The study involved 132 subjects divided into 5 groups based on the type of antioxidant supplementation they received. All the patients admitted to the Intensive Medical Care Unit (IMCU) and toxicology ward were screened for acute intoxication. With a prior approval from the Ethical committee for research and experimental study and consent from the subject or care-taker, the supplementation was initiated orally after a routine supportive care was completed, and a stable general condition was established by the attending physician.
Inclusion Criteria
All patients acutely intoxicated with amitriptyline, assessed drowsy but responding to verbal commands as per the Edinburg scale of classification of the grade of coma were selected. The subjects were divided into four groups with healthy volunteers forming the fifth group. The groups were classified as follows:
-
Group I: 30 healthy volunteers (15 males and 15 females) with mean age 32 years.
-
Group II: 30 patients (18 males and 12 females) with mean age 34 years, who received only Routine Standard Treatment (RST)
-
Group III: 21 patients (12 males and 9 females) with mean age 32 years, who received (RST) + vitamin C supplementation.
-
Group IV: 27 patients (13 males and 14 females) with mean age 31 years, who received (RST) + alpha lipoic acid supplementation.
-
Group V: 24 patients (14 males and 10 females) with mean age 34 years, who received (RST) + vitamin C and alpha lipoic acid supplementation.
Exclusion Criteria
-
Unconscious and not responding to verbal commands as per the Edinburg scale of classification of the grade of coma were excluded.
-
Age less than 18 years and more than 60 years, were not included considering the confounding effect of hormonal and metabolic alterations.
-
Have taken other drugs along with amitriptyline were not included, to avoid cross interference.
-
False positive TLC (Thin Layer Chromatography) and spectra (uv–vis) negative were excluded.
Enzyme Levels Estimation
About 10 ml of venous blood from the ante-cubital vein of each subject and 50 ml of gastric aspirate was collected from all patients who are directly admitted to IMCU for Thin Later Chromatography (TLC).
• Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)
Serum total LDH was analyzed by ‘semi-auto-analyzer Micro-lab 200’ by Modified IFCC method. LDH catalyzes the reduction of pyruvate with NADH to form NAD. The rate of oxidation of NADH to NAD is measured as a decrease in absorbance, which is proportional to the LDH activity in the sample. Initial absorbance A0 after 1 minute and final absorbance reading after every 1, 2 & 3minutes were recorded. The mean absorbance change per minute (ΔA/min) is calculated. Total LDH activity in µl at 37°C = ΔA/min x 8095.
• Creatine Kinase (CK)
Analysis of Isoenzymes of CK was carried out by ‘HYDRASYS system SEBIA, PN 1210’. The HYDRASYS SEBIA system is a semi-automated multi-parameter electrophoresis system. Commercial kits ‘HYDRAGEL 7 ISO-CK’ are available for the analysis. On HYDRAGEL 7 ISO-CK and HYDRAGEL ISO-CK 15/30 gels, the BB fraction is the most anodic, the MM fraction is the most cathodic and the MB is intermediary. All CK isoenzymes catalyze the same reaction that is utilized in their visualization.
• Catalase activity
Catalase was assayed according to the method of Takahara et al., 1960 [18]. To 1.2 ml of phosphate buffer (0.05M, pH 7.0), 0.2 ml of the hemolysate was added and the enzyme reaction was started by the addition of 1.0 ml of hydrogen peroxide (0.03M in phosphate buffer) solution. The decrease in absorbance was measured at 240 nm at 30sec intervals for 3 min. The enzyme blank was run simultaneously with 1.0ml of distilled water instead of hydrogen peroxide. The enzyme activity is expressed as µ moles of H2O2 decomposed/min/ mgHb.
• Superoxide dismutase activity
SOD was assayed by the method of Misra and Fridovich, 1972 [19]. 0.1 ml of hemolysate was added to tubes containing 0.75 ml ethanol and 0.15ml chloroform (chilled in ice) and centrifuged. To 0.5ml of supernatant, added 0.5 ml of EDTA (0.6 mM) solution and 1 ml of Carbonate- bicarbonate buffer (0.1M, pH 10.2). The reaction was initiated by the addition of 0.5 ml of epinephrine (1.8 mM) and the increase in absorbance at 480 nM was measured with UV spectrophotometer. The enzyme activity is expressed as 50% inhibition of epinephrine auto-oxidation/min/mgHb.
• Glutathione peroxidase activity
The activity of glutathione peroxidase was determined by the method of Rotruck et al. 1973[20]. In brief, 0.4ml of buffer, 0.1ml of sodium azide, 0.2 ml of reduced glutathione, an aliquot of hemolysate, 0.1 ml of H2O2 and distilled water were taken to make a final volume of 2.0ml. The tubes were incubated at 37°C for 10 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 0.56ml of 10% TCA. To determine the residual glutathione content, the supernatant was removed by centrifugation; 3.0ml of disodium hydrogen phosphate and 1 ml of DTNB reagent were added and read at 412 nm. A blank was treated with only disodium hydrogen phosphate and 1.0ml of DTNB reagent. The activity of glutathione was expressed as µg of GSH utilized/min/mgHb.
• Total antioxidant status
Total antioxidant status of the sample was measured by a commercial kit, supplied by the Randox Laboratories®. About 20µL of plasma was added to 1 mL of chromogen and incubated at room temperature for 1 min. The initial absorbance (A1) was measured at 600 nm. Another 200µl of substrate added to it and incubated at room temperature for 3 min and the final absorbance (A2) was measured again at 600 nm. A Blank and a Standard were run simultaneously, and the initial Absorbance (A1) and final absorbance (A2) was measured at 600 nm for both the blank and standard respectively [21].
A2-A1 = DA of the sample/ blank/ standard were individually determined,
$$Factor=\frac{Concentration of the standard}{DA blank-DA standard}$$
Total Antioxidant status in mmol/L = Factor X (DA blank-DA sample)
Statistical analysis
Statistical evaluation was carried out using SPSS (14.0). Data obtained from the study groups were compared by the parametric student's t-test. A correlation analysis between the variables was made by Pearson test and a P value of < 0.001 was considered statistically significant. The effect of vitamin C, ALA and both combined were analyzed for each group and expressed as a percentage of change from baseline.