SNHG6/mir-26a-5p/PIM1 Axis Could Regulate Tumorigenic Glioma Cells Behaviors

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-786648/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

SNHG6/mir-26a-5p/PIM1 Axis Could Regulate Tumorigenic Glioma Cells Behaviors

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-786648/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Purpose Today, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are considered more than before. SNHG6 like many lncRNAs is proved to have different roles in human malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma, brain cancers and … . Glioma with a poor prognosis needs a faster way to prognosticate. Finding key molecular mechanisms of gliomagenesis is essential for producing effective drugs. We indicated a new possible molecular gliomagenesis pathway involving of PIM1 and mir-26a-5p.

Methods SNHG6 expression level was assessed in 29 brain tumor samples. Two specific siRNAs were designed and SNHG6 was silenced in A172 & U87-MG cells. Cell cycle progression, apoptosis, EMT, migration ability and survival of target cells were assessed following of SNHG6 knock-down.

Results Expression of SNHG6 in glioma tissues and target cell lines was satisfied. Following of using siRNAs, G1 arrest, mesenchymal characteristics reduction and much apoptosis of U87-MG tumorigenic cells was proved. Target cells demonstrated less proliferation and survival ability when SNHG6 was silenced. Following of SNHG6 knockdown, mir-26a-5p and PIM1 mRNA were fluctuated and U87-MG cells showed this phenomenon more prominent.

Conclusion In this research we indicated a new possible molecular pathway that could affect gliomagenesis. SNHG6/mir-26a-5p/PIM1 might be an unknown gliomagenesis molecular pathway for new treatments.

Molecular Biology

Long non-coding RNAs

SNHG6

Glioma

Brain cancer

Today, long non-coding RNAs are well known as important players of cell behavior regulators. As a big part of un-translated transcriptome of the cell, long non coding RNAs have more than 200 nucleotides in length. These long RNAs play different roles in gene regulation, apoptosis, cell cycle progression, cell senescence, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and … [1–5]. The role of lncRNA SNHG6 in cancer cells cycle progression and inhibition of apoptosis was proved in many cancers such as hepatocellular carcinoma and gastric cancer [6, 7]. Glioma with characteristics such as early metastasis, high malignancy and rapid progression needs effective drug(s) for treatment [8, 9].

PIM1 as an important proto-oncogene[10] could be involved in induction of malignancies in glial tissue [11, 12]. PIM1 protein as a regulator, phosphorylates its down-stream targets consecutively after activation[13].

PIM1 mRNA was considered as a target of miRNA 26a-5p in several bioinformatics prediction sites. Also, lncRNA SNHG6 was introduced as a molecular sponge of mir-26a-5p [14–16]. Sponging of miRNA 26a-5p could lead to increase of PIM1 mRNA. Therefore, lncRNA SNHG6 could act as a protective factor for PIM1 mRNA.

PIM1 mRNA stability increase is an important factor for production of more PIM1 protein in the cell. PIM1 causes apoptosis decrease [12], cell cycle progression [17], cell survival increase [18], epithelial to mesenchymal transition and cell migration increase[19].

In this study we assessed the expression of lncRNA SNHG6 in different brain cancer tissues. In the next step, possible connection of SNHG6 RNA, mir26a-5p and PIM1 mRNA was studied bioinformatically. Then, we assessed the possible role of SNHG6 in cell behaviors alteration via PIM1 by RNAi strategy.

Patients and samples

Tumor samples tissues were collected from 29 patients with brain malignancies from National Tumor Bank of Iran, which founded by Cancer Institute of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The tissues were stored at -185ºC until RNA extraction.

Cell lines

The glioma cell lines including, U87-MG and A172, were received from Pasteur institute of Iran. The cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 and DMEM media (Gibco, CA, USA) which contained 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum) in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C.

RNA extraction, synthesis of cDNA and qPCR performing

The total RNA was extracted from samples and cell lines by means of RNX plus solution (cinnaGen, Iran). The quality and quantity of the RNAs were estimated by sample visual observation on agarose gel and UV spectrophotometry. Treatment of extracted RNA with RNase free DNAse was performed. First strand of cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of extracted RNA based on protocol of manufacturer (Fermentas, Lithuania). QPCR was done using SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM II (Takara, Japan) on ABI Step One Plus real-time PCR system (Life Technologies, USA). Results of qPCR were normalized by the β-actin reference gene. The 2^-ΔΔCt method was applied for calculating of relative expressions.

