“The concrete mix is designed as per absolute volume method according to the Indian standard -Concrete mix proportioning Guidelines to meet environmental exposure conditions of Mumbai city, Maharashtra i.e., considered a severe condition” [12]. “The properties of the concrete ingredients differ from one state to another state of the same country, and it is totally depending on the actual environmental exposer condition of the site and quality of available concrete ingredients for making suitable concrete mix” [13]. Various concrete trials were conducted using different kinds of materials and found two concrete mixes are matching the requirement of self-compacting concrete as per the requirement of European guideline and durability parameters of the technical specification of contract agreement of underground metro projects.
Concrete mix compositions are presented in Table 6 & Table No-7.
Table 6. Concrete Mix Proportions for Self-compacting concrete M40 Grade – TR 1.
Trial Mix No
|
Cement
(Kg/m3)
|
GGBS
(Kg/m3)
|
Powder (Kg/m3)
|
W/P
Ratio
|
C.A
(Kg/m3)
|
F.A
M-Sand
(Kg/m3)
|
C.A /FA ratio (%)
|
Water
(Kg/m3)
|
H.P.S
(Kg/m3)
|
TR1
|
330
|
230
|
560
|
0.32
|
770
|
972
|
44/56
|
179
|
8.1
|
Table 6. Concrete Mix Proportions for Self-compacting concrete M40 Grade – TR 2.
Trial Mix No
|
Cement
(Kg/m3)
|
GGBS
(Kg/m3
|
UGGBS- Alcofine 1203
(Kg/m3)
|
Powder (Kg/m3)
|
W/P
Ratio
|
C.A
(Kg/m3)
|
F.A
M-Sand
(Kg/m3)
|
C.A /FA ratio (%)
|
Water
(Kg/m3)
|
H.P.S
(Kg/m3)
|
C.W.A
(Kg/m3)
|
TR2
|
330
|
200
|
20
|
550
|
0.32
|
778
|
981
|
44/56
|
176
|
7.7
|
5.50
|
“Acceptable results achieved in concrete trial mix no-TR 1 and TR 2. Coarse aggregate content, fine aggregate content, and cementitious content were optimized, until a slump flow of 500-700 mm is achieved by a slump flow test. All tests were carried out in the order that the trial mix satisfies slump flow test and Sieve stability tests” [1].
3.1 Test Procedures
“Self-compacting concrete is able to flow under its self-weight without segregation, bleeding without vibration and these behaviors of concrete can be ensured by Flowability tests, and Sieve segregation resistance tests of concrete to determine the flowability, passing ability, and segregation resistance of Self -compacting concrete according to BS: EN 12350 Part 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12” [14]
Comparison of fresh concrete and harden concrete tests was carried out for concrete trial mix no- TR 1& TR 2 and observed more difference in the results of fresh concrete properties tests and harden concrete properties test values.
Table 8. Comparative statement for fresh concrete properties of Self-compacting concrete M40 Grade, Trial Mix no TR 1& TR 2 – Trials for SCC were conducted for design time 3 hours and obtained results are presented below.
Mix
|
Slump flow (mm)
|
T500
(sec)
|
|
V-funnel
Tf (sec)
|
V-funnel
T5min
(sec)
|
L-box
Blocking ratio(H2/H1)
|
U-box
Difference
(mm)
|
Segregation
Resistance
|
Remarks
|
TR1
|
540
|
5
|
|
21
|
32
|
0.75
|
32
|
7.9
|
Results are satisfactory
|
TR2
|
580
|
5
|
|
15
|
21
|
0.8
|
19
|
7.5
|
Results are found more Satisfactory
|
Table 9. Comparative statement of Hardened Concrete Test results for self-compacting concrete trial mix no- TR 1& TR 2.
Sl. NO.
|
Test Description
|
Acceptance Requirement as per contract specification for Lab trial
|
TR-1 Results obtained
|
TR-2 Results obtained
|
1
|
Compressive Strength at 28 days
|
Target strength at the time of trial – 48.25 N/mm2
|
48.34 N/mm2
|
60.22 N/mm2
|
2
|
RCPT
|
1000 Coulombs
|
782 coulombs
|
503 coulombs
|
3
|
Water Permeability
|
10 mm
|
6 mm
|
2.33 mm
|
4
|
Flexural strength
|
> 0.7 √fck
= 5.42 N/mm2
|
6.25 N/mm 2
|
7.3 N/mm 2
|
5
|
Split tensile strength
|
> 0.5 √fck
= 3.87 N/mm2
|
5.01 N/mm 2
|
5.62 N/mm 2
|
6
|
Drying Shrinkage
|
0.05 % (Max)
|
0.026 %
|
0.016 %
|
7
|
Moisture Moment
|
0.03 % (Max)
|
0.018 %
|
0.013 %
|
8
|
Chloride content
|
0.5 % (Max)
|
0.34 %
|
0.29 %
|
8
|
Sulphate content
|
3.7 % (Max)
|
0.35 %
|
0.24 %
|
It has been observed that trial mix no- TR 1 has achieved all the parameters of acceptance criteria of the underground metro project contract specifications in the lab trials but some values observed very closed to the requirement like passing ability values of L box, U-box, and compressive strength values of the lab trial. Hence obtained results values were compared and found trial mix no- TR 02 is far better than TR 1 and mix TR 02 is selected for working concrete at site.
