Antibacterial activity of T. coccinea extracts:
Trametes coccinea, synonym Pycnoporus coccineus, is a saprophytic white rod fungus belonging to the family Polyporaceae. This species, and the related members of this genera are characterized by the presence of an annual sessile or effused-reflexed basiodiocarp which is often pigmented (Lomascolo et al. 2011). Four species of this genus namely Pycnoporus cinnabarinus, P. sanguineus, P. coccineus and P. puniceus were found to produce a typical red pigment which is deposited in the fruiting bodies, and due to this the fruiting body turns in to orange in colour. Except this characteristic feature, the rest of all morphological characters of the genus are similar to the genus Trametes, and therefore recent taxonomy have included these four species in to the genus Trametes (Welti et al. 2012).
In this study, the red pigment was isolated as crude extract using methanol. Here, the antibacterial activity of Trametes coccinea fruiting body extract was assessed against two Gram- positive bacteria viz. Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus cereus and one Gram- negative bacteria viz. Escherichia coli. The extract showed potent inhibitory activity against the tested bacterial strains. The extracts of three mushroom samples were able to form visible zones of inhibition, as detected in the Mueller Hinton Agar plates. The photographs of plates showing zones of inhibition against the bacterial strains were shown in Fig. 1. However, the diameter of the zones of inhibition of the crude extracts at a concentration of 1000 µg/ml was smaller than that of pure streptomycin (100 µg/ml), the positive control used in this study. The minimum zone forming concentrations of the three extracts against Bacillus subtilis, B. cereus and E. coli are presented in Table 1. It was also observed that the extracts were effective at lower concentrations against Gram- negative bacteria (E. coli) than the Gram- positive bacterial strains (B. subtilis and B. cereus). Although, the three tested mushroom samples were collected from different places but, a very negligible amount of differences were recorded in the minimum zone forming concentrations among all the three mushroom extracts. From this, it could be concluded that the active compound(s) present in the extracts of different samples of same species is same and present in similar concentrations.
The MIC of the three extracts were also evaluated in the liquid culture against the test bacteria, which revealed that, the extracts could inhibit more than 90% of bacterial growth at a concentration of 400 µg/ml against B. subtilis and B. cereus. Similarly, the growth of E. coli was also inhibited by more than 90% at a concentration of 300 µg/ml of extracts (Fig. 2). It was earlier reported that the red pigments from Pycnoporus cinnabarinus (synonym. Trametes cinnabarina), an evolutionary close species to Trametes coccinea, possess antibacterial properties against Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonae, Salmonella enteritidis, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus spp. The MIC of P. cinnabarinus extracts against these bacterial strains was recorded between 0.02 – 0.7 mg/ml (Eggert 1997). The pigments of Pycnoporus cinnabarinus has been reported to contain a major bioactive compound called as cinnabarinic acid, along with few analogues of this compound (Eggert et al. 1995; Eggert 1997). Cinnabarinic acid is a metabolite of the kynurenine pathway, which derives from two molecules of 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid through a condensation reaction (Fazio et al. 2012). Laccase mediated production of the red pigments by mycelial cultures of Pycnoporus cinnabarinus has been established earlier (Eggert et al. 1995). Laccase catalyzes the oxidative dimerization of 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid in a 6-electron oxidation reaction (Eggert 1997). Our findings also suggested the production of similar pigments in the mycelial cultures of T. coccinea (Supplementary Figure S1). It was further confirmed in our study that supplementation of guaiacol (an inducer for laccase production) enhances the pigment production in mycelial cultures, suggesting the involvement of laccase in the synthesis process. This enables an advantageous biosynthesis of cinnabarinic acid over chemical synthesis where hazardous or expensive catalysts are used thereby making the synthesis process nonrenewable and environmentally unfriendly (Jabri and Overman 2013). Recently, herterologous production of cinnabarinic acid has been described in a metabolically engineered Pseudomonas chlororaphis GP72 (Yue et al. 2019).
