The association between BMI and outcomes of TKA is unclear. Some studies have shown an increase in BMI had negative effect on the results, whereas the others showed no relationship between BMI and the outcomes. Pasquier et al. reported presence of varus deformity and morbid obesity resulted in a greater gain in flexion postoperatively. Although, the final flexion was lower than the mean in the overall population [11]. We noticed that the difference of preoperative and final flexion achieved was maximum in class III obesity (Table 1).
Singh et al. found that BMI had no effect on the postoperative joint perception, and all classes of obesity experienced similar functional outcomes following TKA [12]. We noticed a difference in the functional outcome in the immediate, intermediate, and late postoperative period but the final functional outcome after one year from the surgery was the same in all obesity classes (Table 4 and Fig. 1). The cases with a higher BMI are at increased risk of attaining lower functional scores following TKA [13]. Similarly, the maximum improvement in functional scores with the least incidence of infection was seen in a normal and overweight group. In contrast, minimum improvement in functional scores with the highest incidence of infection was seen in the morbidly obese group. The trend of decrease in the final functional score was seen while going up in the categories of obesity (Table 1 and Table 3).
It is documented that the obese patient had an increased risk of medical and surgical complications with an increase in rates of complications with an increase in the class of obesity [14]. We observed that all the perioperative complications were maximum in the morbidly obese group and were minimum in the normal or overweight group. The risk of developing complications increased with a transition to higher classes of obesity (Table 3).
An adverse effect of obesity on implant survival is often debated. Gaillard et al. reported that obesity had no effect on mid-term implant survival, though their results showed poor functional outcomes in the obese [15]. We also noticed that the implant positioning, radio-lucent lines around the implants, and implant survival at one year did not correlate with the grades of BMI or classes of obesity. It is a common belief that overloading of the knee occurs with increase in BMI causing more significant loading across the tibial component resulting in poor implant survival [16, 17, 18]. Despite this, it is found that a more sedentary lifestyle in morbidly obese patients counters implant’s wear.
Our mean preoperative and postoperative overall KSS and FKSS were consistently lower in Class III obesity, although the difference between the two was maximum in class III obesity. Chen et al. studied 117 morbidly obese and 2108 non-obese patients, FKSS between the two groups was comparable and improvement in KSS was superior in obese patients [19]. However, our final KSS and the FKSS were similar in all classes of obesity. Krushell et al. found the minimum improvement in FKSS of 13 in the morbidly obese (class III obesity) vs. 26 in the non-obese group [20]. Their results signify that a morbidly obese patient who was housebound earlier can now walk for a significant distance postoperatively.
We were lucky not to encounter any postoperative infections in our subjects in the immediate postoperative period and up to the first year of their follow-up. However, these patients need to be closely observed in the future for any delayed complications like prosthetic joint infections and implant loosening. We suggest that the morbid obesity group not be denied TKA based on their BMI solely, as the procedure significantly improves functional capability and quality of life [21].