Isolation and purity determination of LCBs
GlcCer and CAEP were purified from konjac, Tamogi mushroom, and scallop to prepare LCBs for rat lymph cannulation experiments. The obtained GlcCer and CAEP were hydrolyzed in Ba(OH)2 aqueous solution/dioxane, during which GlcCers were hydrolyzed to LCBs, but most GlcCers were hydrolyzed to lyso-GlcCer, and which was subsequently treated with b-glucosidase. By contrast, CAEP was completely hydrolyzed to LCB in Ba(OH)2 aqueous solution/dioxane. Liberated LCBs were finally purified by ODS HPLC, and d18:24t8c, d18:24t8t, d18:3, 9Me-d18:2, and 9Me-d18:3 were successfully isolated. Purified LCBs were analyzed by ESI-MS, and their associated ions were observed at m/z 298.3 [M+H]+ (d18:24t8c), 298.3 [M+H]+ (d18:24t8t), 296.3 [M+H]+ (d18:3), 312.4 [M+H]+ (9Me-d18:2), and 310.4 [M+H]+ (9Me-d18:3) (Fig. S1A-D). Isolated LCBs were derivatized with OPA and analyzed by HPLC with a fluorescence detector. The purities were >99% for d18:24t8c, 95% for d18:24t8t, >99% for d18:3, >99% for 9Me-d18:2, and >99% for 9Me-d18:3.
Recovery of free LCBs from lymph
To investigate the absorption of LCBs from the digestive tract to lymph, emulsions with 10 mg of purified LCBs were enterally administrated to a thoracic-duct-cannulated rat. Lymph was collected every hour up to 8 h after LCB administration. There were no significant differences in the amount of lymph output among rats administrated each LCB (Fig. S2), indicating that surgery and animal maintenance were appropriately carried out. First, free LCBs extracted from the collected lymph were analyzed by LC/MS/MS. HPLC retention times and exact masses of protonated ion signals ([M+H]+m/z 298.27, 298.27, 296.26, 312.29, and 310.27 for d18:24t8c, d18:24t8t, d18:3, 9Me-d18:2, and 9Me-d18:3, respectively) were used for the identification of each LCB species. Peak areas were integrated at m/z ± 0.05, and LCB amounts were determined by comparing [M+H]+ ion signals of d18:24t8c, d18:24t8t, d18:3, 9Me-d18:2, and 9Me-d18:3 with the peak area of the d17:1 internal standard. The amounts of free LCBs in lymph at each timepoint are shown in Fig. 2. The amount of all LCBs, d18:24t8c, d18:24t8t, d18:3, 9Me-d18:2, and 9Me-d18:3, were elevated in the lymph of rats infused with the corresponding LCBs. The amount of d18:24t8c was highest at 3 h after administration (0.83 nmol). On the other hand, the amount of d18:24t8t, a geometrical isomer of d18:24t8c, was highest at 1 h after administration (4.38 nmol). The levels of both d18:24t8c and d18:24t8t at 8 h decreased to levels similar to those before administration. The total amount of d18:24t8c up to 8 h after LCB administration was ~4.4-fold higher than that of d18:24t8t. In the case of other LCBs, the amount of d18:3 in lymph increased after 1-3 h, 9Me-d18:2 increased after 2-4 h, and 9Me-d18:3 peaked at 4 h after administration. This result suggests that the absorption rates of free LCBs into lymph differ with their structure, even among geometrical isomers. Herein, the absorption rates of d18:24t8c, d18:24t8t, d18:3, 9Me-d18:2, and 9Me-d18:3 into lymph as free LCBs were 0.011% ± 0.006%, 0.048% ± 0.016%, 0.043% ± 0.016%, 0.004% ± 0.000%, and 0.014% ± 0.013%, respectively, when integrated up to 8 h after administration (Fig. 2).
