Does a Third Model for the Vomeronasal Processing of Information Exist? Insights from the Macropodid Neuroanatomy

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-869356/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Does a Third Model for the Vomeronasal Processing of Information Exist? Insights from the Macropodid Neuroanatomy

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-869356/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

The study of the α-subunit of Gi2 and Go proteins in the accessory olfactory bulb (AOB) was crucial for the identification of the two main families of vomeronasal receptors, V1R and V2R. Both families are expressed in the rodent and lagomorph AOBs, according to a segregated model characterized by topographical anteroposterior zonation. Many mammal species have suffered from the deterioration of the Gαo pathway and are categorized as belonging to the uniform model. This scenario has been complicated by characterization of the AOB in the tammar wallaby, Macropus eugenii, which appears to follow a third model of vomeronasal organization featuring exclusive Gαo protein expression, referred to as the intermediate model, which has not yet been replicated in any other species. Our morphofunctional study of the vomeronasal system (VNS) in Bennett’s wallaby, Macropus rufogriseus, provides further information regarding this third model of vomeronasal transduction.

A comprehensive histological, lectin, and immunohistochemical study of the Bennett’s wallaby VNS was performed. Anti-Gαo and anti-Gαi2 antibodies were particularly useful because they labeled the transduction cascade of V2R and V1R receptors, respectively. Both G proteins showed canonical immunohistochemical labeling in the vomeronasal organ and the AOB, consistent with the anterior-posterior zonation of the segregated model. The lectin Ulex europaeus agglutinin selectively labeled the anterior AOB, providing additional evidence for the segregation of vomeronasal information in the wallaby.

Overall, the VNS of the Bennett’s wallaby shows a degree of differentiation and histochemical and neurochemical diversity comparable to species with greater VNS development, which does not support the existence of a third “intermediate” type of vomeronasal information processing.

Cellular & Molecular Neuroscience

wallaby

marsupials

vomeronasal

accessory olfactory bulb

G proteins

immunohistochemistry

The sense organs transmit physical (sight, hearing, and touch) or chemical (smell and taste) signals. In particular, the processing regions associated with smell are anatomically connected to the limbic system, and smell is, therefore, intimately linked to memories, emotions, and behavior (Müller-Schwarze 2006). Parallel to the olfactory system is the vomeronasal or accessory olfactory system, and the vomeronasal organ (VNO), which is the primary organ involved in this system (Wysocki & Lepri 1991; Halpern & Martínez Marcos 2003), is also found in the nasal cavity, specialized in mediating innate behaviors, as territorial aggression (Chamero et al. 2007) and maternal behavior (Keverne 2002).

Morphologically, the vomeronasal system (VNS) is primarily comprised of the VNO, the vomeronasal nerves (NVNs), and the accessory olfactory bulbs (AOB). In the 1970s, the first evidence was presented to indicate that this system was specialized for the detection of pheromones (Powers & Winans 1975), which are substances that establish chemical communication between individuals of the same species; pheromone-based communication does not reflect the simple transmission of information, as occurs in the main olfactory system, but rather serves as an interaction that elicits some type of non-conscious physiological or behavioral change in the receiver (Wyatt 2014). Pheromones modulate important aspects of reproduction (Martín Sánchez et al. 2015; Demir et al. 2020), the adaptive response to stress (Papes et al. 2010; Pallé et al. 2019), and the social behaviors of animals (Ibarra-Soria et al. 2014; Cross et al. 2021). Thus, to intervene in chemical communications, a solid morphofunctional foundation of the VNS is necessary to allow for the understanding of the mechanism of action mediated by various pheromones in different species. These attempts have been hampered by the broad morphofunctional (Salazar et al. 2007; Stoyanov et al. 2021), molecular (Isogai et al. 2011; Katreddi & Forni 2021), and genomic (Grus et al. 2005; Villamayor et al. 2021) diversity of this system among mammals, which makes the establishment of a valid general pattern challenging, even among species belonging to the same order, such as Rodentia (Torres et al. 2020).

The diversity of G protein alpha (Gα) subunit expression has been the subject of specific studies that were crucial to identifying the vomeronasal receptor (VR) family. The expression of Gαi and Gαo proteins were both first detected in the AOB by Shinohara et al. (1992), who observed that nerve endings of vomeronasal neuroreceptor cells innervating the AOB were organized into two regions: one rich in Gαi2 and the other rich in Gαo. This heterogeneous pattern was restricted to the nerve and glomerular layers of the AOB and was conserved in the NVNs. Determining the involvement of both G proteins in the signal transduction chain of VNO neuroreceptor cells was key to the identification of the two main VR families. First, three years after the identification of Gα protein expression in the AOB, a family of receptors, named V1R, was discovered in mice (Dulac & Axel 1995), and the pattern of V1R expression in the VNO coincided with the pattern of Gαi2 expression. Parallel studies examining Gαi2 and Gαo expression in both the VNO and the AOB, using immunohistochemistry in opossum (Halpern et al. 1995) and mouse (Jia & Halpern 1996) specimens and in situ hybridization in mice (Berghard & Buck 1996), demonstrated that both proteins are expressed in separate subpopulations of VNO neurons, which suggested the existence of two independent sensory transduction pathways. However, the second G protein receptor was not identified until 1997, when three different studies examining the expression of Gαo in the VNO simultaneously demonstrated the existence of a second VR family, named V2R (Herrada & Dulac 1997; Matsunami & Buck 1997; Ryba & Tindirelli 1997). Since then, the immunohistochemical characterization of Gαi2 and Gαo has been considered to serve as excellent phenotypic indicators of V1R and V2R expression in the VNS, respectively.

Initially, all mammals were thought to segregate vomeronasal sensory information into two neuronal subsets, determined by the expression patterns of the V1R and V2R receptors. However, the immunohistochemical study of the goat VNS did not identify Gαo-immunoreactivity in either the VNO or in the NVN layer of the AOB (Takigami et al. 2000), indicating the existence of a different projection pattern for vomeronasal neurons to the AOB in some mammals and highlighting the importance of performing comparative studies of the VNS in multiple species. Ensuing studies performed in a wide range of mammals led to the conclusion that two types of VNS organization exist. The segregated model, in which NVNs express both Gαi2 and Gαo, was identified in Rodentia, in species of mouse, rat, octodon (Suarez et al. 2009a), and capybara (Suarez et al. 2011b; Torres et al. 2020); Lagomorpha, in species of rabbit (Villamayor et al. 2018); and marsupials, in species of opossum (Halpern et al. 1995). The uniform model, in which the NVNs only express a single G protein subtype, Gαi2, was observed for goats (Takigami et al. 2000), sheep (Salazar et al. 2007), dogs (Salazar et al. 2013), horses, musk shrews (Takigami et al. 2004), squirrels (Suarez et al. 2011a), and marmosets (Moriya-Ito et al. 2018).