Cell culture and siRNA transfection

Each cell line was cultured in appropriate medium. A172 cells were cultured in DMEM and U87-MG cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 media in humid memert incubator with 37ºC and 5% Co2 conditions.

Two specific SNHG6 siRNAs and a scramble siRNA were synthesized (Microsynth, Swiss). The transfection of siRNA was performed according to manufacturer’s protocol as explained previously [20]. The efficiency of SNHG6 suppression was determined through gene expression analysis.

Cell cycle and apoptosis assays

Cell cycle and apoptosis test were performed as Alipoor , Keshavarz and their colleagues studies [21, 22].

Scratch wound Assay

SNHG6 suppression effect on migration ability of target cancer cells was investigated using scratch wound assay. The 50-60% confluent cells seeded on 12-well plate for siRNA transfection. We try to generate the same size wounds by a sterile yellow pipette tip on the monolayer cells and the wound healing speed was measured at 24 and 48 hours after creating the scratch by IMAGEJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Colony forming cell assay

Colony forming assay was done for investigating the SNHG6 result on survival and proliferation ability of the target cells. To do this, the transfected cells were cultured for about 14 days and they were allowed to form visible colonies. After staining the colonies with 0.1% crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich), they were counted and images were taken.

Immunofluorescence assay

The epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) of cancer cells was studied in presence and absence of lncRNA SNHG6 by immuno-staining of E-Cadherin, Snail and Vimentin proteins. Mentioned EMT markers were investigated using Human EMT 3-Color Immunocytochemistry Kit (R&D Systems, USA) in agreement with the manufacturer’s instructions as described previously [23]. The fluorescence intensity of the EMT markers was measured and analyzed by Matlab software (The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA).

MiRNA expression assessment

Mir-26a-5p expression was quantified after SNHG6 silencing. To do this, total RNA was extracted and cDNA synthesized by the polyadenylation reaction. Then, RT- qPCR was performed using the BonYakhte kit (BON209002, Tehran, Iran) on a Rotor-Gene corbet 6000 instrument according to the previous protocol [20]. Target miRNA expression level was normalized against Snord48 as the control.

Statistical analyses

All investigations were performed three times. The relative genes expression level was calculated using the 2^-ΔΔCt method. The statistical difference between groups was calculated through the independent t-test by Graphpad prism6 software. Statistical significance level was considered at P<0.05.

LncRNA SNHG6 is expressed in different kinds of brain cancers.

Expression assessment in different brain cancer tissues demonstrated that SNHG6 RNA is expressed widespread among brain cancer types such as glioma (Fig. 1A).

Mir-26a-5p measurement in knock-down cells exposed that connection of lncRNA SNHG6, mir-26a-5p and PIM1 mRNA could be possible.

Knock down of SNHG6 was done in target cell lines (Fig. 1B). Measurement of mir-26a-5p level was performed by qPCR after SNHG6 knockdown. This assessment demonstrated that reduction of SNHG6 expression level and mir-26a-5p increase were arisen concurrently in transcriptome of target cells. In U87-MG cells, the level of mir-26a-5p increased more than A172 cells following of SNHG6 knockdown. Reversely, PIM1 mRNA in U87-MG cells was reduced more than A172 cells when SNHG6 had been silenced (Fig. 1C).

Knock-down U87 MG cells demonstrated much apoptosis.

Following of SNHG6 silencing, more apoptotic U87-MG cells were being seen and the difference was significant. A172 cells did not significant apoptosis increase after lncRNA SNHG6 knockdown (Fig. 2).

SNHG6 knockdown and G1 arrest of U87 MG cells could be related.

To evaluate SNHG6 effect on cell cycle progression of target cells, the cells were transfected with SNHG6 siRNAs. Following of SNHG6 knockdown, U87-MG cells showed a significant G1 arrest (Fig. 3D-F). A172 cells demonstrated non-significant G1 arrest after SNHG6 knock down (Fig. 3A-C). After SNHG6 knock down, Cyclin D1 mRNA measurement demonstrated this mRNA was reduced in U87 MG cells (Fig. 3G) more than A172 cells (Fig. 3H).

Wound healing assay demonstrated that SNHG6 could affect the migration ability of non-tumorigenic glioma cells significantly.

Migratory ability of studied glioma cells was measured following of SNHG6 knockdown. Wound healing assay demonstrated SNHG6 knockdown affected migration ability of both U87-MG and A172 cells. After SNHG6 knockdown, U87-MG and A172 cells demonstrated less migratory ability than their respective controls and this difference was significant for A172 cells (Fig. 4A).