Detection and identification of bioactive metabolite:
Cinnabarinic acid, a red pigmented derivative belonging to the group of phenoxazinone, is produced by a few Tramates (Pycnoporus) species as a byproduct of kynurenine pathway, due to the condensation of two molecules of 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid (Téllez-Téllez et al. 2016). To confirm the presence of cinnabarinic acid and/or its analogues, the crude extracts of the mushroom fruiting bodies were separated in a TLC plate containing silica gel as stationary matrix. It was observed that the crude extract of sample APS1 was separated to 5 different fractions with Rf values of 0.91, 0.83, 0.74, 0.65 and 0.32 (Fig. 3A). Likewise, APS2 and F3 showed 5 fractions (0.85, 0.75, 0.65, 0.33 and 0.17) and 6 fractions (0.85, 0.75, 0.65, 0.56, 0.33 and 0.25), respectively (Fig. 3B and C). The fractions with Rf value 0.56 and 0.25 were exclusively detected in the sample F3, whereas, fractions with Rf value 0.17 was exclusive to sample APS2. While comparing with the standards of cinnabarinic acid (Sigma, USA) and phenoxazine (Sigma, USA), both the fractions were detected in sample APS1, APS2 and F3, suggesting that the two compounds were common active metabolites of the T. coccinea. As cinnabarinic acid has been reported from other related species of T. coccinea that possess antibacterial activity (Eggert 1997), we assumed that this compound is responsible for the inhibitory activity against the Gram-positive and Gram-negative test bacterial strains. To confirm this, we tested the antibacterial activity of the major fractions in each sample after TLC separation. It was found that the cinnabarinic acid corresponding fraction contained significant antibacterial activity against the test bacterial strains (Supplementary Table S1). Spectroscopic analysis suggested that this fraction has an absorption maxima of 427 nm in the visible region of the spectrum (Supplementary Fig. S2).
To confirm the identity of cinnabarinic acid, we also considered the HPLC and ESI-MS data as evidence. The HPLC analysis revealed the presence of cinnabarinic acid in the crude as well as TLC purified fraction, with a retention time of 14.1 min. The HPLC peaks of standards cinnabarinic acid (Sigma, USA) and phenoxazine (Sigma, USA), T. coccinea crude extracts from sample APS1 and APS2, along with TLC purified bioactive fraction (Rf value 0.33) are shown in Fig. 4. The molecular mass of cinnabarinic acid from T. coccinea was detected using ESI-MS which suggested the presence of cinnabarinic acid [m/z: 301.0 (M+H)+] in the TLC purified fraction (Fig. 5A). The identity of phenoxazine present in the samples as common metabolites (TLC Rf value 0.83/0.85) was also confirmed by ESI-MS [m/z: 184.1 (M+H)+] (Fig. 5B), however, this fraction did not possess antibacterial activity.
Inhibition of biofilm production in Bacillus subtilis and B. cereus:
Biofilm production is an important mechanism of antimicrobial resistance in many pathogenic bacteria. Biofilm production in bacteria is associated with several economic and environmental implications as well as medical complications. Recent strategies to overcome these problems focus on the use of antimicrobial agents that could target bacterial biofilm formation (Singh et al. 2017). Here, we performed the biofilm production assay to study the effect of cinnabarinic acid produced by T. coccinea on development of bacterial biofilms in B. subtilis and B. cereus. It was observed that a concentration of 500 µg/ml, cinnabarinic acid from APS1, APS2 and F3 could inhibit 95%, 87.7% and 86.9% of biofilm formation, respective in B. subtilis compared to the control condition. Similarly, the same concentration was also found to be effective to inhibit (91.5 – 94.7%) biofilm formation in B. cereus (Fig. 6). Previously, a few natural compounds including bacterial and fungal metabolites have been reported to inhibit bacterial and fungal biofilms. For example, farnesol – a sesquiterpene group of quorum sensing molecule from Candida species was reported to inhibit biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis, and pathogenic strains of Candida albicans (Ramage et al. 2002). In a separate study, it was that farnesol treatment could reverse the resistance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus against methicillin by inhibition of biofilm production (Gomes et al. 2009). Similarly, bacterial pigment prodigiosin (an alkaloid) could inhibit biofilm production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Kimyon et al. 2016). There are several possibilities through which biofilm production is inhibited. Some antibiotics targets bacterial exopolysaccharide production mechanisms, thereby inhibiting the biofilm production. A few antibacterial compounds (for e.g., prodigiosin) targets bacterial DNA of the target cells and induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, which ultimately leads to the inhibition of bacterial biofilm production and cell death (Kimyon et al. 2016). Prodigiosin also cause damages to the plasma membrane of Gram-positive bacteria and show antimicrobial properties (Suryawanshi et al. 2017). It was reported earlier that cinnabarinic acid generated from the oxidation of 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid induced apoptosis in thymocytes of mouse through the production of ROS and DNA fragmentation (Hiramatsu et al. 2008). There is a strong possibility that cinnabarinic acid may use any of these mechanisms to exhibit antibacterial activity and inhibit bacterial biofilm formation.