An Anatomical Study of Incisive Canal and its Foramen

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-770424/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

An Anatomical Study of Incisive Canal and its Foramen

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-770424/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Introduction: Anatomically, the incisive canals start on the nasal fossa floor, close to the septum, and open at the incisive foramen of the maxillary palatine process. The nasopalatine nerve passes through the incisive foramen as well as the septal artery and the sphenopalatine vein. Also, there may be accessory canals. Typically, the incisive foramen has two incisive canals. This work aimed to analyze the morphology and morphometry of the foramen and incisive canals in the macerated cephalic skeletons.

Material and methods: For this purpose, we selected 150 samples of adult individuals, with no distinctions of sex and ethnicity. We analyzed the frequency of incisive canals in the foramen was analyzed as well the area, diameter, and communications of incisive canals with the fossa and nasal cavity.

Results: The cephalic analysis results showed that most incisive foramina have at least two canals that communicate the nasal cavity with the oral cavity. The right-side canal had an average of 1.975mm² in area and 1.281mm in diameter. Also, the left-side canal had an average of 1.468mm² in area and 1.182mm in diameter. The average area and total diameter of the incisive foramen were 8.148mm² and 3.101mm, respectively.

Conclusion: Hence, understanding anatomy and its variations is essential for clinical applications, as it may alter surgical technique and prognosis. Besides, it can be said all incisive canals have communication with the nasal cavity.

Scientific Communication

Surgery

Biomedical Engineering

Anatomy

Anesthesia

Dental. Anesthesia

Local

The incisive canals have been described beginning on the nasal fossa floor, close to the nasal septum, and openin the incisive foramen of the maxillary palatine process ^1,2. Moreover, there are two incisive canals in the incisive foramen and, additional canals may exist³.

Furthermore, anatomical study of the foramen and incisive canals is critical in the dental practice, as the nasopalatine nerve, the septal artery, and the sphenopalatine vein pass through incisive canals^{3, 4} are responsible for innervation, blood supply, and drainage of the soft tissue of the hard palate⁵.

The anterior maxilla is considered esthetic, phonetic, and functionally important⁷; however, it is the most common region exposed to trauma and tooth loss⁶. Surgeries in this site have been regarded as safe, although iatrogenic injury has been increasingly reported due to the growing surgical interventions in this^{8, 9}. Besides, in a hospital environment is common to use the procedure The LeFort I, which is one of the most commonly used techniques to correct midface deformities. In this case, the most important anatomical structures in this region must be well-known in order to prevent complications during and after surgery^{7, 8, 9}.

For example, the knowledge of critical anatomical structures as the incisive canals and the incisive foramen is vital during dental implant procedures^{10, 11, 12}. In this way, the comprehension of these structures' anatomy, morphology, and morphometry is crucial to perform surgical procedures without harming the patients^{13, 14}. For this reason, this study aimed to analyze the morphology and morphometry of the incisive foramen and the incisive canals in macerated cephalic skeletons.

The present study was carried out at the Department of Biological Science of the Bauru School of Dentistry – University of São Paulo, Brazil.

Ethical statements

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the São Paulo University (n°1.713.069) and this work has followed the set of ethical principles from the Declaration of Helsinki in all methods that have been done. The informed consent was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardian(s).

Design of study

150 macerated cephalic skeletons of adult individuals, which belong to the Anatomy discipline of Bauru School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo, were selected without identifying sex and ethnicity. The following procedures were performed:

The frequency of incisive canals presented in the incisive foramen.
Area and diameter of the incisive foramina.
Area and diameter of the incisive canals.
The evaluation of communication of the incisive canals with the nasal cavity and oral cavity.

The frequency of incisive canals and the evaluation of each canal's area and diameter were performed with the Dino Lite® microscope. Besides, we verified the incisive canals' communication with the nasal cavity through a stainless-steel orthodontic wire with 0.2- and 0.4-mm. Measurements were conducted with DinoCapture 2.0 software.

In all the samples, frequency, area, and the incisive foramen's total diameter were analyzed and also, the area and diameter of each incisive canal (Figure 1).

In the incisive foramina analysis, we determined the number of canals presented at each incisive foramen, with a minimum numerical variation of one (Figure 2) to a maximum of six incisive canals (Figure 3). In this way, we classified the incisive foramina as (Figure 4):

Type 1 – Only one incisive canal

Type 2 – Two incisive canals

Type 3 – Three incisive canals

Type 4 – Four incisive canals

Type 5 – Five incisive canals

Type 6 – Six incisive canals

Additionally, to the number of canals, the canal's name was established according to its location, which can be: anterior, posterior, right lateral, left lateral, right medial, and left medial (Figure 5).

Statistical methods

Both measurements were assessed using descriptive statistics, using absolute frequency (N), relative frequency (%), mean and standard deviation with a probability of 5 percent being regarded as significant.

