Efficacy and Safety of Single-Session Radiofrequency Ablation in Treating Benign Thyroid Nodules: A Short-Term Prospective Cohort Study

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-776049/v1

Download PDF

Research

Efficacy and Safety of Single-Session Radiofrequency Ablation in Treating Benign Thyroid Nodules: A Short-Term Prospective Cohort Study

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-776049/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Objective:

The aims of this study are to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RFA in the treatment of benign thyroid nodule(s) and to find independent factors related to the volume reduction rate of the nodule(s).

Materials and methods: This short-term prospective study from a single medical center was conducted on 93 benign thyroid nodules in 93 patients treated with RFA. Two basic techniques were used: the trans-isthmic approach, moving-shot technique. Clinical and ultrasonography examinations were performed at 1; 3 months follow-up after the treatment session. Primary outcomes included volume reduction ratio (VRR) at 1 month and 3 months follow-ups; Secondary outcomes were therapeutic success rate and complications. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine independent factors associated with VRR.

Results: A final sample of 78 patients with 78 nodules, given participant rate 83.8%, (included 60 solid nodules, 16 predominantly cystic nodules, and 2 thyroid cysts) was followed for 3 months. The mean volume reduction ratio was 41.47% and 64.72% after 1 month and 3 months follow-ups, respectively. The therapeutic success rate was 30.8% at 1 month and 84.6% at 3-month follow-ups. Symptom score and cosmetic score improved significantly. There was no change in thyroid function tests. Two minor complications (transient voice change) were found. The only internal component of nodules significantly related to the VRR during the 3 months follow-up (b = 23.00; 95%CI (7.59 - 38.45)).

Conclusion: RFA was demonstrated as a safe and effective option for benign thyroid nodules treatment. It can be used as an alternative treatment with encouraging results.

Endocrinology & Metabolism

Radiofrequency ablation

thyroid nodules

efficacy and safety

Thyroid nodule(s) is the most second common endocrine disorder behind diabetes, its prevalence being largely dependent on the examination method included high-frequency ultrasound, which can be detected in 20–76% of the adult [1, 2]. Once the benign nodule has been confirmed, ongoing treatment usually depends on the onset of nodule-related compressible and/or cosmetic symptoms [3, 4]. In Vietnam and worldwide, surgery or T4 suppressive therapy is preferred to treat thyroid nodule(s) but both of them still have limitations. Drawbacks of surgery are general anesthesia, iatrogenic hypothyroidism, and neck scar [5]. Using T4 suppressive therapy is controversial and associated with the high risks of iatrogenic hyperthyroidism, decreased bone density, atrial fibrillation, and increasing overall morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular diseases [6, 7].

In recent years, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been emerging from one of the treatments of benign thyroid nodule(s) as a minimally invasive alternative treatment with encouraging results, fewer complications than surgery, high feasibility of performing in an outpatient room, and preservation of thyroid function [8–10]. It can induce thyroid tissue heated - necrosis, and nodule volume will be shrunk afterward, which in turn alleviates the associated symptoms or cosmetic issue [11]. Theoretically, RFA is usually used 2 basic techniques included the moving-shot technique and the trans-isthmic approach with the guidance of ultrasonography (US) [12]. Factors related to the efficacy of this therapy in benign thyroid nodule(s) treatment have been reported in numerous studies in the world including Vietnam. It included initial volume, US features, vascularity grade, and initial ablation ratio (IAR) [13–18]. However, their conclusions are still debated. Therefore, this short-term prospective study from a single medical center aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RFA in the treatment of benign thyroid nodule(s) and to find independent factors related to the volume reduction rate of the nodule(s).

Study design and patients’ selection

This prospective cohort single-center study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institutional Review Board of Danang Family hospital, Danang, Vietnam (number: 12.04–30218), and written informed consent for procedures was obtained for all patients.

All patients were selected with the following inclusion criteria: (1) benign thyroid nodule(s) was confirmed by following recommendations from the Asian Conference on Tumor Ablation Task Force: US result and at least two separate US-guided fine-needle aspirations (US-FNAs) cytology or US-guided core needle biopsy (US-CNB) [19]; (2) reports of pressure symptoms (including pain, compressive symptoms, neck discomfort) or cosmetic problems, or anxiety about tumor; (3) refusal to undergo surgery. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the largest dimension of the nodule(s) less than 15mm; (2) nodule(s) showing established or suspected malignant features during US (according to ACR-TIRADS 4 to 5) or cytology (according to Bethesda Class III to VI); (3) current thyrotoxicosis; (4) patients with short life expectancy by comorbidity of severe diseases; (5) pregnancy; and (6) patients lost to follow-up.

