3.1 Evaluation of aeration performance of aerators
The tests of aeration performance of aerators were carried out in the No.3-tank and No.6-tank in ZY-WWTP by using the process state aeration performance tester. As shown in Fig. 3(a), the OTE of aerobic tank ranged from 20.02–39.01% in the No.3-tank, with an average of 26.93%. At the first corridor, the OTE of the first two test points were as low as 20.02% and 20.10%, which were lower than the average level of the whole aerobic zone. In the middle section of the second corridor, the OTE of the No.8 test point is obviously higher than others, which have reached 39.01%, it can basically reach the OTE (40%) in the state of clear water. Overall, the average OTE of the three test points in the second corridor was 31.79%, which indicates that the performance of the aerator in this area is better than the first and third corridor. The OTE of No.9, No.10 and No.11 test points were 26.31%, 23.2% and 26.05% respectively, which were far lower than the expected value of aerator. The OTE test results showed that there are serious pollution, blockage or other circumstances of aerator in the NO.1, No.2, No.3, No.4, No.5, No.9, No.10 and No.11 test points in the No.3-tank, where the uneven aeration has led to the increase of bubbles and the decrease of OTE. Moreover, due to the decrease of pollutant concentration along the corridor, the inhibition of oxygen mass transfer (KLa) is reduced, and the average OTE values of the second and third corridor are on the rise.
In the same way, the test results of oxygenation performance of the No.6-tank were analyzed. As shown in Fig. 3(b), the OTE of the No.6-tank fluctuates less compared with the No.3-tank, ranging from 19.08–37.5%, with an average of 25.52%. The OTE of the first and second corridor fluctuated slightly, with an average of 22.73%, which was lower than 2.79% of the overall average. However, the OTE increased rapidly in the third corridor, the OTE of the No.10, No.11 and No.12 were 28.42%, 37.5% and 35.83%, respectively. Combined with field investigation, the aeration pipeline of the No.6-tank was maintained two years ago, and there is no obvious big bubble point at present. However, according to the results of oxygenation performance test, the OTE in some aerobic aeras has dropped to a lower value, which indicate that the pollution has begun to exist.
Moreover, the gas-collecting capacity (Qc) at the front end of the No.3-tank is fluctuates greatly, increasing from 0.538 m3/h to 13.679 m3/h along the corridor, and the Qc in the area of gas-collecting hood (gas-collecting area: 3 m3) is only 0.583 m3/h, which indicates that the outlet of the first two test points in the front-end of aeration zone is abnormal, where the aerators are likely polluted or blocked. The regional aeration rate of the first corridor in the No.3-tank is much lower than that of the second and third corridor, the average of the Qc at each test points of the first corridor is 3.318 m3/h, and the second and third corridors is 7.229 m3/h and 11.055 m3/h, respectively. While the fluctuation range of the Qc is relatively small in the No.6-tank, which is basically in the range of 4.735 ~ 9.866 m3/h. Combined with field observation, there are large bubbles on the surface of the first corridor. There are mainly two reasons, the first one is serious blockage of aerator, the second is damage of pipeline valve. From the first corridor to the second corridor, the OTE increased gradually.
By calculating the IAU, it can be known that the overall IAU of the No.3-tank and No.6-tank are 4.86 and 1.46 respectively, and the aeration uniformity of the No.3-tank is in a poor state. According to the field observation of the oxygenation performance in the aerobic zone, the phenomenon of “boiling” exists at many test points in the No.3-tank. The large bubble aeration on the surface of the aerobic zone indicates that the blockage or damage of the aerator in this area has been serious. Similarly, the OTE of some test points is lower than the average of the whole aerobic tank can also shows that.
Through the measurement of aeration performance, the test points with low OTE and Qc of the biological treatment system can be found accurately and sensitively, so as to guide the maintenance of the aeration system in time. According to the test results, the aerators in some aeras need to be cleaned or replaced to improve the operation efficiency. Results showed that these aerators where the No.1, No.2, No.3, No.4, No.5, No.10 in the No.3-tank, the No.6, No.7, No.9 in the No.6-tank need to be repaired or replaced.