1. Frequency of incisive canals presented at each incisive foramen

After the anatomical evaluation of 150 macerated cephalic skeletons, the number of incisive canals found was 1 single canal in 10 (6.7%), 2 canals in 52 (34.7%), 3 canals in 53 (34,0%), 4 canals in 27 (18%), 5 canals in 8 (5,3%) and 6 canals in 2 (1.3%) (Figure 6). Besides, from the total of incisive foramen analyzed, 54 had an anterior canal; 93 had a posterior canal; 123 had a right lateral canal; 127 had a left side canal; 10 had a right medial canal, and 10 had a left medial canal (Figure 7).

2. Area and diameter of the incisive foramina

Regarding the average area and diameter of incisive foramina, it is possible to state that the average total area of 150 incisive foramina analyzed was equal to 8.148mm². The average of the entire diameter of the foramina was equal to 3.101mm (Table 1).

Table 1

The description of the incisive foramina averages of the area and total diameter.

Parameters

Average

Standart deviation

The total area of the foramen

8,148

4,616

The total diameter of the foramen

3,101

0,884

3. Area and diameter of the incisive canals

The average areas of each incisive canal were as follows: Anterior canals – 0,341mm²; posterior canals – 1,068mm²; right lateral canals – 1,975mm²; left lateral canals – 1,468mm²; right medial canals – 0.330mm² and left medial canals – 0.383mm² (Figure 8).

The average diameters of each incisive canal were as it follows: Anterior canals – 0.572mm; posterior canals – 1,016mm; right lateral canals – 1,281mm; left lateral canals – 1,182mm; right medial canals – 0.644mm and left medial canals – 0.685mm (Figure 9).

4. Communication of the incisive canals with the fossa and nasal cavity

In brief, in all of the incisive analyzed canals, communication between the nasal cavity and the oral cavity has occurred.

Therefore, from the results obtained, it is possible to state that the most incisive foramina have at least two canals, which communicate the nasal fossa, being the right lateral canal with an average of 1.975mm² in area and 1.281mm in diameter. Also, in the left lateral canal, with an average of 1.468mm² in area and 1.182mm in diameter, the average area and total diameter of incisive foramina were 8.148mm² and 3.101mm, respectively.

This study aimed to analyze the morphology and morphometry of incisive foramen also incisive canal in macerated cephalic skeletons. Our results showed that most incisive foramina have at least two canals, which communicate with the nasal cavity and the oral cavity .

Because of its location, the incisive foramen could target the installation of osseointegrated implants to compose a sound protein structure and protect through a balance between distribution and distance^{10, 11, 12}. Thus, prior knowledge of its anatomy and physiology is critical since the proximity of the incisive foramen with the anterior central elements affects the ability to place immediate implants on the ideal position¹¹. On the other hand, the patient's age also hinders the ability to place immediate implants since the typical clinical profile of individuals seeking this type of treatment, in most cases, are over 60 years. In which it is demonstrated that the thickness of the anterior maxillary bone is affected by aging¹¹.

In implantology, the necessity for implant installations over the incisive canals and their foramen is common. Thus, it is necessary to have anatomical expertise, in agreement with other authors, not to cause damage and harm to the patient. For example, the structures that pass through the incisive foramen, such as the sphenopalatine vein, are responsible for the hard palate's irrigation and drainage^{1, 2, 11, 12 , 13}.

In the literature, other authors have described the importance of anatomical variations for corrective surgeries in the craniomaxillofacial region^{10, 11}. Some surgical techniques used in clinical practice, such as the Le Fort I, require anatomical knowledge of the incisive canal and its foramen^{6 , 7}.

To date, there are some morphological and morphometric studies of the incisive canals with also their foramen; however, using diagnostic imaging ^{3, 10, 11}. Considering the scarcity of studies on incisive canals and their foramen, performed on macerated skulls, the data of this study were compared with those from research using diagnostic imaging methods ¹².

In our study, we checked the frequency of the incisive canals and measured each canal's diameter with the Dino Lite® microscope, and performed the analysis of the images captured using the software DinoCapture 2.0. To check the incisive canal communication with the nasal cavity, we used stainless steel orthodontic wires in the macerated skulls to obtain a privileged view. It showed that the most macerated cephalic skeletons had two incisive canals, the right-lateral canal, and the left-lateral canal.

Thus, some works have described the incisive canal as a duct of the oral cavity, which divides into two canaliculi, and ends at the nasal cavity floor next to the nasal septum⁵. Other authors have classified the incisive canal based on symmetry, the number of canaliculi, and shape^{10, 12, 13}.