The absence of the V2R pathway in the uniform model has been hypothesized to be closely related to the appearance of sexual dimorphism in mammals (Suarez et al. 2011a). This deterioration has become a challenge for understanding the role played by the VNS in mammals, and this complex panorama was further convoluted by the appearance of a study of the VNS in the marsupial tammar wallaby, Macropus eugenii (Schneider et al. 2012). This species presents a VNS organization similar to the uniform type, with the crucial difference that only immunopositivity against Gαo was identified, becoming the first species displaying a new, third type of vomeronasal pheromone transduction pathway organization, in which only the V2R pathway is conserved.

Since the publication of this study, no contributions to the literature have appeared that can either support or refute the existence of this third model, which remains an open question that must be viewed cautiously. The authors themselves presented some reasonable doubt; although they did not identify Gαi2 immunopositivity in the VNO and AOB, they did identify functional V1R receptor-encoding genes within the tammar wallaby genome (Young et al. 2010). Although this suggested the existence of V1R receptor-expressing cells in the tammar wallaby VNS, V1R receptors could also be expressed in other tissues, such as the V1R expression observed in the rabbit testis (Xia et al. 2020; Villamayor et al. 2021).

To examine the potential existence of this third model of VNS organization, we performed a morphological and immunohistochemical study of the VNS of Bennett’s wallaby, focusing on the expression of Gα subunits in the VNO and AOB. Additionally, we performed a comprehensive histological, lectin-histochemical, and immunohistochemical investigation of the entire VNS, employing antibodies against microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP-2), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), growth-associated protein 43 (GAP43), calbindin, calretinin, olfactory marker protein (OMP), and the lectins Ulex europaeus agglutinin (UEA) and Lycopersicon esculentum agglutinin (LEA).

Three adult individuals of Bennett's Wallaby (Macropus rufogriseus) used in our study were transferred by Marcelle Natural Park (Outeiro de Rei, Lugo) after dying of natural causes. After separating the heads from the carcass, the skin, jaws, tongue and eyes were dissected out, and a window opened in the dorsal part of the cranium. The fixatives used were 10% Formol and Bouin's fluid. In the latter, after 24 hours, the samples were transferred to 70% alcohol.

Samples extraction

The following anatomical structures: nasal cavity (NC), vomeronasal organs (VNO), nasal septum mucosa and the olfactory bulbs (OB), were employed in the histological study. Additionally, a successful cannulation of the incisor canal was performed in one of the specimens.

Nasal cavity and vomeronasal organs: The entire NC was separated through a transverse incision made rostral to the ethmoidal fossa with the help of a rotary saw. In one individual the resulting sample was destined to study the macroscopic and microscopic changes in the VNO topography. In a second one, after opening the NC laterally, the nasal conchae were removed. This allowed visualization of the entire nasal septum, where the VNO were identified on both sides of the base of the nasal septum. They were extracted under a surgical microscope, Zeiss OPMI 1 Ent.

Main and accessory olfactory bulbs: The olfactory bulbs are located deep in the ethmoidal fossa. To access them, with the help of a gouge forceps the bone was carefully removed from the orbital fossa, which laterally covers the bulbs. Then, the dura mater and olfactory nerves were dissected out, separating them with a scalpel from the cribriform ethmoid plate.

Samples processing for histological study

All samples were embedded in paraffin, except one NC that previously was decalcified in TBD-1 Shandon Decalcifier (Thermo, Pittsburgh, PA) continuously stirred for 9 days. Then, a series of equidistant transversal cuts were made in the NC from the tip of the nose to the caudal end of the vomeronasal cartilage, obtaining five blocks. They were photographed and after that, all the blocks were embedded in paraffin.

Cutting: With the help of a Leica Reichert Jung microtome the paraffin blocks were cut with a thickness ranging from 5 to 8 mm, employing the thinner sections in the study of the VNO and the thicker one to the study of the AOB.

General histological stainings

We employed the following general histological stains: Hematoxylin-eosin (HE), periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and Alcian Blue (AB) for neutral and acidic mucopolysaccharides respectively, and Nissl staining for nervous tissue. In addition, two other specific stains were performed:

Gallego’s Trichrome: Useful for the differentiation of the components of the connective tissue. It stains both erythrocytes and muscle fibers green, collagen light blue, epithelium and glandular tissue red, bone dark blue and cartilage purple. The protocol used by us has been detailed in Ortiz-Leal et al. (2020).

Tolivia: This technique allows to discriminate black myelinated nerve fibers and pink neuronal somas. The protocol followed by us is detailed in Villamayor et al. (2020).

Histochemical and immunohistochemical staining

A detailed account of the procedures is given in Torres et al. (2020).

Histochemical labeling with lectins (HQ): Lectins are naturally occurring carbohydrate-binding molecule, that can be used to detect glycoconjugates in tissues. We have used two lectins; LEA, that comes from tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum, and recognizes N-acetyl-glucosamine (Salazar & Sanchez-Quinteiro 2003), and UEA that comes from gorse, Ulex europaeus, and labels the L-fucose pathway (Alroy et al. 1986).

The protocol for the LEA is as follows. (i) The tissular endogenous peroxidase activity is blocked to avoid interference with the final developing step by incubating in a 3% H₂O₂ solution for 10 minutes. (ii) Sections are incubated for 30 minutes in 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA), which prevents nonspecific binding. (iii) The sections were incubated overnight in biotinylated LEA diluted in 0.5% BSA. The following day, samples were incubated (iv) for 90 min in Vectastain ABC complex (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Finally, (v) the sections were developed by incubating the sections in a solution of 0.05% diaminobenzidine (DAB) and 0.003% H₂O₂ for 5–10 minutes until the desired color reaction is observed when monitored with the microscope.

The protocol for UEA began with the same first two steps. Subsequently, (iii) incubation with UEA lectin is carried out for 1 h followed by (iv) 3 washes of 5 min in 0.1M phosphate buffer (PB, pH 7.2), and (v) sections afterwards incubated for 12 h in a peroxidase conjugated immunoglobulin against UEA. Finally, the samples were developed (vi) by incubation in the same DAB solution as the UEA.

Immunohistochemical techniques (IHQ): The first step was (i) to block endogenous peroxidase activity. Then (ii) non-specific binding was blocked with 2.5% normal horse serum from the ImmPRESS Anti-Mouse IgG / Anti-rabbit IgG Reagent Kit (Vector Laboratories, CA, USA) for 30 minutes. (iii) The primary antibody was then added to the corresponding dilution (Table 1) and allowed to incubate overnight. The next day, (iv) the samples were incubated for 20 minutes with the corresponding ImmPRESS VR Polymer HRP anti-rabbit IgG reagent. Finally, and after (v) rinsing in Tris buffer (pH 7.61) for 10 minutes, (vi) the samples were finally developed using DAB as a chromogen in the same way as for lectins.

All immunohistochemical protocols were run with the appropriate controls. In the absence of a positive control from wallabies, we reproduced the whole histochemical procedure with mouse tissues known to express the respective antigens. Samples for which the primary antibody was replaced by antibody diluent were used as negative controls. For lectins, controls were performed both without the addition of lectins and with the preabsorption of lectins, using an excess amount of the corresponding sugar.