From January 2019 to October 2020, 93 patients who undergone treatment using the RFA were enrolled in this study

Measurement and assessment

Pre-treatment assessment and radiofrequency ablation procedure

Before the procedure, conventional clinical examination, US, 2 times separated US-guided FNAs or CNB, and the laboratory test was done. At registration, patients were evaluated for the compression symptoms using a 10-cm visual analog scale (0–10). Endocrinologist examined a cosmetic grade: 1, no palpable mass; 2, a palpable mass but no cosmetic problem; 3, cosmetic problem on swallowing only; 4, readily detected cosmetic problem [20]. An 8 to 12 MHz linear probe of a real-time ultrasound system (Acuson NX2 or NX3 series, Siemens Healthineer) was performed by only one radiologist with more than 5 years of experience. Nodule(s) was evaluated the position, size, volume, solid/cystic proportions, echogenicity, and volume (V = πabc/6 - where a, b, c are the 3 diameters). Ultrasound-guided FNA or CNB examinations were done by a licensed endocrinologist with more than 3 years of experience (Nguyen VB). Thyroid function (thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxin (FT4) level) was obtained. Before the treatment of each patient, we explained the advantages and disadvantages of thyroid RFA.

All the procedures were performed by the same endocrinologist (Nguyen VB), who has a licensed certificate and more than 3 years of experience in US-FNA/CNB, thyroid ethanol ablation, and thyroid RFA, at the outpatient department of the Center of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Danang Family hospital, Vietnam. In the RFA procedure, patients in a supine position with mild neck extension were done skin sterilization and local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine at the needle-puncture site. We used an 18 gauge internally cooled monopolar electrodes (5mm or 7mm in active tips) which were connected to a radiofrequency generator (CoATherm AK- F200, APRO KOREA Inc.) to puncture into the nodule under US guidance via the trans-isthmic approach (Fig. 1A). The nodules were ablated by using the moving-shot technique (Fig. 1B). Hydro-dissection was used in a few cases to preventing important structures such as the nerve and artery by injecting slowly 5% dextrose (Fig. 1C). The transient hyperechoic zone proved nodules ablated completely [12, 19, 20]. In the case of the cystic nodule(s) or predominantly cystic nodule(s), fluid aspiration was performed completely before ablating the nodule and its vascularity. Patients were asked to stay in the hospital for 60 minutes after the procedure and discharged if having no complications.

Follow-up of the patients

Follow-up was performed at 1, 3 months after the treatment section. In the first month post-ablation, US evaluation, thyroid function tests (TSH, FT4), symptom score, and cosmetic score were evaluated. In other follow-ups, only US examination was used. Volume reduction rate (VRR) of the treated nodule was calculated based on the formula:

A > 50% volume reduction of the initial nodule volume measured at each follow-up US examination was considered as a therapeutic success [16]. Also, we recorded any specific complaints or concerns in the follow-up period.

Efficacy outcome

The primary endpoints were efficacy after 1 month and 3 months post-ablation through VRR. Therapeutic success was defined as a VRR > 50% of the initial nodule volume measured at each follow-up US examination [16]. Secondary endpoints were improvements in symptoms and cosmetic scores, no change of thyroid function tests.

Safety outcome

Safety outcome (complications and side effects) followed as reported by the international working group on image-guided tumor ablation [21]. Major complications include substantial morbidity and disability which increases the level of care, hospital admission, hemorrhage need a blood transfusion, and permanent voice change. Other complications were identified as minor complications (pain, transient voice change, vomiting, and skin burns) .

Demographic characteristics and other factors

In this study, demographic information included age (continuous variable), sex (categorical variable: male and female). Treatment characteristics included ablation time (continuous variable: minute), max RF power (continuous variable: Walt), min RF power (continuous variable: Walt), and volume of lidocaine used (continuous variable: ml).

