Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an immune-mediated, chronic, symmetrical, inflammatory disease that initially affects small joints, progressing to larger joints, and eventually the skin, eyes, heart, kidneys, and lungs. These patients often develop destruction in the bones and cartilage of joints, and eventually, the tendons and ligaments weaken [1, 2]. RA should be considered in any patient with joint stiffness, pain, or swelling that persists for more than a few weeks. Joint pain in RA is typically symmetrical, involving multiple joints; however, it may involve 2 to 4 joints asymmetrically or involve a single joint at the onset [6]. RA presents with various extra-articular manifestations evolving over a few weeks to months along with joint symptoms characterized by widespread, persistent synovitis and positivity of autoantibodies to the Fc portion of immunoglobulin G; rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) [2]. Overexpression of tumour necrosis factors (TNF) is a crucial inflammatory element in RA, causing joint inflammation and deformity [2].
According to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis, the diagnosis of RA can be made in patients who have at least one joint with definite clinical synovitis (swelling) with the synovitis not better explained by another disease. The classification criteria for RA are based on a scoring system considering four entities. The first one is the joint involvement where involvement of 1 large joint scores 0, 2 to 10 large joints – 1, 1 to 3 small joints (with or without the involvement of large joints) – 2, 4 to 10 small joints (with or without the involvement of large joints) – 3 and > 10 joints (at least one small joint) scoring 5. The second one is the serology where negative RF and negative ACPA scores 0, low-positive RF or low-positive ACPA scores 2, high-positive RF or high-positive ACPA scoring 3. The third entity is the acute-phase reactants where normal CRP and normal ESR scoring 0 and abnormal CRP or abnormal ESR scoring 1. The final entity is the duration of symptoms where < 6 weeks scores 0 and ≥ 6 weeks scores 1 [7]. Our patient fulfilled the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria for RA, where the diagnosis was made. Presentation of the RA can be very heterogeneous in some patients associated with other autoimmune diseases. PRCA associated with RA is reported in the literature though it is not common [8, 9].
PRCA is a hemopoietic disorder first reported in 1922. The whole mark of the disease is normocytic normochromic anaemia with severe reticulocytopenia and marked reduction or absence of erythroid precursors from the bone marrow [3]. It can be primary (congenital) or acquired secondary to viral infections, autoimmune diseases, drugs, and toxins [5]. Other secondary causes of acquired PRCA include lymphoproliferative disorders, pregnancy, hematologic malignancies, nonhematologic neoplasms, of which the association with thymoma is the best known [5]. There are numerous cases of PRCA that have been reported as a secondary manifestation of RA [10–18]. Among them, four cases had eosinophilic fasciitis along with PRCA [12]. Some cases have been reported with PRCA associated with both RA and parvovirus B19 infection, and there were several cases of PRCA associated with pregnancy and systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis [13, 15, 16]. One case has been reported of PRCA secondary to D penicillamine treatment in RA [18].
Pathogenesis of PRCA is heterogenous where it involves immune dysfunction with antibodies directed against erythroid precursor cells or erythropoietin or due to T cell-mediated suppression of erythropoiesis [10, 19]. The immunoglobulin (IgG) mediated inhibition of haemoglobin synthesis or complement-binding and direct cytotoxic effect on erythroblasts were found in patients with PRCA, wherein in some patients, the inhibitory antibodies were directed against erythropoietin [20]. Various autoimmune mechanisms of PRCA have been described, such as antibodies against erythroblasts or erythropoietin. T cells or natural killer (NK) cells have been proposed to secrete factors selectively inhibiting erythroid colonies in the bone marrow or directly lysing erythroblasts. Lysis of erythroblasts by T cells could result from `classic’ T-cell receptor (TCR)- mediated antigen recognition. In addition, PRCA can be mediated by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) unrestricted effector-target cell recognition, as erythroid progenitors progressively lose expression of MHC class I and, thus, become susceptible to destruction by NK-type cells. This mechanism is similar to NK-mediated lysis of tumour cells following the loss of HLA class I by the tumour cells [19]. The final result of all these mechanisms is anaemia with bone marrow examination revealing a complete absence of erythroblasts but normal granulocytic and megakaryocytic series [21].
The patients with PRCA present with symptoms of severe anaemia in the absence of haemorrhagic phenomena [19]. Because there is pure underproduction anaemia in PRCA, the gradual decline in haemoglobin concentration allows some degree of adaptation, and symptoms may be less than expected for the degree of anaemia [5]. Of course, patients with secondary PRCA may manifest the symptomatology of the associated syndrome [5]. The findings of the haematological investigations will be normochromic normocytic anaemia with low reticulocyte count (less than 1%) with normal platelet count, leucocyte count, and leucocyte differentials [5, 19]. In the setting of concurrent inflammation, there may be some modest reduction in the total white blood count or a mild abnormality (either slightly high or slightly low) in the platelet count. There may also be a mild relative lymphocytosis [5]. The bone marrow examination will reveal a complete absence of erythroblasts with normal granulopoiesis and megakaryopoiesis [10, 18, 19]. As with all diagnostic examinations of the bone marrow for cytopenias, the materials should be collected for cellular immunology, cytogenetics, and clonal analysis of T-cell receptors. Abnormal cytogenetics in the setting of a characteristic marrow for PRCA indicates the myelodysplastic variant of PRCA. If increased lymphocytes or plasma cells are present, they should be polyclonal in acquired immune PRCA. If clonal lymphocytes are present, it suggests PRCA secondary to an associated lymphoproliferative disorder. T-cell-receptor gene rearrangement studies should be performed routinely [22]. In all patients with marrows diagnostic of PRCA, B19 parvovirus testing should be performed, and in adults with PRCA with evidence of parvovirus infection or of a disorder associated with secondary PRCA, a computed tomography scan of the chest should be performed to rule out a thymoma, which would have potential therapeutic implications [19]. Our patient had anaemia with low reticulocyte count, normal platelets counts and the leucopenia was considered immunological in origin. We confirmed PRCA in our patient by the bone marrows biopsy, where there was a marked reduction in erythroid lineage with normal megakaryopoiesis and increased granulopoiesis. A viral screen for a possible aetiology, autoimmune screen, and CECT to exclude thymoma was done to rule out other secondary causes for PRCA other than RA in this patient.
