We carried out this study to understand the influence (as well as the interactions) of socioeconomic, biodemographic, nutritional and inflammation factors on anaemia among non-pregnant WRA in South Africa. We found that the prevalence of anaemia, ID and IDA was 39.4%, 38.1% and 21.6% respectively. From this it is evident that ID is the main contributor to anaemia, as 54.8% of anaemia is a result of ID. This result agrees with the established approximation that 50% of anaemia cases are due to ID. This approximation has been supported by studies by Stoltzfus et al and Stevens et al, who showed that approximately 50% of anaemia was amenable to iron supplementation (4, 35). Moreover, recent data from a meta-analysis on iron fortification concluded that ID was the main contributor to anaemia in many geographical settings(36).
However, some studies have shown that in areas of high infection burden, inflammation is the main contributor to anaemia (37, 38). For example a study done in Sierra Leone, another Sub Saharan country with high inflammation, showed that 45% of non-pregnant WRA were anaemic but the driver of anaemia was not ID but inflammation(39). Like Sierra Leonne, South Africa is grappling with a high infection burden because of the tuberculosis/HIV pandemic that is concurrently occurring with a rise in non-communicable disease and obesity (40–42). Confirming this, 37.3% of the WRA in our study had elevated inflammation. We, therefore, expected the prevalence of IDA to be lower and for anaemia of inflammation to play a more dominant role. In contrast, our results show ID was the major contributor to anaemia. Further analysis with multivariate regression model confirmed that IDE and ID were significant risk factors for anaemia. SEM results also showed that low iron stores were associated with low haemoglobin levels. However, the multivariate logistic results revealed that the presence of inflammation, denoted by CRP, also significantly increased the risk of being anaemic. Finally, the SEM analysis showed a direct association between elevated CRP and haemoglobin concentration. This indicates that although ID is the key driver, anaemia of inflammation is present. An understanding of the proportion of anaemia that is attributable to iron deficiency and the proportion attributable to inflammation is particularly important to the design and implementation of public health programs. Therefore, in our setting, it may be prudent to replace IFA supplements with MMS that contains a lower dose of iron. This would ensure that women would get the same benefits as with IFA in reducing IDA, as well as additional benefits of alleviating anaemia of inflammation (43).
The SEM results also revealed that contraception use was directly associated with higher haemoglobin concentrations and indirectly affected haemoglobin levels through its protective effect on ferritin levels. Women who used contraception in our study had higher ferritin levels. It is important to note that the majority of the WRA in our study were using hormonal contraceptives and hormonal contraception use is reported to cause less bleeding during menstruation, which in turn results in less blood being lost in menstruation (44, 45). Supporting this, a study conducted in multiple countries reported that those who used hormonal contraceptives had higher ferritin and Hb levels than those who did not(46). Furthermore, studies done in Tanzania and Ethiopia and other low- and middle-income countries showed that hormonal contraceptive use was associated with reduced risk in anaemia(47–49). Not surprisingly, contraception use in our study was higher among women who had more children, resulting in these multiparous women being protected against ID.
It is well established that anaemia and ID is patterned by socioeconomic status, with the poor being the most affected. Research points to the fact that improved socioeconomic status is linked to improved nutrition conditions(50). Our SEM analyses showed that weekly chicken and beef consumption (which is high in bioavailable iron) was indirectly protective against anaemia through its positive association with ferritin. Moreover, those who consumed chicken and beef weekly were less likely to be ID. Research has shown that many young South Africans are unemployed and do not consume beef as the cost of beef is high and often prohibitive (36), the economically disadvantaged in the population tend to consume less meat and if they do buy meat they purchase fat portions(51). Mchiza et al reported that those who consumed fat portions of meat were at increased risk of anaemia(47). It is therefore prudent that when developing interventions, we consider programs that aim to empower WRA economically to improve ID status and therefore anaemia in our context.
Our SEM analyses further revealed that low vitamin A stores are directly associated with low iron levels. Vitamin A deficiency was associated with a more than eight-fold increased risk in being ID. Studies in many parts of the world have shown that, because of generally poor diets ID co-exists with other micronutrient deficiencies, which could be the case in our low resource setting(12, 52). Nonetheless, a physiological interdependence between vitamin A deficiency and low iron status has been documented (53). Vitamin A has been proposed to play a role in regulating plasma iron levels, with decreasing vitamin A levels resulting in decreasing plasma iron (12–14). Some studies have shown that combined vitamin A and iron supplementation was effective in improving ID(14, 54–58) 71–78). Hence, IFA supplementation alone, may not be adequate to deal with anaemia and ID in WRA (59). Acknowledging this, the WHO has suggested that in areas of high prevalence of nutritional deficiencies MMS should replace IFA (60). Hence, as previously mentioned, administering MMS, which contains a lower dose of iron plus vitamin A (plus other micronutrients) instead of the traditional IFA could be more beneficial.
From our SEM analysis we see women with high a BMI are more likely to have elevated inflammation. Several studies have shown that adiposity is associated with increased odds of inflammation (20–22). In a nine country study, in seven countries obesity was consistently associated with elevated CRP (20). Furthermore, obesity is a state of low-grade systemic inflammation reflected by increased concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines and inflammatory markers (61). This obesity-related inflammation has been shown to reduce iron absorption from the gut, contributing towards ID. Several epidemiological studies have reported increased risk for ID in overweight and obese subjects (62–64) (65–68) (69, 70). However, our SEM analyses show no significant direct or indirect association of obesity with ID.
Our results show a relationship with BMI and parity with high BMI being associated with high parity; and women with higher parity being more likely to have higher ferritin and higher RBP levels. Research done by Abrams et al showed that child bearing is associated with weight gain (71). During pregnancy women gain weight and adopt eating habits which they are unable to lose postpartum (72–74). This observation may indicate that the diet of multiparous WRA in our study could be richer in vitamin A and iron than that of their normal weight counterparts.
Strengths of the study include the use of several iron biomarkers, the use of both AGP and CRP as inflammation markers as well as the correction of ferritin for the presence of inflammation. Our study also made use of SEM an analytical approach which allows for simultaneous testing of multiple mediation pathways thereby avoiding the potential bias arising from neglecting the correlation between mediators. Though our analysis identified potential risk factors of anaemia and ID, yet because this is a cross sectional study, we cannot establish causality between any exposure of interest.