Study Area
The study was conducted in Sayint district which is found in the western part of south Wollo zone, Amhara National Regional State which is located 590 km, 659 km and 189 km from Addis Ababa, Bahir Dar and Dessie, respectively. The altitude of the district ranges from 500 to 4247 m.a.s.l. The area constitutes three agro climatic zones, highland (>2500 m.a.s.l), midland (1500-2500 m.a.s.l.) and lowland (<1500 m.a.s.l.), which comprises about 42.8%, 34.6%, 22.6% of the total area, respectively [13]. The average temperature of the district ranges from 4-40oc and annual rain fall ranges from 800 mm to 1000 mm [14]. The main rainy season in this area is between early June and the end of September, in addition a small rain occurs between early February and end of April [13]. Livestock rearing is the most important economic activity in which shoat and cattle are the major livestock species kept in the area. The total number of animals kept in the district were 141, 921 cattle, 222, 996 shoat, 23,982 equine, 143,872 poultry.
Study Animals
Local breed sheep and their crosses with Awassi of both sexes and all ages managed under extensive production system were the study animal.
Study Design
Cross-sectional study
A cross-sectional study was applied from October 2018 to April 2019 in order to estimate the prevalence of sheep lice and to identify the major lice species of sheep and determine associated risk factors in the district. Sex, age, hair length, body condition, housing management (whether the sheep is housed separately or with other animals; as separate and mixed), agro ecology (highland, midland and lowland) and season of sampling (wet and dry season) was recorded and documented along with the sample collection. Sheep were categorized into two age groups; young (< one year) and adult (> one year), as described by [15]. Age estimation was done by dentition as indicated in [16]. Body condition scores of sheep were determined as either poor or good according to [17].
Sampling Method
Preliminary data were sourced from the respective district of agricultural office to have lists of kebeles and list of sheep producing households in the district. Purposive sampling technique was employed to select the study district based on the availability of sheep. Two stage stratified sampling was applied and proportional samples from each kebele were drawn. Accordingly, 34 kebeles were stratified based on agro ecology (nine highlands, nine midland and sixteen lowland). Three kebeles were selected randomly representing the three agro ecologies. Hence, 102, 60 and 70 sheep were sampled from Yegodo, Yegoda and Ada, respectively. The selected kebeles were visited and sampled twice during the study period on October 2018 and January 2019 representing the wet and dry seasons, respectively.
Sample Size estimation
The sample size calculation used in this study was calculated according to [18], using an expected prevalence of 6.94% in Kutaber [19], a 95% confidence interval and a required absolute precision of 5%. In total 99 sheep were used for this study. However, the sample size was increased to 232 to enhance the precision.
Experimental study
Due to limited number of experimental unit, completely randomized design was used to evaluate the efficacy of 60% Diazinon and 1% Ivermectin against Bovicola ovis in local sheep. About 15 naturally Bovicola ovis infested (greater or equal to 100) local male sheep aged between two to four years that have moderate body condition with short and medium hair size and not recently treated with any acaricide were used for this study. Study animals were obtained from three willing local farmers. Before the commencement of the trial, study farmers were trained how to uniformly manage their animals by the investigator and separate houses for each group of sheep was prepared and cleaned. Lists of individual sheep identification number were made and lottery method of randomization was used to allocate into three groups having five sheep each, and followed for 28 days. After 15days of acclimatization period, by proper straining and handling of animal, first group were sprayed with 60% Diazinon, the second group was given 1% Ivermectin injection subcutaneously as per manufacture’s recommended dose and the third group was left untreated as a control. Both in-vivo and in-vitro efficacy trials were performed for Diazinon as per the protocols given by [20], while only in-vivo efficacy trial was conducted for Ivermectin as per [21]. Lice count was performed every 7 days for treatment and control groups and recorded starting from day 0 prior to treatment, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 according to [22]. 60% Diazinon contains an active ingredient of 600g/l Diazinon produced by Adamitulu pesticide processing share company, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.1% Ivermectin was manufactured by Bash Pharmaceutical Company, Khartoum, Sudan, and it was imported by Rang veterinary company, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
In-vivo trial: Each selected sheep in treatment and control group was visually examined and lice from individual animal was counted and recorded separately for 60% Diazinon and 1% Ivermectin for the in-vivo evaluation. The total lice count was applied by direct examination of the body with naked eyes. Lice from each sheep was counted using parting method, classifying the body into five parts: neck, shoulder, withers, flank and rump after marking 4 partings per site on both sides of the body [20, 22]. Thus, twenty sites on each side of the body were examined by parting the fleece about 10 cm and counting all live lices observed, so that , the total count from 40 sites constitutes the body count for each animal. The total lice count per animal was estimated by summation of the lice number at each site. Finally, lousicide activity was checked using arithmetic mean louse count for 60% Diazinon and 1%Ivermectin group separately along with a control group which was calculated according to [23]. Thus, mortality, 98-100% indicates susceptibility and less than 98% is suggestive of the existence of resistance [24].