Statistical analysis

SPSS version 20.0 for Windows was used for all statistical analyses. The number of events and their percentage were calculated as the safety outcome. To evaluating the RFA efficacy, which is a numeric outcome variable, our purpose is to calculate the mean and standard deviation (SD) of the VRR during the follow-up period (1 month and 3 months post-ablation). Although the scheduled examinations (1 month and 3 months after section treatment) were informed to patients, the included patients did not exactly follow this schedule due to individual reasons and COVID19, as a limitation of this study. A general linear model with 3 times repeated measurement was used to compare changes in nodule volume, largest diameter, symptom score, and cosmetic score from the initial time to 1 month, 3 months after the procedure. The Friedman test or the Wilcoxon’s matched-pair signed-rank test was used to alternating Paired t-tests to compare changes in volume reduction rate and therapeutic success rate from 1 month to 3 months after RFA if data cannot be assumed to be normally distributed. To identify factors that were independently predictive of efficacy (the volume reduction ratio at 3 months), we used multiple linear regression analysis. Variables entered into the model included age (continuous variable), sex (categorical variable: male and female), symptom score (continuous variable: range from 1–10 score), cosmetic score (continuous variable: range from 1–4 score), initial volume (continuous variable), thyroid functions (TSH, FT4 - continuous variable), characteristic of nodules (categorical variable: solid nodules, predominantly solid nodules, cyst), ablation time (continuous variable), max RF power (continuous variable), min RF power (continuous variable ), largest diameter (continuous variable) and volume of lidocaine used (continuous variable). Statistical significance was defined when the p-value was less than 0.05.

From January 2019 to October 2020, 93 patients who had undergone treatment of thyroid nodules using the RFA were enrolled in this study. Following treatment, 15 patients were lost before the 3 months follow-up. A final sample of 78 patients with 78 nodules, given participant rate 83.8%, was followed for 1 month and 3 months.

Baseline characteristics of the patients and nodules

Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the patients and nodules. Most of the patients were female (89.3%). The mean age was 44.82 ± 14.72 years (range 20–76). The mean symptom score and cosmetic score are 7.33 and 3.10, respectively. Initial examination, the average largest diameter of the thyroid nodules was 27.20 ± 8.74 mm (range 12.2–49.2) with a mean volume of 6.11 ± 5.46 ml (range 0.68–27.30). Among the 78 treated thyroid nodules, there were 60 solid (76.9%), 16 predominantly solid nodules (20.5%), and 2 (2.6%) cystic nodules. Thyroid functions include mean concentrations of TSH and FT4 are 1.25 mUI/ml and 1.32ng/dL, respectively.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the patients and nodules
Characteristics	Summary statistics (N = 78)
Number of patients	78
Number of nodules	78
Age (years) [(mean ± SD) (range)]	44.82 ± 14.72 (20–76)
Female [n (%)]	70 (89.3)
Nodule position [n (%)]
Left	36 (46.2)
Isthmus	0 (0)
Right	42 (53.8)
Mean nodule volume (ml) [(mean ± SD) (range)]	6.11 ± 5.46 (0.68–27.30)
Mean largest nodule diameter (mm) [(mean ± SD) (range)]	27.20 ± 8.74 (12.2–49.2)
Internal nodule component [n (%)]
Solid	60 (76.9)
Mix solid	16 (20.5)
Cyst	2 (2.6)
FT4 (ng/dL) [(mean ± SD) (range)]	1.32 ± 0.29 (0.91–2.15)
TSH (mIU/ml) [(mean ± SD) (range)]	1.25 ± 0.79 (0.01–4.25)
Cosmetic score [(mean ± SD) (range)]	3.10 ± 1.02 (1–4)
Symptom score [(mean ± SD) (range)]	7.33 ± 2.66 (0–10)

Characteristics of nodule treatment and safety outcome

Our treatment characteristics and safety outcomes are summarized in Table 2. The mean volume of lidocaine 2% was 12.94 ml (range 4–27 ml). Min and max of RF power were 16.41 Walt and 31.02 Walt, respectively. The mean ablation time was 21.97 minutes (range 6.5–62 minutes). There were only two cases with minor complication (2.56%) which was transient voice change and completely recovered one hour after an injection of cold 5% Dextro (0°C to 4°C). There was no major complication.