After SNHG6 RNA knockdown, reduced survival of target glioma cells was observed.

Following of SNHG6 knockdown, the survival of transfected cells was evaluated by colony formation method. A few number of transfected cells were cultured and allowed to form colonies for 2 weeks. After staining, analyses with image.J declared SNHG6 knock-down cells had fewer colonies than their controls and the difference was more prominent for U87 MG cells (Fig. 4B).

Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) of tumorigenic glial cells could be affected by lncRNA SNHG6.

To determine the effect of SNHG6 knockdown on EMT of target cells, we measured three important proteins which are involved in EMT. E-Cadherin, Snail and vimentin proteins were assessed as known EMT markers. After siRNAs (SNHG6 and scramble) transfection, the fluorescence intensity of the immuno-stained cells was measured. Snail protein, as a known marker of mesenchymal state progression, was decreased significantly in SNHG6 silenced U87-MG cells. Subsequently, E-cadherin protein demonstrated an increased level following of SNHG6 silencing in U87-MG cells (Fig. 5A&C). Two above proteins exhibited non- significant alteration in A172 cells after SNHG6 siRNA transfection (Fig. 5B&D).

At the present time, long non-coding RNAs, as factors that are able to alter many functions of the cells, are studding more than past. Nowadays, apoptosis, cell cycle, cell senescence, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and … could be altered by long non-coding RNAs [22]. The role of SNHG6 RNA in progression of hepatocellular carcinoma [6] breast [23] and gastric cancer [7] was proved. Also, role of SNHG6 RNA in gliomagenesis was investigated [24].

MiRDB, Target Scan Human and starbase v2 database predict PIM1 mRNA as a target of mir-26a-5p and sponging of this micro-RNA by SNHG6 was demonstrated in several researches [6, 14, 15]. PIM1 protein was demonstrated as an important gliomagenesis factor [11, 12]. It has been reported that PIM1 protein is up-regulated in glioma tissues. In addition, normal neuronal tissues have low to medium PIM1 protein level [12]. Therefore, determination of SNHG6 role in gliomagenesis via mir-26a-5p/PIM1 mRNA axis as a new probable carcinogenesis molecular pathway of glial tissues seemed interesting.

Of this purpose, following of SNHG6 RNA knockdown, PIM1 mRNA and mir-26a-5p expression levels were measured and the measurement indicated fluctuation of these RNAs. According to our hypothesis, SNHG6 RNA knockdown could release mir-26a-5p potentially [14, 16]. In U87-MG cells, elevated level of mir-26a-5p was confirmed after SNHG6 knockdown. Also, PIM1 mRNA was decreased in these U87-MG cells and these fluctuations were reasonable based on our hypothesis. Also, A172 cells exposed similar behavior but in a more moderate manner (Fig. 1C).

In the next phase of our research, we assessed SNHG6 knockdown effect on apoptosis of target cells. The apoptosis rate in U87-MG cells was different from A172 cells when SNHG6 siRNAs were used. U87-MG but not A172 cells demonstrated a significant increased apoptosis rate after SNHG6 knockdown (Fig. 2). PIM1 mRNA level was reduced significantly in U87-MG cells but not in A172 ones following of SNHG6 silencing. PIM1 as a proto-oncogene could prevent the cells from apoptosis and much apoptosis in U87-MG cells might relate to PIM1 level in these cells after SNHG6 knockdown [25].

Assessing cell cycle progression exposed that U87-MG cells tolerated an obvious and significant G1 arrest compared to their control ones following of SNHG6 knock down. In the same situation A172 cells demonstrated negligible and non-significant G1 arrest (Fig. 3A-F). The role of lncRNA SNHG6 was proved as a cell cycle progressive factor and also relation of cyclin D1 as a key regulator of cell cycle progression and PIM1 is satisfied [23, 26]. So this observation could indicate possible interconnection of lncRNA SNHG6 and PIM1 that conduce to tumorigenic glioma cells cycle progression.

Cell migration ability, as an important ability for malignant cells, affects many aspects of cancer. SNHG6 role in a cancer cell migration could be different based on cell type but in many cancer cells, knock down of SNHG6 has resulted in decreased migration ability of target cells [27–29]. Cell migration ability of A172 cells reduced significantly after SNHG6 silencing and this reduction was not significant for U87-MG cells (Fig. 4A). This observation could be as a result of special protein(s) content of A172 and U87-MG cells [30].