3.2 Evaluation of the oxygen in demand
The performance evaluation of activated sludge in the No.3-tank and No.6-tank were shown in the Fig. 4. The OUR value in the two aerobic tanks showed a downward trend along the corridors, ranging from 39.6 mgO2/(L·h) to 19.06 mgO2/(L·h) in the No.3-tank, from 41.05 mgO2/(L·h) to 31.06 mgO2/(L·h) in the No.6-tank, respectively. The concentration of pollutants in the front of the first corridor in the No.3-tank is relatively high, and there are more available substrates for microorganisms, and their activity is relatively high. With the decrease of pollutant concentration, the oxygen demand of microorganisms also decreases, and OUR is decreasing. The OUR decreases rapidly from the No.6 test point (33.2 mgO2/(L·h)) to the No.7 test point (26.14 mgO2/(L·h)) of the No.3-tank. The gradual rise of DO indicates that the degradation of pollutants is completed basically. The decrease of OUR in the No.6-tank was lower, the oxygen demand of activated sludge remained at a higher level, and the last test point was within 31.06 mgO2/(L·h). According to the calculation of specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR), the performance of activated sludge is at the middle level in the ZY-WWTP. The SOUR in the No.3-tank is in the range of 8.19 ~ 19.89 mgO2/(gVSS·h), and the activity of the activated sludge in the No.6-tank is lower than the No.3-tank, which is in the range of 10.06 ~ 15.43 mgO2/(gVSS·h). Combined with the test results of oxygenation performance and the change regulation of OUR in the No.3-tank, it can be seen that the kLa is obviously lower than others in the first corridor of the No.3-tank. Lower OTE and higher OUR have indicated that insufficient oxygen supply in this aeration aeras, which are likely to form an anoxic zone in the aeration tank.
The variation trend of DO in the aerobic zone of the two biological tanks are shown in Fig. 5. It can be seen from the figure that the DO concentration in the first corridor of the No.3-tank is close to 0 mg/L, which indicates that the aeration rate of the first corridor is quite low. The corridor is basically in anoxic state, which is not conducive to nitrification in aeration tank. At the beginning of the second corridor, DO concentration began to increase significantly and was approximately 0.98 mg/L in the No.9 test point. After entering the third corridor, DO concentration gradually increased to 1.48 mg/L, and was close to 2.95 mg/L at the end of the corridor. Because of the low aeration efficiency and the high activated sludge activity, the DO concentration of the front end is quite low while in the end section is higher. which leads to higher DO concentration in the reflux. The mixture will carry a lot of DO return back to the anoxic tank, so the high DO concentration at the end of the aerobic tank will furtherly affect the denitrification reaction. From the No.11 to the No.12 test point, the DO concentration increased rapidly, ranging from 1.13 mg/L to 2.23 mg/L. The results showed that the oxygen consumption capacity of microorganisms in this area decreased, and the opening of aeration pipeline could be reduced.
The results of OUR and DO show that the oxygen supply in the first two corridors basically meets the oxygen demand capacity, but the aeration capacity of the third corridor is significantly greater than the demand, which result in a waste of energy. On the premise that the complex automatic control program is not introduced into the WWTP, most operation engineers adopt the mode of subsection gradually reducing aeration and control the aeration volume by manually regulating the valve. However, the DO value of each section of subsection decreasing aeration is often determined according to experience, and there is no scientific and clear index to guide the subsection of aeration. Therefore, it is necessary to put forward scientific regulation indicators and control strategies according to the actual degradation law of pollutants and biological treatment systems with different efficiency, so as to provide practical guidance for the upgrading and transformation of WWTPs.
3.3 Analysis of physical-chemical indexes
(1) Analysis of physical-chemical indexes of activated sludge
In this study, the portable analyzer was used to test the oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), pH and other indexes of these twelve test points in the aerobic tank. The results of these physical-chemical indexes are shown in Table 2.
