4.1. Cardiovascular Risk
In general, working condition at the police force are reported as a risk factor for the development of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus and higher rates of mortality (1, 2, 4). Not only German police officers are found to be at a higher risk for cardiovascular disease, when in fact this seems to be a global problem affecting law enforcement. It is likely that various factors in terms of the working conditions are the cause for this. Police patrols are scheduled according to shift work. Furthermore, the majority of work time involves sitting in patrol cars, writing reports, or interviewing persons, placing the officer at a higher risk for obesity.
It is known that occupational sitting time is independently associated with the presence of overweight and obesity and other cardiovascular risk factors in men (17, 18). The time of sedentary work activity was found to be related to an increased waist circumference, elevated serum triglyceride and serum CRP levels and lower HDL cholesterol levels and it can accelerate the emergence and progression of cardiovascular disease (18, 19). Thomas et al. could provide evidence of a link between shift work and a higher level of cardiovascular risk. (20). Workers on night duty generally show a significantly higher BMI as well as higher levels of cholesterol and triglyceride than workers on day shift (21). It is fair to assume that these factors also play an important role in the development of cardiovascular risk to the police officers in our study.
In our group of POs the mean blood lipid levels, depicting cardiovascular risk, were increased above the upper limit of the healthy reference range with the exception of total cholesterol (205.9 ± 40.4) and triglyceride (185.1 ± 145.4) values. Compared to Swiss police officers, the analyzed German cohort showed higher median results for BMI, waist circumference, cholesterol, LDL and levels of triglyceride (22). The German cohort show also higher median results when compared to the results of international studies. A comparison of cardiovascular risk factors in published studies is shown in Table 7.
Regarding blood pressure values in the examined POs, a systolic hypertension was observed in 52.7%, and diastolic hypertension was observed in 49.1%, based on criteria for metabolic syndrome of the IDF.
The presence of hypertension is not only notable in our study cohort but can be observed in the entire population and other occupational groups (23, 24). It seemed the prevalence of arterial hypertension in the group of German POs was higher compared to the general German population. Estimates show that slightly over 30% of the German population show arterial hypertensive blood pressure values (25). In international comparison, our study cohort shows values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure at the same levels as police officers from the USA, India and Switzerland (22, 26, 27). Lower values are described in a Saudi Arabia police officer cohort (28).
One of the most important cardiovascular risk factors is smoking. The prevalence of our examined cohort of nicotine consumption was 18.2%. An international comparison shows that the smoking status of police officers differs greatly. However, studies show that there is a link between shift work, specifically working the night shift, and higher consumption of nicotine (21).
In this study we routinely analyzed lipoprotein (a) in our cohort. Lipoprotein (a) represents an important cardiovascular risk parameter. Elevated values of this parameter are associated with an increased cardiovascular risk profile and may - in conjunction with other cardiovascular risk factors - increase the risk for vascular diseases (29, 30). Lipoprotein (a) is a genetically determined parameter and appears to play a central role in the development of coronary artery diseases and thromboembolic events (31, 32). Kamstrup et al. (30) demonstrated in males with increased lipoprotein (a) levels in combination with other important cardiovascular risk parameters a 35% higher 10-year risk suffering myocardial infarction. 25.5% of German police officers show an increased value of Lipoprotein (a). An international comparison to police officers of other studies is not possible because of the lack of data.
In order to establish the 10-year risk for cardiovascular events, the “Farmingham risk score” was used. The 10-year risk for cardiovascular events of our analyzed cohort was found to be at 9.6 ± 7.4%.
When dividing the Framingham risk score in categories of low, moderate, high and very high risk, our study population could be classified in the ‘low risk’ category, according to a 10-year chance on cardiovascular events being < 10% (33). A direct and valid comparison of the 10-year risk stratification of cardiovascular events in POs in international studies could not be carried out due to the lack of comparative studies by using the same risk score. To date, there is only one study of American police officers which found there to be a lower chance of cardiovascular events in 10 years’ time (MW ± SD: 1.2 ± 0.5) (27).
