Subjects characteristics at baseline
A total of 106 aMCI cases were enrolled in this study and randomly allocated to the DHYZ group (n=53) and Aniracetam group (n=53). The average age of patients in the Aniracetam group was 69.62 ± 4.95 years, and that of DHYZ group was 67.66 ± 5.26 years. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age (P = 0.058), MMSE (P = 0.827), MoCA (P = 0.951), ADAS-Cog (P = 0.847), ADL (P = 0.865) or TCM before treatment (P = 0.874) (Table 1 and Table 3).
Efficacy outcomes
Table 1 shows the results of several neuropsychological scale tests,including MMSE, MoCA, ADAS-Cog and ADL before and during the 12-month treatment period.
In terms of MMSE, there was no significant difference in the Aniracetam group compared with baseline value (P > 0.05). However, the MMSE was significantly improved by DHYZ after treated for 6 months (24.46±1.11 after 6 months, 25.06±1.36 after 9 months and 25.68±1.33 after 12 months versus 24.04±1.24 at baseline; P = 0.049, < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). Compared with the Aniracetam group, statistically higher MMSE score in the DHYZ group were observed at the 9-(25.68±1.33 versus 23.88±1.55, P < 0.001) and 12-month timepoints (24.04±1.24 versus 23.74±1.70, P < 0.001).
In terms of MoCA, there was no difference in the Aniracetam group compared with baseline value (P > 0.05). However, improved MoCA were detected following DHYZ treatment at the 9-and 12-month timepoints (24.06±1.79 and 24.68±1.56 versus 22.90±1.63 at baseline, P < 0.001). Compared with the Aniracetam group, statistically higher MoCA score in the DHYZ group were observed at the 9- (24.06±1.79 versus 22.68±2.03, P < 0.001) and 12-month timepoints (24.68±1.56 versus 22.38±1.92, P < 0.001).
In terms of ADAS-Cog, there was no difference in the Aniracetam group compared with baseline value at the 3-, 6- or 9-month timepoints (P > 0.05), while the ADAS-Cog score was even higher at the 12-month timepoint (23.82±9.01 versus 20.56±4.24, P < 0.001), indicating a worse performance of Aniracetam. In the DHYZ group, significantly lower ADAS-Cog score was observed at the 12-month timepoint (17.58±3.99 versus 20.36±5.93, P < 0.001). The value also had statistically prominent difference when compared with the Aniracetam group (P < 0.001).
In terms of ADL, there were significant improvement in the Aniracetam group compared with baseline value at the 3-, 9- and 12-month timepoints (23.60±1.69 after 3 months, 23.30±1.85 after 9 months, 22.96±1.89 after 12 months versus 24.04±1.76 at baseline; P = 0.016, 0.009 and < 0.001, respectively). In the DHYZ group, significant improvement was detected since treated for 3 months (23.44±1.84 after 3 months, 23.28±1.93 after 6 months, 22.58±1.86 after 9 months and 21.7±1.43 after 12 months versus 23.98±1.76 at baseline; P = 0.001, < 0.001, < 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). Although improvement in terms of ADL score was both detected in the Aniracetam group and DHYZ group, the value in the DHYZ group at 12-month timepoint was notably lower than that in the Aniracetam control group (P < 0.001).
Table 2 shows the results of several neuropsychological scale tests including MMSE, MoCA, ADAS-Cog and ADL after treatment and 1 year follow-up
After 1 year follow-up, there was no significant change in MMSE and ADAS-Cog scores between the two groups. The MoCA was significantly improved by DHYZ (24.68±1.56 after 12 months versus 25.03±2.06 1 year follow-up; P = 0.029). ADL scores in the DHYZ group (21.7±1.43 after 12 months versus 20.66±1.58 1 year follow-up; P < 0.001) and Aniracetam group (22.96±1.89 after 12 months versus 22.07±2.38 1 year follow-up; P = 0.011) were both significant improved. Compared with the Aniracetam group, statistically lower ADL score in the DHYZ group (P < 0.001).
Table 3 shows the results of TCM symptom scores before therapy and during the 12-month treatment period.
In terms of TCM (Table 3), there were significant improvement in the Aniracetam compared with baseline value since treated for 3 months (11.82±2.58, 11.34±2.65, 10.84±2.61 and 10.18±2.39 after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months versus 12.60±2.60 at baseline; Ps < 0.001). In the DHYZ group, significant improvement was detected since treated for 6 months (10.88±2.68, 9.18±2.78 and 7.52±2.54 after 6, 9 and 12 months versus 12.68±2.43 before treatment; Ps < 0.001). Although improvement in terms of TCM score was both determined in the Aniracetam group and DHYZ group, the values in the DHYZ group at 9- and 12-month timepoints were markedly lower than that in the placebo control group (P = 0.003 and < 0.001, respectively).
Table 4 shows the results of TCM symptom scores after treatment and 1 year follow-up. After 1 year follow-up, there was no significant change in TCM symptom scores in the Aniracetam group. While the TCM symptom scores was significantly improved by DHYZ (7.52±2.54 after 12 months versus 6.31±2.18 1 year follow-up; P < 0.001).
Exclusion and drop-out
One female patient and two male patients in DHYZ group were excluded due to poor compliance and failure to take medication as required; two female patients in Aniracetam group were excluded due to poor compliance, failure to take medicine on time and regular follow-up, so the final statistical results were: 50 cases in DHYZ group and 51 cases in Aniracetam group. After 1 year follow-up, no one was lost, so the final statistical results were: 50 in DHYZ group and 51 in Aniracetam group.
Conversion rate
After 1 year follow-up, 13 patients in the two groups were found to be transformed into AD, 5 in the DHYZ group, with a conversion rate of 10%, and 8 in the Aniracetam group, with a conversion rate of 15.69%. 13 patients had significant decline in memory, calculation and orientation. In daily life, they need help in cooking, taking medicine, financing and so on.