Table 2

Characteristics of nodule treatment and safety outcome.
Characteristics	Summary statistics (N = 78)
Lidocaine 2% (ml) [(mean ± SD) (range)]	12.94 ± 4.57 (4–27)
Min RF power (Walt) [(mean ± SD) (range)]	16.41 ± 3.02 (10–25)
Max RF power (Walt) [(mean ± SD) (range)]	31.02 ± 8.28 (20–45)
Ablation time (minute) [(mean ± SD) (range)]	21.97 ± 13.45 (6.5–62)
Complication [n (%)]
Minor complication	2 (2.56)
Major complication	0 (0)

The treatment outcome and its related factors

The treatment outcomes are summarized in Table 3. The mean largest diameter of nodules decreased significantly from 27.20 ± 8.74 mm at an initial time to 22.17 ± 8.00 mm at 1-month post-ablation and 18.50 ± 6.86 mm at 3 months post-ablation with p < 0.0001. Mean nodules volume were 6.11 ± 5.46 ml, 3.55 ± 3.34 ml, and 2.07 ± 1.93 at the initial time, 1 month, and 3 months follow-ups, respectively (p < 0.0001). This represents approximately 41.47% and 64.72% of the volume reduction ratio after 1 month and 3 months follow-ups. The therapeutic success rate was 30.8% at 1 month and 84.6% at 3-month follow-ups. At the 3 months follow-ups, symptom score, and cosmetic score decreased significantly from 7.33 to 3.79 (symptom score) and from 3.10 to 1.56 (cosmetic score) with p < 0.0001. However, there was no change in thyroid function tests.

Table 3

Outcomes for 78 benign thyroid nodules after RF ablation
Variables	Before	1 Month	3 Months	p
Largest diameter (mm)	27.20 ± 8.74	22.17 ± 8.00	18.50 ± 6.86	0.0001
Volume (ml) (mean ± SD)	6.11 ± 5.46	3.55 ± 3.34	2.07 ± 1.93	0.0001
Volume reduction rate (%)		41.47 ± 19.92	64.72 ± 17.71	0.0001
Symptom score	7.33 ± 2.65	4.74 ± 2.31	3.79 ± 1.64	0.0001
Cosmetic score	3.10 ± 1.02	1.64 ± 0.93	1.56 ± 0.82	0.0001
Therapeutic success [n(%)]		24 (30.8)	66 (84.6)	0.0001
TSH (mIU/ml) (mean ± SD)	1.25 ± 0.79	1.32 ± 1.07		0.711
FT4 (ng/dL) (mean ± SD)	1.31 ± 0.29	1.28 ± 0.27		0.505

Table 4 summarized the results of the multiple linear regression analysis, which revealed that the only characteristic of nodules (p < 0.05) was independent factors that predicted the volume reduction rate at 3 months post-ablation. All other clinical and US characteristics including age, sex, initial volume, TSH, FT4, cosmetic score, symptom score, ablation time, volume lidocaine 2%, RF powers, and largest diameter did not show significant relations to the VRR at 3 months post-ablation.

Table 4

Factors independently predictive of volume reduction via multiple linear regression analysis
Variable	B	95% CI of B		p
Variable	B	Lower	Upper	p
(Constant)	9.03	-52.41	70.47	0.76
Age	0.29	-0.1	0.69	0.135
Sex	-16.09	-39.59	7.41	0.17
Internal nodule component	23.00	7.59	38.45	0.005
TSH	-7.76	-16.25	0.71	0.07
FT4	14.28	-12.66	41.27	0.28
Cosmetic	-2.12	-11.75	7.5	0.65
Symptom	-0.117	-3.39	0.16	0.94
Ablation time	0.819	-0.701	2.33	0.278
Volume lidocain 2%	0.823	-1.108	2.75	0.38
min RF power	0.506	-2.38	3.39	0.72
max RF power	-0.385	-1.57	0.806	0.511
largest diameter	0.016	-1.57	1.61	0.98
Initial volume	-1.96	-5.659	1.729	0.284

Representative typical cases

A 27-year-old woman visited our center in 2019 for a left neck bulging and pain, feeling neck discomfort during swallowing. The physical examination revealed a Grade III goiter on the left lobe of the thyroid. The nodule was approximately 4 cm in diameter by palpation, relatively soft inconsistency, and was not attached to the adjacent tissue. Cosmetic score and symptom score were 4 and 10, respectively. Thyroid ultrasonography showed a solid nodule in the left lobe. The volume of the nodule was approximately 13.4 ml (Fig. 2A). The pre-ablation sonographic images and two separate US-guided fine-needle aspirations (US-FNAs) cytology show benign left thyroid nodule. Laboratory examination results including blood test counts, thyroid functions and bleeding time were all normal.

