Table 1 shows the number of fecal samples categorized based on the method of collection and on the state in which the samples were gathered. Samples collected during transect or census walks were almost the same in number as those that were collected opportunistically. More dry or old samples, characterized by a near-soil texture, were collected than fresh samples. Also, most of the dry samples were obtained during transect walks while fresh macaque feces came from opportunistic sampling. Overall, 35 fecal samples of long-tailed macaques were collected from 13 sites in PPSRNP, 30 of which (85.71 %) were found positive for enteroparasites. Fecal sampling in the field can thus be maximized by following both systematic and opportunistic sampling designs, and dry or old samples are still valuable specimens for parasitological analysis.
Table 1 Prevalence of enteroparasites from fecal samples of long-tailed macaques collected in Puerto Princesa Subterranean River National Park
Criteria
|
Number of samples collected
(n = 35), %
|
Number of positive samples (Prevalence)
|
Sampling method
|
|
|
Opportunistic
|
18
|
17 (48.57%)
|
Transect walks
|
17
|
13 (37.14%)
|
Fecal State
|
|
|
Fresh
|
16
|
15 (42.85%)
|
Dry/old (near-soil texture)
|
19
|
15 (42.85%)
|
A total of 14 species of enteroparasites were identified from the samples: eight protozoans (Blastocystis sp., Chilomastix mesnili, Endolimax nana, Entamoeba coli, Entamoeba polecki, Entamoeba spp. and Iodamoeba butschlii) (Figure 2), five nematodes (Ascaris sp., Enterobius vermicularis, Strongyloides sp., Trichuris sp. and hookworm) (Figure 3 and Figure 4), one cestode (Hymenolepis nana) (Figure 3). Hookworm was the most common as it was detected in eight of the 13 sites, while all parasites except H. nana and E. vermicularis were identified from the Central Park Station where most samples were collected. Almost all protozoans were identified from the localities where opportunistic sampling was conducted, and where most of the fresh samples were from. It is possible that other enteroparasites may have occurred in the sample before it dried out in the sample with a single infection.
Table 2 shows the prevalence of 14 species of parasites observed in long-tailed macaque feces. The overall prevalence for enteroparasites was 85.71%, while multiple infections were observed in 63.33% of the samples. Among protozoans, E. coli showed the highest prevalence (34.29%), followed by Entamoeba spp. and I. butschlii (31.43%), E. nana (28.57%), Blastocystis sp. (22.86%), C. mesnili and E. polecki (20%), and lastly G. intestinalis (8.57%). From the helminth group, hookworm larva was the most prevalent (40%), followed by hookworm/Strongyloides ova (34.29%), Strongyloides sp. larva (28.57%), T. trichiura (20%), Ascaris sp. (11.43%), and lastly H. nana and E. vermicularis (2.86%). The larvae of Strongyloides sp. and hookworm were distinguished separately, hence the separate prevalence of larval and egg stages. In Figure 3, the first and second row show larvae stages of hookworm and Strongyloides sp. respectively. Identification was mainly based on morphological differences concerning the buccal cavity, pharyngeal bulb, genital primordium, tail, and the presence of sheath.
Table 2. Overall prevalence and mean intensity of protozoa and helminth enteroparasites detected from fecal samples (n=35) of long-tailed macaques in Puerto Princesa Subterranean River National Park.
Parasite
|
No. infected samples
|
Prevalence (%)
|
Intensity (eggs/oocyst/larvae per gram) [min,
max]
|
Entamoeba coli
|
12
|
34.29
|
+++
|
Entamoeba spp.*
|
11
|
31.43
|
+++
|
Entamoeba polecki
|
7
|
20.00
|
+++
|
Endolimax nana
|
10
|
28.57
|
+++
|
Iodamoeba butschlii
|
11
|
31.43
|
+++
|
Blastocystis sp.
|
8
|
22.86
|
+++
|
Chilomastix mesnili
|
7
|
20.00
|
+++
|
Giardia intestinalis
|
3
|
8.57
|
+++
|
Ascaris sp.
|
4
|
11.43
|
2 [0, 3]
|
Enterobius vermicularis **
|
1
|
2.86
|
1 [0, 1]
|
Trichuris trichiura
|
7
|
20.00
|
3 [0, 6]
|
Hymenolepis nana
|
1
|
2.86
|
4 [0, 4]
|
Strongyloides sp. **
|
10
|
28.57
|
63 [0, 386]
|
Hookworm **
|
14
|
40.00
|
9 [0, 51]
|
Hookworm/Strongylid sp. egg
|
12
|
34.29
|
10 [0, 32]
|
No parasite detected
|
5
|
14.29
|
N/A
|
*Species: E. histolytica, E. dispar, E. chattoni, E. hartmanni. All protozoans were detected from fresh samples.
