3.1. Plant growth phenotype and the N and P content of alfalfa
Based on Fig. 1, the shoot height, root length and biomass of alfalfa were increased as the increasing of Cu concentration in treatments, but in a way, rhizobium inoculation alleviated the growth inhibition of the alfalfa. For example, compared to the non-inoculated treatment, alfalfa height, root length and shoot and root biomass in the inoculated treatment were increased by 19.15%, 6.94%, 35.29% and 33.33%, respectively, under the Cu 800 treatment (Fig. 1). The chlorophyll content increased significantly after inoculation with rhizobium, and the increase of chlorophyll by inoculation with rhizobium was more distinct at the Cu concentration of 800 mg kg-1, which was 1.44 times higher than that of the non-inoculated treatment (Table 1). At Cu 800 mg kg-1, the chlorophyll a and b were significantly lower than that of other treatments.
The N level of alfalfa shoot and root was superlative in the Cu 0 treatment, but did not differ significantly with increasing Cu stress (Table 1). Inoculation with rhizobium increased N content of shoot at the Cu concentrations of 0 mg kg-1 and 800 mg kg-1. Interestingly, the root N content was significantly increased by rhizobium inoculation. In addition, the P level in alfalfa tissues consistently decreased with the increasing Cu concentration (Table 1). Compared to the uninoculated treatment, inoculation with rhizobia significantly increased the P levels in the alfalfa tissues (Table 1), particularly for the Cu 600 and Cu 800 treatments (P < 0.05).
3.2. Differences Cu and Cu uptake by alfalfa
It is noteworthy that the effect of rhizobia on copper concentration in difference parts of alfalfa was not uniform (Table 2). Specifically, exogenous addition of rhizobia significantly reduced the Cu concentration in the shoot but noticeably increased the Cu concentration in the root (P < 0.05). In the shoots, the Cu uptake by the inoculated plants was noticeably lower than that of the non-inoculated plants in the Cu 0, Cu 400 and Cu 600 treatments (P < 0.05). Interestingly, rhizobium inoculation decreased the Cu uptake of root in treatments with low Cu concentrations (0 or 200 mg kg-1). However, under high Cu concentrations, the Cu uptake of root was increased with by rhizobium inoculation. Except for Cu 0 treatment, the transfer coefficients of Cu were considerably less than 1.0 (Table 2). And the rhizobium inoculation increased Cu transfer coefficients in treatments with low Cu concentrations (0 or 200 mg kg-1). However, under high Cu concentrations, the Cu transfer coefficients were decreased with rhizobium inoculation.
3.3. Plant oxidative damage, soluble protein and antioxidant enzyme activity
Exploring the effect of heavy metals on lipid peroxidation damage by measuring the MDA content of lipid peroxidation reaction (Fig. 2a). Based on Fig. 2a, the MDA content was increased in both shoots and roots as the increasing of Cu concentration in treatments, but in a way, rhizobium inoculation reduced the accumulation of MDA in plant tissues. The content of MDA in the shoot and root parts of Cu 800 mg kg-1 increased by 29.2% and 41.4%, respectively, compared with that of Cu 0 mg kg-1 (Fig. 2a). In the Cu 400, Cu 600 and Cu 800 treatment, the reduction of shoot after inoculation of rhizobium was 13.8%, 17.7% and 17.8%, respectively; and reduction in the root was 17.6%, 18.4% and 24.6%, respectively. This indicating that inoculation of rhizobium had a greater relieving effect on roots than aboveground parts. Additionally, MDA content in shoots and roots was noticeably negatively correlated to N and P content (P < 0.001) content (Fig. 5).