Confocal laser scanning microscopy

The autofluorescence imaging of elastic fibres of the VNO was performed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. After cryopreserving the samples in 30% sucrose, they were cut in a sliding microtome at 40 µm thickness, and stored in 0.1 M PB, pH 7.2, at 4°C until free-floating processing. Sections were counterstained with TO-PRO-3 iodide (1 µM; Molecular Probes) for 15 min and mounted in Slow-Fade solution (Molecular Probes Cat. # S7461). A Bio-Rad MRC 1024 ES setup for dual-channel fluorescence using green autofluorescence and TO-PRO-3 iodide (far red fluorescence) filter settings (100 mW Ar laser, wavelength 488 nm, and He-Ne laser, wavelength 633 nm, respectively) were used. Images were taken using a 20 × lens (NA 0.45) on a Nikon TE 2000 inverted microscope, with separate emission filtering for each type of fluorescence (RIAIDT, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain).

Acquisition of images and digital treatment

Images were taken using the Karl Zeiss Axiocam MRc5 digital camera coupled to a Zeiss Axiophot microscope. If needed, Adobe Photoshop CS4 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA) was used to adjust parameters such as contrast or brightness, balance light levels, and crop or resize images for presentation in this work. No specific characteristics within the images were altered, enhanced, moved or introduced.

Table 1

Lectins and antibodies used. Species of elaboration, manufacturer, dilutions, catalog number.
Ab/Lectin	1st Ab species/dilution	1st Ab Catalogue number	2nd Ab species / dilution / Catalogue number
Anti-Gαo	Rabbit 1:100	MBL 551	ImmPRESS VR HRP Anti-Rabbit IgG Reagent MP-6401-15
Anti-Gαi2	Rabbit 1:100	Sta Cruz Biotechnology SC-7276	ImmPRESS VR HRP Anti-Rabbit IgG Reagent MP-6401-15
Anti-OMP	Goat 1:400	Wako S44-10001	Horse 1:250 Vector BA-9500
Anti-MAP2	Mouse 1:200	Sigma M4403	ImmPRESS VR HRP Anti-Mouse IgG Reagent MP-6402-15
Anti-GAP43	Mouse 1:800	Sigma G9264	ImmPRESS VR HRP Anti-Mouse IgG Reagent MP-6402-15
Anti-GFAP	Rabbit 1:400	Dako Z0334	ImmPRESS VR HRP Anti-Rabbit IgG Reagent MP-6401-15
Anti-CB	Rabbit 1:6000	Swant CB38	ImmPRESS VR HRP Anti-rabbit IgG Reagent MP-6401-15
Anti-CR	Rabbit 1:6000	Swant 7697	ImmPRESS VR HRP Anti-rabbit IgG Reagent MP-6401-15
UEA-I	1:10	Vector L-1060	Rabbit 1:50 DAKO P289
LEA	20 µg/ml	Vector B-1175	Vectastain ABC reagent PK-4000

MACROSCOPIC STUDY

The primary anatomical landmarks identified for Bennett’s wallaby VNS are shown in Figs. 1–3. Cross-sections made along the entire length of the decalcified nasal cavity allowed us to define the exact location of the VNO within the anterior half of the nasal cavity and to identify topographic relationships (Fig. 1A–D). The VNO occupies the ventral recess of the cavity, lying on both sides of the nasal septum. Its shape is elongated in the dorsoventral axis and relatively narrow in the lateromedial direction, especially in the more caudal part of the organ. This shape is proportional to the dorsoventrally elongated nasal septum of this species (Fig. 1A). The medial side of the VNO lays over the lateral lamina of the vomer bone, and the ventral portion of the VNO rests on the continuous ridge formed by the palatine processes of the incisive and maxillary bones. The latter forms two thin lateral projections in its dorsal crest that widen the surface of contact with the organ (Fig. 1D).

The dissection and extraction of both complete VNOs were aided by the information obtained from the cross-sectional study. Two longitudinal sections of the nasal cavity, one dorsal section, along the left nasal bone, and one ventral section, in a left parasagittal plane, allowed for the removal of the lateral nasal cavity wall and the nasal turbinates that originate from the nasal cavity wall, making the nasal septum visible (Fig. 2A and B). The nasopalatine duct could then be progressively cannulated from the nasal cavity (Figs. 2C and 3A and B) to the oral cavity due to the presence of a functional palatal fissure, as demonstrated in the skull (Fig. 3C). The thickness and pigmentation of the nasal mucosa prevented the identification of the projection area of the VNO or the NVN path (Fig. 3B). Progressively lifting the mucosa in the rostro-caudal direction, separating the mucosa from the nasal septum, allowed access to the VNO, which occupies the curved lateral recess formed by the vomer bone (Fig. 3D). Once the VNOs were dissected out, their nature was confirmed by cross-sectional examination (Fig. 2D). Additionally, the observation of the mucosa against the light allowed us to visualize the branches of the NVNs (Fig. 2E).

To extract the whole brain, the lateral walls of the cranium were removed using a rotary saw and gouge forceps, completely revealing both hemiencephalons (Fig. 4A). The olfactory bulbs are housed in the narrow and slender ethmoidal fossa. The bulbs, as well as the rest of the rhinencephalon, olfactory tracts and tubercula, and piriform lobes, are well-developed in this species (Fig. 4B–E). The AOB is easily recognizable in the dorsocaudal part of the olfactory bulb (Fig. 4F) because it is delimited by vascular formations. The arrival of the NVN is appreciable by its medial border

MICROSCOPIC STUDY

Histological, decalcified cross-sections of the whole snout from Bennett’s wallaby confirmed the location of the VNO in the ventral recess of the nasal cavity at the base of the nasal septum (Fig. 5A). The VNO of the Bennet’s wallaby presents all of the necessary components to perform its function in a highly developed fashion: a cartilaginous capsule (vomeronasal cartilage, VNC) and a vomeronasal duct (VND) associated with a soft tissue rich in veins, nerves, and glands. The organization of all these components varies noticeably along the rostrocaudal axis. Anteriorly (Fig. 5A and B), the cartilage is J-shaped, and the duct has a crescent or semilunar-like shape. The sensory neuroepithelium is arranged along the medial concave surface of the lumen, whereas the respiratory epithelium occupies a lateral location that covers the lateral luminal surface of the duct. The lateral soft tissue forms a recognizable mushroom body containing two or three large veins (Vv).

At a more caudal level (Fig. 5C and D), several significant changes can be observed in the structure of the VNO. The VND becomes more slender and elongated dorsoventrally, and remarkably, the VNC disappears completely. Therefore, the boundaries between the parenchyma and the respiratory mucosa of the nasal cavity are more diffuse. At both levels, the nasal mucosa is highly vascularized, comprising a dense network of subepithelial and periglandular capillaries.

The microscopic study of the dissected VNO was performed using histological stains and confocal microscopy on decalcified sections. The results are shown in Figs. 6–8. The lateral respiratory epithelium (Fig. 6A and B) has a ciliated pseudostratified appearance, with a small number of pseudolayers. An abundant number of periodic acid–Schiff (PAS)-positive and Alcian blue–positive goblet cells can be observed (Fig. 7C and D), similar to those that cover the respiratory mucosa of the nasal cavity. The columnar cells show a variable affinity for hematoxylin–eosin dyes, including strongly basophilic cells and others that are hardly stained. The medial neuroreceptor epithelium shows remarkable development, even though the receptor cells are not as densely packed as in other species. The receptor cells feature rounded nuclei that are variably stained by hematoxylin (Fig. 6C).