We adopted RFA therapy by using 18 gauge internally cooled monopolar electrodes (7mm in active tips) which were connected to a radiofrequency generator (CoATherm AK- F200, APRO KOREA Inc.). The nodules were ablated by using the trans-isthmic approach technique, the moving-shot technique, and the hydro-dissection technique. The patient was asked to stay in the hospital for 60 minutes after the procedure and have no complications.

In the first-month post-ablation follow-up, the volume is 8.4 ml, representing 37.3% of the VRR (Fig. 2B) and there was no change in thyroid function tests. Cosmetic score and symptom score were 3 and 8, respectively. After 3 month follow-up, the volume is 5.7 ml, representing 57.4% of the VRR (Fig. 2C). Cosmetic score and symptom score were 3 and 5, respectively.

The efficacy and safety of RF ablation were demonstrated from our prospective cohort single-center study which was performed by only one endocrinologist with 3 years of experience. Only two cases (2.56%) with transient voice change occurred on 78 patients in 2 years of study and no major complication was found. Thyroid functions were constant after 1- month post-ablation. Regarding efficacy, RFA reduced nodule volume by 41.47%, 64.72% after 1 and 3 months post-ablation, respectively. This represents approximately 30.8% and 84.6% therapeutic success rates in this follow-up period. In addition, patients who were treated by RFA improved their symptom score and cosmetic score significantly. We found that only characteristics of nodules significantly related to the VRR during the 3 months follow-up.

Benign thyroid nodule(s) is a relatively common disease. Its traditional treatment options include surgery, T4 suppressive therapy. However, both of them had some limitations. Radiofrequency ablation has been adopted worldwide as a minimally invasive treatment of benign thyroid nodules. It has proven to be a safe and effective option but the results have been heterogeneous in many studies. The VRR ranged from 32.7–58.2% at 1 month [22–24]; 50–85.5% after 3 months depending on different ablation machine systems, basic techniques, and thyroid nodule’s characteristics in the studies [25–27]. Our study showed suitability in VRR results during the 1 month and 3 months follow-up, matched with the literature. A gradual progression of VRR, which was approximately 44.6–84.1% at 6 months; 58–89.6% at 12 months; 84–88% at 2 years was showed in many longer follow-up studies [25, 28–33]. The quick decrease of nodule volume within 3 months post-ablation helps to improve the symptomatic and cosmetic problems.

The safety profile of thyroid RFA was demonstrated in the literature. In treating benign thyroid nodules, the prevalence of RFA complications was 2.11% for overall complications, and 1.27% for major complications [34–36]. No major complications were found in our study and 2.56% of minor complication (transient voice change) occurred. It’s all because of strictly applying two fundamental techniques (the moving-shot technique and the trans-isthmic approach) during the RFA procedure. These techniques help to not only prevent hot fluid escape and the electrode tip changing in the position when patients talk, swallow, or cough but also limiting damage to surrounding tissue [12, 19]. Moreover, in a few cases to preventing important structures such as nerves and arteries when complete ablation of the nodule with unfavorable anatomy was desired, the hydro-dissection technique was used by injecting slowly 5% dextrose. For management of voice change after RFA, we injected cold 5% dextrose (0°C to 4°C) as the same hydro-dissection technique [37]. In addition, our study showed thyroid function test was no change. These results agree with some study conclusions that the rate of hypothyroidism and hypoparathyroidism were reduced as compared to surgery.

In many previous studies, factors such as initial volume, the solidity of the nodule, vascularity, applied energy, and initial ablation ratio was related to the efficacy of RFA for thyroid nodules (VRR) [13–18]. In agreement with previous findings, our study confirmed only internal component of nodules as an independent factor affecting the VRR. Higher VRR occurred in cystic or predominantly cystic nodules. The cystic fluid of the nodule was aspirated before the RFA procedure followed by a quick reduction in the volume of the ablated nodule. Also, due to solid components and their vascularity which secrete the fluid were ablated, the recurrence of a cystic nodule was effectively prevented. However, our results showed no association between other factors (baseline characteristics of the patients and nodules, treatment characteristics) and the VRR. Sim and et al show that the IAR is a factor highly correlated with the VRR. If the IAR is greater than 70% and the VRR greater than 50%, therapeutic success may be expected after RFA [18].

