In this paper, under the two working conditions of bank slope reservoir water level decline and rise, the community detection algorithm is applied to process displacement data, and the deformation characteristic zoning of bank slope is obtained. Based on displacement cloud map analyzed by ArcGIS, the relationship between deformation characteristic zoning and bank slope displacement is gained, and the leader nodes existing in the community are further analyzed. Additionally, based on the zoning of geological characteristics, the relationships between community detection results and three types of geological geometric factors are researched.
4.1 Reservoir water level decline
According to the decline degree of reservoir water level, the community detection results can be divided into two parts.
Taking the decline of water level in bank slope reservoir as the standard, the monitoring data are processed, and the results are shown in Fig. 5. According to the zoning results, the 22 monitoring points can be divided into two communities, the first community is the blue monitoring point, and the second community is the yellow monitoring point. When the falling range of reservoir water level is 0 ~ 2 m (excluding 0), the first community is mainly distributed at the upper and lower edges of the bank slope, and the second community is mainly distributed at the middle and upper parts of the bank slope. When the falling range of reservoir water level is 2 ~ 6 m, the first community is mainly distributed in the middle and right of the bank slope, and the second community is mainly distributed on the left of the bank slope.
The results after superimposing the community detection results with the bank slope displacement nephogram are shown in Fig. 6. Community detection can quickly identify the large deformation and closely related parts on the bank slope and classify them as the same community. The displacement curve of monitoring points is drawn according to the community detection results, as shown in Fig. 7. When the reservoir water level drops, the curves of the second community are slightly higher than the first community, indicating that the bank slope deformation in the second community is more severe than that in the first community. What’s more, we can also identify the leader nodes, which play the main control role in the community. Combining Fig. 6 and Fig. 7, we can see the specific locations and deformation values of the leader nodes. When the decline range of reservoir water level is 0 ~ 2 m (excluding 0), the leader nodes in the first community are No. 12 and No. 21, and the leader nodes in the second community are No. 7 and No. 9. When the falling range of reservoir water level is 2 ~ 6 m, the leader nodes in the first community are No. 9 and No. 21, and the leader nodes in the second community are No. 17 and No. 20. The number of leader nodes shall not be greater than 20% of the total number of nodes in the same community. The average displacement of nodes in the community where the reservoir water drops is shown in Table 1. After calculation, the average displacement of leader nodes in the same community is 22 ~ 36% more than that of ordinary nodes, and the overall displacement of the second community is 17.5 ~ 21.2% more than that of the first community.
Table 1 Average displacement of nodes in community with reservoir water decline
Reservoir water condition
|
Community order
|
Average displacement
|
surplus displacement of leader node(%)
|
surplus displacement of the second community
(%)
|
leader
node
(mm)
|
common node
(mm)
|
declines by 0~2 m
|
first
|
5.9
|
3.8
|
36
|
21
|
second
|
6.3
|
4.8
|
24
|
declines by 2~6 m
|
first
|
6.9
|
5.0
|
28
|
18
|
second
|
7.4
|
5.8
|
22
|
Comparing the community detection results with the elevation, slope and aspect zoning results, it is shown that the community detection results have a great relationship with the slope. According to the superposition results (Fig. 8), the slope within the second community accounts for a large proportion of 63 ~ 90°, especially 72 ~ 90°, indicating that the slope in the second community is steep and prone to deformation.
4.2 Reservoir water level raise
According to the rising degree of reservoir water level, the community detection results can be divided into two parts.
Taking the rise of reservoir water level on the bank slope as the standard, the monitored data is processed, and the results are shown in Fig. 9. According to the zoning results, the 22 monitoring points can be divided into two communities, the first community is the blue monitoring point, and the second community is the yellow monitoring point. When the rising range of reservoir water level is 0 ~ 6 m (excluding 0), the first community is mainly distributed at the top and middle lower part of the bank slope, and the second community is mainly distributed at the middle upper part of the bank slope. When the rising range of reservoir water level is 6 ~ 23 m, the first community is mainly distributed in the middle and right of the bank slope, and the second community is mainly distributed at the edge of the bank slope.
The results after overlapping the community detection results with the bank slope displacement nephogram are shown in Fig. 10. According to the results, the part with severe deformation and close connection on the bank slope is also within the scope of the second community, which is the same as the water level decline condition of the reservoir on the bank slope. Combining Fig. 10 and Fig. 11, we can see the specific position and deformation value of the leader nodes. When the rising range of reservoir water level is 0 ~ 6 m (excluding 0), the leader nodes in the first community are No. 1 and No. 13, and the leader nodes in the second community are No. 9 and No. 12. When the rising range of reservoir water level is 6 ~ 23 m, the leader nodes in the first community are No. 5 and No.11, and the leader nodes in the second community are No. 8 and No. 12. The number of leader nodes is no more than 20% of the total number of nodes in the community. The average displacement of nodes in the community where the reservoir water raises is shown in Table 2. After calculation, the average displacement of leader nodes is 11 ~ 17% more than that of ordinary nodes, and the overall displacement of the second community is 5 ~ 18.1% more than that of the first community.
Table 2 Average displacement of nodes in community with reservoir water raise
Reservoir water condition
|
Community order
|
Average displacement
|
surplus displacement of leader node(%)
|
surplus displacement of the second community
(%)
|
leader
node
(mm)
|
common node
(mm)
|
raises by 0~6 m
|
first
|
5.2
|
4.3
|
17
|
18
|
second
|
5.9
|
5.2
|
12
|
raises by 6~23 m
|
first
|
7.2
|
6.0
|
17
|
5
|
second
|
7.2
|
6.4
|
11
|
The community detection results under the condition of rising reservoir water level are superimposed with the bank slope zoning results, as shown in Fig. 12. According to the superposition results, it is basically consistent with the results obtained under the condition of reservoir water level decline. the slope within the second community accounts for a large proportion of 63 ~ 90°, indicating that the slope in the second community is steep and prone to deformation.