.
Evaluation of GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) content
GABA content was analyzed duplicate according to the method of Zhang et al. (2014) with a slight modification in sample preparation. Sample (1.0 g) was placed in a plastic tube, and 5 mL deionized water was added. The mixture was then extracted for an hour, followed by a centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 30 minutes and filtered. A half milliliter of supernatant was added with 0.2 mL borate buffer (pH 9), 1.0 mL phenol reagent 6% (w/v), and 0.4 mL sodium hypochlorite 9% and then mixed vigorously. The tube was then boiled in the water bath for 10 minutes and cooled immediately in ice water for 20 minutes to develop a blue color. The absorbance was measured by a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific 150, US) at 645 nm. Standard curve calibration of GABA was prepared to determine GABA concentration in the samples and expressed as mg GABA/100 g dried samples.
Determination of total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity
Phenolic compounds were extracted using ethanol extraction (Munarko et al. 2020). The rice flour (approximately 1.5 g) was extracted with 20 mL of ethanol 80% (v/v) using a shaker (Innova2300, new Brunswick scientific) for 30 minutes and centrifuged at 6000 rpm (Hermle Z 383 K, Wehingen, Germany) at 4 °C for 30 minutes. The supernatant was collected into a dark bottle and stored at 4 °C.
Total phenolic content (TPC) was analyzed duplicate by the modified Folin-Ciocalteau method (Qiu et al. 2010). Extract (0.2 mL) was mixed with 1.8 mL of 10 × diluted Folin-Ciocalteau reagent (freshly prepared) and 1.8 mL of Na2CO3 60 g/L. After reacting for 90 minutes, the mixture was analyzed by a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific 150, US) at 725 nm. The absorbance was compared to the standard curve of gallic acid and expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent per 100 g dry samples (mg GAE/100 g).
Determination of DPPH scavenging activity was measured duplicate by the method originally developed by Brand-Williams et al. (1995) with a modification. The phenolic extract of rice (0.3 mL) and 0.7 mL of distilled water were mixed with 3.0 mL of freshly DPPH solution 140 µM and incubated in the darkroom for 60 minutes. The mixture was then analyzed using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific 150, US) at 515 nm. The antioxidant activity was expressed by mg ascorbic acid equivalent per 100 g of dried sample (mg AAE/100 g).
Analysis of γ-oryzanol
Analysis of γ-oryzanol applied a partial extraction method (Lilitchan et al. 2008). Two identical rice flour samples (1.0 g) were extracted with isopropanol using different volumes (4 mL and 8 mL) and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 2500 rpm (Eppendorf 5810R). The absorbance of the supernatant was measured using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific 150, US) at 326 nm. Total γ-oryzanol of the sample was compared to the γ-oryzanol standard curve and then calculated as follows (Eq. 1):
Where y is the concentration of γ-oryzanol in the rice samples (expressed as mg/100g dry sample), is the concentration of γ-oryzanol in 4 mL extract, and is the concentration of γ-oryzanol in 8 mL extract.
Analysis of fatty acid composition
Lipid extraction applied the method of Bligh and Dyer (1959) with a modification (Munarko et al. 2020). Sample (5.0 g) was mixed with distilled water, chloroform, and methanol to reach chloroform:methanol:water became 1:2:0.8 (v/v/v), followed by centrifugation at 4000 rpm (Hermle Z 383 K, Wehingen, Germany) for 10 minutes. The sample was added chloroform and water containing 0.85% of KCl to reach the final ratio of 2:2:1.8 of chloroform:methanol:water (v/v/v). The mixture was centrifuged at 4000 rpm (Hermle Z 383 K, Wehingen, Germany) for 10 minutes and then filtered to remove the solid. The supernatant was allowed to separate into two phases. The lower chloroform phase was collected and evaporated using nitrogen gas at 50 °C.
Fatty acid derivatization was prepared by using the BF3 methanol catalyst, and the analysis of fatty acid composition was assayed by Gas Chromatography 7890A (Agilent Technologies, California, US) with a flame ionization detector (FID). The column was DB-23 (J and W Scientific, Folsom, CA) with a dimension of 60 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness of 0.25 µm. The temperature of the detector and injector was set at 280 °C and 270 °C, respectively. The initial temperature was set at 130 °C and held for 2 min. It increased to 170 °C at a rate of 6.5 °C/min and held for 5 min. Then, it increased to 215 °C at 2.75 °C/min and held for 12 min, followed by increased to 230 °C at 30 °C/min and held for 30 min. Helium and nitrogen from ultra-high purity grade at flow rate 11.07 and 31.24 mL/min, respectively, were used as carrier gasses. Identification of fatty acid composition was determined by comparing the retention time of each peak in the sample containing internal standard (C17:0) with the respective external standard (C8:0 to C22:0) containing internal standard of fatty acid methyl esters (Taufik et al. 2016).
Analysis of pastingprofile
Pasting profiles of brown rice flour were carried out duplicate by using a rapid visco analyzer (RVA) (Tec-Master, Newport Scientific, Australia). Sample (3.0 g, moisture content 14%) was diluted in 25 g of aquadest, followed by heating and cooling cycle with constant stirring. The sample was heated at 50 °C for 1 min in advance of heating to 95 °C at 6 °C/min and maintained for 5 min. The temperature reduced to 50 °C at 6 °C/min and then held at 50 °C for 5 min.
Statistical analysis
Analysis of the variance and significance of the differences among the samples were conducted by analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedure and Duncan’s multiple range test of SPSS software version 22.