FSGS has been reported as having poorer transplant outcomes in children than most other causes of KF largely because of disease recurrence [13]. Proteinuria may herald recurrent FSGS even if an early biopsy does not show glomerular abnormalities [14]. Absence of a causative mutation represents the major risk factor for FSGS recurrence, while transplant can be curative in genetic forms of the disease [15]. Since recurrent FSGS was postulated to be caused by CPF affecting podocyte structure and function, interventions such as PE and RTX may result in improved outcomes in treatment rather than prevention of recurrence [16].
We already have reported our 10 year experience of KT in children as of 2018 as a specialized Center in Egypt [12]. In this study we displayed the role of pre-emptive PE in decreasing proteinuria and improving outcome of FSGS after a mean of 3.8 years follow up after KT.
This study represents a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 40 pediatric KTRs with KF caused by primary FSGS. Non-genetically proven/ familial recipients (28 patients; 70%) received perioperative pre-emptive six PE sessions. Eleven patients; 27.5% (including 3 genetic/familial FSGS) developed early recurrence were successfully treated by PE/RTX, while 2 patients (5%) with late proteinuria developed graft failure.
Our overall incidence of disease recurrence after KT among non-genetic patients (10/28; 35.7%) is less than what was reported by Morello & his co-workers [15] in their Italian experiences (53%). Additionally; previous data in the literature, stretching back almost three decades, reported higher incidence of recurrence than our report [13, 17, 18].
We reported significant reduction in early proteinuria of non-genetic FSGS transplant recipients with perioperative PE sessions [D1 to D7 (2514.65 ± 915 versus 954 ± 321mcg/day; p ≤ 0.001) and D7 to time of assessment after mean 3.8 years follow up duration (954 ± 32 versus 35.29 ± 60.94 mcg/day; p ≤ 0.001).
Bouts & his colleagues performed survey among European Society of Pediatric Nephrology (ESPN) members that gives insight into the variation in policies regarding the prevention and treatment of FSGS recurrence with response rate of 15% (59/391 active members), mostly all by pediatric nephrologists. In this survey, one-third of the respondents treated pre-emptively with PE and/or RTX or CsA [18].
To date, PE is of uncertain value in primary FSGS in the native kidney [19] unlike CsA which is the only evidence-based treatment for FSGS before KT [18, 20]. In the transplant kidney, pre-emptive PE implementation in FSGS patient with anticipated high recurrence risk makes sense: remove the injurious; podocyte toxic CPF from the blood before causing irreversible structural damage. However, a prospective, randomized trial of apheresis therapy versus placebo has never been conducted for either native kidney or post-transplant FSGS.
In the present study we reported 1 year graft and patient survival of the whole cohort of 93.8%, with a mean 1 year graft function (serum creatinine) of 0.67 ± 0.25 mg/dl. Moreover; we analyzed graft survival and recurrence free survival data using Kaplan Mayer curves (Figs. 3 & 4 respectively) with very promising results.
The effect of PE on long-term graft survival is especially unknown [19]. However, reported response rates were 50–90% higher than expected with other approaches (30–40%) making it a reasonable approach until more data become available [8].
Genetic FSGS patients have defective components of the kidneys, rather than circulating factors and therefore their risk of recurrence is low [4, 21]. However apart from disease recurrence, which mostly occurs early after KT, graft outcome differences between genetic and non-genetic FGSG patients have not yet been discussed. Interestingly; we reported no difference in graft function in term of serum creatinine in sporadic than genetic FSGS transplant recipients (p = 0.1437) after a mean follow up duration of 3.8 years with implementation of pre-emptive PE to sporadic patients. This means that the postulated worse outcome of sporadic than genetic FSGS patients after KT that is associated with increased risk of recurrence can be partially overcomed by pre-emptive PE implementation
Native kidney nephrectomy prior to KT has been suggested by some as a preventive measure of recurrence [22], but it has not been effective and has even shown a higher risk of recurrence in other reports [23, 24].
Native nephrectomy was specifically analyzed among our cohort as one of the potentially modifiable risk factors of proteinuria recurrence after KT. We reported positive impact of native nephrectomy on the graft in term of less prost-transplant proteinuria (both early and current; p = 0.0296 & 0.0441 respectively). Our finding regard native nephrectomy does not go with what was recently published by Uffing & his co-workers [25]. They reported prior nephrectomy as a significant risk for recurrence, but their number of participants is too small to draw definitive conclusions. One of the hypotheses is that the native kidneys left in situ may act as a “sponge” to absorb the potential pathogenic CPF, leading to reduction of the free CPF that may injure the transplanted kidney [26]. Our explanation, however, of less proteinuria in patients with native nephrectomy is based on the absence of proteinuria derived from the native kidneys after KT. This contradictory findings could be simply explained by the fact that severe nephrosis from FSGS, which may also have conferred a higher risk for recurrence, might have been the indication for nephrectomy [19].
This study has a number of limitations. First; lack of genetic testing of the whole cohort and the limitation of genetic testing to only NPHS2 mutation for non-genetically proven familial patients. Second; lack of pathological analysis of most of patients with early proteinuria. Third; other confounders causing proteinuria as chronic rejection particularly in late proteinuria were not analyzed in details in this study. Further studies to overcome these limitations and to investigate the potentially modifiable predictors of outcome in this particular group of transplant recipients are highly recommended