Quantification of reconstituted ceramide and GlcCer in lymph
Since the LCBs absorbed from the digestive tract were predicted to be metabolized to ceramide and complex sphingolipids in intestinal epithelial cells, these LCB metabolites in lymph were also analyzed. As expected, a portion of each administrated LCB was processed into ceramide (Fig. 3A-D), and more than 80% was bound to the fatty acid C16:0, followed by C24:0 and C23:0 (Fig. S3), and the bound fatty acid species did not depend on the structure of the administrated LCB (Fig. S3). Similar to the results of free LCB absorption, the amount of d18:24t8t ceramide in lymph peaked at 1 h after administration and then gradually decreased to only trace amounts at 8 h (Fig. 3A). The rates of d18:2-bound ceramide absorption into the lymph of groups administrated d18:24t8c and d18:24t8t were compared. As in the case of free LCBs, ceramides containing d18:24t8c were absorbed more slowly and to a lesser extent than d18:24t8t ceramides (Fig. 3A). In the case of other LCBs, the amount of administrated LCB-bound ceramides in the lymph increased at 2-4 h after administration of d18:3, at 2-6 h after administration of 9Me-d18:2, and at 3-7 h after administration of 9Me-d18:3 (Fig. 3B-D). The absorption of 9Me-d18:3-bound ceramides were the slowest among the LCBs tested in this study, and the maximum amount of ceramides detected in lymph recovered at 6 h after LCB administration (Fig. 3D). The total absorption rates of d18:24t8c, d18:24t8t, d18:3, 9Me-d18:2, and 9Me-d18:3 into lymph as ceramide were 0.095% ± 0.008%, 0.143% ± 0.023%, 0.030% ± 0.008%, 0.054% ± 0.019%, and 0.088% ± 0.023%, respectively (Fig. 6).
GlcCers metabolized from the administrated LCB in the collected lymph were identified. Interestingly, d18:24t8t and 9Me- d18:24t8t were the only LCBs detected in lymph that were converted to GlcCer (Fig. 4A, C), which was unlike in the case of free LCBs or ceramide. GlcCer of other LCBs was present only at trace levels (Fig. 4B, D). Only C16:0-bound GlcCers of d18:24t8t and 9Me- d18:24t8t were detected, and no other fatty acids such as C24:0 and C23:0 were detected in lymph. Changes in the amount of GlcCer in lymph showed a similar trend. The amount of reconstructed GlcCer in lymph was highest at 3 h after administration of d18:24t8t, and at 4 h after administration of 9Me-d18:24t8t (Fig. 4A, C). Both d18:24t8t and 9Me-d18:24t8t bound to GlcCer were decreased to trace levels at 6 h after administration (Fig. 4A, C). In addition, the absorption rates of GlcCers as the LCB were lower than that of ceramides (Fig. 3A-D, 4A, C). The biosynthesis rate of GlcCer is estimated to be lower than the ceramide synthesis rate because it requires an additional glycosylation step. Additionally, it is possible that the transport of reconstituted GlcCer from the small intestine to lymph may be slower than that of ceramide. The absorption rates of d18:24t8t and 9Me-d18:2 into lymph as GlcCer were 0.011% ± 0.004% and 0.017% ± 0.005%, respectively (Fig. 6).
Analysis of the LCB backbones of sphingomyelin by in-source CID/MRM in ESI-negative mode
To identify and quantify nonmammalian-type LCB-bound SMs, lipids extracted from lymph from rats administrated LCBs were analyzed. In the ESI-positive mode, fragmentation of protonated ions ([M+H]+) of SM yielded only one typical product ion (m/z 184.07) derived from phosphocholine; hence, information for LCBs was not obtained using this mode (Fig. S4A). Therefore, the in-source CID/MRM method was established, a combination of in-source CID and postsource CID, in the ESI-negative mode to identify the LCB backbones of SMs. In this analysis, methyl groups liberated by in-source fragmentation of SM ([M-CH3]-) were observed on the TOF survey scan when the declustering potential was set to -200 V; hence, [M-CH3]- was selected as the precursor ion. The postsource CID of [M-CH3]- ions produced the product ion [M-CH3-fatty acid]-, and these pairs were selected for the MRM mode (Fig. S4C, D).
