DAMA continues to be a large healthcare problem, constituting a major adverse effect on healthcare systems and patient care. DAMA exposes patients to the risk of untreated medical problems, an increased rate of re-admission, and an extended period of recovery and/or morbidity.(6)
Some studies have shown that DAMA is a major strain on healthcare systems and a direct cause of wasted resources. Incurred costs due to DAMA over a 5-year period are estimated to be nearly $3 billion.(12) The calculated costs due to DAMA are 56% higher than those expected from a patient’s initial hospitalization.(1) This increase in cost could be secondary to several reasons, such as a longer readmission period, double care by physicians and nurses, and extra work-ups on the patient due to care needed to treat complications that may have occurred.
Only 12.5% of our participants reported having ever signed a DAMA, but this was much higher than our calculated ED DAMA rate in the past year (2020). Still, it was less than the average of 13.2%, derived from three studies published in Iran.(13–15)
In this cross-sectional study, and in contrast to what we expected, we found that educational level has no impact on a patient’s decision to sign DAMA. We also found that the majority of our participants who have signed a DAMA were over the age of 43, which is in contrast to a studies conducted in Pakistan.(16, 17)
Our findings indicate that gender is not a major factor that influences patients’ decisions related to DAMA, unlike other studies that showed a significant male predominance.(13, 17, 18) Meanwhile, marital status was found to be a factor associated with DAMA (p = 0.024), which is compatible with the study conducted in Iran.(13)
We were surprised to find that the major factor that would influence our patients to choose DAMA was a long time spent waiting to be seen by a physician, with a p-value of 0.001, followed by the tiredness related to the hospital stay (p = 0.010). Followed by inappropriate behavior and disrespect by staff (p = 0.024), an unexpected management plan and a failure to inform the patient or their relatives about their condition came next, with p-values of 0.030 and 0.032, respectively. These findings correlate well with findings from other studies.(19, 20)
Concerns about the lack of available beds in relevant wards was not significant in our study (p = 0.360), which could be due to the availability of private rooms and good accommodation in the ER and the same standard of care provided there as in the wards.
Regarding other factors, such as physicians’ and nurses’ attention to the patient and their relatives’ emotional support, financial issues, looking for another medical opinion, having relatives at home for which the patient is personally responsible, feeling better, and educational level, we noted only insignificant correlations with DAMA decisions. This was in contrast to other studies, where financial concerns and insurance had a significant effect.(9, 18, 19)