The impact of COVID-19 on complementary and alternative medicine providers: a cross-sectional survey in Norway&nbsp;

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-79227/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

The impact of COVID-19 on complementary and alternative medicine providers: a cross-sectional survey in Norway

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-79227/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 01 Aug, 2021

Read the published version in Advances in Integrative Medicine →

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: The Norwegian authorities decided on a nationwide lockdown to prevent spread of the COVID-19 virus. The lockdown had huge socioeconomic consequences for the society. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) providers in Norway.

Method: This cross-sectional survey analyzed data from a self-administrated questionnaire. A total of 581 CAM providers completed the questionnaire, which was designed to describe consequences for CAM providers and their clinical practice after the nationwide lockdown. Between group differences were analyzed using chi-square, ANOVA and Fisher’s exact test. Significance level was defined as p < 0.05 without adjustment for multiple comparisons.

Result: During the nationwide lockdown of Norway, 38.4% of respondents were able to provide CAM treatment to their patients. Of those, the majority (96.4%) had reorganized their clinical practice in accordance with COVID-19 hygiene regulations, offered video consultations (57.4%) or telephone consultations (46.6%). To manage financially during the lockdown, half of the providers spent their savings (48.7%). More than one third (35.1%) was supported by their partner, and 26.7% received compensation from the Norwegian state. A total of 26.3% of the CAM providers had other paid work that provided them with income. Nearly a quarter (18.6%) borrowed money from friends and family, changed their loan terms, or took out new bank loans. The majority (62.7%) expressed uncertainty about the future of their practice. CAM providers who had reorganized their practice to online consultations were more optimistic.

Conclusion: The impact of COVID-19 on CAM providers was considerable. It adversely affected their clinical practice, financial situation, and view on their future practice. To ensure that the health needs of the Norwegian population regarding CAM use are met during pandemic times like COVID-19, it is recommended to support and train CAM providers in the development of online CAM services, as well as efficient implementation of infection prevention and control measures.

Health Economics & Outcomes Research

Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM)

COVID-19

Pandemic

Finance management

The outbreak of a novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19; previously known as 2019-nCoV) (1) was first reported in Wuhan in December 2019 (2). On January 7 2020, the Chinese health authorities identified the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that rapidly spread to other parts of China and globally, including Norway (3). On March 11 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic (4). By July 2020, the disease was confirmed in 14,043,176 people worldwide (5).

In general, COVID-19 is an acute resolved disease. However, in severe cases COVID‐19 might result in death as a result of massive alveolar damage and progressive respiratory failure (6). COVID-19 carries a mortality of approximately 3-7% (7) compared with a mortality rate of less than 1% from influenza. Currently, there is no effective treatment against COVID-19. Until vaccines are available, public health strategies focus on preventing or slowing down further transmission of the virus. Suggested strategies are frequent hand-washing, face masks, social distancing, and home-quarantine. Other measures that have been implemented by governments on a national level are closure of schools and universities, working from home, to minimize the use of public transport in peak hours, and to refrain from nonessential traveling (4).

Voluntary work as corona rhetoric

On March 12 2020, the Norwegian government held a press conference presenting the most severe nationwide restrictions since World War II. The Minister of Health and Care Services (Høie) stated that “working together will slow down and limit the transmission of the virus that is harmless to most people, but extremely dangerous to a few. By participating in this voluntary work, we can all help saving lives”. Voluntary work is a concept characterizing the Norwegian corona rhetoric (8). It is like the nation has entered a warlike situation, appealing to unity, responsibility, voluntary work, herd mentality, and the national feelings of its citizens.

On 16 March 2020, the Norwegian authorities decided on a nationwide lockdown, including the closure of kindergartens and schools (9). Where possible, employees were instructed to work from home. From one day to the next, health care providers such as physiotherapists, psychologists and ophthalmologists closed down their physical consultation practices if infection control and hygiene measureses could not be met (physical contact with less than two meters distance and with a duration of more than 15 minutes) (10, 11). This also applied to providers of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM).

Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM)

CAM is defined as a group of diverse medical and health care symptoms, practices, and products that are not generally considered part of conventional medicine (12). If CAM is used together with conventional medicine, it is considered complementary, and if used in place of conventional medicine, it is considered alternative (12). In a study from 2018 (13) , we reported that a little over one third (37%) of the Norwegian population has used one or several CAM modalities at least once during the previous year. The individual average cost for CAM was about NOK 5,700. A total of 23% had received CAM from a CAM provider and/or authorized health personnel, within or outside the official healthcare system (13). The five most frequently applied CAM modalities are massage, acupuncture, naprapathy, healing, and reflexology (13). According to the latest survey (14), the use of CAM is even higher in specific patient groups. More than one third (33.4%) of the Norwegian cancer patients used some form of CAM, and 14% had visited a CAM provider. Cancer patients who used CAM applied these modalities complementary to conventional cancer treatment.

In Norway, the majority of CAM providers are members of a professional organization that demands ethical and professional standards among their members. Many of these organizations are registered in the Brønnøysund Register (15). A national register for CAM practitioners was established in 2004 with the purpose of increasing patient safety, quality, seriousness, and professionalism in the CAM field. Today 40 CAM organizations with a total of 4,130 providers are registered in Brønnøysund (15).