Table 2
Basic operation indexes of aerobic tank
Test point (m)
|
No.3-tank
|
NO.6-tank
|
MLSS
(mg/L)
|
MLVSS
(mg/L)
|
pH
|
ORP
(mV)
|
MLSS
(mg/L)
|
MLVSS
(mg/L)
|
pH
|
ORP
(mV)
|
3
|
3652
|
1991
|
6.91
|
-96.8
|
4676
|
2899
|
6.802
|
87
|
12
|
3830
|
2183
|
6.918
|
-98.1
|
4820
|
3088
|
6.805
|
74.5
|
27
|
3764
|
2045
|
6.898
|
-91
|
4535
|
2811
|
6.771
|
80.5
|
42
|
4081
|
2326
|
6.892
|
-83.8
|
4609
|
2757
|
6.738
|
83.6
|
57
|
4175
|
2179
|
6.887
|
-65.1
|
4818
|
2887
|
6.702
|
82
|
77
|
4027
|
2295
|
6.885
|
-12.8
|
4599
|
2951
|
6.675
|
95.1
|
97
|
3970
|
2262
|
6.857
|
24.9
|
4605
|
2855
|
6.693
|
90.2
|
127
|
4013
|
2187
|
6.793
|
68.3
|
4734
|
2905
|
6.603
|
97.4
|
157
|
3851
|
2195
|
6.756
|
102.2
|
4528
|
2707
|
6.636
|
108.3
|
187
|
3709
|
2154
|
6.739
|
110.7
|
4601
|
2852
|
6.512
|
116.7
|
215
|
3578
|
2099
|
6.688
|
164.3
|
4492
|
2885
|
6.461
|
120.4
|
245
|
3659
|
2018
|
6.67
|
213.5
|
4735
|
2915
|
6.421
|
135.2
|
The MLVSS/MLSS ratio is commonly used to evaluate the activated sludge activity. In municipal WWTPs, the MLVSS/MLSS ratio is often determined as about 0.75 (Wentzel et al., 2002; Fan et al., 2015). Test results of sludge concentration along the corridor were shown in Table 2. The MLSS was ranging from 3578 mg/L to 4174 mg/L, 4492 mg/L to 4820 mg/L in the No.3-tank and No.6-tank respectively, which shows that the systems have good flow pushing effect. Moreover, the MLVSS/MLSS are 0.56 and 0.62 respectively. Studies have shown that the influent sediment concentration has an important effect on the accumulation of inorganic solids and the recovery of activated sludge system. Lower MLVSS/mixed could show that not only reduces the effective pool capacity but also increases operating costs.
The ORP reflects an oxidation or reduction state of the activated sludge mixture, and it can reflect the denitrification environment and whether adjustments need to be made to change them (Gao et al., 2003). ORP index is more sensitive than DO, and it has stronger indicative effect in biochemical treatment system. As shown in Table 2, ORP in the No.3-tank varies widely, and test points in the first corridor all are negative, ranging from -96.8 mV to -12 mV, and the lowest ORP at the inlet end is close to -96.8 mV. With the increase of process, the change trend is consistent with the change of DO. After entering the second corridor, ORP increased to a positive value, and nitrification was mainly carried out in this stage. At the end of the third corridor, ORP increased to 200 mV. The ORP began to rise significantly after 77 m in the front of the pool, indicating that the tank was in anoxic state at 60 m in the front. The overall DO value of the No.6-tank is high, and ORP basically positive, with little change trend. The results showed that the aerobic environment in the front of the No.6-tank was better, and the nitrification effect was better than that in the No.3-tank.
The alkalinity is an important factor affecting nitrification and dentification reaction, the relative bacteria are very sensitive to pH. Under neutral or slightly alkaline pH conditions (pH 8 ~ 9), their biological activity is the strongest and nitrification process is rapid. When pH > 9.6 or pH < 6.0, the biological activity of nitrifying bacteria will be inhibited and tend to stop. Under acidic conditions, when pH < 7.0, the nitrification rate slows down. When pH < 6.5, the nitrification rate slows down significantly. When pH < 5, the nitrification rate was close to zero. As shown in Table 2, it can be seen that the pH decrease range of the No.6-tank is larger than that of the No.3-tank, which indicates that the nitrification effect of the former is better than that of the latter, and the pH at the end of the No.6-tank is lower than 6.5, which indicates that the nitrification rate of the No.6-tank is obviously decreased. This conclusion is consistent with the change of DO. On the whole, the pH of the two aeration tanks were in acidic condition, and the overall nitrification effect was not ideal.
