1. Gibelli D, Cellina M, Gibelli S, Cappella A, Panzeri MM, Oliva AG, et al. Anatomy of the pterygopalatine fossa: an innovative metrical assessment based on 3D segmentation on head CT-scan. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2019;41(5):523-8.
2. Etoz M, Sisman Y. Evaluation of the nasopalatine canal and variations with cone-beam computed tomography. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2014;36(8):805-12.
3. Duruel O, Kulkarni V, Ataman-Duruel ET, Tözüm MD, Tözüm TF. Radio-Morphometric Evaluation of Greater Palatine Canal and Pterygopalatine Fossa Component: Maxillary Anesthetic Implications. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2019;30(3):863-7.
4. Madeira M. Face anatomy. Anatomical basis for the dental practice 5th ed Sao Paula: Sarvier. 2004.
5. Malamed SF. Handbook of local anesthesia-e-book: Elsevier health sciences; 2019.
6. McKinney KA, Stadler ME, Wong Y-T, Shah RN, Rose AS, Zdanski CJ, et al. Transpalatal greater palatine canal injection: radioanatomic analysis of where to bend the needle for pediatric sinus surgery. American journal of rhinology & allergy. 2010;24(5):385-8.
7. Sved AM, Wong JD, Donkor P, Horan J, Rix L, Curtin J, et al. Complications associated with maxillary nerve block anaesthesia via the greater palatine canal. Australian dental journal. 1992;37(5):340-5.
8. Lepere A. Maxillary nerve block via the greater palatine canal: new look at an old technique. Anesthesia & pain control in dentistry. 1993;2(4):195-7.
9. Dalili Z, Mahjoub P, Sigaroudi AK. Comparison between cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in the assessment of the relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted class C mandibular third molars. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2011;8(4):203-10.
10. Ghaznavi A, Ghaznavi D, Valizadeh S, Vasegh Z, Al-Shuhayeb M. Accuracy of linear measurements made on cone beam computed tomography scans at different magnifications. Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences, 2019, 5.5.
11. Vasegh Z, Valizadeh S, Safi Y, Ghazizadeh Ahsaie M, Mohammadi Y. Evaluation of Posterior Superior Alveolar Canal on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images. J Dent Sch [Internet]. 2020Mar.11 [cited 2021Aug.10];37(2):62-6
12. Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017;51(3 Suppl 1):S102-S21.
13. Safi Y, Moshfeghi M, Rahimian S, Kheirkhahi M, Eslami Manouchehri M. Assessment of Nasopalatine Canal Anatomic Variations Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in a Group of Iranian Population. Iran J Radiol. 2017; 14: e37028
14. Safi Y, Amid R, Vasegh Z, Ghazizadeh Ahsaie M. Anatomical variations in the interforaminal regions of candidates for implantassisted overdentures: a cross-sectional CBCT analysis. Gen Dent 2020;68:11–16
15. Safi Y, Amid R, Vasegh Z, Ahsaie MG. A new classification of anterior mandible edentulous ridge based on cone beam computed tomography. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2021;31:21–31
16. Razavi M, Noori M, Shirafkan S, Pirzad S. The Length and Course (Path) of Greater Palatine Canal in Computer Imaging with Cone Beam. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology. 2019;13(4).
17. Aoun G, Nasseh I, Sokhn S, Saadeh M. Analysis of the greater palatine foramen in a Lebanese population using cone-beam computed tomography technology. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5(Suppl 2):S82-S8.
18. Kalmin O, Efremova A, Zyulkina L. Anatomical variability of greater palatine canal and greater palatine foramen in men of the first period of adulthood. 2020;16:974-8.
19. Ikuta CRS, Cardoso CL, Ferreira-Júnior O, Lauris JRP, Souza PHC, Rubira-Bullen IRF. Position of the greater palatine foramen: an anatomical study through cone beam computed tomography images. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2013;35(9):837-42.
20. Tavassolizadeh H, Torkzadeh A, Kheiri L, Negahdar P. Evaluation of Greater Palatine Canal and Foramen Anatomical Variation on Cone-beam CT Radiography. Regen Reconstr Restor [Internet]. 2019Oct.7 [cited 2021Aug.10];4(4):151-5.