Rationale for the study

Based on knowledge from previous respiratory illness pandemics in the last century, and the current situation in the USA and South America, it appears that the COVID-19 pandemic recurs in waves (16). This might also very well be the case in Norway. Furthermore, sporadic increase of cases in connection with local outbreaks and clusters are likely to occur (3). Therefore, it is of high importance to gain knowledge on how CAM providers in Norway are coping during the COVID-19 pandemic and how it has affected their clinical practice. This will provide essential information that is needed to ensure that the health needs of the Norwegian population regarding CAM use are met during pandemic times.

The present study was initiated to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on CAM providers in Norway. Specific aims were to investigate how COVID-19 affected their practice and consultations with patients, their recommendations to patients, their financial situation, and how CAM providers perceived their future practice.

A national cross-sectional survey was carried out in Norway from April to June 2020. The study protocol was reviewed by the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD) and approved in April 2020 (NSD/ 287191). A modified version of the International Questionnaire to Measure Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (I-CAM-Q) was surveyed (17, 18).

Setting and participants

Norwegian residents receive healthcare within the public health care system, in which licensed conventional health care professionals treat and care for the patients (19). CAM modalities are practiced outside this system, and CAM practices are unregulated. Anyone can use the term CAM provider and treat patients (20). However, most CAM providers are members of professional organizations. To ensure patient safety in cases of intervention-related health issues, CAM providers are required to obtain professional liability insurance. Generally, patients themselves pay for the visits to CAM providers.

Inclusion criteria for participation in the study were being a currently practicing CAM provider and member of a professional CAM organization. Thirty-five CAM organizations received an email with a link to the questionnaire and were asked to forward the link to their members. Thirteen organizations did not respond to the invitation, but 22 organizations did. They forwarded the link to 2,215 CAM providers that were a member of their organization. A total of 581 CAM providers (response rate 26%) completed and returned the questionnaire (Fig. 1).

Data collection

This study was a self-administered questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey.

Questionnaire content

The modified I-CAM-Q consisted of four parts, and all parts related to CAM practices during the past three COVID-19 pandemic months (March-May 2020). The first part included demographics. The second part included questions related to clinical practice and financial consequences of the COVID-19 situation. The third part included questions related to what modalities these providers recommended, such as dietary supplements, vitamins, herbals, and other over-the-counter remedies. The fourth part included questions related to the recommendation of self-care techniques. The last part of the survey included questions on the fear that CAM providers may have of getting infected with COVID-19, or that a family member gets infected, and how they evaluated the danger of COVID-19 compared to other influenza viruses. An open-ended question invited the participants to give a final remark about the study. All data was anonymously collected and reported.

Data collection procedures

The data collection was based on the Dillman survey procedure (21). By email, the CAM organizations were invited to participate in the study and informed that a new-email with a link to the online survey would be sent a week later. One week after the email with the link, a second email was sent as a reminder to the non-respondents and as a thank you to those that had already responded. Finally, after an additional week, a reminder with the link to the survey was sent to the non-respondents. The CAM organizations forwarded these emails following the same procedure subsequently to their members.

Measures

Personal characteristics

Household income was collected using the following categories (NOK <100,000, 100,000-199,000, 200,000-299,000, 300,000-399,000. 400,000-499,000, 500,000-599,000, 600,000-799,000, 800,000-999,000, 1000,000-1500,000 and more than NOK 1500,000). These were categorized into a measure of household income of low (< NOK 400,000), middle (NOK 400,000 - 799,000) and high (NOK ≥ 800,000).

Level of education was recorded using six values; Primary education (up to 8 years); Lower secondary education (from 9-10 years); upper secondary education (from 11-13 years); lower levels at university/college (up to 4 years); higher levels at university/college (more than 4 years): and do not want to reply. These were merged into a measure with four categories (compulsive level; middle level; college/university less than 4 years; and college/university 4 years or more).

Age was obtained as an open question and assessed as a continuous variable. In the analysis, this was categorized into three levels (25-39 years; 40-59 years; and 60-83 years).

Other personal characteristics included sex (female, male), postal code (merged into the Norwegian regions East, South, West, Mid (Trøndelag), and North), location (city, town, village, rural area), and number in the household with income or responsible for the economy.

Financial management of the clinical practice during the COVID-19 pandemic

How the clinical practices were organized was surveyed using five categories: Individual practice organized as sole proprietorship; individual practice organized as private limited company; salaried employee in a practice without employer responsibility; other mode of operational business and other.

Whether the participants had worked as a CAM provider after March 12, 2020 was measured by the dichotomous variable yes/no. In case the participants responded yes to this question, they were asked if they had made any changes in the way their practice was organized during COVID-19 and what the changes included. This question had four response options: Video consultations; telephone consultations; physical consultations with patients with or without infection control measures; other.