To determine SNHG6 RNA effect on proliferation and survival of glioma cells, colony formation assay was carried out. Results of colony formation assay demonstrated that U87-MG cells formed fewer colonies when SNHG6 was destroyed and a similar result was seen for A172 cells (Fig. 4B). PIM1 that is involved in cell survival and proliferation [12, 31, 32], demonstrated a decreased mRNA level in SNHG6 silenced U87-MG cells and this observation could be connected with lower survival ability of knock-down cells.

Measurement of important EMT markers after SNHG6 silencing demonstrated that SNHG6 silenced U87-MG cells tolerated a significant reduction of Snail protein and E-cadherin increase. Alteration of these proteins level was happened with PIM1 mRNA reduction, simultaneously. Such a protein level alteration demonstrated the tendency reduction of U87-MG cells to mesenchymal state (Fig. 5A&C). In the same situation, A172 cells demonstrated non-significant alteration of EMT markers (Fig. 5B&D). In fact, for U87-MG cells, reduction of PIM1 mRNA and mesenchymal characteristics were arisen concurrently. It could demonstrate a connection between SNHG6, PIM1 and mesenchymal state of tumorigenic glioma cells. In previous studies, involvement of PIM1 in EMT was proved [33].

Taken together lncRNA SNHG6 could develop glioma by progression of EMT and cell cycle of tumorigenic glial cells which were prohibited from programmed cell death and also could be related with proliferation ability of tumorigenic glial cells. All of these observations could be of mir26a-5p sponging by lncRNA SNHG6 and PIM1 mRNA level increase.

Funding

This research was supported by Iran National Science Foundation grant of number 93030186.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare have no conflict of interest about the article

Availability of data and material

The data underlying this article are available in the article.

Code availability

Not applicable

Authors' contributions

Conceptualization: Malek Hossein Asadi & Amin Jafari-Oliayi; Methodology: Amin Jafari-Oliayi; Formal analysis and investigation: Amin Jafari-Oliayi; Writing - original draft preparation: Amin Jafari-Oliayi; Writing - review and editing: Amin Jafari-Oliayi; Funding acquisition: Malek Hossein Asadi & Amin Jafari-Oliayi; Resources: Malek Hossein Asadi and Amin Jafari-Oliayi

Ethics approval

Not applicable

Consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

The authors declare their consent for publication of this research.