The cell limits are very well defined, to the point that the dendritic knobs approaching the lumen of the VND and the axonal projections toward the lamina propria are neatly differentiated. Gallego’s trichrome stain (Fig. 6A and D) enhances the visualization of the nuclear morphology, the high development of the connective tissue in the lamina propria, and the profuse network of sensorial NVNs. The NVNs not only rest under the sensorial epithelium but also extend dorsally and ventrally around the two commissures of the duct and beyond. Atypically, the NVNs partially occupy the lamina propria of the VNO respiratory epithelium (Fig. 6F). Autofluorescence confocal microscopy allows for the recognition of the layers that form the receptor epithelium, which appears as bands: basal, receptor, and sustentacular cells and the zone of the cell processes (Fig. 6E). Additionally, the lamina propria of the sensory epithelium in the Bennet’s wallaby has uniquely large veins and a huge accumulation of diffuse lymphoid tissue (Fig. 6C).

The glandular tissue within the VNO parenchyma is highly developed, surrounding the VND primarily on the lateral side. In the anterior zone of the VNO (level 2), the VNO parenchyma is concentrated in the elevated portion within the lateral mucosa, associated with the large veins that give it shape. The nature of this glandular tissue is tubulo-acinar (Fig. 7A), comprising serous acini with PAS-positive and Alcian blue–negative secretions (Fig. 7C and D, respectively). Although this area is also rich in serous acinar Alcian blue–positive PAS-negative glands (Fig. 7D), they are associated with the respiratory mucosa of the nasal cavity. The caliciform cells in the respiratory epithelium of the VNO are both PAS- and Alcian blue–positive (Fig. 7C and D).

Caudally, in the central zone of the VNO, the lateral vomeronasal glands (VNG) decreases, and serous acinar tissues invade the ventral and dorsal areas of the parenchyma (Fig. 6A and F). The morphology of the ventral glands is more visible in the confocal study (Fig. 7B), which reveals acini with a neat central cavity. Dorsally, the glands form large patches of glandular tissue that are differentially stained using Gallego’s trichrome stain (Fig. 6A), appearing weakly stained by fuchsin in ventral regions closer to the VND and appearing fuchsin-negative in the dorsal regions. Additionally, the ventral patches are primarily PAS-positive, whereas the dorsal patches are Alcian blue–positive (Suppl. Figure 1). In the most caudal part of the VNO, coinciding with the blind sac of the VND, a huge density of PAS-positive serous glands can be observed (Fig. 8D, Suppl. Figure 2).

The development of the NVN branches in the parenchyma is striking. From the anterior segment of the VNO, these unmyelinated branches join in large fascicles located dorsally, medially, and even ventrally to the duct (Figs. 6A and F; 7B; and 8A and E). An important vegetative innervation from the autonomic nervous system was also observed, formed by myelinated fibers and derived from the caudal nasal nerve. These nerve bundles are located exclusively in the lateral parenchyma and are always closely related to the VNG and the veinous (Figs. 6A and F; 7B; and 8A and E) structures that they innervate.

The vascular component of the parenchyma primarily consists of large veins and venous sinuses that give the VNO the appearance typical of erectile tissue, especially in the anterior part of the duct (Fig. 8A). The presence of two or three large-caliber veins in the lamina propria of the medial sensory epithelium is remarkable (Fig. 8A). Arterial vessels in both the anterior and central levels are difficult to identify, even when using confocal microscopy, which typically allows for the visualization of the elastic tunic of the arteries due to the autofluorescent nature of elastin (Fig. 8C). However, in the most caudal portion of the organ, the caliber of the veins decreases (Fig. 7B), and the arterial vessels responsible for providing the blood supply to the large anterior venous network are noticeable (Fig. 8C and D).

Microscopically, the AOB shows an appreciable development, which matches the noticeable macroscopic appearance (Fig. 9A and B). Structurally, the AOB shows a well-differentiated laminar organization (Fig. 9C and D). Although the nerve and glomerular layers are highly developed, the typical mitral cell and plexiform layers of the main olfactory bulb (MOB, Fig. 9C) are reorganized into a single mitral-plexiform joint layer, which contains the diffusely arranged mitral cells (Fig. 9D). The mitral cells have a fusiform or polyhedric shape and are easily recognized by Tolivia staining (Fig. 9G).

Another remarkable feature in the microscopic organization of the wallaby AOB is the appreciable difference in size between the larger glomeruli of the anterior part and the smaller glomeruli in the posterior segment(Fig. 9E and F) and the great development of the white matter bundles that delimit a granular zone of relatively scarce development (Fig. 8B and D).

Immunohistochemical and lectin histochemical study

Immunostaining of the VNO sensory epithelium using antibodies against the Gαo and Gαi2 proteins shows characteristic patterns. Gαo neuroreceptor cells are not excessively abundant but are labeled very neatly and with great intensity in the pericarion and along the dendritic and axonal prolongations. The soma are distributed along the entire thickness and perimeter of the neuroepithelium (Fig. 10A–C). Gαi2 cells are more numerous, but the labeling is less striking as it is primarily concentrated in the somas (Fig. 10D). For both markers, strong immunopositivity is observed in the vomeronasal nerves (Fig. 10A, B, and E). Histochemical labeling with UEA lectin stains the entire receptor epithelium (Fig. 10F), although without labeling the entire population of neuroreceptor cells. UEA lectin produces an intense and sharp marking that affects both the dendrites in the luminal area of the sensory epithelium and the axons in the lamina propria (Fig. 10G and H).

The immunohistochemical labeling of G proteins in the AOB allowed us to confirm that the anteroposterior zonation suggested by the Nissl staining also reflects the differential expression of G proteins in the superficial layers of the AOB. Specifically, the anterior zone is Gαi2 positive (Fig. 11A), whereas the complementary posterior zone is Gαo-positive (Fig. 11B). This zonation pattern was confirmed by the use of UEA lectin, which revealed a labeling pattern similar to that for anti-Gαi2, which was circumscribed to the anterior zone (Fig. 11C). UEA is not specific for the AOB and also stains the superficial layers of the MOB (Fig. 11E). The study using the LEA lectin showed the wide positive labeling of the superficial layers of both the AOB (Fig. 11D) and MOB (Fig. 11F).

Anti-OMP stains the superficial layers of both the AOB (Fig. 12A) and MOB (Fig. 12C). Anti-GFAP does not strongly stain the AOB, concentrating most of its labeling in the peripheral regions of the AOB, both anterior and posteriorly (Fig. 12B). In this latter area, anti-OMP forms a dense network that accompanies the vomeronasal fibers of the nerve layer (Fig. 12D). Remarkably, astrocytes are not observed in the AOB, although they are observed in other areas of the olfactory brain, for instance, the anterior olfactory nucleus (Fig. 12F). Anti-MAP-2 stains the deeper layers of the AOB, the mitral-plexiform and granular layers (Fig. 12E), and anti-GAP-43 labels both superficial layers, nervous and glomerular, in addition to the granular layer (Fig. 12G). However, it does not label the mitral-plexiform zone.

