Important decisions in our lives are not necessarily made by the right, the best or the smartest person but rather by the person who has the power to make that decision especially in young age groups where individuals cannot give consent as in adolescence. Decision makers in any society are a key group that must be targeted and approached due to their direct influence on changing the beliefs and awareness of people living in that society. Many wives in the current study reported that they follow the beliefs of their husbands for all life decisions and even for health promotion related issues. Meanwhile, in rural communities, refusal of husbands was reported by many wives to be the most common barrier to their referral to health services (17, 18, 29). Moreover, the target audience whose behaviors need to be changed the most may not be the direct beneficiaries from the messages. Often, it is -the "influencers"- the people who influence direct beneficiaries’ behaviors- that most need to be informed and to change their concerns and practices.
Targeting the influencers will guarantee effective communication that is needed to affect the environment in which healthy behaviors are requested for adoption, promotion, and sustainability. Based on all the above findings and facts, women and their husbands were considered as the priority target groups for the current study.
The Survey of Young People in Egypt (SYPE) 2014, revealed that 21.1% of married female youth aged 25–29 years were married before the age of 18, and 33.3% of young women residing in rural Upper Egypt were also reported to be married before 18 (6). Accordingly, one of main causes were that female participants in our study let their husbands take the decisions was that many of them were in the adolescent period (63.7 %) or being first married in that period (96.6 %), which is a critical and transitional period where adolescents cannot yet make their own decisions.
In the field of health, substantial evidence shows that people are willing to change their health behavior irrespective to the health condition. It is therefore important to identify channels of communications through which health promotion (HP) messages that contribute in promotion of reproductive health should be disseminated to the specific target audience. Nowadays, health care messages including reproductive health, are increasingly being delivered through digital channels such as the internet, mobile phone messaging, social media, apps, voice/ video messaging, and telemedicine. These ways have proven to be effective in developed countries, yet in developing countries many barriers such as infrastructure, lack of equipment, and technology gap hinder their successful implementation (29–32).
In the current study, the internet was not a first choice for the participants as a source of reproductive health information as only one third of them had access to android phones. Interpersonal communication appeared to be the most credible source of information and the most favorite channel through which reproductive health promotion messages could be received by target audience. Talking with health promoter (39.3% for husbands and 49.1% for wives) and talking with doctors (48.7% of wives) came as the most important means for both wives and husbands followed by TV (42.6 % of wives and 38.3 % of husbands). This result is like that of many previous old and recent studies as well, who assessed the effectiveness of broadcasted media versus interpersonal channels in delivering health messages to the public (33–38). They reported that in low and moderate socioeconomic societies, interpersonal communication serves as primary health information sources for health- oriented individuals with strong health beliefs and commitment to healthy activities, while passive consumption channels such like television and radio serve as primary health information sources for individuals in low socioeconomic societies and who are not health-oriented. Unfortunately, neither one of these studies assessed the reach, frequency, managerial feasibility nor the effectiveness of the recent social media channels versus the traditional ones as tool for health promotion.
In the present study, on investigating the channels of communication through which reproductive health promotion messages could be disseminated, the percentages of wives who had accessibility to TV, radio and reading media were 72.5%, 14 % and 31.3 % respectively, while for the husbands the percentages were 63.3%, 12.6 %, and 18.4% respectively. This indicates more accessibility of wives and their husbands to TV as a main source for health information within Egyptian families. TV serials have been proven as a very successful means of ‘edutainment” as well.’ They usually convey a particular theme which can possibly influence viewers’ behavior (39–41).
Assessing the managerial feasibility will help in the identity of the possibilities to be targeted for any future interventions depending on the exposure over time through detecting the top three types of media and platforms to which the target audience were most exposed. The current study found Television stations as key partners in disseminating messages for promoting public health. The current study revealed that the more than three quarters of wives (81.5%) and husbands (74.2%) spent less than 3 hours per day watching televisions watching drama and series (48.4% and 85.6 % respectively). This finding was in accordance with an old study dated 1999 that was done by the National Research Council (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Board on children, youth, and families (42), indicating that the situation still the same in rural communities despite of the nowadays widespread of the social media. Whereas only half of those reported to have android mobiles spent up to five hours per day on android mobiles. This finding indicate that future programs should rely on mass media rather than social media for the large and broad campaigns to target rural communities. An example in Egypt that is proved to be successful one with the use of mass media is a soap opera called “The Family House” which reached out to millions of Egyptians with health messages on issues such as AIDS, drugs, child spacing, home accidents, and hygiene (43, 44). Another example is a soap opera on the South African television that was run by public health activists over 70% of the population addressing, from HIV and AIDS to rape (45).
For wives, talk with doctors or health promotors was two times significantly higher as the most credible information sources and the best-suited CCs methods than that with search on you tube (OR = 2.0 & OR = 2 respectively) and three times higher than that for social media using browser engine (OR = 3.1 for each). For husbands the odds were nearly one and half for all. This was in accordance with many Egyptian studies which have achieved their goals for improving behaviors for many health-related diseases and issues with the aid of the health promotors, community leaders or health care workers; e.g reduction of maternal mortality (17, 18, 46, 47), improving environmental health (48, 49), alleviating children anemia (50), counteracting barriers against diabetes (51), and accelerating HCV elimination (52–54). These studies are mainly community-based studies in rural communities respecting the culture and believes within their communities. Other Egyptian studies that relay on the nurses and physician for facility-based studies addressing a number of health issues from improvement of cognitive function (55), children nutritional habits (56–58), improving response of HBV among children (59–60) and improving compliance with hemodialysis patients (61–62). All these health communication programs were proved to be helping aid for people make these changes especially for rural communities of Egypt by using the most credible and favorite channels.