Table 7
Comparison of cardiovascular risk factors in published studies of police officers
Cardiovascular risk factors
|
Source
|
Own results
|
Schilling et al. (22)
|
Thayyil et al.(34)
|
Tharkar et al. (26)
|
Violanti et al. (35)
|
Everding et al. (27)
|
Alghamdi et al. (28)
|
Study cohort
|
Police officers Germany
|
Police officers
Switzerland
|
Police officers
India
|
Police officers India
|
Police officers USA
|
Police officers USA
|
Police officers Saudi Arabia
|
Study cohort
|
55
|
201
|
823
|
318
|
58
|
379
|
160
|
Age (Years)
|
45.3 ± 7.8
|
38.6 ± 10.1
|
41.3 ± 6.8
|
44.3 ± 12.1
|
44.0 ± 8.7
|
41.5 ± 8.6
|
34.4 ± 8.3
|
Weight (kg)
|
93.6 ± 13.2
|
|
71.3 ± 8.4
|
|
94.5 ± 14.2
|
|
79.0 ± 15.2
|
BMI (kg/m²)
|
28.0 ± 3.2
|
25.8 ± 3.6
|
23.9 ± 2.5
|
25.9 ± 4.1
|
29.8 ± 5.8
|
28.8 ± 3.9
|
27.5 ± 5.1
|
Abdominal waist (cm)
|
97.8 ± 12.4
|
91.1 ± 11.3
|
85.9 ± 11.9
|
92.5 ± 11.6
|
|
|
|
Number of smokers (%)
|
18.2
|
|
10.6
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
RRsRest (mmHg)
|
127.7 ± 12.3
|
129.0 ± 13.0
|
125.2 ± 13.4
|
128.3 ± 18.8
|
122.6 ± 14.9
|
125.1 ± 8.6
|
119.5 ± 13.9
|
RRdRest (mmHg)
|
85.7 ± 10.2
|
85.0 ± 10.0
|
82.0 ± 9.0
|
85.5 ± 12.5
|
81.2 ± 10.4
|
85.1 ± 7.6
|
79.4 ± 11.9
|
Cholesterol (mg/dl)
|
205.9 ± 40.4
|
192.3 ± 38.5
|
207.2 ± 40.2
|
183.6 ± 42.8
|
|
190.2 ± 32.9
|
187.5 ± 32.9
|
HDL (mg/dl)
|
49.4 ± 15.3
|
69.2 ± 15.4
|
49.1 ± 11.3
|
39.8 ± 10.5
|
|
49.4 ± 13.3
|
43.9 ± 8.6
|
LDL (mg/dl)
|
129.1 ± 37.7
|
96.2 ± 30.8
|
129.0 ± 38.8
|
106.9 ± 38.4
|
|
115.1 ± 28.0
|
119.5 ± 24.4
|
Triglyceride (mg/dl)
|
185.1 ± 145.4
|
150.4 ± 106.2
|
143.0 ± 56.9
|
177.6 ± 116
|
|
145.8 ± 84.7
|
124.5 ± 50.9
|
HbA1c (%)
|
5.5 ± 0.4
|
5.4 ± 0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ten year-risk Framingham (%)
|
9.6 ± 7.4
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 ± 0.5
|
|
Lipoprotein a > 30 mg/dl (%)
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2. Metabolic Syndrome
International studies confirm an increased risk for metabolic syndrome in POs (26, 36, 37). In our study the definition of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) was used for diagnosis of metabolic syndrome (16). The definition of IDF is well-validated, posing adipositas as the central factor for defining the metabolic syndrome. In comparison with other studies the definition of IDF is more likely to be used in central Europe than definitions of National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) and World Health Organization (WHO) (38, 39). POs in our study cohort showed a mean waist circumference of 97.8 ± 12.4 cm. BMI was within the overweight range with a mean of 28.0 ± 3.2 kg/m2. Examined POs from Switzerland and India displayed lower mean abdominal circumferences and BMI values compared to our German cohort (22, 34). Mean values of American POs concerning BMI are at the same range to our German POs, but American POs had lower mean values concerning the lipid profile (Cholesterol, LDL and Triglyercide) (27, 35). However, an increased abdominal circumferences and BMI do not appear to be exclusive to our investigated German cohort; they are globally detectable in police forces.
One reason of high abdominal circumferences in POs examined in our study seemed to be caused by sedentary work activities. But the impact of this fact is unkown. It is known that prolonged sedentary activities are associated with higher abdominal circumferences and the severity of the associated metabolic risk (40).
According to criteria of the IDF the metabolic syndrome was detected in 32.7% of probands in our study. Looking at various studies around the world the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the general population varies from 23% France to 41% in USA (41). Compared to the regional prevalence of metabolic syndrome of the male population of North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany), the analyzed POs were found to be at an above-average risk of metabolic syndrome (males in North Rhine-Westphalia: 22% vs. POs: 32%) (42). These results correspond to the conclusion drawn by Tharkar et al. (26). It was shown that Indian POs had a significantly higher risk for MetS than the rest of the population (57.3% vs 28.2%). However, Hartley et al. (43) detected a lower prevalence of the metabolic syndrome at 26.7% of the analyzed cohort in the BCOPS study. The lowest prevalence of metabolic syndrome was found by Violanti et al. (44) among POs in USA (13.3%) and one of the highest were described for POs in Poland (53.6%) (36). Table 8 shows a comparison of the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the professional category of "Police officers" among countries.
Table 8
Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in published studies.
Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome
|
Police officers
|
Source
|
Prevalence (%)
|
Country
|
Criteria
|
Own results
|
32.7
|
Germany
|
IDF
|
Tharkar et al.(26)
|
57.3
|
India
|
IDF
|
Thayyil et al.(34)
|
16.8
|
India
|
Modified NCEP / ATP III
|
Garbarino et al. (46)
|
24.5
|
Italy
|
IDF and NCEP / ATP III
|
Hartley et al.(43)
|
26.7
|
USA
|
Modified NCEP / ATP III
|
McCanlies et al.(49)
|
22.0
|
USA
|
NCEP / ATP III
|
Everding et al. (27)
|
29.0
|
USA
|
IDF
|
Violanti et al. (44)
|
13.3
|
USA
|
Modified NCEP / ATP III
|
Janczura et al. (36)
|
53.6
|
Poland
|
IDF
|
Zhang et al. (37)
|
26.0
|
China
|
IDF
|
It can be assumed there are multifactorial reasons for high prevelance of metabolic syndrome in POs exist. In a study by Janczura et al. (45), it was shown that there is a correlation between “perceived stress” (Perceived Stress Scale-10) on the job and a higher prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in Polish police officers. Garbarino et al. (46) supports this result, proving that work-related stress induces the metabolic syndrome. The prevalence was found to be at 24.5% in the analyzed male police officers. Furthermore, the irregular work hours, specifically those at night, can trigger sleeping disorders (47, 48). It is safe to assume that a high number of German police officers also suffer from a sleeping disorder. A connection to the higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome is therefore quite possible. The study by McCanlies has shown that POs who claimed to sleep less than 6 hours per 24 hours had an increased prevalence for the metabolic syndrome by 150% in comparison to those POs who stated to sleep more than 6 hours per 24 hours (49).
It may seem surprising that German POs show a similarly high risk of metabolic syndrome to office workers (24, 50). This could be due to the fact that both occupations conduct activities mostly while sitting. It is well known that sedentary activities carry a higher risk for metabolic syndrome (51) and cardiovascular disease (52).
Overall differences in individual status and private and professional activities exist and there will also be differences concerning the way of life between the countries. Therefore, in the future there is a need to perform prospective studies concern these factors.
4.3. Cardiorespiratory Fitness
High cardiorespiratory fitness is an important factor in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular risk, diseases and mortality (53, 54). In detail, higher cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with lower BMI, a lower risk for development type 2 diabetes and being active (55, 56). Physical fitness is an important basic requirement for police officers on duty. As we know, there are only few researches about cardiorespiratory fitness among police officers. A direct comparison of the data investigated is challenging because of diverging parameters in age and BMI between the study groups. In our study the examined POs reached a mean oxygen uptake of (rel. VO2max) 34.1 ± 8.0 ml/kg-1 min-1. When compared to police officers of other countries, the rel. VO2max values of German POs are the lowest. But the comparison suffers from a lack of available study data. Comparison to international literature German police officers shows the lowest relative oxygen uptakes. Canadian police officers have the highest relative oxygen uptake (32.4 ± 5.4 ml/kg-1 min-1) (57) and police officers from America and Finland also showed higher values (58, 59). A comparative presentation of relative oxygen uptake is shown in Table 9. In general, the VO2max values estimated in German police officers seemed to be lower to the range of values in healthy participants (rel. VO2max: 40.5 ± 5.5 vs. 34.1 ± 8.0 ml/kg-1 ·min-1.) (60). Compared to recreational athletes VO2max assessed in our study is expectedly lower (rel. VO2max: 64.7 ± 6.7 vs. 34.1 ± 8.0 ml/kg-1 ·min-1.) (61), but almost identical compared to a mainly sedentary working group of German office workers (rel. VO2max: 34.1 ± 8.1 vs. 34.1 ± 8.0 ml/kg-1 ·min-1.) (24). A group of professional firefighters with high degrees of physical activity at work also showed higher values of oxygen uptake (rel. VO2max: 37.3 ± 6.3 vs. 34.1 ± 8.0 ml/kg-1 ·min-1.) (23).
Table 9
Published data of relative oxygen uptake (rel. VO2max) by police officers and healthy participants.
Police officers
|
Healthy participants
|
Source
|
rel. VO2max
(ml/kg− 1 ·min− 1)
|
Source
|
rel. VO2max
(ml/kg− 1 ·min− 1)
|
Own results
|
34.1 ± 8.0
|
|
|
Pollock et al. (58)
|
40.7 ± 4.5
|
Duque et al. (60)
|
40.5 ± 5.5
|
Spitler et al.(62)
|
42.1 ± 8.9
|
Sörensen et al.(59)
|
42.8 ± 10.1
|
Rhodes et al.(57)
|
44.1 ± 6.6
|
Lentz et al. (63)
|
42.2 ± 5.8
|