Characteristics of carcass traits of emu
The mean body weight and lean body weight were 38.824 ± 5.870 kg and 30.333 ± 3.545 kg, respectively (Table 1). Meat production and cut meat production were 6.328 ± 1.192 kg and 2.743 ± 0.363 kg, respectively. Meat production per 1 kg body weight (meat rate) was 0.164 ± 0.022 kg. In 2-year-old birds, approximately 16 % of the total body weight could be utilised as meat in the OEF. Fat weight and fat weight per 1 kg of body weight (fat rate) were 8.659 ± 3.049 kg and 0.216 ± 0.055 kg, respectively, indicating that emus accumulated more fat than 20 % of body weight at 2 years of age.
The mean body weight (lean body weight) in females and males was 39.500 ± 6.053 kg (32.080 ± 3.505 kg) and 38.088 ± 5.780 kg (29.013 ± 2.975 kg), respectively (Table 2). Female emus showed significantly higher body weight (P < 0.05) and lean body weight (P < 0.001) values than males did, consistent with a previous report[8]. Meat production (meat rate) was 6.411 ± 0.843 kg (0.164 ± 0.016 kg) and 6.130 ± 1.349 kg (0.162 ± 0.025 kg) in females and males, respectively, and there was a significant difference between them (P < 0.001). Therefore, we confirmed that 2-year-old female emus have higher meat productivity than males of the same age in the OEF. The fat weights of males and females were 9.232 ± 3.156 kg (0.235 ± 0.055 kg) and 7.772 ± 2.697 kg (0.190 ± 0.045 kg), respectively. Thus, the fat weight and fat rate of males were significantly higher than those of females (P < 0.01) in the 2-year-old emus, consistent with data obtained from other ages[8, 16]. The dispersion of fat weight was larger than the other traits in both sexes, which is consistent with a previous report[8]. The fat melting point is known to be a factor in estimating the oil quality. The average fat melting points in females and males were 19.187 ± 3.391°C and 19.390 ± 3.387°C, respectively, with no significant differences between them, indicating that oils produced from 2-year-old male and female birds might be of similar quality.
Seasonal changes in carcass traits
We divided the data of each trait into six conditions: male, female, and slaughtered periods: July to August (summer, no egg-laying), September to October (autumn, pre-egg-laying), and November to December (winter, initial egg-laying). None of the measured traits showed significant seasonal changes in males and females (Fig. 1A–C, Table S1). Although the mean body weight with total periods of females indicated higher values than males, a significant difference was observed between them only in autumn (Fig. 1A). Meanwhile, lean body weight indicated significant differences between genders in all investigated seasons. Meat production in summer and autumn was significantly higher in females than in males (P < 0.05), but gender differences in meat rate were not observed in any season (Fig. 1B). Although there were no significant differences in fat weight between sexes in summer and autumn, those of males showed substantially higher values than females in the winter season (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1C). Similar to fat weight, the fat rate also showed larger values in males than females in autumn and winter (P < 0.05). Since the productivity of these traits during summer to winter did not change in either sex, we propose that emus should be slaughtered in the summer season for cost-effective production. In addition, a large dispersion of fat weight compared to body weight, lean body weight, and meat production were found in males and females, suggesting that the fat productivity of the emu has the potential to be raised by further environmental and genetic improvement.
The emu begins laying eggs in November in northern Japan[8], and weight loss through the reduction of feed intake is recognised during the breeding season[17–19]. However, our results showed no significant seasonal changes in carcass traits in either sex (Fig. 1). In 2-year-old birds, the body and fat weights of females tended to decrease from autumn to winter, while those of males tended to increase. Consequently, a large difference in fat productivity in winter was exhibited between the sexes. Extra-pair copulations were frequently observed, demonstrated in a previous study using microsatellite markers, indicating that pairs of the emu are formed by fluxional behaviour during the same breeding season[8, 24]. In the feral population, males incubate the eggs for approximately 50 days without feed intake; therefore, the accumulated fat is used as the energy source during brooding. Maintenance of body and fat weights during summer to winter observed in males might be a fixed genetic character for brooding after egg-laying and predicted that such habits were also retained even in captive breeding. Meanwhile, the reduction tendency of female fat observed in this study might be caused by wasting at the start of the egg-laying season. Although this study did not collect data from January to June, we predicted that the remarkable weight loss might be observed from January onward since the peak of egg-laying was February and March in northern Japan[14].
Relationship between productivity and body weight
Body weight is a simple marker for the prediction of certain productive traits. We analysed the relationships between body weight and carcass traits, and the results are shown in Fig. 2. Meat production was positively correlated with body weight (r= · 0.75 and 0.76 · in males and females, respectively; P < 0.01), indicating that large amounts of meat could be obtained from individuals with higher body weight (Fig. 2A). In contrast, the meat rate was significantly negatively correlated with body weight (r=-0.52 and − 0.49 in males and females, respectively; P < 0.01). Therefore, we revealed that a large bodied individual has a low yield rate at 2 years of age in meat production (Fig. 2B). The fat weight showed a highly significant positive correlation with body weight in both males and females (r = 0.92, and 0.86 in males and females, respectively; P < 0.01), similar to meat production (Fig. 2C). Moreover, a high correlation was also observed in the fat rate, which was different from the meat rate (Fig. 2D). Such results are similar to a previous study in 4–5 year old emus[8]. These results suggested that the increase in body weight in 2-year-olds was caused by the accumulation of adipose tissue rather than muscle and bone. Thus, we suggest that fat could be effectively obtained from individuals with high body weight in 2-year-old birds, consistent with 4-year-old birds[8]. Yokohama[8] reported that meat production and fat weight of 3- and 4-year-old emus were 8.41 kg and 8.83 kg, respectively. Therefore, we revealed that the fat productivity of 2-year-old emu is similar to that of a 3- or 4-year-old emu. Since Yokohama[8] analysed an identical population to our study, it was suggested that slaughter of 2-year-olds was appropriate to effectively harvest fat rather than 3- or 4-year-old birds.