Mourtada-Maarabouni, M., et al., GAS5, a non-protein-coding RNA, controls apoptosis and is downregulated in breast cancer. Oncogene, 2009. 28(2): p. 195.
Long, Y., et al., How do lncRNAs regulate transcription? Science advances, 2017. 3(9): p. eaao2110-eaao2110.
Kitagawa, M., et al., Cell cycle regulation by long non-coding RNAs. Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2013. 70(24): p. 4785-4794.
Montes, M. and A.H. Lund, Emerging roles of lnc RNA s in senescence. The FEBS journal, 2016. 283(13): p. 2414-2426.
Dhamija, S. and S. Diederichs, From junk to master regulators of invasion: lncRNA functions in migration, EMT and metastasis. International journal of cancer, 2016. 139(2): p. 269-280.
Cao, C., et al., The long non-coding RNA, SNHG6-003, functions as a competing endogenous RNA to promote the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene, 2017. 36(8): p. 1112-1122.
Yan, K., et al., LncRNA SNHG6 is associated with poor prognosis of gastric cancer and promotes cell proliferation and EMT through epigenetically silencing p27 and sponging miR-101-3p. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, 2017. 42(3): p. 999-1012.
Lamborn, K.R., S.M. Chang, and M.D. Prados, Prognostic factors for survival of patients with glioblastoma: recursive partitioning analysis. Neuro-oncology, 2004. 6(3): p. 227-235.
Wilson, C. and G. Critchley, Factors predicting poor survival in glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology, 2018. 20(suppl_1): p. i23-i23.
Tursynbay, Y., et al., Pim-1 kinase as cancer drug target: an update. Biomedical reports, 2016. 4(2): p. 140-146.
Iqbal, A., et al., Targeting of glioblastoma cell lines and glioma stem cells by combined PIM kinase and PI3K-p110α inhibition. Oncotarget, 2016. 7(22): p. 33192.
Herzog, S., et al., Pim1 kinase is upregulated in glioblastoma multiforme and mediates tumor cell survival. Neuro-oncology, 2014. 17(2): p. 223-242.
Zhukova, Y.N., et al., Pim family of protein kinases: Structure, functions, and roles in hematopoietic malignancies. Molecular Biology, 2011. 45(5): p. 695.
Zhu, X., et al., Silencing of SNHG6 induced cell autophagy by targeting miR-26a-5p/ULK1 signaling pathway in human osteosarcoma. Cancer cell international, 2019. 19(1): p. 82.
Lv, P., et al., Long non-coding RNA SNHG6 enhances cell proliferation, migration and invasion by regulating miR-26a-5p/MAPK6 in breast cancer. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2019. 110: p. 294-301.
Liang, R., et al., SNHG6 functions as a competing endogenous RNA to regulate E2F7 expression by sponging miR-26a-5p in lung adenocarcinoma. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2018. 107: p. 1434-1446.
Morishita, D., et al., Pim kinases promote cell cycle progression by phosphorylating and down-regulating p27Kip1 at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels. Cancer research, 2008. 68(13): p. 5076-5085.
Herzog, S., et al., Pim1 kinase is upregulated in glioblastoma multiforme and mediates tumor cell survival. Neuro-oncology, 2015. 17(2): p. 223-242.
Zhao, B., et al., PIM1 mediates epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting Smads and c-Myc in the nucleus and potentiates clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma oncogenesis. Cell death & disease, 2018. 9(3): p. 307.
Keshavarz, M. and M.H. Asadi, Long non‐coding RNA ES 1 controls the proliferation of breast cancer cells by regulating the Oct4/Sox2/miR‐302 axis. The FEBS journal, 2019.
Alipoor, F.J., M.H. Asadi, and M. Torkzadeh‐Mahani, MIAT lncRNA is overexpressed in breast cancer and its inhibition triggers senescence and G1 arrest in MCF7 cell line. Journal of cellular biochemistry, 2018. 119(8): p. 6470-6481.
Keshavarz, M. and M.H. Asadi, Long non‐coding RNA ES 1 controls the proliferation of breast cancer cells by regulating the Oct4/Sox2/miR‐302 axis. The FEBS journal, 2019. 286(13): p. 2611-2623.
Jafari-Oliayi, A. and M.H. Asadi, SNHG6 is upregulated in primary breast cancers and promotes cell cycle progression in breast cancer-derived cell lines. Cellular Oncology, 2019. 42(2): p. 211-221.
Meng, Q., et al., Long non-coding RNA SNHG6 promotes glioma tumorigenesis by sponging miR-101-3p. Int J Biol Markers, 2018. 33(2): p. 148-155.
Aho, T.L., et al., Pim-1 kinase promotes inactivation of the pro-apoptotic Bad protein by phosphorylating it on the Ser112 gatekeeper site. FEBS Lett, 2004. 571(1-3): p. 43-9.
Zhu, X., et al., Pim-1 acts as an oncogene in human salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma. Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2014. 33(1): p. 114-114.
Zhang, M., W. Duan, and W. Sun, LncRNA SNHG6 promotes the migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of colorectal cancer cells by miR-26a/EZH2 axis. OncoTargets and therapy, 2019. 12: p. 3349-3360.
Zhou, H., et al., Long non-coding RNA SNHG6 promotes tumorigenesis in melanoma cells via the microRNA-101-3p/RAP2B axis. Oncol Lett, 2020. 20(6): p. 323.
Wu, Y., et al., Long non-coding RNA SNHG6 promotes cell proliferation and migration through sponging miR-4465 in ovarian clear cell carcinoma. J Cell Mol Med, 2019. 23(8): p. 5025-5036.
Louca, M., et al., Ras suppressor-1 (RSU-1) promotes cell invasion in aggressive glioma cells and inhibits it in non-aggressive cells through STAT6 phospho-regulation. Scientific Reports, 2019. 9(1): p. 7782.
Liao, Y., et al., Clinical and biological significance of PIM1 kinase in osteosarcoma. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 2016. 34(7): p. 1185-1194.
Magnuson, N.S., et al., Why target PIM1 for cancer diagnosis and treatment? Future oncology, 2010. 6(9): p. 1461-1478.
Zhao, B., et al., PIM1 mediates epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting Smads and c-Myc in the nucleus and potentiates clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma oncogenesis. Cell Death Dis, 2018. 9(3): p. 307.

Download PDF

Reviews received at journal
26 Aug, 2021
Reviewers invited by journal
23 Aug, 2021
Editor assigned by journal
05 Aug, 2021
First submitted to journal
04 Aug, 2021

You are reading this latest preprint version

SNHG6/mir-26a-5p/PIM1 Axis Could Regulate Tumorigenic Glioma Cells Behaviors

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Methods And Materials

Results

Discussion

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1