The study was designed to evaluate the service gap and its influencing factors of provided UGC screening in People's Hospital of Yangzhong City in the southeast of China using the SERVQUAL model and help managers develop appropriate promotion strategies.
Generally, the SQG for all dimensions of the screening service were negative, and the overall SQG was − 0.51, implying that service users' expectations were higher than their perceptions and they were dissatisfied with all five dimensions consistent with the results of other studies [29, 30]. The SQG in the provided service in health centres in Mashhad of Iran was − 1.707 [29]. Evaluation of outpatient service quality in a hospital in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia showed that the SQG was − 1.200 [30]. Aghamolaei and Eftekhaari revealed that the SQG in the provided service was − 1.29 [31]. In contrast, some Chinese scholars found relatively small SQG. A study aimed to determine the SQG of provided service among twenty-seven hospitals in 15 provinces found that the SQG was − 0.3888 [27] and the SQG found in the provided nursing service via SERVQUAL scale in a tertiary hospital of Hubei Province, China, was − 0.35 [32]. The overall SQG presented in different studies are diverse due to differences in culture, economy, health policy, the type of health services and the targeted population included in studies. The overall SQG in our study is at a medium level compared to the literature mentioned above [27, 29–32]. However, the prevalent SQG suggests a deficiency in screening services and reminds managers to take early steps to close the gap.
The present study revealed that service users' expectations were high except for the tangibles dimension and the overall expectations were 4.55. The expectations were ranked from high to low: reliability, assurance, responsiveness, empathy and tangibles. The reliability, assurance, and responsiveness were the top three dimensions with expectation scores of more than 4.5, consistent with one previous study performed by Lu et al. [28]. In this study, the highest three expectation scores were reliability (4.73), assurance (4.66), and responsiveness (4.60), respectively. This finding was consistent with the philosophy of health care displayed by Chinese residents today. During the consultation process, patients are very concerned about the professionalism, timeliness of the medical services, and attitude of the medical staff [33, 34]. Meanwhile, we found that the expectations of tangibles and empathy were at a relatively low level. This indicated that the needs of service users are still at the basic stage, and the need for higher dimensions such as tangibles and empathy has not yet been fully released, according to Maslow's hierarchy of needs [27]. Screening service providers should improve tangibles and empathy dimensions because this is necessary to improve overall service quality and in line with the concept of person-centred health care.
Our study revealed that the top three dimensions with perceptions were reliability, assurance, and responsiveness with mean scores of more than 4, which indicated that screening services users have a good perception of quality in these three dimensions. Specifically, our study's highest perception score was related to the reliability dimension (4.30), consistent with several previous studies [28, 35]. However, Fan et al. and Aghamolae et al. mentioned the highest perceptions in the assurance dimension [27, 31]. Sharifi et al.'s study showed that tangibles was the highest-performing dimension [29], and some other studies revealed that empathy was their highest-performing dimension [30, 36]. In conclusion, different studies tend to present different findings, which may be attributed to the heterogeneity of the types of health services, and the capacity of the services. We also found that tangibles (3.86) and empathy (3.76) perception scores were less than 4. Specifically, item4 ("Materials associated with the service will be visually appealing.") in the tangibles dimension and item 22 ("Workers at the Screening Centre understand the special needs of the patient and the family.") in the empathy dimension were the lowest-performing items among 22 items, which pointed out the direction of quality improvement.
As mentioned above, the SQG among five dimensions were all negative, and their rank was as follow (high to low): responsiveness, assurance, empathy, reliability and tangibles. In other words, the largest SQG was in the responsiveness dimension. This dimension includes the willingness to help patients and families and provide prompt service [37]. The largest gap of responsiveness was in item 10 ("Workers at the Screening Centre tell you exactly when the care will be performed.") and 13 ("Workers at the Screening Centre are never too busy to respond to the patient's or your requests"). This could be related to complex screening procedures and insufficient service awareness among staff. Specifically, screening for UGC involves some necessary procedures such as screening registration, ECG, epidemiological investigations, endoscopy and biochemical index tests [9, 11, 22]. These processes take varying amounts of time, making it impossible to determine precise service times. In addition, the lack of service awareness among staff may overlook the needs of service users.