We next investigated the relationships between the fat melting point and other traits to identify a marker to estimate oil quality. The fat melting point did not correlate with body and fat weights, indicating no relationship with growth and fat accumulation (Fig. 3). These results suggest that the known environmental factors, such as nutrition, did not affect the fat melting point. Previous studies reported that the fat melting point did not correlate with fat weight in other livestock such as cattle, and some genetic polymorphisms (e.g. stearoyl-CoA desaturase; SCD) were associated with the fat melting point[25, 26]. Thus, we speculated that the fat melting point with large dispersion is strongly affected by genetic factors harboured in emu individuals. In fact, we detected a non-synonymous substitution of the SCD gene in the emu (unpublished data).
Fatty acid composition of fat tissue
The fatty acid component plays an important role in the function of skincare in emu oil[5, 6]. Although the fatty acid composition of emu oil has been reported in previous studies, individual differences have not been investigated. In this study, we measured the concentrations of palmitic acid (C16:0), stearic acid (C18:0), oleic acid (C18:1), linoleic acid (C18:2), and α-linolenic acid (C18:3) in fat tissues derived from 12 individuals. A primary fatty acid of emu fat was C18:1 (54.11 ± 5.17 %), followed by C16:0 (22.27 ± 3.50 %), C18:2 (13.54 ± 7.80 %), and C18:0 (9.37 ± 1.90 %). Few C18:3 was detected in all of the examined samples (Table 3). Therefore, the fat tissue of the emu contained abundant C18:1n9, consistent with previous reports[20, 23, 27]. Meanwhile, Bucław et al. (2020) reported that the most abundant fatty acid component was C16:0 (41 %) in 1- and 3-year-old emus[21]. Bucław et al.[21] attributed that the difference in fatty acid composition among reports might be caused by the age, sex, or nutritional condition of the tested emus, although forage contents were not disclosed in previous studies[20, 23, 27]. Our results obtained from 2-year-old emus indicated no gender differences in fatty acid components, similar to the data reported in previous studies[20, 27]. The coefficient of variation (CV) values ranged from 0.1 to 0.2 in C16:0, C18:0 and C18:1, indicating that the large individual differences were not shown in these fatty acids. Meanwhile, the proportion of C18:2 indicated a large deflection, ranging from 0.3–19.9 (Supplementary Table 2). According to previous reports, the C18:2 content of emu fat is approximately 20 %[20, 23] and 10 %[21, 27]. C18:2 is one of the essential fatty acids for animals, including avian and mammalian species; thus, it has to take up and accumulate from food. Since we analysed populations under the same feeding conditions (Supplementary Table 3), individual differences in C18:2 content might be caused by unknown factors regarding its absorption or accumulation. Although the reasons for the scarcely detected C18:2n6 in some individuals were unclear, polyunsaturated fatty acids have an anti-inflammatory effect[28]; thus, their content might be an important factor for determining oil quality. We propose that individuals with low C18:2 content should be removed from the breeding population to produce good-quality oils. Since our study analysed small sample sizes, the C18:2 content should be verified across seasons with many individuals.
We next investigated the relationship between the fat melting point and fatty acid composition. Among the three divided groups based on the fat melting point, no significant differences were observed in fatty acid composition among the three groups (Table 3). However, saturated fatty acids (SFA) in the high, medium and low melting point groups were 33.91 ± 5.1, 31.49 ± 5.36 and 29.53 ± 4.44, respectively, indicating that SFA components tend to be reduced in association with a low melting point. In USFA and the C18:1/C18:0 ratio, tendencies to increase with a decreasing melting point were found, and the ranges in high to low were 66.09 ± 5.10 to 70.47 ± 4.44 and 5.27 ± 1.50 to 6.94 ± 0.98, respectively. Especially, C18:1 content indicated the large differences between the high (51.78 ± 3.65) and low group (57.02 ± 6.46), and it may be associated with USFA contents and the C18:1/C18:0 ratio. Although there were no significant differences and a small sample size, we speculated that a large dispersion observed in the melting point influenced the fatty acid composition of emu fat regarding its quality. Next, we focused on the ratios of C18:1 and C18:0. C18:1/C18:0 is an indirect indicator of SCD activity[29]. In this study, a negative correlation between the fat melting point and C18:1/C18:0 was observed (r=-0.62, P < 0.05) (Fig. 4). C18:1 melts at a lower temperature than SFAs such as C18:0, suggesting that fat with a low melting temperature contains relatively rich USFA. Although the fatty acid composition was reported in previous studies[20–22, 27], our preliminary data revealed a relationship between the melting point and fatty acid composition in the emu fat tissues. Accordingly, we suggest that the fat melting point may be a useful marker for cost-effective and simple estimation of the emu oil quality, providing an efficient selection system for its genetic improvement.