Symptomatic sarcoidosis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation represents a rare condition, and we here provide an estimate of incidences in the autologous and allogeneic transplantation setting and its clinical characteristics. Sarcoidosis post HSCT occurred in patients receiving both allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantations at a ratio of 3:1, both in the UMG and the previously published patients. The increased frequency of sarcoidosis after allogeneic transplantation is compatible with the strong activation of the immune system upon engraftment in these patients. This observation suggests that a preformed immunological reaction may occur with increasing immunological competence of the T-cell repertoire and/or antigen presenting cells. This notion is further supported by the HLA allele associations observed for sarcoidosis post HSCT, which reiterates the associations described for sporadic sarcoidosis [2, 8–14] (Table 1). While the antigen(s) triggering sarcoidosis still remain elusive, our observations were best compatible with a minor self-antigen or a preexisting viral antigen, which is represented to the newly engrafted immune system in an HLA allele associated efficacy to elicit the sarcoidosis-type reaction in the post transplantation period (median time of 17 months, 20 months after allo HSCT, seven months after auto HSCT).
Seven of 13 patients with sarcoidosis post allogeneic HSCT also developed acute or chronic GvHD in the post-transplantation follow-up. Dependent on the precise transplantation setting, approximately 60% of patients develop GvHD after allo HSCT. Thus, our data do not support an association of sarcoidosis and GvHD, albeit this is limited by the small patient numbers.
Immunologically, granuloma formation is initiated by an interaction between CD4 + T cells and antigen presenting cells (APCs), such as macrophages or dendritic cells via HLA class II antigen-peptide complex leading to T cell activation, differentiation into Th1 cells, secretion of interleukin (IL)-2 and interferon (IFN)-g, and augmented macrophage tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a production, resulting in immune response amplification [31–33]. After granuloma formation, there are two possible outcomes: Granuloma formation can either resolve, if the peptide antigens are presented by HLA-DR3 molecules on dendritic cells or macrophages and subsequently recognized by T cells leading to the release of a range of cytokines, or persistent granulomatous inflammation with subsequent tissue damage requiring immunosuppressive therapy [32]. The latter is thought to occur if the antigen recognition is inefficient and can be due to peptides displayed by molecules other than HLA-DRB1*03 (HLA-DR3) or T cells that are not capable of generating efficient T cell clones [34].
Two agents that interfere with both T cell and dendritic cell (DC) mediated immunity, which is necessary for the resolution of sarcoid granulomas, are ATG and ALM. Two of our allo HSCT patients received ATG, while its was not reported in any of the case reports. ATG, a polyclonal antibody, is used to prevent GvHD and suppress allograft rejection. Owing to its polyclonality, there are diverse effects of ATG on the immune system, among them T cell depletion, modulation of leukocyte/endothelial interactions, apoptosis in B cells, interference with DC function and the induction of regulatory T and natural killer (NK) T cells [35]. So far there have been no reported cases linking sarcoidosis to ATG treatment.
Alemtuzumab, however, has been associated with the development of sarcoidosis and there are several case reports describing the occurrence of sarcoidosis post ALM treatment in multiple sclerosis patients [36–38]. While the exact mechanism by which ALM triggers sarcoidosis is not yet known, a dysregulation in the Th1/Tc1 cell/IFN-γ network and the development of autoantibodies by dysregulated B cells has been postulated [39]. The immune dysregulatory effects of ATG and ALM could play a role in the development of sarcoidosis in the post HSCT setting, however, taking into account the heterogenous usage of ATG and ALM in the reported patients, no clear causal link can be inferred.
Different hypotheses have been proposed, aiming to explain the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis after malignancy: Firstly, it has been postulated that sarcoidosis develops as a reaction to the immunosuppressive effect of chemotherapies or to a specific chemotherapy agent, such as bleomycin, known to achieve high concentrations in LN, skin and lung tissue [40].
Secondly, Brincker et al. hypothesized that the appearance of sarcoidosis post malignancy may be driven by antigens derived from tumor cells leading to immunological events resulting in granuloma formation [41]. Thirdly, Kornacker et al. suggested that underlying immunologic disturbances associated with the primary malignancy may lead to the formation of epithelioid granulomas [42].