The SQG for assurance and empathy dimensions were ranked second and third, respectively. Assurance refers to the level of competence, courtesy, credibility and security [37]. The greatest gap in this dimension was in item 15 ("You feel safe for the patient's care by the Screening Centre"). and 17 ("Workers at the Screening Centre have the knowledge to answer your questions."). Lack of experience with endoscopy or unfamiliarity with the investigation process may lead to service users feeling unsafe, with 47.3% of the subjects in this survey had never experienced endoscopy before. Hence, there is a need to enhance health education before screening to increase service users' knowledge of endoscopy and the service process to reduce their feelings of unease. In addition, the large SQG of item 17 may be due to the high expectations of service users because the item's perception score is as high as 4.31. Empathy is a dimension worth focusing on. With improved living standards, service users will pay more and more attention to this dimension [27]. Item 19 ("The Screening Centre has operating hours convenient to its patients and families.") in the empathy dimension had the largest SQG among all items. The working arrangements for the screening service may be a reason for this. Because screening needs to be done on an empty stomach considering the characters of endoscopy, it is usually scheduled in the morning, so it is impossible to set a flexible screening time to meet the diverse needs of the targeted population. Although it is difficult to adjust the opening hours of screening, we can improve the perception of this dimension by providing personalized services, actively caring about the discomfort and bad emotions of the screeners and solving them promptly. Under the premise of fixed expectations, improvement measures can effectively improve the gap in empathy because this dimension currently has the lowest perception score.
The SQG for the reliability and tangibles dimensions were ranked fourth and fifth, respectively. The greatest gap in reliability dimension was in item 5 ("When the Screening Centre promises to do something by a certain time, it does so.") and 8 ("The Screening Centre provides its service at the time it promises to do so."). Combining the expectation and perception scores of the above two items, we can find that they were both in the high expectation and high perception level. Reducing their SQG can start by reducing excessive expectations and improving actual perception at the same time. Hence, on the one hand, the screening managers should inform the service users that the entire screening process may take a long time and do an excellent job of explaining to reduce the users' excessive psychological expectations. On the other hand, the staff should be urged to fulfil the promised service and managers should pass the different assessments to improve efficiency. The tangibles dimension has the smallest SQG, and the greatest gap in this dimension was in item 4 ("Materials associated with the service are visually appealing."). This suggested that we should use a diverse range of posters, brochures, pictures and videos to carry out our services to increase the appeal, rather than just relying on large, unattractive paragraphs of text.
Some studies examined the association between demographic characteristics and SQG. Nevertheless, these studies' findings are conflicting [38]. In the present study, not only did we explore the relationship between SQG and demographic characteristics, but we also incorporated several health-related characteristics and made some new findings. The results of our study showed that SQG was associated with occupational status, health self-assessment, endoscopy experience, distance from screening hospital and frequency of visit.
Consistent with previous studies [39, 40], we found that being employed compared to unemployed was associated with lower odds of higher SQ (satisfaction). Meanwhile, participants who reported that the distance from the screening hospital was less than 30min had lower odds of higher SQ than the distance between 30–60 minutes. This can be explained by socioeconomic status. Whether in terms of education level or economic income, working residents and residents with better medical access have relatively good socioeconomic status, especially in Chinese rural areas. As a result, they are more aware of the services they should receive, leading to higher expectations. If the service fails to reach the expected level, they are more likely to express their dissatisfaction. Moreover, the advantages of cultural literacy and resource capabilities enable them to evaluate services more objectively and impartially. If there are indeed deficiencies in the screening services, it is easier to be discovered [36]. However, our findings differ from some local studies, whereby having no jobs was instead associated with lower satisfaction or occupation status was not associated with satisfaction [41, 42].
Furthermore, compared to participants with poor health status, we found that participants with general health status were more likely to have higher SQ, consistent with previous studies [43, 44]. One possible explanation for the difference might be that participants with poor health status usually suffer from acute or chronic conditions. The varying degrees of disease symptoms lead to a lower quality of life, increasing expectations for screening services. However, our screening service is only used for early diagnosis and does not involve treating the diseases, reducing its perceived quality [9, 12, 22]. Participants who had endoscopy experience were more likely to have higher SQ. This is mainly because this screening service is provided by specialized clinics and professional screening personnel [9, 12, 22]. Compared with outpatient endoscopy, the waiting time, service attitude and doctor-patient communication time are better. Participants who have been to our hospital before were less likely to have higher SQ. Different findings were noted in Slovenia and n Saudi Arabia [45, 46]. Usually, the regularity of patients to medical institutions enables service users to understand the shortcomings of the service provider, thus reducing unreasonable expectations and increasing satisfaction [47]. The reason for this contradiction may be that compared to outpatient services, screening services are not only complex and time-consuming procedures but also generate a certain amount of discomfort, resulting in poorer SQ scores.
There were some limitations in our study. First, the data in this study are from only one time period and do not reflect the overall performance of screening services. Meanwhile, the research data mainly comes from UGCEDAT inYangzhong City and cannot be generalized to the whole country. However, our research made a good demonstration for service quality evaluation of cancer screening. Second, because of the nature of cross-sectional, we can not determine the correlates of SQG in the present study are causal. Third, the translation of SERVQUAL in the Chinese context may affect the study's finding, despite the quality control. Therefore, our research team's future directions are developing the SQ evaluation scale of cancer screening and the in-depth study of the screening SQ at multiple time points and centres.