(2) Analysis of water quality along the corridor
Through the analysis of water quality along the corridor, the degradation regulation of pollutants in the aerobic zone can be investigated, and it can be linked with the aeration performance, activated sludge performance and physic-chemical indexes of the aeration system to evaluate the improvement potential of the treatment capacity of the biochemical system. In this study, samples were taken at the corresponding test points to test the concentrations of CODCr, NH3-N, TN, and TP in the wastewater samples, and the treatment effect of the aerobic tank was analyzed and evaluated according to the change results. Through the comparison, it can be found that the change regulation of wastewater index test results better echoes the activated sludge activity status, while the change of OUR is more forward and more sensitive than the change of concentration of the water quality.
The water quality test results of the No.3-tank and No.6-tank in ZY-WWTP are shown in Fig. 6. The concentration of CODCr decreases from 40 mg/L to 27 mg/L at the outlet, and the removal rate is 32.5%. The concentration of NH3-N decreased from 22.41 mg/L to 13.12 mg/L, but there was a weak rising stage in the front, and the removal rate was 41.45%. The nitrification effect was poor, which was consistent with the insufficient aeration and acidic pH value of the No.3-tank. The TN concentration decreased from 35.82 mg/L to 25.45 mg/L, and the removal efficiency was poor, mainly due to the higher ORP in the anoxic zone and the general anoxic environment, which led to the weak denitrification ability. The removal rate of TP was 95.04% when the concentration of TP ranged from 5.24 mg/L to 0.26 mg/L. The degradation process mainly occurred at the end of the first corridor and the second corridor. In the pool section where DO value began to rise at about 100 m, TP began to decrease significantly, indicating that a good phosphorus absorption reaction was carried out.
The results of water quality in No.6-tank of ZY-WWTP are shown in Fig. 6 (b). The CODCr concentration of influent was relatively low, showing a downward trend from 55 mg/L to 36.2 mg/L, with a removal rate of 34.18%. The removal rate of NH3-N was 97.98% when decreased from 13.34 mg/L to 0.27 mg/L. The change of TN was very small, decreased from 24.66 mg/L to 21.47 mg/L, which decreased by 12.9%. The concentration of TP decreased from 1.62 mg/L to 0.25 mg/L, which was reduced by 84.57%. It reached the standard in the second corridor, and the effluent of the last section was basically unchanged. According to the results of aeration rate and OTE, the No.6-tank has better aeration effect than No.3-tank, which makes No.6-tank have a better aerobic environment, and the removal rate of NH3-N and TP is better than No.3-tank.
From the above analysis, it can be seen that the scientific operation of aeration system directly determines whether the living environment of microorganisms is suitable, the activity of activated sludge and the effluent quality. Due to the poor aeration effect of the No.3-tank in ZY-WWTP, the DO in the middle and front section is low, which affects the nitrification effect. Cleaning or replacing the aeration equipment, improving the OTE and optimizing the aerobic environment are conducive to the complete nitrification. Taking the first level an emission standard as the limit, the NH3-N concentration still has a reduction potential of at least 8 mg/L. After entering the third corridor, the DO increased gradually in the No.3-tank and No.6-tank of the ZY-WWTP, and the DO at the end was close to 3 mg/L. Because of the low aeration efficiency and the high OUR of activated sludge, the DO concentration of the front end is very low; However, the higher DO value in the end section will lead to higher DO concentration in the reflux and destroy the anoxic environment. In order to ensure the anoxic environment, the amount of aeration in the last stage should be reasonably controlled, and the TN concentration still has the potential to reduce at least 10 mg/L. The efficient operation of biological treatment system is inseparable from the monitoring and diagnosis of aeration system. Only by accurately understanding the operation status of biochemical tank can the efficient operation of the whole system be scientifically guided.