In three patients the occurrence of sarcoidosis has been reported after possible transmission from the donor [23–25]. The data from our patient cohort do not support an increased risk of transmission, as none of our patients was transplanted from a donor with a previous history of sarcoidosis, and vice-versa, none of the patients with sarcoidosis in their pre-transplant medical history experienced sarcoidosis recurrence.
The immunological environment post HSCT, similar to that present in sarcoidosis pathogenesis outside of the context of HSCT, could promote the development of sarcoidosis, especially in a genetically susceptible individual with a specific HLA allele. The reported disease pathogenesis and potentially triggering factors are summarized in Fig. 5: Before HSCT, the conditioning regimen as well as underlying disease damage of host tissues induce pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-a, chemokines, and costimulatory molecules on host APCs. Following HSCT, donor T cells proliferate and differentiate in response to activated host APCs, then expressing IFN-g, IL-2 and TNF-a, leading to T cell expansion and differentiation into Th1 vs Th2 subtypes [43, 44]. This is followed by an increase in the number of suppressor/cytotoxic lymphocytes and then of helper-inducer phenotype T cells, thereby inverting CD4+/CD8 + ratios. A normalization of CD4+/CD8 + T cell ratios takes place around one to two years after HSCT [45, 46] with a longer time-span in older patients, whose thymic function is less pronounced.
During immune reconstitution higher levels of cytokines such as MCP-1, CCR1, CCR2, IL-8, and Rantes are present, leading to a tissue environment promoting the formation of non-necrotizing epithelioid granulomas [47–49].
All allogenously transplanted patients reported previously, including those in our cohort, developed sarcoidosis after complete donor engraftment of their bone marrow, suggesting that the development of sarcoidosis in these circumstances was initiated by the donor immune system. Interestingly, it has been shown that individuals with a HLA-B8/DR3 phenotype produce higher amounts of TNF-a compared to their IFN-g generation potential [50], making them susceptible to humoral hyperreactivity and anergy under an environmental stress.
The older age and shorter time to the onset of sarcoidosis post HSCT of the analyzed patients compared to the normal population might be explained with the progressive involution of thymic tissue during ageing with a decline in T cell output and T cell senescence with restricted T cell receptor repertoire diversity, leading to a slower immune reconstitution and impaired immune responses following transplantation [46]. However, a bias that patients with malignancies, especially lymphomas, are generally older must be considered.
The occurrence of extrapulmonary manifestations of sarcoidosis in patients with leukemia, MDS and MF compared to lymphoma patients has been linked to malignant antigens as a sarcoidosis trigger in leukemic diseases [41]. While the remission status prior to HSCT of most reported patients in the literature is unknown, sarcoidosis in our cohort patients occurred exclusively in patients with complete disease remissions, rendering a malignant antigenic trigger for sarcoidosis unlikely. Specific chemotherapeutic agents, such as bleomycin, have been hypothesized to trigger sarcoidosis. Interestingly, the majority of the allo HSCT patients received a regimen including BU, FLU, and CYC. There have been no reports implicating FLU and BU in the formation of sarcoidosis, CYC has been used previously in the treatment of severe cardiac or neurosarcoidosis [51]. TBI is known to lead to a delayed immune reconstitution [46].
Our study has several limitations. First, sarcoidosis post HSCT is a rarely reported event, although based on observations by Bhagat et al. [18] and the prevalence in our cohort of HSCT patients, the occurrence in HSCT might be higher than previously estimated. Also, the number of patients with accesible data for analysis was limited and the small number of cases may influence trends we observed in sub-groups during data analysis. Furthermore, multicentric analyses in additional cohorts may gain more granular insights into the prevalence, potential triggers, and the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis post HSCT. Nevertheless, our report has several strengths: To our knowledge, this report represents the most comprehensive analysis from a single center in comparison with previously published data. The strong HLA association reported and corroborated by our data suggest that sarcoidosis occurrence in this vulnerable population is influenced by a genetic predisposition requiring additional immunological events in the context of HSCT.