Depending on the cause, the course of PRCA can be acute and self-limiting or chronic with rare spontaneous remissions [19]. Otherwise, treating PRCA varies with the aetiological factors; however, for primary acquired autoimmune PRCA or secondary PRCA refractory to other therapy, the treatment of choice is immunosuppression [5, 17]. The therapeutic plan usually focuses on the sequential use of various immunosuppressive therapies, including corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporin A and anti-thymocyte globulin, splenectomy and plasmapheresis until remission is obtained [10]. Corticosteroids have been considered the treatment of the first choice, although relapse is not uncommon. Cyclosporin A has become established as one of the leading drugs for the treatment of PRCA. Recently, the efficacies of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab and anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, alemtuzumab, to induce remissions of therapy-resistant PRCA have also been reported [10].
In principle, PRCA secondary to autoimmune/collagen vascular disorders may respond to therapy specific to the management of those disorders. In practice, the treatment of these disorders is usually immunosuppression, and in cases where alternative disease-modulating therapy is available, the patient is usually referred to the haematologist because it was ineffective [5]. The goal of treatment is to induce remission to attain an average haemoglobin concentration with the recovery of erythropoiesis without any requirement for transfusion and avoiding problems associated with transfusions; a partial response is the attainment of transfusion independence with a low but clinically acceptable haemoglobin concentration [4, 5]. Our patient has been treated with prednisolone 40 mg daily, which tailed off over one month with concurrent treatment of cyclosporin A and hydroxychloroquine, where she attained complete recovery within two months.
The clinical outcome of PRCA is variable from complete remission to fatal, and it depends upon the cause and the types of treatment [11, 18, 23]. Some patients with PRCA show no response to treatment [11]. In pregnancy-associated PRCA, cyclosporine and other immunosuppressive agents may significantly affect the fetal outcome and maternal morbidity and probably should be avoided [5]. Naparuck et al. has reported favourable treatment response in groups of parvovirus B19 infection, drug- (non-erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-) induced PRCA and idiopathic PRCA. The outcome has been unfavourable in groups of ESA and thymoma-induced PRCA, even they were receiving immunosuppressants or chemotherapy, respectively [23]. However, Hirokawa et al. has reported cyclosporine producing excellent responses in patients with thymoma-associated PRCA, although limited information suggests that patients with thymoma-associated PRCA have poor prognoses [24]. At the same time, continuous immunosuppression is associated with an increased risk of infection and malignancy; therefore, adequate prevention of infection will be essential [24]. Nevertheless, our patient did not develop any complications due to immunosuppressive therapy.
The final diagnosis of or patient was long-standing deforming rheumatoid arthritis complicated with PRCA with immune-mediated leukopenia and vasculitis. The challenges in the diagnosis were to exclude the possible other aetiologies of the PRCA, leukopenia, generalized lymphadenopathy and venous thrombosis in an unusual site. Extensive lymphadenopathy and venous thrombosis were also reported in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [25]. A nationwide cohort study done in Taiwan recruiting nearly 30000 RA patients has shown a 3.36 fold increased risk of deep venous thrombosis and a 2.07 fold increase in pulmonary embolism than patients without RA [26]. A study done in the United Kingdom has also concluded a similar result [27]. Lymphadenopathy is also a clinical manifestation of RA, indicating the disease activity [28]. Some studies found that the overall frequency of lymphadenopathy in patients with RA is as high as 82% and mainly involving axillary lymph nodes [29]. Lymphadenopathy at unusual sites has also been reported in patients with RA, contributing to venous thrombosis at unusual sites due to vascular compression [30]. Venous thrombosis involving the axillary vein in our patients may be attributed to the fact of possible lymphadenopathy. We excluded the possibility of haematological malignancy by doing a lymph node biopsy and repeating bone marrow biopsy as both of them showed no evidence of leukaemia or lymphoma. The thrombophilia screen also excluded the antiphospholipid syndrome, and the overlapping SLE was also excluded due to not satisfying the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria [31]. Hence these manifestations were thought to be an immune-mediated phenomenon due to rheumatoid arthritis at the multidisciplinary team involving a haematologist.
The major drawback to start immunosuppressive drugs was leukopenia. Nevertheless, after starting cyclosporin A, hydroxychloroquine and steroids, she showed a marked improvement [32]. Cyclosporin A has proven to be the drug of choice for PRCA, and the second-line therapy for PRCA include anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclophosphamide [3, 33, 34]. She was transfusion dependent for nearly 16 months, but she was completely free of blood transfusion after the treatment. Her joint deformities were fixed but minimally interfering with daily living activities, and her constitutional symptoms were also improved.
Patient Perspective
The patient had mild joint symptoms, although with joint deformities where she did not complain about them until the direct questioning. Her main concern was the acute symptoms she got due to the cytopenias in the first two episodes and venous thrombosis in the second episode. However, the patient was educated about the disease after the third episode, where she was satisfied with the treatments she received after the complete diagnosis of PRCA secondary to RA.