Our study has several limitations. Firstly, the follow-up in this prospective study was largely affected by irregular patient’s follow-up intervals during the COVID19 pandemic. A single-center study with relatively small sample size and short time follow-up of 1 month, 3 months is another limitation. Some variables include vascularity of nodule and IAR were not collected. These limitations inspire our group to do larger and longer prospective multicenter cohort studies to prove these results.

In conclusion, RFA was demonstrated as a safe and effective option for benign thyroid nodules treatment. The VRR reached 41.47%, 64.72% after 1 and 3 months post-ablation. Minor complication (transient voice change) occurred in two cases after the RFA procedure and thyroid functions were constant. We found only the internal component of nodules as an independent factor affecting the VRR during the 3 months follow-up. Thus, RFA can be used as an alternative treatment with encouraging results, fewer complications.

ACR-TIRADS: American College Of Radiology - Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems

CI: Confidence interval

CNB: Core needle biopsy

FNA: Fine Needle Aspiration

FT4: Free Thyroxin

IAR: Initial ablation ratio

RFA: Radiofrequency ablation

SD: Standard deviation

TSH: Thyrotropin

VRR: Volume Reduction Rate

US: ultrasound

Ethics approval and consent to participate: Written informed consent form was given to patients

Consent for publication: Not applicable

Availability of data and materials: Availability of data and materials supporting our findings will be shared upon request.

Competing interests: Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.

Funding: Not applicable

Authors' contributions: All authors contributed to data analysis, drafting or revising the article, have agreed on the journal to which the article will be submitted, gave final approval of the version to be published, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the patients who agreed to participate in this cohort study.