The calcium-binding proteins calbindin (CB) and calretinin (CR) are expressed along the whole VNS. In the AOB, both antibodies labeled the NVN and glomerular layer of the AOB in a diffuse and strong manner (Fig. 13A and B). Neither periglomerular nor mitral cells were immunopositive for either of these markers. Individual somas were observed for both markers in both the mitral-plexiform and granular layers of the AOB.

In the VNO neuroepithelium, both markers produced similar labeling patterns, characterized by the intense staining of the axonal bundles of the NVN and most of the neuroreceptor cells. The labeling was concentrated in the dendritic knobs and soma (Fig. 13C–F).

The mechanisms through which the mammalian VNO transduces chemical signals, such as pheromones and kairomones, into electrical responses that regulate sexual, hormonal, and reproductive function has not yet been fully clarified. During attempts to understand this process, the expression patterns of the α-subunit of the Gi2 and Go proteins were characterized in the rat AOB (Shinohara et al. 1992), leading to the identification of two VR families, V1R (Dulac & Axel 1995) and V2R (Herrada & Dulac 1997; Ryba & Tirindelli 1997; Matsunami & Buck 1997). Gαi2 is considered to serve as an unequivocal marker of the V1R-positive cells of the VNO, whereas the Gαo protein co-expresses with V2R cells. The ubiquitous nature of G protein expression along the NVN extends this labeling along the vomeronasal axons until they reach the superficial layers of the AOB. In the AOB, the NVNs express both G proteins, Gαi2 and Gαo, according to a topographical anteroposterior zonation, in which the anterior region expresses the Gαi2 protein, and the posterior region expresses the Gαo protein. This segregated model of G protein subunit expression was first shown in laboratory rodents (Shinohara et al. 1992; Jia & Halpern 1996) and the opossum (Halpern et al. 1995) and was later confirmed in wild rodents, including degus (Suarez et al. 2009a) and capybara (Suarez et al. 2011b; Torres et al. 2020), tenrecs (Suarez et al. 2009b), and rabbits (Villamayor et al. 2018, 2021). In parallel, the study reported by Takigami et al. (2000) in the goat VNS showed the absence of the Gαo-positive pathway in some mammals for the first time. This deterioration of the Gαo/V2R pathway was confirmed in species as diverse as shrews, horses, dogs, marmosets (Takigami et al. 2004), cats (Salazar & Sanchez-Quinteiro 2011), squirrels, hyrax (Suarez et al. 2011a), and sheep (Salazar et al. 2007). In these species, the NVN and glomeruli only express Gαi2 throughout the AOB, presenting a uniform model of vomeronasal information transduction.

This scenario was complicated by the 2012 publication of a study on the VNS in the tammar wallaby, Macropus eugenii, which unexpectedly revealed that this animal might constitute an alternative model of vomeronasal organization, with vomeronasal neuroreceptor cells along the VNO and AOB expressing only the Gαo protein (Schneider et al. 2012), indicating the existence of a third accessory olfactory type, intermediate to the segregated and uniform types previously described.

However, the authors of the study in tammar wallaby warned that their findings should be taken with caution, as some of their observations prevented the drawing of definite conclusions. Very atypically for a uniform model of G protein subunit expression, the anti-Gαo protein was only expressed in a subpopulation of neuroreceptor cells in the vomeronasal epithelium rather than in the whole population of VR neurons. To explain this low number of Gαo positive cells, the authors hypothesized a reduced affinity of the antibody used for the tammar Gαo; however, no other examples of any similar selectivity deficits in response to the use of anti-Gαo antibodies have been described in the literature.

More critically, immunolabeling of the tammar wallaby AOB using anti-Gαo has only been demonstrated by this single study (Fig. 6E in Schneider et al. 2012). Their staining protocol resulted in very faint labeling, which was restricted to a very small area of the superficial layers of the AOB receiving projections from the vomeronasal neuroreceptor cells. By contrast, in all other studied species, in both the segregated and uniform models, both Gαo and Gαi2 antibodies are associated with positive immunolabeling that can be observed throughout the entire thickness of the superficial layers, including the NVN and glomerular layers. Regrettably, the authors do not specify the antibody employed that resulted in a Gαi2 immunonegative pattern in both the VNO and AOB. Neither the commercial source nor the antibody lot number was reported, precluding any comparisons with other studies of Gαi2 expression in the VNS using the same antibody.

To date, no further studies have been reported that either reinforces or rejects the potential existence of this third model of organization for the vomeronasal transduction pathways. Therefore, we have performed a morphofunctional study of the VNS of the Bennett’s wallaby (Macropus rufogriseus) to characterize the expression patterns of G proteins in this species to shed light on the proposed presence of a third model of vomeronasal transduction in macropodids.

Our immunohistochemical study of G proteins in the Bennet’s wallaby revealed a canonical immunohistochemical labeling pattern for both Gαi2 and Gαo in the VNO and AOB of all samples studied. Moreover, the pattern of labeling observed in the Bennett’s wallaby vomeronasal neuroepithelium using anti-Gαo staining (Fig. 10A–C) was identical to that described for the tammar wallaby (Fig. 3A and B in Schneider et al. 2012), in which only a small fraction of neuroreceptor cells were labeled. The nuclei of these cells were located at the base of the epithelium, with very strong staining in the somas and the knob-like structures protruding into the VNO lumen from the receptor cell endings. However, whereas Schneider et al. did not obtain positive immunolabeling with their anti-Gαi2 antibody in the VNO, we observed an abundant number of immunopositive cells in the neuroepithelium (Fig. 10D) using our anti-Gαi2 antibody. The strong immunopositivity identified in the vomeronasal axons in both the lamina propria and the nasal mucosa confirmed the neuroreceptor nature of these cells (Fig. 10E).

By extending immunohistochemical characterization of G protein expression to the AOB, we were able to verify the existence of the anterior-posterior zonation pattern that is typical of mammalian species belonging to the segregated model. The vomeronasal axons reaching the anterior zone of the AOB only expressed Gαi2, whereas those reaching the posterior zone only expressed the Gαo subunit, and the immunolabeling of these two G proteins revealed a complementary pattern. The employment of the UEA lectin provided additional evidence for the segregation of vomeronasal information in the wallaby, revealing the selective labeling of the anterior zone of the AOB. The affinity of the UEA lectin for the anterior AOB has been reported for all the species belonging to the segregated model in which this histochemical marker has been investigated, including hamster hamster (Taniguchi et al. 1993), mouse (Salazar et al. 2001; Salazar & Sanchez-Quinteiro 2003; Kondoh et al. 2017), rat (Salazar & Sanchez Quinteiro 1998), and capybara (Torres et al. 2020). However, studies using UEA lectin staining in species belonging to the uniform model, including pig (Salazar et al. 2000), cat (Salazar & Sanchez-Quinteiro 2011), and dog (Salazar et al. 2013), and studies that have utilized a very broad panel of lectins, as in the goat (Mogi et al. 2007), have not described any evidence of zonation in the AOB.