How the COVID-19 situation had affected their income had four response options: More than expected; as expected; less than expected; the practice is closed. Further, in case of decreased income, the participants were asked how they managed financially. This measure had ten response options: using life savings; support from NAV (Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration); live on the income of my spouse/cohabitant; other paid work; compensation from the state; borrow money from friends and family; take out loan from the bank; change terms on bank loans; other; do not want to reply. In the analysis, this was categorized into a measure of finances with seven levels: Savings; supported by my partner/cohabitant; compensation from the state/support from NAV; other paid work; loan, other, and did not answer.

The participants were asked what the future prospects were for their practice. This variable had four response options: Optimistic about the future due to minimal impacts on my practice; unsure about the future, do not know what will happen to my practice; pessimistic about the future due to devastating impacts on my practice.

CAM modalities recommended

The participants were asked what CAM modalities they had recommended to patients to prevent COVID-19 infection after the national lockdown. The section included six CAM groups, with the following response options: self-care techniques included 13 modalities such as mindfulness, yoga, and coaching; Herbs included 12 different herbs, such as garlic, ginger and, turmeric; Diets included nine different regimes such as low carb diet, fasting, and macrobiotic diet; Homeopathy included two options such as individual homeopathic remedies, and complex remedies; vitamins and minerals had 11 response options such as C-vitamin, magnesium, and zinc; dietary supplements included five products such as omega 3, 6, and 9, cod-liver oil, and protein drink.

Perceptions of COVID-19 infection

Whether the participants forwarded patients to their general practitioner (GP) on suspicion of COVID-19 was recorded by the dichotomous variable yes/no. One question measured whether the participants were afraid of becoming infected with COVID-19. This variable had four response options: Not at all, somewhat, absolutely, and do not want to answer. Finally, the participants were asked whether they perceived COVID-19 to be more dangerous than the common influenza virus. This variable had four response options: Not at all, somewhat, absolutely, and do not want to answer.

Statistical Analysis

Quantitative analysis

Descriptive statistics were carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) v. 26.0. Pearson’s Chi-square test and ANOVA tests were performed to identify differences in sociodemographic factors (age, education level, household income) between men and women.

Qualitative analysis

The open-ended question that invited the participants to give a final remark about the study was analyzed by means of a content analysis (22). A content analysis is a systematic examination of text by identifying and categorizing themes (23). In addition, it classifies and develops categories, and performs the coding (24). In this study, the codes were grouped according to the questions in the survey. The quotations were analyzed in Norwegian before being translated into English by a professional service. The first author read the data several times and performed the content analysis.

Demographics

The average respondent was middle aged (65.4%), female (80.3%), and lived nearby the capital in the southeastern part of Norway (53.8%). They held a university degree (87.9%) and had high income (46%). The majority of the respondents lived with a spouse/cohabitant (69%), had children (31.3%) or both (22.4%). Twenty-one percent had a single household (Table 1).

Differences in demographic characteristics

Female CAM providers had higher education compared to male CAM providers. Furthermore, a higher percentage of female CAM providers lived in rural areas (9% vs. 5.5%), whereas men were more likely to live in the city (45.5% vs. 40.6%, p<0.001). The youngest age group (25-39 years) was more likely to have high income compared to the middle and higher age group (68% vs. 58 and 49%, respectively, p=0.05). An explanation for this finding may be that the majority of the respondents in the younger age group lived together with someone else who contributed to the household income (13% vs. 20% and 29%, respectively, p=0.023). The oldest age group (60-83 years) was more likely to live together with children compared to the younger and middle age groups (3.8% vs. 41.3% and 38.9%, respectively p<0.001).

Table 1: Characteristics of the respondents (n=581)
	N	%
Gender
Male	110	19.0
Female	466	80.3
Did not answer	4	0.7

Age
25-39	63	10.8
40-59	380	65.4
60-83	138	23.8

Education
Compulsive level	10	1.7
Middle level	51	8.8
University up to 4 years	246	42.3
University more than 4 years	265	45.6


Household*
Single household	120	20.7
Living with spouse or cohabitant	401	69.0
Living with children	182	31.3
Living with others	11	1.9
Did not answer	8	1.4


Number in household with income and responsible for the economy
One	172	29.6
Two	372	64.0
Three or more	28	4.8
Did not answer	9	1.5

The total gross annual household income before taxes
Low (< 400 000NOK)	106	18.3
Middle (400 000 - 799 000 NOK)	172	29.6
High (≥ 800 000 NOK)	267	46.0
Don't know	21	3.6
Did not answer	47	8.1

Location
City	241	41.5
Town	176	30.3
Village	108	18.6
Rural area	48	8.3
Did not answer	8	1.4

Region of practice
South East	313	53.8
South	84	14.5
West	85	14.6
Mid	69	11.9
North	29	5.0
Did not answer	1	0.2

*More options possible

Qualitative data based on an open-ended question

A total of 134 CAM providers (27.3%) responded to the open question and wrote a remark that explained their current situation. Five themes were identified in these qualitative data: CAM modalities, reorganization of clinical practice, finance management, vision of the future, and perceptions of COVID-19 infection.

These themes are further explained and presented together with the quantitative data below:

CAM modalities

A wide range of CAM providers responded to the survey. Their clinical practice mostly included acupuncture/acupressure/ear acupuncture/cupping. Other frequent CAM modalities in their clinical practice were massage (24.6%), gestalt therapy (19.6%), reflexology (19.6%), muscle therapy (11.7%), coaching (11.5%), and conversation/psychotherapy/psychosynthesis (10%) (Table 2).

