A total of 129 women were assessed for MTX treatment, and of these, we excluded 3 women who underwent surgical intervention, 5 women who underwent expectant management, 2 women who were lost to follow-up, and 4 women who declined to participate. Finally, 115 women were included in the study, and these women were divided into 2 groups according to the luteal blood flow. Fifty-six women were successfully treated with MTX in the poor luteal blood flow group, and 59 women were successfully treated with MTX in the abundant luteal blood flow group (Fig. 2).
Table 1 illustrates the baseline characteristics of the women in the two groups. No significant difference was found when comparing maternal age, BMI, number of pregnancies and deliveries, pregnancy method, risk factors of ectopic pregnancy, duration of pregnancy, clinical symptoms, serum β-hCG level before treatment, or ultrasound findings (P>0.05). However, the serum progesterone level before treatment was significantly higher in women with abundant luteal blood flow than in those with poor luteal blood flow (P=0.041).
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of women in the two groups.
Characteristics
|
Poor blood flow group (n=56)
|
Abundant blood flow group (n=59)
|
P-valuea
|
Maternal age (years)
|
32.4±7.9
|
33.1±9.3
|
0.413
|
BMI (kg/m2)
|
22.5±4.9
|
23.2±5.0
|
0.769
|
Number of pregnancies
|
2.2±0.8
|
2.2±0.7
|
0.802
|
Number of deliveries
|
1.0±0.4
|
0.9±0.5
|
0.613
|
Pregnancy method
|
|
|
0.866
|
Natural conception
|
49 (87.5)
|
51 (86.4)
|
|
ART
|
7 (12.5)
|
8 (13.6)
|
|
Risk factors of EP
|
|
|
|
Previous EP
|
3 (5.4)
|
5 (8.5)
|
0.511
|
Pregnant with IUD
|
4 (7.1)
|
3 (5.1)
|
0.645
|
Duration of pregnancy (days)
|
46.6±7.1
|
48.3±8.2
|
0.598
|
Clinical symptoms
|
|
|
|
Abdominal pain
|
47 (83.9)
|
48 (81.4)
|
0.716
|
Vaginal bleeding
|
51 (91.1)
|
54 (91.5)
|
0.931
|
Pretreatment β-hCG (mIU/mL)
|
1365.6(769.2–2824.5)
|
1403.2(813.1–2902.5)
|
0.497
|
Pretreatment progesterone (nmol/L)
|
26.7(15.8–46.9)
|
42.3(23.7–71.5)
|
0.041
|
Ultrasound findings
|
|
|
|
Average diameter of ectopic mass (cm)
|
2.1(1.3–3.2)
|
2.3(1.6–3.5)
|
0.764
|
Yolk sac
|
11 (19.6)
|
14 (23.7)
|
0.928
|
Free fluid in Douglas cavity
|
44 (78.6)
|
46 (78.0)
|
0.937
|
BMI: Body mass index, ART: Assisted reproductive technology, EP: Ectopic pregnancy, IUD: Intrauterine device.
Values are presented as mean ±SD, median (quartile range) or number (percentage).
a Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.
No significant difference was found when comparing the volume of the corpus luteum (P=0.058); however, the VI (P=0.019), FI (P=0.042) and VFI (P=0.031) of the corpus luteum were significantly higher in women with abundant luteal blood flow than in women with poor luteal blood flow (Fig. 3).
The serum β-hCG level 4 days, 1 week and 2 weeks after MTX treatment in women with abundant luteal blood flow were significantly higher than those in women in the poor luteal blood flow group (P<0.05). Moreover, the time of serum β-hCG clearance in women with abundant luteal blood flow was significantly longer (P=0.029). The average diameter of the ectopic mass 1 week, 2 weeks and 3 weeks after MTX treatment in women with abundant luteal blood flow was significantly larger (P<0.05), and the time required for ectopic mass disappearance was significantly longer (P=0.043) compared with that in women in the poor luteal blood flow group (Fig. 4).
In women with poor luteal blood flow, 55 women (98.2%) received one dose of MTX treatment, and 1 woman (1.8%) received a second dose of MTX treatment because her serum β-hCG level did not decline by 15% between days 4 and 7. However, in women with abundant luteal blood flow, 52 women (88.1%) received one dose of MTX treatment, and 7 women (11.9%) received a second dose of MTX treatment. There was a significant difference in the dose of MTX used in the two groups (P=0.034). Eight women with poor luteal blood flow reported side effects versus 11 in the abundant luteal blood flow group, and the laboratory results showed a minor rise in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) levels, which ranged from 45–64 U/L. These side effects were mild and disappeared within 2 weeks after MTX treatment. No significant difference was found when comparing the side effects of MTX between the two groups (P=0.529) (Table 2).
Table 2 Dose and side effects of MTX treatment.
Variable
|
Poor blood flow group (n=56)
|
Abundant blood flow group (n=59)
|
P-valuea
|
Success rate of MTX treatment
|
|
|
0.034
|
One dose
|
55 (98.2)
|
52 (88.1)
|
|
Second dose b
|
1 (1.8)
|
7 (11.9)
|
|
Side effects of MTX
|
8 (14.3)
|
11 (18.6)
|
0.529
|
Clinical symptoms
|
|
|
|
Nausea
|
3 (5.4)
|
5 (8.5)
|
|
Diarrhoea
|
2 (3.6)
|
2 (3.4)
|
|
Laboratory results
|
|
|
|
Rise of ALT
|
2 (3.6)
|
3 (5.1)
|
|
Rise of AST
|
1 (1.8)
|
1 (1.7)
|
|
ALT: alanine aminotransferase, AST: aspartate transarninase.
Values are presented as number (percentage).
aChi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.
bSecond dose was given if serum β-hCG level did not decline 15% between days 4 and 7.