Selected trial Mix no -2 for Self-compacting concrete M40 Grade (10 MSA) [1]
Cementitious (Kg)
|
Water (Kg)
|
Fine Aggregate
M-Sand (kg)
|
Coarse aggregate (10 MSA) (Kg)
|
H.P.S
(Kg)
|
C.W. A
|
`Cement
|
GGBS
|
UGGBS
|
176
|
981
|
778
|
7.7
|
5.5
|
330
|
200
|
20
|
Table 10. Test Results of Selected trial Mix no -TR 02 for Self-compacting concrete M40 Grade in Laboratory [1]
Test Observation
|
Property
|
Acceptance Limits as per European Guideline
|
Initial
|
1hr
|
2hrs
|
3 hrs.
|
Slump-flow class SF1
|
Flowability/Filling Ability
|
≥ 520mm, ≤ 700mm
|
660
|
650
|
610
|
580
|
T500
|
Viscosity Flowability
|
between 3-7 Sec
|
4
|
4
|
4.5
|
5
|
V5min
|
viscosity Flowability
|
---
|
15
|
18
|
22
|
21
|
V Funnel Tv
VF 2
|
Viscosity Flowability
|
≥ 7S, ≤ 27s
|
11
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
L Box (H2/H1)
|
Passing Ratio
|
≥ 0,75
|
0.85
|
0.85
|
0.82
|
0.8
|
U Box Deference
|
Height difference
|
30 mm Max
|
0
|
14
|
18
|
19
|
Sieve Segregation
|
Segregation Resistance
|
< 23 %
|
9.5
|
9.2
|
8.4
|
7.5
|
Ambient Temperature
|
|
26.5
|
27.5
|
28.2
|
29.4
|
“Mix proportion of selected mix design TR5 implemented at the site for Tunnel NATM concrete and NATM cross passages and a total of 11426 cum concrete quantity is executed from 25th Feb 2020to 30th June’2021. The flowing ability and passing ability of concrete mix is checked according to conformity criteria for the properties of Self-compacting concrete at the site and observed results are as below” [3].
Table 11. The Average Test Results of Site executed Self-compacting concrete mix during concreting for Tunnel NATM Lining Concrete.
Test Observation
|
Property
|
Acceptance Limits as per European Guideline
|
Results obtained at Batching Plant
|
Results obtained (around 1 to 2 hrs after batching time)
|
Remarks
(Comparison with 2 hrs results of
TR 9)
|
|
Slump-flow class SF1
|
Flowability/Filling Ability
|
≥ 520mm, ≤ 700mm
|
630
|
560
|
-40 mm than TR 2
|
|
T500
|
Viscosity Flowability
|
between 3-7 Sec
|
4
|
6
|
-1.5 sec than TR2
|
|
V5min
|
viscosity Flowability
|
---
|
-
|
-
|
Not Taken
|
|
V Funnel Tv
VF 2
|
Viscosity Flowability
|
≥ 7S, ≤ 27s
|
-
|
-
|
Not Taken
|
|
L Box (H2/H1)
|
Passing Ratio
|
≥ 0,75
|
-
|
-
|
Not Taken
|
|
U Box Deference
|
Height difference
|
30 mm Max
|
-
|
-
|
Not Taken
|
|
Sieve Segregation
|
Segregation Resistance
|
< 23 %
|
-
|
-
|
Not Taken
|
|
Ambient Temperature
|
|
26.5
|
27.5
|
28.2
|
-1.2 deg at site
|
|
All the parameters of tests are not checked at the site due to the fact shifting of all checking out equipment could not nearly be possible at some point of concreting at the site, but slump flow, T 500 mm checks, and the temperature had been executed for 1904 transit mixers and their common values are cited in above table.
Sample of concrete cubes of the working structures were taken as per requirements of contract technical specifications and results of 7 days, 28 days, and 56 days are presented in the table below.
Table 12. The Compressive Strength of site casted cubes for M40 grade Self-compacting concrete (in N/mm2) [1]
SI. No
|
Age of casted Cubes
|
No. Samples
|
Avg. Compressive Strength of Samples in N/mm2
|
% Of Compressive Strength Gaining
|
Standard Deviation in N/mm2
|
% Of Coefficient of Variation
|
1
|
7 days
|
8
|
40.14
|
100.35
|
1.82
|
3.03
|
2
|
28 Days
|
35
|
60.22
|
150.55
|
3
|
56 days
|
8
|
65.09
|
162.73
|