To prevent COVID-19 infection, the respondents recommended several CAM modalities to their patients. The most recommended modality was vitamin C (high and normal doses). This modality was recommended by 6.9% of the respondents. Other frequently CAM modalities recommended were relaxation techniques (3.1%); prayer for own health (2.1%); psychotherapy/counseling (1.9%); Ginger (1.9%), and Omega 3, 6, and 9 (1.2%).

In the free text, respondents emphasized the importance for their patients to take good care of themselves, as one respondent added: During this period, I advised my patients about exercise, health, and diet.

Another respondent wrote: I am engaged in the clients' increased awareness of how they sleep, eat, and are physically active and how this relates to mental health and their energy levels. I am concerned about how they take care of themselves and others, and that there is a balance between these two factors.

Table 2. Modalities in the clinical practice of respondents (n=581)*
	N	%
Acupuncture, acupressure, ear acupuncture, cupping	175	30.1
Massage	143	24.6
Gestalt therapy	114	19.6
Reflexology	77	13.3
Muscle therapy	68	11.7
Coaching, health coaching	67	11.5
Conversation, psychotherapy, or psychosynthesis	58	10.0
Healing	44	7.6
Osteopathy	44	7.6
Trauma therapy	41	7.1
Mindfulness	34	5.9
Homeopathy	33	5.7
Aromatherapy	29	5.0
Herbal medicine	18	3.1
Holistic therapy	15	2.6
Kinesiology	15	2.6
Hypnosis	14	2.4
Natural therapy	14	2.4
Skin and body therapy	13	2.2
Art and expression therapy, imaging therapy	13	2.2
Quantum medicine	13	2.2
Rose therapy	13	2.2
Craniosacral therapy	12	2.1
Qigong	12	2.1
Dance therapy, creative body expression therapy	8	1.4
Bioresonance	7	1.2
Regression therapy	7	1.2
Shiatsu therapy	6	1.0
Biopathy, biological medicine	4	0.7
Feldenkrais method	3	0.5
Heilpractice	3	0.5
IKYA treatment	3	0.5
Naprapathy	3	0.5
Bowen therapy	2	0.3
Lightning Process	2	0.3
Anthroposophic medicine	1	0.2
Polarization	1	0.2
Did not reply	1	0.2
Other	82	14.1

*More options possible

Reorganization of clinical practice

The majority of the responding CAM providers had a sole proprietorship practice (84.3%) followed by a private limited company practice (12%), and other modes of operation (1.7%). Only 7 (n=7, 1.2%) of the providers were employed by others. During the lockdown of Norway (March 12 2020 – April 22 2020), only 38.4% of the respondents provided CAM treatment to their patients. Of those, the majority (96.4%) had reorganized their clinical practice in accordance to COVID-19 hygiene regulations (not shake hands, proper hand hygiene measures, keep distance (1 meter (adjusted from 2 meters)) from other people, assess own health condition with regard to symptoms, if possible use video consultations, assess whether physical consultations are necessary, clean equipment after each patient) (25). Furthermore, more than half of these CAM providers offered video consultations (57.4%), telephone consultations (46.6%), or physical consultations with or without infection control measures (43.5%) (Table 3). As one of the participants expressed: I have only had conversations and motivations by phone with my regular course participants and clients. This has been free of charge, as part of the voluntary work.

One respondent wrote: I have advised my patients by means of video consultations, focusing on physical activity, sleep and socializing, not to cure COVID-19 but to contribute to good physical and mental health.

Another added: I work as an EQ (emotional intelligence) therapist, and as time has passed and people's need for therapy has increased, I have used phone consultations. This has worked well, and is one of the reasons why I perceive the future as relatively bright. I have expanded my practice. From treating local patients only, I now treat patients from all over the country.

The impact of COVID-19 on finance management

The majority of the respondents (91.6%) experienced that the income was less than expected during the lockdown. Only 1% responded to have increased their income. To manage financially, half of the CAM providers spent their savings (48.7%). Male CAM providers made use of their savings to a higher degree than female providers (60% vs. 46%, p=0.029). More than one third (35.1%) was supported by their partner, and 26.7% received compensation from the state (including support from NAV). A total of 26.3% had other paid work that provided them with income. Nearly a quarter (18.6%) borrowed money from friends and family, changed the loan terms, or took out new bank loans (table 3).

The youngest age group (25-39 years) made significantly more use of their savings (p=0.006) or loans from the bank or family/friends (p=<0.001) compared to the middle and older age groups. This finding may be explained by the fact that the youngest age group appeared to be most affected by the lockdown. A significantly lower percentage of CAM providers in the youngest age provided CAM treatment to their patients during the lockdown compared to the other age groups (25% vs. 42% and 35%, respectively, p=0.010). The oldest age group (60-83) on the other hand, was less likely to have other paid work compared to the youngest age group (17.7% vs. 28.5%, p=0.049).