By this in-source CID/MRM method in the ESI-negative mode, the levels of SM in the lymph of rats administrated LCBs were measured (Fig. 5). Metabolized SMs from administrated LCBs were detected, especially in the group administered d18:24t8c (Fig. 5A). The amount of d18:24t8c-bound SMs in lymph increased at 4-7 h after administration of d18:24t8c. C16:0 was the most common fatty acid in d18:24t8c-bound SM as well as d18:24t8c-bound ceramides and GlcCers (Fig. 3A, 4A, 5A). By comparing the detected d18:24t8c-bound SMs, as in the case of GlcCer, the absorption of SM into lymph occurred later than ceramide (Fig. 3A, 5A). In the case of groups administered d18:24t8t, d18:3, 9Me-d18:2, and 9Me-d18:3, the amount of SM detected in lymph was much lower than that in the d18:24t8c-administrated group (Fig. 5B-D). The amounts of d18:24t8c, d18:24t8t, d18:3, 9Me-d18:2, and 9Me-d18:3 adsorbed into lymph as SM were 1.064% ± 0.149%, 0.047% ± 0.068%, 0.026% ± 0.004%, 0.277% ± 0.023%, and 0.131% ± 0.053%, respectively, when integrated up to 8 h after administration (Fig. 6).
Uptake and transport of d18:2 geometrical isomers in differentiated Caco-2 cells
In rat lymph, the levels of reconstituted GlcCers and SMs clearly varied with the geometric isomerism of the 8—position of d18:2 (Fig. 4A, 5A). Thus, the absorption behaviors of d18:24t8c and d18:24t8t were analyzed using differentiated Caco-2 cells, an intestinal epithelial transport system model. LCBs (10 mM) were added to the apical side of Caco-2 cells, which were cultured on a cell culture insert for 21 days and differentiated into intestinal epithelium-like cells, and incubated for 24 h. Lipids were extracted from the medium on the basolateral side and from cells. Free LCBs, reconstituted ceramide, GlcCer, and SM were analyzed by LC/MS/MS (Fig. 7A-D). There were no significant differences in the amounts of free d18:2- and d18:2-bound ceramides in the medium on the basolateral side between treatments with d18:24t8c and d18:24t8t (Fig. 7A, B). Levels of d18:2-GlcCer were higher in d18:24t8t-treated cells, and the amounts of d18:2-SMs in d18:24t8c-treated cells were larger than that in d18:24t8t-treated cells, which consistent with the rat lymph results. Quantitative analysis revealed that the amount of intracellular free d18:2 in the d18:24t8c-treated cells were significantly higher than that in the control cells, but there was no significant difference between the d18:24t8t-treated cells and the control cells (Fig. 7E). The amount of intracellular d18:2-bound ceramides significantly increased only in the d18:24t8t-treated cells compared with that in the control cells (Fig. 7F), but there was no significant difference between the d18:24t8c-treated cells and the control cells. The amount of intracellular d18:2-bound GlcCers significantly increased in the d18:24t8t-treated cells compared with that n the control cells, but there was no change in the amount of d18:2-bound GlcCers in the d18:24t8c-treated cells compared with that in the control cells (Fig. 7G). These results followed a similar trend to those of the experiment on LCB absorption in rat lymph. However, unlike in the rat experiment, the amount of intracellular d18:2-bound SMs of both d18:24t8c- and d18:24t8t-treated cells significantly increased compared with that in the control cells, and there were no significant differences in the amount of intracellular d18:2-bound SMs between d18:24t8c- and d18:24t8t-treated cells (Fig. 7H).