**Detected in the larval stage. Hookworm and/or Strongyloides sp. were only observed in dry samples
+++ Mean intensity not determined because some samples have stages that are too many too count (TNTC)
Common zoonotic parasites detected in the samples collected in this study include Endolimax nana, (suspected) Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia intestinalis, Ascaris lumbricoides, Enterobius vermicularis, and Trichuris trichiura (Baker 2003; Baker 2018; Freeland 1979; Michaud et al. 2003; Munene et al. 1998; Ooi et al. 1993; Reardon and Rininger 1968; Rothman and Bowman 2003; Stuart et al. 1990; Takano et al. 2005); while emerging zoonoses have been reported for Chilomastix mesnili, Entamoeba coli, hookworm, and Strongyloides sp. (Baker 2003; Baker 2018; Benson et al. 1955; Brede and Burger 1977; Brooks and Glen 1982; Desportes 1944; Desportes and Roth 1943; Eberhard et al. 2001; Gasser et al. 1999; Harvey and Keymer 1991; Hugot et al. 1999; Levine 1985; Little 1966; Reardon and Rininger 1968; Valerio et al. 1969; Young et al. 1957). All identified parasites in this study have been noted in previous studies on free-ranging (Freeland 1979; Lane et al. 2011) and captive (Baker 2018; Johnson-Delaney 2009) long-tailed macaques, and are also included from the vast majority of parasites described from wild primates (Nunn et al. 2006; Pedersen and Davies 2009).
These findings demonstrate that long-tailed macaques serve as important hosts of enteroparasites which could be acquired from potential hosts in associated human habitats (e.g., humans, domestic animals., etc.) or are naturally-occurring in wild populations. Due to time constraints and limited access to roosting sites, however, this study may not have presented a comprehensive inventory of enteroparasites occurring in wild long-tailed macaques. Another study which involves identification of roosting sites and opportunistic fecal sampling in areas adjacent to the established transects in PPSRNP will complete the picture. Identification of parasite larvae to species level and verification of parasitic protozoans will be possible through copro-culture and molecular analyses.
The occurrence of several protozoan enteroparasites was expected considering the routine access, particularly of macaques in the Central Park Station, Underground River, and Sabang Zipline to human refuse and wastewater (i.e., washing water, food preparation wastes, etc.) coming from the rangers’ quarters. It is still possible, however, that samples collected in sites with some distance to human habitation and the corresponding sources of enteroparasites may also harbor parasitic protozoa (Lane et al. 2011). Although prevalence estimates were recorded for each parasite species, these values are not considered as the 'true prevalence' within the sampled population because not all samples were collected fresh, so some species of protozoa that once occurred in the dry samples may have been missed. Typically, fresh feces can be collected from the most recent roosting site of long-tailed macaques as they are observed to defecate first thing in the morning, before leaving their respective roosting sites (Chavez and Dimalibot, unpublished). During transect walks, however, roosting sites were not located due to the time constraint for a concurrent population survey.
Macaca fascicularis is an edge species and as their habitats become more fragmented (hence, creating more forest edges), it is be reasonable to argue that despite their conspicuousness, the species may be decreasing in number as they get displaced from their natural habitats, and come into conflict with human communities living in or near these edges. Land-use change caused by the conversion of forests to agricultural lands and expansion of human activity into areas that previously sustained long-tailed macaques increased the species’ habituation with humans and dependence on agricultural communities for food. Their apparent abundance in these areas, combined with their highly adaptable and opportunistic behaviors, caused the species to emerge as agricultural pests. This study demonstrates the importance of long-tailed macaques in studying biotic interactions pertaining to the transmission of enteroparasites in an environment where human interference in forests is inevitable. Research on parasite ecology and epidemiology among free-ranging long-tailed macaques has the potential to predict which parasites or pathogen may have come from or could spill over human populations and domestic animals. There is also a need to determine how certain anthropogenic activities influence parasitism in long-tailed macaques at the organism and population levels, given their increasing contacts with humans and domestic animals in forested regions. More importantly, the impacts of diseases and the transmission of zoonoses are expected to be affected by primate density and abundance in general, so further work on macaque population dynamics is indispensable for both wildlife conservation and public health.