The respondents expressed strong concerns about their economy. One of the respondents wrote: I find this period very difficult financially. I do not have the finances to pay my bills due to the closedown, even though I have an agreement with the bank about an interest-only loan. Fortunately, I will start working again on April 27, but will struggle with wage backlog, and debt collection fees for several months. The summer vacation is canceled. I have to work.

Another added: After March 12, I am constantly considering discontinuing my practice. The turnover has fallen to such a low level that the costs of continuing are too large.

One participant expressed: I have another permanent job and can barely manage financially, even if I lose about 1/3 of my income. The compensation from the state, that someone gets, does not apply to me. That is disappointing and despairing. When the state orders me to close, I think the state behaves irresponsibly.

Vision of the future

The majority of the respondents (62.7%) expressed uncertainty about the future and did not know what would happen to their practice. Nevertheless, 27.4% were optimistic about their future, mostly because they continue to see patients by means of video/telephone consultations. A minority (7.6%) was pessimistic due to devastating impacts on their practice (table 3), illustrated by this note: This does not look good. The clients are worried or broke, and it will be a long time before we can return to “normal.” Considering finding another job.

Another respondent was more optimistic: I have not had income since the virus outbreak, but ongoing expenses. Small businesses will not receive compensation from the state, as far as I know. So this job is just a bad project now. However, I think this will pass and that the business will flourish again.

Table 3: The impact of COVID-19 on clinical practice (n=581)*
	n=581	%
How is your practice organized?
Sole proprietorship	490	84.3
Private limited company	70	12
Other mode of operation	10	1.7
Employee in a practice without employer responsibility	7	1.2
Did not answer	4	0.7

Have you worked as a provider after March 12?
Yes	223	38.4
No	356	61.3
Did not answer	2	0.3

If Yes, have you made any changes in the way you organize your business?
Yes	215	96.4
No	8	3.6
Did not answer	0	0.0

What are the changes?
Video consultations	128	22
Telephone consultations	104	17.9
Physical consultations with patients with or without infection control measures	97	16.9
Other	20	3.4
Did not answer	0,00	0.0

In case of income decrease, how do you manage financially?
Savings	283	48.7
Supported by my partner/spouse	204	35.1
Compensation from the state/support from NAV	155	26.7
Other work	153	26.3
Loan	105	18.2
Other	43	7.4
Did not answer	5	0.9

What are the future prospects for your practice?
Optimistic about the future due to minimal impacts on my practice	159,00	27.4
Unsure about the future. Do not know. I do not know what will happen to my practice	364,00	62.7
Pessimistic about the future due to devastating impacts on my practice	44,00	7.6
Did not answer	14,00	2.4

Did you refer your patients to their GP on suspicion of COVID-19?
Yes	27	4.6
No	251	43.2
No patients during this period	298	51.3
Did not answer	5	0.9

Do you see the need for updated knowledge of infection control and hygiene?
Yes	262	45.1
No	314	54.0
Did not answer	5	0.9

Are you afraid of becoming infected by COVID-19?
Not at all	209	36.0
Somewhat	335	57.7
Absolutely	30	5.2
Did not answer	7	1.2

Do you perceive COVID-19 as more dangerous than the common flue?
Not at all	34	5.9
Somewhat	240	41.3
Absolutely	246	42.3
Did not answer	61	10.5

*More options possible

Perceptions of COVID-19 infection

A total of 43.3% of the respondents did not refer patients to their GP on suspicion of COVID-19, probably because most CAM providers did not consult with patients during the lockdown. A total of 45.1% wanted updated information about infection control and hygiene measures. However, the majority (54%) did not see the need for such an update. One participant pointed out: I assess the clients from a professional nursing perspective. I urge them to obey national guidelines. I also discuss good hygiene measures with the client, safe hygiene.

A total of 42.3% of the respondents perceived COVID-19 to be absolutely more dangerous than common influenza. A total of 41% perceived COVID-19 to be somewhat more dangerous than common influenza (table 3), which was illustrated by the following comment from one respondent: I think COVID-19 is more dangerous than common influenza for those at risk. Not for those who are healthy, have a good diet, and a good nutritional status.

The majority of the respondents (57.7%) was not very concerned about becoming infected with COVID-19 themselves, as noted by this respondent: I'm not worried for my own sake, but of infecting others.

Another added: I am mostly worried that someone will be infected in my practice, even though all hygiene measures have been followed.

The present study revealed that a little over one third of CAM providers in Norway were able to advise or provide treatment to their patients during the first three COVID-19 pandemic months in 2020. The majority of the CAM providers organized their clinics as sole proprietorships. To prevent COVID-19 infection, CAM providers in Norway mostly advised patients to use vitamin C, Ginger, and Omega 3, 6, and 9. Furthermore, they also advised patients to practice relaxation techniques, pray for own health and to use psychotherapy/counseling. To date, there is no evidence of effect for any CAM modality regarding the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 infections (26). Natural medicine (27) recommends CAM providers to inform patients that there is no good data to support using any natural medicines for COVID-19 treatment or prevention. Additionally, López-Alcalde et al. (28) concluded in a recent overview that there is no current evidence to recommend any specific CAM modality for the treatment of patients with COVID-19.

