Changes in the diel rhythm, sleep-wake cycle, dining and exercise
We found that 85.6% (386) of participants self-reported changes in at least one variable related to diel rhythmicity. The sleep schedule became irregular and regular in 31.0% (140) and 14.6% (66) of the participants. To assess the changes in the diel phases, we classified the participants into three chronotypes based on their sleep onset time during the survey period as follows: early-type, slept before 22:00; intermediate type, slept between 22:00 and 24:00; late-type, slept after 24:00. In addition, irregular type denotes people who showed no fixed sleep time. Both the time of falling asleep and waking up are diel phase references. In this study, we used the former parameter to assess the changes in the diel phase since there was a significant positive correlation between both parameters (suppl. file 3).
Among the 451 participants, during the quarantine period, 34.6% (156) of the participants reported chronotype changes. Among these 156 individuals, 81 individuals (18.0%) showed a delayed phase while 33 (7.3%) showed an advanced phase (Fig. 1B). The most prevalent (13.7% participants [62/451]) changed from the intermediate type to the late type (62/451) (Fig. 1C). During the quarantine period, the proportion of participants who woke up prior to 7:00 before and during the quarantine period was 35.5% (160) and 10.6% (48), respectively. In contrast, the fraction of participants who woke up after 9:00 before and during the quarantine period was 12.9% (58) and 42.1% (190), respectively (suppl. file 4). Compared to the parameters before the quarantine period, 16 (3.6%) and 119 (26.4%) participants showed an increase and decrease in exercise, respectively. 20 (4.3%) and 95 (21.1%) participants reported more and lesser dining times, respectively (Fig. 1D,E).
Among the teachers, 29.6% (21/71) of individuals showed a delayed sleep phase, which was a notable increase from the average (18.0%). Among the students, 9.5% (20/210) and 13.8% (29/210) reported an advanced and delayed sleep phase, respectively (Fig. 2A). Among the participants, 102 (36.3%) females and 38 (22.4%) males reported an irregular time of sleeping. Difficulty waking up and falling asleep was reported by 18.8% and 14.7% of the males, respectively, and 24.9% and 23.5% of the females, respectively (Fig. 2B, C). In addition, 26.7% (27/101) individuals aged between 41 and 50 years showed a delayed sleep phase, which was approximately 9.0% more than the proportion in other age groups (suppl. file 5). There was a positive correlation between gender and irregular rhythms (r=0.130, P=0.006), delayed waking up (r=0.163, P=0.001), and difficulty falling asleep (r=0.115, P=0.015). Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between age and increased nocturnal wake-up episodes (r=0.122, P=0.011) and prolonged daytime napping (r=0.236, P<0.001); moreover, age was negatively correlated with KSS-rated sleepiness (r=-0.115, P=0.015). Education level was positively associated with increased exercise (r=0.094, P=0.046). Exercise was negatively associated with self-reported diel change (r=-0.109, P=0.021), difficulty falling asleep (r=-0.109, P=0.021), delayed degree of waking up (r=-0.164, P<0.001), and delayed degree of falling asleep (r=-0.125, P=0.012) (Fig. 2D and suppl. file 3).
Analysis of changes in sleep duration and quality
The questionnaire was used to assess the quantity and quality in terms of daily total sleep duration, daytime nap duration, nocturnal wake-up times, and KSS-rated sleepiness. During the quarantine period, 59.7% (269), 3.1% (14), and 37.3% (168) of the participants reported an increase, decrease, and no change in the daily total sleep duration during the quarantine period (Fig. 2F). Nocturnal wake-up episodes were associated with sleep quality and caused sleep fragmentation and sleep cycle disturbance. The female gender was positively associated with KSS-rated sleepiness (r=0.133, P=0.005). Education level was positively associated with prolonged daytime napping (r=0.154, P=0.001). Age was positively associated with increased waking episodes (r=0.122, P=0.011) and prolonged daytime napping (r=0.236, P< 0.001) and negatively associated with KSS-rated sleepiness (r=-0.115, P=0.015) (Fig. 2G and suppl. file 3).
Compared to that in the control period, there was an increase in the incidence of nocturnal waking episodes (53, 11.8%) during the pandemic period. An assessment of KSS-rated sleepiness showed that most participants had a score of 5 (33.9%, 153). In addition, 123 (27.3%) participants had a score of 1-3, 319 (70.7%) had a score of 4-7, and 9 (2.0%) had a score of 8-10 (Fig. 2E). Furthermore, 12.6% (57) reported a subjective decrease in sleep quality (Fig. 2F). Before January 20, 2020, 27.9% (126) of the participants did not have a daytime napping habit; among them, 80.2% (101) maintained this habit after the emergency launch. Some of the participants with previous daytime napping did not report them during quarantine. The proportion of participants without daytime napping habits during the quarantine period was 49.0% (221) (Fig. 2F). Exercise was negatively associated with prolonged total sleep duration (r=-0.157, P=0.001) (Fig. 2G and suppl. file 3).
Analysis of changes in negative emotions
The questionnaire assessed negative emotions, including worry, fear, downheartedness, anxiety, depression, and stupefaction, which might be associated with diel rhythms and sleep. Among the 451 participants, 303 (67.2%) showed at least one negative emotion as follows: worry, 257 (57.0%); anxiety, 231 (51.2%); stupefaction, 222 (49.2%); downheartedness, 214 (47.5%); fear: 208 (46.1%); and depression: 166 (36.8%). Moreover, 148 individuals (32.8% of 451) reported no obvious negative emotions. Among the six negative emotions, responders scored the highest on worry (average 2.18) with 16.4% (74/451) of the participants rated 4 (moderate negative emotion) or 5 (severe negative emotion). Furthermore, 7.1% (32/451) of the responders rated ≥4 on depression (Fig. 3A, B and suppl. files 6,7).