In non-inoculated plants, the highest shoot and root soluble protein contents were detected in the Cu 800 treatment, which was 1.83 and 1.21 times higher compared to the Cu 0 treatments, respectively (Fig. 2b). Compared with the non-inoculated treatment, the rhizobium-inoculated plants exhibited higher soluble protein content in the alfalfa tissue (Fig. 2b). In the Cu 400, Cu 600 and Cu 800 treatment, the reduction of shoot after inoculation of rhizobium was 47.9%, 29.8% and 20.8%, respectively; and reduction in the root was 19.5%, 8.8% and 16.1%, respectively. In addition, soluble protein content in roots was significantly positively correlated to N content (P < 0.05) (Fig. 5b). The SOD activity in the shoots of non-inoculated plants showed no obvious change, while the SOD activity in the roots of alfalfa showed a downward trend under copper stress (Fig. 3a). Rhizobium inoculation significantly increased SOD activity of the shoot under Cu 600 mg kg-1 (P < 0.05). Plants inoculated with rhizobium exhibited higher SOD activity in the roots compared to uninoculated plants (Fig. 3a). For example, in the Cu 600 treatment, the increases of shoot and root after inoculation of rhizobium was 22.1% and 65.3%, respectively (Fig. 3b). The highest root POD activity was exhibited in the Cu 600 treatment. Rhizobium inoculation significantly increased the POD activity in the shoots and roots (P < 0.05). Compared with the uninoculated alfalfa, application of rhizobium reduced the CAT activity in shoot by 31.44%, 62.40%, 61.87% and 19.92% for the Cu 0, Cu 200, Cu 400 and Cu 800 treatments, respectively (P < 0.05); while application of rhizobia markedly enhanced the CAT activity in the Cu 600 treatment (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3c). The inoculation of rhizobium had no obvious effect on CAT activity in the alfalfa root. Differences in alfalfa tissue APX activity between uninoculated and inoculated plants were not consistent and were influenced by specific Cu treatments (Fig. 3d). And the application of rhizobium increased the alfalfa APX activity in the low Cu concentrations (0 or 200 mg kg-1). SOD activity of shoot was significantly and negatively correlated to the content of N and P (P < 0.01). However, the APX activity of alfalfa (shoot and root) was significantly and positively correlated with the content of N and P, respectively (P < 0.05) (Fig. 5).
3.4. Soil nutrient, enzyme activities and microbial biomass
The soil Cu concentration decreased significantly under rhizobium inoculation (P <0.05) (Table 3). Rhizobium inoculation significantly increased NO3--N and NH4+-N content in Cu 400 and Cu 800 treatments (P < 0.05). In the inoculated treatment, the highest AP content was detected in the Cu 600 mg kg-1, which was higher of 42.19% and 27.93% compared to the Cu 0 and the Cu 800 treatments, respectively (Table 3). However, the effect of rhizobium inoculation on AP was not obvious. And the rhizobium inoculation increased the DOC content in the low Cu concentrations (200 or 400 mg kg-1), on the contrary, application of rhizobia significantly reduced the DOC at the Cu concentration of 600 mg kg-1 (P < 0.05).
The changes of soil enzymes (i.e., catalase, UR, BG and ALP) were shown in Fig. 4. In the non-inoculated treatment, the catalase activity in Cu 0 was significantly higher than that in other treatments, the increasing Cu concentration strongly inhibited catalase activity. Rhizobium inoculation remarkably increased catalase activity in Cu 400 and Cu 600 treatments (P < 0.05). The inoculation of rhizobia had a notable effect on the BG and ALP activity. However, the inoculation of rhizobium only enhanced the UR activity in the low Cu concentrations (0 or 200 mg kg-1). Rhizobium inoculation significantly increased MBN in Cu 200, Cu 400 and Cu 600 treatments (P < 0.05) (Fig. S1).
3.5. Driving factors affecting plant growth
The N content of shoot and root showed the strongest and positive correlations with DOC, β-glucosidase, alkaline phosphatase, urease and SOC, but the strongest and negative correlations with MBN, NH4--N, AP and Cu concentrations (P < 0.05) (Fig. S2). In addition, the plant P showed the strongest positive correlation with MBC, soil enzyme activities, and SOC; and strongest negative correlation with MBN, NH4--N, TN, AP and Cu concentrations (P < 0.05) (Fig. S2). We used PLS-PM to further reveal the effects of plant physiological indicators, soil physicochemical properties and soil biochemical indicators on alfalfa growth (Fig. 6). The PLS-PM method showed that plant antioxidant enzyme activities, soil nutrient content and soil enzyme activities had a significant positive direct effect (0.35, 0.28 and 0.42, respectively; P < 0.01) on plant growth (Fig. 6a). The application of S. meliloti (0.34), soil microbial biomass (0.61), soil enzyme activities (0.82), soil nutrient (0.28), and plant antioxidant enzyme activities (0.35) had positive total effects on the plant growth, whereas the plant oxidative damage (-0.13) induced negative total effects (Fig. 6b).