In this study, CAM providers also advised patients to take healthy life-style measures such as ensure sufficient sleep, stay physically active, and ensure healthy diets. These measures are in line with recommendations from the national health authorities (29) and trustworthy online resources, as to advice patients to focus on healthy lifestyle choices such as getting eight hours of proper sleep each night, eating a well-balanced diet, and exercising regularly (26, 27, 30).

Financial limitations

More than 70% of the respondents were uncertain or pessimistic about the future for their practice due to the financial impact of the pandemic. This seems to be a serious problem for the provision of CAM to patients in Norway. The respondents in the present study experienced that the income was less than expected during the lockdown, and only 1% reported increased income. To manage financially, the majority employed savings or was supported by their partner. Overall, respondents had high expectations regarding compensation from the state. However, less than one third received compensation from the state or support from NAV. The reason for this was that many businesses did not meet the compensation criteria (31). Many participants had small-scale businesses with low turnovers and therefore placed below the financial limit of compensation. For example, expenses below NOK 5,000 were not covered by the system and the first NOK 10,000 was withdrawn from the total sum of compensation (31). The current compensation criteria thus hits hard on small businesses with low turnovers. It is recommended that authorities consider to remove the lower limit of compensation for health care providers and CAM practitioners, should a similar situation arise in the future.

Reorganization of clinical practice

In order for CAM practices to survive such a pandemic, this study demonstrates how important it is for CAM providers to be able to adapt their practice both to effectively implement infection control and hygiene measures, but also to shift their consultation online or via telephone, whenever possible. Online consultations have been a part of the official health care service in Norway now for some time. According to HelseNnorge (The official health care services’ web page for inhabitants in Norway) (32), online consultation is understood as consultation conducted via the web using audio, video, or text conversation. Patients can only use this service when it does not require physical attendance. The service should not be used for immediate help or emergency situations. The health care provider is responsible for ensuring patient rights and safety, confidentiality, privacy, and providing necessary information security throughout the web solution (33).

Many health care providers want to offer online consultations to patients, and HelseNnorge provides information on how to facilitate this in collaboration with helsenorge.no. (34). New online approaches for consultation of patients have improved practice in many ways, and is regarded an advantage for a specific group of CAM providers as it allows them to increase their practice by not only serving local patients but also patients across the country. The present study demonstrated that the latter contributed to an improved turnover for business for some CAM providers that responded to the survey. This was illustrated by one of the respondents who claimed that online consultations was the reason for perceiving the future relatively bright. This approach may also benefit CAM provision for chronically ill and elderly patients, since they are able to receive CAM care while staying at home. In addition, these consultations are timesaving for both CAM providers and patients. Online consultations are however not suitable for CAM providers who offer physical treatments, such as massage and acupuncture. Since the majority of the respondents in this study offered patients acupuncture, massage, reflexology, and muscle therapy, online consultations were not an option.

Practical implications

Based on the findings from this study, CAM organizations are recommended to facilitate online consultation options for their members, where applicable, with support from HelseNnorge. Such consultations should ensure patient rights and safety, confidentiality, privacy and secure that the information obtained is safely stored. CAM organizations are also recommended to provide updated knowledge on infection control and hygiene in daily practice by offering seminars on the theme in collaboration with for example the National Institute of Public Health.

Hygiene control is a global issue. It is a task for professional CAM organizations worldwide and their members to facilitate the accessibility of CAM services for patients in a therapeutic environment without the risk of being exposed to the COVID-19 virus for both patients and CAM providers.

The CAM providers in this study participated in the national voluntary work by promoting healthy life style advice to patients. As such, CAM providers can have a role as health promoters during these pandemic times. Further research is necessary to investigate the role of CAM in preventing and treating COVID-19 symptoms.

Limitations

The results of this study should be interpreted in light of its limitations. A limitation was the low response rate of 26%, which may hamper the generalizability of the findings. Some organizations did not want to participate in our study because according to the Norwegian law (35), CAM providers are not allowed to treat infections, even though it was being made clear to these organizations that CAM providers are allowed to consult patients on possible prevention of COVID-19 infection. Other CAM practitioner organizations had decided to perform an own survey among members, and did not want to bother them with another survey related to COVID-19. Thus although the findings from this study give a good indication of the impact of the national lockdown, it may not represent the situation for all CAM providers in Norway. However, the risk of non-response bias depends not on the response rate per se, but to what extent respondents differ from non-respondents (36, 37). Non-response bias can be assessed by examining changes in the prevalence of outcomes before and after including late responders in the sample. In this study the outcomes from late responders did not differ significantly from the outcome of early responders with respect to age, education, income, organization of clinics, and how to manage financially. This finding suggests that the non-response bias may be limited (36, 38). Another limitation of this study was that CAM providers were surveyed during the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway. The long-term effects of the lockdown are therefore not known, and should be further investigated.