The age groups of 26-30, 18-25 and 31-40 years had the highest negative emotion averages, i.e., 2.26, 2.04 and 1.96, respectively (suppl. file 6). Age was negatively associated with worry, stupefaction, dismissal, anxiety, and fear (Fig. 3D and suppl. file 3). The averaged total scores in men and women were 1.97 and 1.90, respectively, with men showing higher scores than women on stupefaction (men 2.05; women 1.89), downheartedness (men 1.97; women 1.85), depression (men 1.74; women 1.60) and anxiety (men 2.05; women 1.97) (Fig. 3C and suppl. file 6). In addition, individuals with higher education levels reported more negative emotions (Fig. 3C and suppl. file 6).
Correlation coefficient analysis among changes in diel rhythms, sleep and negative emotions
There was a positive correlation between total sleep duration and the frequency of irregular sleep-wake cycles (r=0.180, P<0.001), and changes in wake-up time (r=0.393, P<0.001), as well as a negative correlation between total sleep duration and changes in dining times (r=-0.187, P<0.001). Changes in sleep quality were positively associated with changes in wake-up time (r=0.094, P=0.045), and negatively associated with the frequency of irregular sleep-wake cycles (r=-0.102, P=0.030), difficulty falling asleep (r=-0.275, P<0.001), daytime sleepiness (r=-0.252, P<0.001), and changes in sleep onset time (r=-0.162, P=0.001). Increased waking times were positively associated with the frequency of irregular sleep-wake cycles (r=0.148, P=0.002) and increased difficulty falling asleep (r=0.160, P=0.001). Increased daytime napping was positively associated with changes in sleep-onset time (r=0.108, P=0.029) and changes in dining times (r=0.171, P<0.001) (Fig. 4A and suppl. file 3).
A negative correlation of changes in sleep quality was revealed with all the studied negative emotion types (worry, stupefaction, downheartedness, depression, anxiety and fear), with the following correlation coefficients: -0.116 (P=0.014), -0.130 (P=0.006), -0.180 (P<0.001), -0.127 (P=0.007), -0.134 (P=0.004), and -0.140 (P=0.003), respectively. Among the sleep parameters, prolonged daytime napping was negatively associated with stupefaction (r=-0.093, P=0.047); moreover, KSS-rated sleepiness was positively associated with stupefaction (r=0.125, P=0.008) and downheartedness (r=0.111, P=0.018). Regarding the diel rhythm parameters, changes in daytime sleepiness were negatively associated with fear (r=-0.098, P=0.037) and downheartedness (r=0.111, P=0.018). Changes in wake-up time were negatively associated with fear (r=-0.098, P=0.037) (Fig. 4B and suppl. file 3).
Among the diel rhythm variables, self-reported diel changes were positively associated with difficulty falling asleep, difficulty waking up, changes in wake-up time, and changes in sleep onset time, with the following respective correlation coefficients: 0.337, 0.426, 0.356 and 0.367. Furthermore, diel change was negatively associated with changes in dining times (r=-0.189). Difficulty falling asleep was positively associated with difficulty waking up (r=0.252), changes in wake-up time (r=0.131, P=0.005) and changes in sleep onset time (r=0.173). Additionally, difficulty waking up was positively correlated with wake-up time (r=0.195) and changes in sleep onset time (r=0.231). Changes in wake-up time were positively associated with changes in sleep onset time (r=0.308) and negatively associated with changes in dining times (r=-0.212). Total sleep duration was positively associated with increased sleep quality (r=0.229) and increased daytime napping (r=0.141, P=0.003). Sleep quality was negatively associated with increased nocturnal wake-up episodes (r =-0.174) (suppl. file 3).
Subjective assessments of the effect of quarantine on diel rhythms and sleep
We assessed three potential factors: the Spring Festival holiday, concerns regarding the epidemic situation and constant quarantine and community containment. In this subjective assessment, the effects on diel rhythms and sleep were considered to be one entity. The responders reported the subjective assessments of these factors on diel rhythms and sleep using the corresponding scales 1-5. Among the 451 participants, 89.6% (404), 76.7% (346), and 88.0% (397) of the participants considered constant quarantine, holiday, and community containment, as the causative factors, respectively (rating ≥ 2) for diel rhythms and sleep disturbance (Fig. 4C,D and suppl. file 8).
There was a positive correlation of the Spring Festival holiday with daily sleep duration (r=0.292, P<0.001), sleep quality (r=0.123, P=0.009), delayed waking up time (r=0.160, P=0.001), irregularity in diel rhythms (r=0.130, P=0.006), KSS-rated sleepiness (r=0.127, P=0.007) and worry (r=0.150, P=0.001). Concerns regarding the pandemic situation were positively correlated with nocturnal wake-up episodes (r=0.112, P=0.020); and negatively related to sleep quality (r=-0.146, P=0.002) and the components of diel rhythms and negative emotions. Constant quarantine and community containment were positively related to total sleep duration, delayed waking up time, difficulty falling asleep and the degree of rhythms becoming irregular. There were positive relationships of constant quarantine, community containment, and five negative emotions, i.e., worry, stupefaction, depression, anxiety and fear (Fig. 4E and suppl. file 3).
Moreover, 80 participants (17.7%) listed that other factors could affect diel rhythms and sleep including family (38.8%, 31/80), work or schoolwork (30%, 24/80), environmental comfort (17.5%, 14/80), and economic pressure (2.5%, 2/80). Regarding environmental comfort we found that noise (3.8%, 3/80) and ambient temperature (2.5%, 2/80) could contribute to effects on diel rhythms and sleep (suppl. file 8).