3.4 Maintenance and management of aeration equipment
After long-term operation, the aeration equipment in aerobic tank will produce pollution and blockage problems, which will lead to the decrease of the OTE in aeration system and the increase of energy consumption in wastewater treatment operation. The process of this kind of problem is slow, and it is difficult for operators to judge by naked eyes in a short time. When the damage of the aerator is completely reflected on the surface of the aerobic tank, the treatment effect of the WWTP has been seriously reduced, and the operation cost has caused a lot of waste. In addition, in order to avoid Not-In-My-Back-Yard, the government has strengthened the control of odor emission from WWTPs in recent years, and the fully enclosed aeration tank is gradually implemented, which further increases the operation difficulty of biochemical tank. The long-term monitoring of the aeration system by using the process state aeration performance tester and the long-term monitoring of the activated sludge activity and influent toxicity by using the specific oxygen uptake rate online monitoring device can scientifically and timely guide the efficient operation of the biological treatment system.
Through the system evaluation of the instrument, the lower aeration efficiency point of the aeration system can be obtained, so as to guide the maintenance or transformation of the aeration equipment. On the basis of field test, the average OTE of the No.3-tank is 26.93%, which is lower than the average. That is, there are at least six test points where the aerator needs to be cleaned or replaced. The average OTE value of the No.6-tank is 25.52%, there are at least three test points where the aerator needs to be cleaned or replaced. Through the replacement of aeration equipment and scientific and effective maintenance, the theoretical maximum aeration efficiency can be increased by 7%. For different pollutants, there are different DO requirements for organic matter degradation and NH3-N degradation, while in plug flow aeration tank, there are different degradation rules and oxygen demand in space. Through the above field test and OUR analysis results show that the variation trend of OUR is significantly related to the variation trend of pollutants, and OUR is more sensitive than that of pollutants. For the organic matter degradation section, relevant research and experimental verification show that when other operating conditions are in a reasonable range, no matter DO is 2 mg/L or 0.5 mg/L, organic matter can be degraded rapidly. Therefore, DO at 0.5 mg/L can meet the demand of heterotrophic bacteria. For the NH3-N degradation stage, DO should be maintained at about 2 mg/L in order to ensure the NH3-N degradation effect.
Results of the balance of oxygen in supply and demand in aerobic tank were shown in Fig. 7. Under the current operating conditions, the oxygen in supply (Qs) are about 440, 309 and 241 kg/h, while the oxygen in demand (Cs) are 81, 355 and 448 kg/h respectively in the three corridors of the No.3-tank. Similarly, the Qs are about 440, 309 and 241 kg/h, while the Cs are 309, 266.3 and 245.3 kg/h respectively in the No.6-tank. Results showed that these two aerobic tanks generally have the problems of insufficient aeration at the front end and residual aeration at the back end. Based on the process state aeration performance tester and the specific oxygen uptake rate online monitoring device, the Qs and Cs can be accurately monitored and evaluated. Through the analysis of the measurement process and results, more scientifically and reasonably aeration was regulated, which ensure that the biological treatment system can not only meet the effluent quality standards, but also achieve energy saving and consumption reduction.
For different pollutants, the degradation of organic matter and NH3-N have different requirements of DO, but in the plug flow aerobic tank, it shows different spatial degradation regulations and different oxygen in demand. Combined with the above experiments and analysis, the following subsection regulation strategies could be proposed: (1) Measuring the influent water quality or analyzing the historical data of the WWTP to determine the CODCr and NH3-N concentrations at the head end of the aerobic tank. (2) According to the pollutant concentration at the head end of the aerobic tank, the subsection applicability of aeration control is analyzed to determine the subsection mode. (3) Using the specific oxygen uptake rate online monitoring device, the model of OUR and pollutant degradation rate is tested and established, the test points of aeration control aeras are determined, and the length of each aera of the aeration tank is calculated. (4) According to the degradation characteristics of pollutants in each section, set the optimal DO level and establish aeration control countermeasures.