Ezzat, S., et al., Thyroid incidentalomas. Prevalence by palpation and ultrasonography. Arch Intern Med, 1994. 154(16): p. 1838-40.
Brander, A., et al., Thyroid gland: US screening in a random adult population. Radiology, 1991. 181(3): p. 683-7.
Miccoli, P., et al., Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for benign thyroid disease: an evidence-based review. World J Surg, 2008. 32(7): p. 1333-40.
Kim, J.-H., J.H. Baek, and e. al, 2017 Thyroid Radiofrequency Ablation Guideline: Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology. Korean journal of radiology, 2018. 19(4): p. 632-655.
Yue, W.W., et al., Quality of Life and Cost-Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation versus Open Surgery for Benign Thyroid Nodules: a retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep, 2016. 6: p. 37838.
Bandeira-Echtler, E., K. Bergerhoff, and B. Richter, Levothyroxine or minimally invasive therapies for benign thyroid nodules. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014(6): p. Cd004098.
Haugen, B.R., et al., 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association, 2016. 26(1): p. 1-133.
Ha, E.J., J.H. Baek, and J.H. Lee, The efficacy and complications of radiofrequency ablation of thyroid nodules. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes, 2011. 18(5): p. 310-4.
Cesareo, R., et al., Efficacy and safety of a single radiofrequency ablation of solid benign non-functioning thyroid nodules. Arch Endocrinol Metab, 2017. 61(2): p. 173-179.
Che, Y., et al., Treatment of Benign Thyroid Nodules: Comparison of Surgery with Radiofrequency Ablation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2015. 36(7): p. 1321-5.
Baek, J.H., et al., Thermal ablation for benign thyroid nodules: radiofrequency and laser. Korean J Radiol, 2011. 12(5): p. 525-40.
Park, H.S., J.H. Baek, and e. al, Innovative Techniques for Image-Guided Ablation of Benign Thyroid Nodules: Combined Ethanol and Radiofrequency Ablation. Korean J Radiol, 2017. 18(3): p. pp. 461-469.
Cesareo, R., et al., Nodule size as predictive factor of efficacy of radiofrequency ablation in treating autonomously functioning thyroid nodules. Int J Hyperthermia, 2018. 34(5): p. 617-623.
Deandrea, M., et al., Radiofrequency ablation for benign thyroid nodules according to different US features: an Italian multicentre prospective study. Eur J Endocrinol, 2018.
Dobnig, H. and K. Amrein, Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation of Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Austrian Single-Center Study. Thyroid, 2018. 28(4): p. 472-480.
Jung, S.L., et al., Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation for Benign Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Multicenter Study. Korean J Radiol, 2018. 19(1): p. 167-174.
Lee, G.M., et al., Successful radiofrequency ablation strategies for benign thyroid nodules. Endocrine, 2018.
Sim, J.S., J.H. Baek, and W. Cho, Initial Ablation Ratio: Quantitative Value Predicting the Therapeutic Success of Thyroid Radiofrequency Ablation. Thyroid, 2018. 28(11): p. 1443-1449.
Ha, E.J., et al., Radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules: recommendations from the Asian Conference on Tumor Ablation Task Force. Ultrasonography, 2020.
Baek, J.H., et al., Benign predominantly solid thyroid nodules: prospective study of efficacy of sonographically guided radiofrequency ablation versus control condition. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010. 194(4): p. 1137-42.
Ahmed, M., et al., Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update. Radiology, 2014. 273(1): p. 241-60.
Jeong, W.K., et al., Radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules: safety and imaging follow-up in 236 patients. Eur Radiol, 2008. 18(6): p. 1244-50.
Sung, J.Y., et al., Radiofrequency ablation for autonomously functioning thyroid nodules: a multicenter study. Thyroid, 2015. 25(1): p. 112-7.
Deandrea, M., et al., US-guided percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation for the treatment of solid benign hyperfunctioning or compressive thyroid nodules. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2008. 34(5): p. 784-91.
Bernardi, S., et al., 12-month efficacy of a single radiofrequency ablation on autonomously functioning thyroid nodules. Endocrine, 2017. 57(3): p. 402-408.
Kohlhase, K.D., et al., Bipolar radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules using a multiple overlapping shot technique in a 3-month follow-up. Int J Hyperthermia, 2016. 32(5): p. 511-6.
Abd El-Galil, M.S., A.H. Ali, and e. al, Efficacy and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 2021. 52(1): p. 57.
Aysan, E., et al., Single-session radiofrequency ablation on benign thyroid nodules: a prospective single center study : Radiofrequency ablation on thyroid. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2016. 401(3): p. 357-63.
Doros, A., et al., Treatment of benign thyroid nodules by radiofrequency thermal ablation. Orv Hetil, 2020. 161(27): p. 1131-1136.
Hamidi, O., et al., Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy for Large Benign Thyroid Nodules: A Mayo Clinic Case Series. Mayo Clin Proc, 2018. 93(8): p. 1018-1025.
Feroci, F., et al., Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation of Benign Thyroid Nodules: The Correlation Between Ultrasound Nodule Characteristics and Results. Surg Innov, 2020: p. 1553350620913134.
Aldea Martinez, J., L. Aldea Viana, and e. al, Radiofrequency Ablation of Thyroid Nodules: A Long-Term Prospective Study of 24 Patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2019. 30(10): p. 1567-1573.
Guang, Y., et al., Patient satisfaction of radiofrequency ablation for symptomatic benign solid thyroid nodules: our experience for 2-year follow up. BMC Cancer, 2019. 19(1): p. 147.
Wang, J.F., et al., Complications Following Radiofrequency Ablation of Benign Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review. Chin Med J (Engl), 2017. 130(11): p. 1361-1370.
Baek, J.H., et al., Complications encountered in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules with US-guided radiofrequency ablation: a multicenter study. Radiology, 2012. 262(1): p. 335-42.
Chung, S.R., et al., Safety of radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules and recurrent thyroid cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Hyperthermia, 2017. 33(8): p. 920-930.
Chung, S.R., et al., Management strategy for nerve damage during radiofrequency ablation of thyroid nodules. Int J Hyperthermia, 2019: p. 1-7.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Efficacy and Safety of Single-Session Radiofrequency Ablation in Treating Benign Thyroid Nodules: A Short-Term Prospective Cohort Study

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Methods

Study design and patients’ selection

Measurement and assessment

Pre-treatment assessment and radiofrequency ablation procedure

Follow-up of the patients

Efficacy outcome

Safety outcome

Demographic characteristics and other factors

Statistical analysis

Results

Baseline characteristics of the patients and nodules

Characteristics of nodule treatment and safety outcome

The treatment outcome and its related factors

Representative typical cases

Discussion

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1