The expression patterns observed for both Gαi2 and Gαo proteins in the VNO neuroepithelium, the NVN, and the AOB, including the establishment of a clear zonation pattern that was confirmed by UEA lectin staining, contradict the existence of a hypothetical third model of vomeronasal information processing, as described by Schneider et al. (2012). Although Schneider et al. performed their study in the tammar wallaby, Macropus eugenii, whereas our study was performed in Bennett’s wallaby, Macropus rufogriseus, this difference is unlikely to explain the observed differences in immunohistochemical labeling, as differences in both the structure and G protein expression patterns of the AOB have never been reported between species belonging to the same genus or family (Meisami & Bhatnagar 1998; Halpern & Martinez Marcos 2003).

Moreover, the main morphological and histological features of the VNS described for Macropus eugenii are indistinguishable from those found by us in Macropus rufogriseus. Thus, comparing the observations of Schneider et al. for the VNO (2008) and AOB (2012) of M. eugenii with our observations in M. rufogriseus reveals that both species share important aspects, such as the opening of the VNO to the nasopalatine duct, the semilunar shape of the VND, with the presence of a remarkable mushroom body, the layering and cellularity of the neuroreceptor epithelium, and the presence of many PAS-positive vomeronasal glands in the lateral parenchyma. Both species share a comparable arrangement of large blood vessels surrounding the VND along its medial and lateral planes, and a similar presence of profuse dorsal, medial, ventral, and ventrolateral unmyelinated innervation is described for both species (Fig. 3B in Schneider et al. 2008), transmitting the information collected by the vomeronasal sensory neuroepithelium to the AOB. This arrangement of vomeronasal axons in the parenchyma is very atypical and has not previously been described in the VNO of any other mammal species apart from these two Macropodidae.

In both species, all of the nerve bundles leave the VNO through a dorsolateral opening in the vomeronasal capsule, which is cartilaginous in both species. Another feature common to the VNO of both macropodids, which was observed by Schneider et al. (2008) and Sanchez-Villagra (2001) in the tammar wallaby and which we have verified in our histological series characterizing Bennett’s wallaby, is the failure of the caudal VNC enclose the entire VNO, such that the posterior portion of the VNO is free of surrounding cartilage. A similar finding has been reported for other marsupials, such as Notoryctes (Sweet 1904) and Caenolestes (Broom 1926).

The information available for the AOB of the tammar wallaby is limited to the study of its lamination using hematoxylin–eosin and Nissl stains and the expression pattern of Gα subunits (Schneider et al. 2012). Our work extends these histological observations through the additional use of Tolivia staining, which allows for the characterization of the AOB lamination with greater definition, including its relationship with the lateral olfactory tract and the organization of mitral cells, all of which appeared comparable in the Bennet’s wallaby to species with highly developed AOB structures, such as rodents (Meisami & Bhatnagar 1998) and Lagomorpha (Villamayor et al. 2020). Similarly, our immunohistochemical study allowed for the characterization of UEA and LEA lectin affinity and the immunohistochemical characterization using various marker proteins, including OMP, MAP2, GAP43, and GFAP, which were performed for the first in this marsupial family.

The UEA labeling, we previously discussed as a differential marker for the anterior zone of the AOB, with a distribution pattern analogous to that of Gαi2, is not specific to the VNS of the Bennett’s wallaby, as staining of the superficial layers of the MOB was also observed, similar to the distribution observed in rodents, such as the capybara (Torres et al. 2020), or in pigs (Salazar et al. 2000). LEA lectin stains all mammals, which has been investigated in the vomeronasal and olfactory neuroepithelia (Park et al. 2012; Lee et al. 2016) and the nerve and glomerular layers of both the AOB and MOB compartments in the mouse (Salazar et al. 2001), sheep, pig (Salazar et al. 2000), and rabbit (Villamayor et al. 2020). In the wallaby, unlike UEA, LEA produces a labeling pattern without zonation, similar to the pattern observed for OMP, a marker of mature olfactory and vomeronasal cells (Bock et al. 2006), and identical to the LEA pattern observed in the rabbit AOB, a species in which the zonation determined by G proteins cannot be discriminated using LEA and OMP (Villamayor et al. 2020).

Anti-GAP-43 is one of the best-characterized markers of growing and regenerating neuronal processes (Ramakers et al. 1992) and was able to identify growing axons in the Bennet’s wallaby AOB, with no difference observed between the anterior and posterior zones. However, the antibody against GFAP showed stronger immunolabeling of glial components in the posterior portion of the AOB relative to the anterior segment, a pattern that has not been previously reported for other studies of this marker in the mammalian AOB (Salazar et al. 1994; 2006) and should be examined in more detail in future studies.

CB and CR are expressed in the entire VNS, along the VNO neuroepithelium, the NVN, and AOB. For both markers, the immunostaining of the VNO comprises the soma and dendrites in a pattern similar to that described in the mouse; however, in the mouse, both CB and CR also stain basal cells (Kishimoto et al. 1993). Additionally, in rats, CR labels most of the neuroreceptors cells, whereas CB only labels a neuronal subpopulation without displaying a generalized labeling pattern (Jia & Halpern 2003).

The distribution of CB and CR immunoreactivity in the Bennett’s wallaby’s AOB concentrates on the vomeronasal fibers and glomeruli. The mitral-plexiform and granular layers are stained diffusely with both markers, although this staining is much weaker. This pattern is analogous to that found in other species, such as the rabbit (Villamayor et al. 2020) or the capybara (Torres et al. 2020). However, in both the rabbit and capybara, CB labels the periglomerular cells, and CR labels the mitral cells, which was not observed in the Bennet’s wallaby. In the case of other marsupials, such as the opossum, striking differences in the labeling patterns for CB and CR in the AOB were observed compared with the pattern found in the wallaby. In the opossum AOB, CB-labeled neurons were found in all layers except the nerve layer and the periglomerular cells, whereas CR showed a pattern analogous to that found in the wallaby, although in opossum CR also labels mitral cells and discriminates an anteroposterior zonation, with more intense staining in the posterior AOB than in the anterior AOB zone (Jia & Halpern 2004). Limited knowledge is currently available regarding the functions of calcium-binding proteins in the AOB; therefore, the formulation of hypotheses regarding the importance of these differences between species is challenging; however, CB and CR staining can provide valuable neuroanatomical information in the VNS.