The impact of COVID-19 on CAM providers was considerable. It adversely affected their clinical practice, financial situation, and view on their future practice. The majority of the providers did not meet the criteria for compensation. Therefore, the authorities should consider removing the lower limit of compensation should a similar situation arise in the future. To ensure that health needs of the Norwegian population regarding CAM use are met during pandemic times like COVID-19, it is recommended to support and train CAM providers in the development of online CAM services, as well as efficient implementation of infection prevention and control measures.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the CAM organizations and CAM providers who completed the questionnaire and participated in this study. We are also grateful to Jane Ekelund and Tine Lillegård Bergli, Ola Lillenes and Solveig Johansson for technical support.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

TS conceived the study and designed the Norwegian part of the questionnaire. She also collected the data, performed qualitative analysis and interpretation of data, and drafted the initial version of the manuscript. AEK was involved in the conception and design of the study, and performed quantitative analyses and interpretation of data. MCJ was involved in the conception and design of the study, interpretation of data, and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors reviewed subsequent versions and read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

TS is trained in complementary medicine. She holds a PhD in Medical science and is specialized in both qualitative and quantitative research methodology. AEK is a language sociologist and a complementary therapist. She holds a PhD in Medical science and is trained in quantitative research design. MCJ holds a PhD in Medicine and has considerable expertise in understanding the use of complementary modalities, and patient-provider communication about complementary therapy use.

Funding

The publication charges for this paper have been funded by a grant from the publication fund of UiT The Arctic University of Norway. No additional funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset this paper has been based on has not been deposited in any repository. All dataset and materials are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was reviewed and the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD) approved the study in April 2020 (NSD/ 287191). Written informed consent was obtained from the participants’ bye the means of completed and returned questionnaire.

Consent for publication

Consent to publication was obtained from the participants.

Competing interests

The first author Agnete Egilsdatter Kristoffersen is a member of the editorial board (Associate Editor) of BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. TS and MKJ declare that they have no competing interests.

Author details

National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Dpartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens veg 19, 9019 Tromsø, Norway.