In-vitro trial: sufficient live and motile lice were collected manually from naturally infested sheep that came into clinics and immediately taken into the laboratory. After species identification, 80 Bovicola ovis louse were randomly allocated into treatment and control groups. Each group contains 4 replicates having 10 lice placed on each petri dish as per the protocol provided by [25]. Then, 60% Diazinon was diluted in water according to the manufacturer’s recommendation (1:1000) and lice in the treatment group were immersed completely in 0.5ml of this solution of 60% Diazinon for one min [26] and the control lice in the same amount of distilled water. After one minute, the solution soaked and dried using Whatman filter paper. Then, the vital signs in which lice exhibited after treatment was checked at 10, 30, 60, 120 minutes, as well as 6 and 12 hours of contact time under microscope [25].
Accordingly, recording of vital signs of lice in the treatment and control groups was held in each visiting time as described by [26]. For the calculation of mortality, highly stringent criteria was used and lice only judged as dead if they are in the categories 3 or 4 after 10, 30, 60 and 120 minutes as well as after 6 and 12 hours of contact time with 60% Diazinon[26].The percentage mortality was calculated using a formula described by [27] as follows;
Where the insecticidal effect of Diazinon was classified as: ‘’strong’’ when mortality is >80%, ‘’moderate’’ mortality 80–60%, ‘’ weak’’ mortality 60–40%, ‘’little or no activity’’ mortality < 40%.
Data Collection
Clinical examination
Data were collected in two seasons (October and January) to observe the seasonal lice infestation variation between the late rainy and dry seasons of the area. After proper restraining, clinical examination of each sheep was done using multiple fleece partings in the opposite direction in which sheep’s hair or wool normally rests. The skin was inspected carefully with naked eye and palpated across all parts of the sheep for the presence of ectoparasites and gross lesions that could be suggestive for clinical form of parasitic infestation [28]. Sheep having the parasite or lesions like alopecia and itching was considered as positive.
Lice collection and identification
Careful examination of the animal body, especially neck, shoulder, breast, ribs, back, and flank and rump areas was performed to detect the presence of lice by parting the body hair. Lice were collected manually and added into labelled universal bottles with 70% Ethanol. Collected samples were dispatched to Bahir Dar Animal Health Diagnostics and Investigation Center for laboratory analysis. Lice identification was done using stereo microscope according to the descriptions of [29].
Data Management and Analysis
Raw data obtained during sample collection and laboratory identification were checked, coded, and entered into Microsoft Excel spread sheet by the principal investigator and then the raw data was exported to STATA version 13 for analysis. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to examine and quantify the association between lice infestation and explanatory variables. These significant variables (P<0.05) by univariable logistic regression were further evaluated by multivariable logistic regression to adjust the effect of confounding. Moreover, independent sample t-test was used to compare mean lice burden between treatment and control group