Overall, the VNS of the Bennett’s wallaby shows a degree of differentiation and histochemical and neurochemical diversity comparable to species with greater VNS development; as the main consequence of our study, the existence of a third intermediate type of vomeronasal information processing is not supported. We confirm the presence of effective expression of the two primary VR families in the VNS of the Bennett’s wallaby, and our contribution expands the morphological, histochemical, and immunohistochemical information available on the VNS of Macropodidae and marsupials in general.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

Conceptualization: Mateo V. Torres, Irene Ortiz-Leal, Pablo Sanchez Quinteiro; Methodology: Mateo V. Torres, Irene Ortiz-Leal, Paula R. Villamayor, Andrea Ferreiro, José Luis Rois, Pablo Sanchez-Quinteiro; Formal analysis and investigation: Mateo V. Torres, Irene Ortiz-Leal, Paula R. Villamayor, Pablo Sanchez-Quinteiro; Writing - review and editing: Mateo V. Torres, Irene Ortiz-Leal, Pablo Sanchez-Quinteiro; Funding acquisition: Pablo Sanchez-Quinteiro; Supervision: Pablo Sánchez Quinteiro.

COMPLIANCE OF ETHICAL STANDARDS:

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All the animals employed in this study dead by natural causes.

Informed consent

No human subject was used in this study.

FUNDING

This work was partially supported by a University of Santiago de Compostela grant [1551-8179] to P.S.Q.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIAL (DATA TRANSPARENCY)

Not applicable

CODE AVAILABILITY (SOFTWARE APPLICATION OR CUSTOM CODE)

Not applicable

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank MARCELLE NATURE PARK (Outeiro de Rei, Spain) for providing the animals employed in this study.

