Animals
In this experimental research, forty male Wistar rats (210 ± 5 g, eight weeks) were purchased from Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences Animal House, Rafsanjan, Iran. The animals were maintained in a standard room (temperature: 23 ± 1°C, humidity: 50%) with 12 h light/dark cycle. The rats were allowed free access to a standard rodent chow diet and drinking water. This study was approved by Ethics Committee of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences (Ethics No. IR.RUMS.REC.1397.222). Also, this research was carried out according to the animals care and use guidelines (National Institutes of Health Publication No. 85 − 23) revised in 2010.
Experimental groups and protocol
After the adaptation period (one week), rats were randomly assigned to five groups (n = 8 per group) including:
Group 1: Control.
Group 2: (Carvacrol): Animals in this group received carvacrol (10 mg/kg) for one week (daily) via intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection [15].
Group 3: (Acetaminophen): this group received acetaminophen (500 mg/kg) in a single dose by i.p. injection [3].
Group 4: (Acetaminophen + carvacrol 5 mg/kg): this group initially received a single dose of acetaminophen (500 mg/kg, i.p.). Then rats were treated with carvacrol (5 mg/kg, i.p.) one hour later for one week (daily).
Group 5: (Acetaminophen + carvacrol 10 mg/kg): this group initially received a single dose of acetaminophen (500 mg/kg, i.p.). Then rats were treated with carvacrol (10 mg/kg, i.p.) one hour later for one week (daily) [15].
A single dose of acetaminophen (500 mg/kg, i.p) was used in this study [3]. In the treatment groups, rats first received high-dose of acetaminophen and then were treated with carvacrol (5 or 10 mg/kg, i.p) for one week [15]. The animals in the control group received no intervention. The animals in group 2 received only carvacrol (10 mg/kg) without acetaminophen. Finally, 24 hours after the last intervention, the rats were weighed and anesthetized with urethane (1.7 g/kg, i.p.) (Sigma, St. Louis USA) to measure the hemodynamic parameters.
Hemodynamic parameters measurement
At first, the rats' trachea was intubated via polyethylene tube (Microtube Extrusions, Australia) to facilitate breathing [16]. Then, two polyethylene tubes were used for catheterizing the left carotid and femoral arteries [17]. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and renal perfusion pressure (RPP) were assessed via these catheters jointed to two transducers linked to PowerLab hardware (ADInstruments, Australia) and lab chart software. Also, the left renal artery was exposed and RBF (as perfusion units (PU)) was measured by help of a laser-Doppler perfusion monitor instrument (DRT4, Moor Instruments, UK) [18]. The hemodynamic parameters were recorded for thirty minutes, then the last five minutes of recording time were used for analysis [19]. RPP to RBF ratio was applied for the calculation of the RVR (mm Hg/perfusion units) indicator [18]. During the measurement period, the rat’s body temperature was sustained at 37°C via a heated platform.
Blood urea nitrogen and creatinine measurement
After hemodynamic parameters measurement, heart puncture was used for blood samples collection. Then rat’s blood samples were centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 20 min. The blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (Cr) concentrations were evaluated via quantitative determination kits (Pars Azmoon, Iran).
Oxidative stress parameters assessments
The rats were killed in deep anesthesia. Kidneys were removed. One of them was homogenized in ice-cold buffer solution and centrifuged (20 min at 6000 rpm). The supernatant was prepared for oxidative and apoptosis parameters. Some of the oxidative stress parameters like malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration, glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity levels were measured in the kidneys using their commercial kits (Zellbio-Germany) [20–22].
Histopathological assessments
The other kidney was kept in formalin (10%) for histological assessment. Then histological staining was done via hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) method. Kidney tissue damage score (KTDS) was applied for histopathological assessments. KTDS was considered based on the tubular vacuolization and dilatation, debris, hyaline cast, interstitial edema and interstitial infiltration in the kidney tissue [23, 24]. The slides were graded from zero to three based on intensity of kidney tissue damage for each sample (0-0.5 = normal, 1 = minor damage, 2 = moderate damage, 3 = severe damage) [6, 7].
Apoptosis parameters measurement
The immunoblotting method was done to measure the Bax, Bcl-2 and cleaved caspase-3 proteins expression level in the kidney tissue. In brief, each protein sample was separated from 12.5% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Each membrane was incubated overnight (at temperature of 4°C and pH 7.4) in Tris-buffered saline and Tween-20 (20 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) with 5% nonfat milk. Then polyvinylidene difluoride membranes were incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-Bax (1:1000), monoclonal rabbit anti-caspase-3 (1:1000), and rabbit polyclonal anti-Bcl-2 (1:1000) antibodies for 3 h at temperature of 20 to 22°C. Subsequently, each blot was washed with 20 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20 (three times), and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Abcam, 1:5000) at room temperature for another hour. Subsequently, blots were detected via an enhanced chemiluminescence method. Band densitometry analysis was done by the ImageJ software. Beta (β)-actin (1:5000) was considered as a loading control.
Statistical Analysis
All data were statistically analyzed by GraphPad Prism version 6.01 for Windows (GraphPad Software, USA). Results are presented as mean ± SD. For comparison between the groups (in quantitative values) One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used. Moreover, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for KTDS data analysis between the groups. The null hypothesis was rejected at the level of 0.05.