CAM: Complementary and Alternative Medicine

COVID-19: Coronavirus Disease

GP: General practitioner

Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen YM, Wang W, Song ZG, et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature. 2020;579(7798):265-9.
Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Huang L, Zhang C, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2020;8(4):420-2.
The Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Weekly reports for coronavirus and COVID-19 Oslo: The Norwegian Institute of Public Health; 2020 [cited 2020 02. July]. Available from: https://www.fhi.no/en/publ/2020/ukerapporter-for-koronavirus-og-covid-19/.
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO announces COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic Copenhagenm Denmark: WHO Regional Office of Europe; 2020 [cited 2020 03. June]. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/news/news/2020/3/who-announces-covid-19-outbreak-a-pandemic.
(WHO) WHO. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020 [cited 2020 20. July].
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-506.
World Health Organization( WHO). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) situation report – 52. March 12, 2020. Montréal, Québec, Canada: World Health Organization; 2020 [cited 2020 03. June]. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/20200312-sitrep-52-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=e2bfc9c0_2
Pettrém MT. Retorikkprofessor roser norske myndigheter: – Mindre fryktpreget enn det vi har sett i Danmark og Sverige. Aftenposten. 2020.
Helsedirektoratet. In English: the Norwegian Directorate of Health. Helsedirektoratet har vedtatt omfattende tiltak for å hindre spredning av Covid-19. In English: The Directorate of Health has adopted comprehensive measures to prevent the transmission of Covid-19 Oslo: The Norwegian Directorate of health; 2020 [cited 2020 04. June]. Available from: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/nyheter/helsedirektoratet-har-vedtatt-omfattende-tiltak-for-a-hindre-spredning-av-covid-19.
The Norwegian Tax Administration. Business compentation Scheme. Application form for enteprises with a significant drop in revenue due to the coronavirus situation Oslo: The Norwegian Tax Administration; 2020 [cited 2020 11. June]. Available from: https://kompensasjonsordning.no/en/.
The Norwegian Directorate of Health. Decision acording to the act on protection against infectious diseases § 4-1 second paragraph on closure of business. Oslo. 2020.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Complementary, Alternative, or Integrative Health: What’s In a Name? Bethesda, Maryland 2018 [cited 2019 04. January]. Available from: https://nccih.nih.gov/health/integrative-health#hed1.
The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM). NAFKAM-undersøkelsen 2018, Bruk av alternativ behandling i Norge. [The NAFKAM survey 2018. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in Norway] Tromsø: The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM) 2018 [cited 2020 31. March]. Available from: https://nafkam.no/en/nafkam-survey-2018-facts-and-figures.
Kristoffersen AE, Stub T, Broderstad AE, Hansen AH. Use of traditional and complementary medicine among Norwegian cancer patients in the seventh survey of the Tromsø study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019;19(1):341.
Brønnøysundregistrene. Registrere alternativ behandler. In English: Register Complementary and Alternative Provider Brønnøysund: Brønnøysundregistrene; 2020 [cited 2020 20. July]. Available from: https://www.brreg.no/person/registrering-av-utovere-av-alternativ-behandling/.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH). Facts about infection control meaures during COVID-19 outbreak Oslo: Norwegian Institute of Public Health; 2020 [cited 2020 20. July]. Available from: https://www.fhi.no/en/op/novel-coronavirus-facts-advice/facts-and-knowledge-about-covid-19/facts-about-infection-control-measures-during-the-covid-19-outbreak/?term=&h=1.
Quandt SA, Verhoef MJ, Arcury TA, Lewith GT, Steinsbekk A, Kristoffersen AE, et al. Development of an international questionnaire to measure use of complementary and alternative medicine (I-CAM-Q). J Altern Complement Med. 2009;15(4):331-9.
Eardley S, Bishop FL, Cardini F, Santos-Rey K, Jong MC, Ursoniu S, et al. A pilot feasibility study of a questionnaire to determine European Union-wide CAM use. Forsch Komplementmed. 2012;19(6):302-10.
LOV-1999-07-02-64 Lov om helsepersonell m.v. (helsepersonelloven- hlspl) English: Act 1999-07-02-64. Act relating to health personnel etc, HOD (Helse og omsorgsdepartementet)(1999).
LOV-2003-06-27-64 Lov om alternativ behandling av sykdom mv; [Act relating to the alternative treatment of disease, illness, etc,] Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet [Ministry of Health and Care Services] 2002-2003 Sess. (2003).
de Leeuw ED, Hox JJ, Dillman DA. International Handbook of Survey Methodology. East Sussex: Psychology Press; 2008.
Pope C, Mays N. Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ. 1995;311:42-5.
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15.
Kvale S. Det kvalitative forskningsintervju. English: The Qualitative Research Interview. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag AS; 2001.
Helsedirektoratet og Folkehelseinstituttet (FHI). In English: The Norwegian Directorate of Health and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Veileder. Covid-19 epidemien:Veileder for smittevernfaglig forsvarlig drift i helsevirksomheter med én-til-én kontakt, både i og utenfor offentlig helsetjeneste. In English: Supervisor. Covid-19 epidemic: Guide for infection control-sound operation in health care services with one-to-one contact, both in and outside the public health service. Oslo: The Norwegian Directorate of Health and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health.
Alschuler L, Weilb A, Horwitza R, Stamets P, Chiassona AM, Crockera R, et al. Integrative considerations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Explore. 2020;Article in Press1-3.
medicine N. Understanding Turmeric & Echinacea COVID-19 Warnings Stockton, CA TRC Health care, ; 2020 [cited 2020 08. July]. Available from: https://naturalmedicines.therapeuticresearch.com/news/news-items/starnatural-medicines-and-covid-19star/understanding-turmeric-echinacea-covid-19-warnings.aspx.
López-Alcalde J, Yan Y, Witt CM, Barth J. Complementary, alternative and integrative medicine (CAM) for the treatment of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): an overview. Creative Commons Attribution 40 International License. 2020.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH). Coronavirus disease - advice and information Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Public health; 2020 [cited 2020 03.July]. Available from: https://www.fhi.no/en/id/infectious-diseases/coronavirus/.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. In the News: Coronavirus and "Alternative" Treatments Bethesda, Maryland, USA: National Institute of Health; 2020 [cited 2020 28. May]. Available from: https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/in-the-news-coronavirus-and-alternative-treatments.
The Norwegian Tax Administration. Business Compensation. Application form for enterprises with a significant drop in revenue due to the coronavirus situation Oslo: The Norwegian Tax Administration; 2020 [cited 202003. July. Available from: https://kompensasjonsordning.no/en/.
Helsenorge.no. Hva er e-consultasjon og de andre tjenestene med fastlege på nett. In English: What is online consultation and other online services with your family physician Oslo: Norsk Helsenett; 2020 [cited 2020 06. July]. Available from: https://helsenorge.no/kontakt-fastlegen/hva-er-e-konsultasjon.
Normen Nfi. Faktaark 54, Videokaonsultasjoner. In English: Videoconsultations Oslo: Direktoratet for e-helse; 2020 [cited 2020 24. July]. Available from: file:///C:/Users/tst021/Downloads/Faktaark%2054%20-%20Videokonsultasjon%20v2.0%20(2).pdf.
Helsenorgelab.no. Videokonsultasjoner. In English: Video consultations Oslo: Direktoratet for e-helse. In English: The Norwegian Directorate of eHealth (NDE); 2019 [cited 2020 06. July].
LOV-2003-06-27-64 Lov om alternativ behandling av sykdom mv; English Act relating to the alternative treatment of disease, illness, etc, Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet, 2002-2003 Sess. (2003).
Lie HC, Rueegg CS, Fosså SD, Loge JH, Ruud E, Kiserud CE. Limited evidence of non-response bias despite modest response rate in a nationwide survey of long-term cancer survivors—results from the NOR-CAYACS study. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2019;13(3):353-63.
Bordens KS, Abbott BB. Research Design and Methods. A Process Approach. Fifth Edition ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education; 2002.
Halbesleben JRB, Whitman MV. Evaluating Survey Quality in Health Services Research: A Decision Framework for Assessing Nonresponse Bias. Health Services Research. 2013;48(3):913-30.

EnglishterapeutCovid1915.04.2020.xlsx
The questionnaire

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 01 Aug, 2021

Read the published version in Advances in Integrative Medicine →

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

The impact of COVID-19 on complementary and alternative medicine providers: a cross-sectional survey in Norway

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Declarations

Abbreviations

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1