Berghard A, Buck LB (1996) Sensory transduction in vomeronasal neurons: evidence for G alpha o, G alpha i2, and adenylyl cyclase II as major components of a pheromone signaling cascade. J Neurosci. 16 (3): 909-918. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-03-00909.1996
Bock P, Rohn K, Beineke A, Baumgärtner W, Wewetzer K (2009) Site-specific population dynamics and variable olfactory marker protein expression in the postnatal canine olfactory epithelium. J Anat 215: 522–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01147.x
Broom R (1926) On the organ of Jacobson and some other structures in the nose of Caenolestes. Proc Zool Soc 1926: 419-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1926.tb08104.x
Chamero P, Marton TF, Logan DW, Flanagan K, Cruz JR, Saghatelian A, Cravatt BF, et al. (2007) Identification of protein pheromones that promote aggressive behaviour. Nature 450: 899-902. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05997
Dulac C, Axel R (1995) A novel family of genes encoding putative pheromone receptors in mammals. Cell. Vol. 63: 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90161-2
Grus WE, Shi P, Zhang YP, Zhang J (2005) Dramatic variation of the vomeronasal pheromone receptor gene repertoire among five orders of placental and marsupial mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 5767-72. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501589102
Halpern M, Shapiro LS, Jia C (1995) Differential localization of G proteins in the opossum vomeronasal system. Brain Res 677: 157-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(95)00159-n
Halpern M, Martinez-Marcos A (2003) Structure and function of the vomeronasal system: an update. Prog Neurobiol 70: 245-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-0082(03)00103-5
Herrada G, Dulac C (1997) A novel family of putative pheromone receptors in mammals with a topographically organized and sexually dimorphic distribution. Cell 90: 763-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80536-x
Ibarra-Soria X, Levitin MO, Logan DW (2014) The genomic basis of vomeronasal-mediated behaviour. Mamm Genome 25: 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-013-9463-1
Isogai Y, Si S, Pont-Lezica L, Tan T, Kapoor V, Murthy VN, Dulac C (2011) Molecular organization of vomeronasal chemoreception. Nature 478: 241-245. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10437
Jia C, Halpern M (2003) Calbindin D28K immunoreactive neurons in vomeronasal organ and their projections to the accessory olfactory bulb in the rat. Brain Res 977: 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-8993(03)02693-3
Jia C, Halpern M (2004) Calbindin D28k, Parvalbumin, and Calretinin Immunoreactivity in the Main and Accessory Olfactory Bulbs of the Gray Short-Tailed Opossum, Monodelphis domestica. J Morphol 259: 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10166
Jia C, Halpern M (1996) Subclasses of vomeronasal receptor neurons: differential expression of G proteins (Giα2 and Goα) and segregated projections to the accessory olfactory bulb. Brain Res 719: 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(96)00110-2
Keverne EB (2002) Pheromones, vomeronasal function, and gender-specific behavior. Cell 108:735-8. https://doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00687-6
Kishimoto J, Keverne EB, Emson PC (1993) Calretinin, calbindin-D28k and parvalbumin-like immunoreactivity in mouse chemoreceptor neurons. Brain Res 610 (2): 325-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(93)91417-q
Kondoh D, Kamikawa A, Sasaki M, Kitamura N (2017) Localization of α1-2 Fucose Glycan in the Mouse Olfactory Pathway. Cells Tiss Org 203: 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000447009
Lee KH, Park C, Kim J, Moon C, Ahn M, Shin T (2016) Histological and lectin histochemical studies of the vomeronasal organ of horses. Tissue Cell 48: 361-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2016.05.002
Matsunami H, Buck LB (1997) A multigene family encoding a diverse array of putative pheromone receptors in mammals. Cell 90: 775-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80537-1
Mogi K, Sakurai K, Ichimaru T, Ohkura S, Mori Y, Okamura H (2007) Structure and chemical organization of the accessory olfactory bulb in the goat. Anat Rec 290: 301-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.20505
Meisami E, Bhatnagar KP (1998) Structure and diversity in mammalian accessory olfactory bulb. Microsc Res Tech 43: 476-99. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19981215)43:6<476::AID-JEMT2>3.0.CO;2-V
Moriya-Ito K, Hayakawa T, Suzuki H, Hagino-Yamagishi K, Nikaido M (2018) Evolution of vomeronasal receptor 1 (V1R) genes in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Gene 642: 343-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2017.11.048
Müller-Schwarze D (2006) Chemical ecology of vertebrates. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607233
Ortiz-Leal I, Torres MV, Villamayor PR, López-Beceiro A, Sanchez-Quinteiro P (2020) The vomeronasal organ of wild canids: the fox (Vulpes vulpes) as a model. J Anat 237: 890-906. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13254
Papes F, Logan DW, Stowers L (2010) The vomeronasal organ mediates interspecies defensive behaviors through detection of protein pheromone homologs. Cell 141: 692-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.037
Park J, Lee W, Jeong C, Kim H, Taniguchi K, Shin T (2012) Developmental changes affecting lectin binding in the vomeronasal organ of domestic pigs, Sus scrofa. Acta Histochem 114: 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acthis.2011.02.001
Powers JB, Winans SS (1975) Vomeronasal organ: critical role in mediating sexual behavior of the male hámster. Science. 187 (4180): 961-963. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1145182
Ramakers GJ, Verhaagen J, Oestreicher AB, Margolis FL, van Bergen en Henegouwen PM, Gispen WH (1992) Immunolocalization of B-50 (GAP-43) in the mouse olfactory bulb: predominant presence in preterminal axons. J Neurocytol 21: 853-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01191683
Rekwot PI, Ogwu D, Ovedipe EO, Sekoni VO (2001) The role of pheromones and biostimulation in animal reproduction. Anim Rep Sci 65: 157-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00223-2
Ryba NJP, Tirindelli R (1997) A new multigene family of putative pheromone receptors. Neuron. 19 (2): 371-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80946-0
Salazar I, Cifuentes JM, Sanchez-Quinteiro P (2013) Morphological and immunohistochemical features of the vomeronasal system in dogs. Anat Rec 296: 146-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22617
Salazar I, Cifuentes JM, Sanchez-Quinteiro P, Garcia Caballero T (1994) Structural, morphometric, and immunohistological study of the accessory olfactory bulb in the dog. Anat Rec 240: 277-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092400216
Salazar I, Sanchez-Quinteiro P (1998) Lectin binding patterns in the vomeronasal organ and accessory olfactory bulb of the rat. Anat Embryol 198: 331-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004290050188
Salazar I, Sanchez-Quinteiro P (2003) Differential development of binding sites for four lectins in the vomeronasal system of juvenile mouse: from the sensory transduction site to the first relay stage. Brain Res 979: 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-8993(03)02835-x
Salazar I, Sanchez-Quinteiro P (2011) A detailed morphological study of the vomeronasal organ and the accessory olfactory bulb of cats. Microsc Res Tech 74: 1109-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.21002
Salazar I, Sanchez-Quinteiro P, Alemañ N, Cifuentes JM, Troconiz PF (2007) Diversity of the vomeronasal system in mammals: the singularities of the sheep model. Microsc Res Tech 70: 752-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.20461
Salazar I, Sanchez-Quinteiro P, Cifuentes JM, Troconiz PF (2006) General organization of the perinatal and adult accessory olfactory bulb in mice. Anat Rec 288: 1009-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.a.20366
Salazar I, Sanchez-Quinteiro P, Lombardero M, Cifuentes JM (2000) A descriptive and comparative lectin histochemical study of the vomeronasal system in pigs and sheep. J Anat 196: 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19610015.x
Salazar I, Sanchez-Quinteiro P, Lombardero M, Cifuentes JM (2001) Histochemical identification of carbohydrate moieties in the accessory olfactory bulb of the mouse using a panel of lectins. Chem Senses 26: 645-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/26.6.645
Sanchez-Villagra, MR (2001) Ontogenetic and phylogenetic transformations of the vomeronasal complex and nasal floor elements in marsupial mammals. Zool J Linnean Soc 131 (4): 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1006/zjls.2000.0271
Schneider NY, Fletcher TP, Shaw G, Renfree MB (2008) The vomeronasal organ of the tammar wallaby. J Anat 213: 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00933.x
Schneider NY, Fletcher TP, Shaw G, Renfree MB (2012) Gao Expression in the Vomeronasal Organ and Olfactory Bulb of the Tammar Wallaby. Chem Senses 37: 567-577. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjs040
Shinohara H, Asano T, Kato K (1992) Differential localization of G-proteins Gi and Go in the accessory olfactory bulb of the rat. J Neurosci 4: 1275-79. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-04-01275.1992
Suarez R, Fernandez-Aburto P, Manger PR, et al. (2011a) Deterioration of the Gαo vomeronasal pathway in sexually dimorphic mammals. PLoS One 6: e26436.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026436
Suarez R, Mpodozis J (2009a) Heterogeneities of size and sexual dimorphism between the subdomains of the lateral-innervated accessory olfactory bulb (AOB) of Octodon degus (Rodentia: Hystricognathi). Behav Brain Res 198: 306-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.009
Suarez R, Santibáñez R, Parra D, Coppi AA, Abrahão LMB, Sasahara THC, Mpodozis J (2011b) Share and differential traits in the accessory olfactory bulb of caviomorph rodents with particular reference to the semiaquatic capybara. J Anat 218: 558-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01357.x
Suarez R, Villalón A, Künzle H, Mpodozis J (2009b) Transposition and Intermingling of Galphai2 and Galphao afferences into single vomeronasal glomeruli in the Madagascan lesser Tenrec Echinops telfairi. PLoS One 4: e8005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008005
Sweet G (1904) Contributions to our knowledge of the anatomy of Notoryctes typhlops, Stirling. Parts I and II. Proc R Soc Victoria 17: 76–111. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.s2-50.200.547
Takigami S, Mori Y, Ichikawa M (2000) Projection pattern of vomeronasal neurons to the accessory olfactory bulb in goats. Chem Senses 25: 387-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/25.4.387
Takigami S, Mori Y, Tanioka Y, Ichikawa M (2004) Morphological evidence for two types of mammalian vomeronasal system. Chem Senses 29: 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjh032
Taniguchi K, Nii Y, Ogawa K. (1993) Subdivisions of the accessory olfactory bulb, as demonstrated by lectin-histochemistry in the golden hamster. Neurosci Lett 158: 185-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(93)90260-r
Torres MV, Ortiz-Leal I, Villamayor PR, Ferreiro A, Rois JL, Sanchez-Quinteiro P. (2020) The vomeronasal system of the newborn capybara: a morphological and immunohistochemical study. Sci Rep 10: 13304. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69994-w
Villamayor PR, Cifuentes JM, Fdez-de-Troconiz P, Sanchez-Quinteiro P (2018) Morphological and immunohistochemical study of the rabbit vomeronasal organ. J Anat 233: 814-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12884
Villamayor PR, Cifuentes JM, Quintela L, Barcia R, Sanchez-Quinteiro P (2020) Structural, morphometric and immunohistochemical study of the rabbit accessory olfactory bulb. Brain Struct Funct 225: 203-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01997-4
Villamayor PR, Robledo D, Fernández C, Gullón J, Quintela L, Sánchez-Quinteiro P, Martínez P (2021) Analysis of the vomeronasal organ transcriptome reveals variable gene expression depending on age and function in rabbits. Genomics 113: 2240-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.05.007
Wyatt TD (2014) Pheromones and animal behavior: Chemical signals and signatures. Cambridge, UK. Cambridge University Press. 2ª ed. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030748
Wysocki CJ, Lepri JJ (1991) Consequences of removing the vomeronasal organ. J Steroid Biochem Molec Biol 39: 661-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-0760(91)90265-7
Young JM, Massa HF, Hsu L, Trask BJ (2010) Extreme variability among mammals V1R gene families. Genome Res 20: 10-8. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.098913.109
Xia B, Yan Y, Baron M, Wagner F, Barkley D, Chiodin M, Kim SY, Keefe DL, Alukal JP, Boeke JD, Yanai I (2020) Widespread Transcriptional Scanning in the Testis Modulates Gene Evolution Rates. Cell 180, 248-262.e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.015.

Download PDF

Reviews received at journal
02 Sep, 2021
Reviewers invited by journal
02 Sep, 2021
Editor invited by journal
02 Sep, 2021
Editor assigned by journal
02 Sep, 2021
First submitted to journal
01 Sep, 2021

You are reading this latest preprint version

Does a Third Model for the Vomeronasal Processing of Information Exist? Insights from the Macropodid Neuroanatomy

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Material & Methods

Samples extraction

Samples processing for histological study

General histological stainings

Histochemical and immunohistochemical staining

Confocal laser scanning microscopy

Acquisition of images and digital treatment

Results

Immunohistochemical and lectin histochemical study

Discussion

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1