A study carried out by Mraiwa et al. (2004) using the 2D, and 3D images showed that at the level of the nasal floor, commonly two, sometimes three or four orifices, referring to the incisive canals could be seen. In contrast, in some particular individuals, the incisive canal emerged as a single-cylinder with only one nasal opening¹⁶. This result agrees with our work since we observed accessory canals during the analysis of the macerated skulls. However, the numbers obtained were higher, reaching up to six openings.

As a result, most adult individuals have two incisive canals with insignificant length differences between them, varying only in diameter and width according to gender ^{10, 12, 13}. In our study, the canals' average area and diameter were 1.975mm² and 1.281mm for the right-lateral canal. Furthermore, for the left-lateral canal, the average area and diameter were 1.468mm² and 1.182mm. To date, no other study has individually evaluated the diameter of accessory canals.

As a result, our work shows that the average area and total diameter of the incisive foramina is 8.148mm² and 3.101mm, respectively, similar to others described by other authors^{3, 4, 14}. However, recent research carried out by Reinhard et al. (2015) showed that the average diameter of incisive foramen varies according to its trajectory. Thus, at the oral cavity opening, the diameter was 4.49mm and 3.43mm at the nasal floor level.

In conclusion, our study shows that it is possible to affirm that the anatomy of the incisive canals and their foramen are variable. Therefore, the knowledge and analysis of these structures are crucial for surgical procedures in the maxilla's anterior region.

Sicher, H. & Dubrul, E. L. Anatomia bucal 6. edn (Guanabara Koogan, Rio de Janeiro, 1977).
Rizzolo, R. J. C. & Madeira, C. M. Anatomia Facial com fundamentos de anatomia geral 3. edn (Sarvier, São Paulo, 2009).
Panjnoush, M., Norouzi, H., Kheirandish, Y., Shamshiri, A. R. & Mofidi, N. Evaluation of morphology and anatomical measurement of nasopalatine canal using cone beam computed tomography.J Dent (Tehran). 2016.
Nasseh, I., Aoun, G. & Sokhn, S. Assessment of the nasopalatine canal: an anatomical study.Acta Inform Med. 2017.
Radlanski, R. J., Emmerich, S. & Renz, H. Prenatal morphogenesis of the human incisive canal.Anat Embryol. 2004.
Vieira, E. H. Fixação interna rígida em fratura alvéolo-dentária na maxila.
Agha, R. A. et al. For the SCARE Group. The SCARE 2018 Statement: Updating Consensus Surgical Case Report (SCARE) Guidelines. International Journal of Surgery, 60, 132–136 (2018).
Sangalette, B. S. et al. Treatment of Complex Mandibular Body Fractures and Functional Reimplantation of the Maxillary Alveolar Fragment. Case Reports in Surgery, 20, 1–7 https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8853562 (2020).
Urban, I., Jovanovic, S. A., Buser, D. & Bornsteim, M. M. Partial lateralization of the nasopalatine nerve at the incisive foramen for ridge augmentation in the anterior maxilla prior to placement of dental implants: a retrospective case series evaluating self-reported data and neurosensory testing.Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015; v. 35, n. 2, p.169–177.
Bornstein, M. M., Balsiger, R., Sendi, P. & Von Arx, T. Morphology of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radiographic analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited conebeam computed tomography.Clin Oral Implants. 2011
Al-amery, S. M., Namblar, P., Jamaludin, M., John, J. & Ngeow, W. C. Cone beam computed tomography assessment of the maxillary incisive canal and foramen: considerations of anatomical variations when placing immediate implants.Plos one, february 13, 2015.
Mardinger, O., Namani-Sadan, N., Chaushu, G. & Schwartz-Arad, D. Morphologic changes of the nasopalatine canal related to dental implantation: a radiologic study in different degrees of absorbed maxillae.J Periodontol, 2008.
Fernández-Alonso, A. et al. Three–dimensional study of nasopalatine canal morphology: a descriptive retrospective analysis using cone–beam computed tomography.Surg Radiol Anat, 2014.
Friedrich, R. E., Laumann, F., Zrnc & Assaf, A. T. The nasopalatine canal in adults on cone beam computed tomograms-A clinical study and review of the literature. In vivo, 2015.
Song, W. C. et al. Microanatomy of the incisive canal using three-dimensional reconstruction of microCT images: an ex vivo study (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2009).
Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Sanderink G, Schutyser F, Suetens P et al. The nasopalatine canal revisited using 2D nad 3D CT imaging.Journal of Head and Neck Imaging. 2004.

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

An Anatomical Study of Incisive Canal and its Foramen

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Materials And Methods

Ethical statements

Design of study

Statistical methods

Results

1. Frequency of incisive canals presented at each incisive foramen

2. Area and diameter of the incisive foramina

3. Area and diameter of the incisive canals

4. Communication of the incisive canals with the fossa and nasal cavity

Discussion

Conclusion

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Version 1