Selection of articles
Our primary search identified a total of 326 articles (Fig. 1). Through the study selection process, 13 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review [3, 9, 21–31]. The majority of the studies evaluated CD14 gene polymorphisms (n = 9), whereas four studies analyzed NOD2 polymorphisms. All of the selected studies adopted the case-control design, in which the case was defined as patients with tuberculosis, whether pulmonary, extrapulmonary, or both and controls were defined as individuals not infected with Mtb. The majority of articles investigated the relationship between presence of polymorphisms and the risk of developing only pulmonary TB (n = 7), whereas five studies tested association of SNPs with pulmonary and other forms of TB, and one assessed the relationship with susceptibility to spinal TB (Table 1).
In this systematic review, data on 4,054 TB patients were examined, whereas 3,993 individuals were identified as controls. The median sample size (IQR) per study was 267 (123–401) and 187 (127–413) for TB patients and healthy controls, respectively. The detailed characteristics of each study are shown in Table 1.
As observed in Fig. 2, most studies originated from Asia (n = 8) [21–26, 29, 30], with China leading as the most frequent study site (n = 5) [21–23, 29, 30], followed by Turkey (n = 1) [25], Iran (n = 1) [24] and South Korea (n = 1) [26]. The American continent also contributed to some studies (n = 3): 1 in the USA [31], 1 in Mexico [3] and 1 in Colombia [9]. Only one study was set in Africa, specifically in Uganda [28], and Europe was represented by one study from Poland [27]. It is also possible to visualize in the Fig. 2 that the CD14 polymorphisms were studied in diverse populations from various ethnicities, including Mexican, Colombian, Polish, Turkish, Iranian, South Korean and Chinese. In contrast, the NOD2 polymorphisms were studied in 3 restricted populations: North Americans, Chinese and Ugandan.
Quality Assessment
The quality scores of the studies, assessing the risk of bias, are displayed in Table 2. Five studies were of good quality and eight were of moderate quality (Table 2).
CD14 polymorphisms and risk of tuberculosis
In the present review, CD14 polymorphisms were the most frequently studied in the context of TB susceptibility. In total, 9 studies reported potential associations, presenting data for different populations. The sample sizes varied between 3987–1969 TB cases and 2018 controls. The studies reported data on 7 CD14 SNPs: rs2569190 [3, 9, 21–27], rs2569191 [22, 23], rs3138078 [22], rs2915863 [22], rs3138076 [22], rs5744455 [22] and rs5744454 [22]. Of the 9 publications which investigated this gene locus, six studies reported a significant association between the T allele of SNP rs2569190 and higher odds of TB [3, 21–24, 26]. The T allele was significantly more frequent in TB patients compared with healthy controls in subpopulations from China [21–23], Mexico [3], Iran [24] and South Korea [26]. Also, analyzes of odds ratio (OR) revealed an increased risk of TB when this allele was present, in case of both pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease. Of note, three of such studies [21–23] reported this aforementioned association in Chinese participants, reinforcing the idea that this CD14 allele may indeed increase the risk of developing TB in this particular population.
With regards to genotypes, the CD14 TT genotype was significantly more common in TB patients than in healthy controls and increased the risk of TB in five [3, 21, 23, 24, 26] of the six studies which analyzed the rs2569190 SNP. Only in one Chinese study, Zhao et al [23], the occurrence of the T allele in homozygosis was reported not to be related with a significant risk of TB in the OR analyzes (OR = 1). Nevertheless, in the same study, the presence of T allele alone was shown to be not only more frequent in TB cases, but also was described as a risk factor for TB development in the same population (OR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.148–1.708; p = 0.001). In addition, Zheng et al [23] described that the association of TT with the CT genotype (TT + CT) was found significantly more frequent in spinal TB patients than in controls (85.00% vs 44.17%; P < 0.05), with an OR of 2.10 (CI 95%= 1.09–3.85). Therefore, it is possible to conclude that the CD14 T allele may directly impact the risk of TB development. When such allele is present in the genetic loci, either in heterozygosis or homozygosis, the odds to progress with active TB is shown to be high.
In contrast, Zhao et al [23] reported that frequencies of the CD14 genotypes CT and CC in the rs2569190 polymorphism were lower in TB cases than in controls. Logistic regression analysis of such results demonstrated that presence of CT and CC genotypes are likely protective against TB (OR = 0.46 and 0.63, respectively; 95% CI = 0.34–0.63 and 0.42–0.93). In agreement with these latter findings, Alavi-Naini et al. [24] described that the C allele in homozygosis was a protection factor in a sub-analysis of Iranian subjects, with an OR of 0.44 (95% CI 0.23–0.83; p = 0.006), whereas the CT genotype was not significantly associated with a lower risk for TB (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.6–1.7; p = 0.5). Thus, the CC genotype might be a protective factor in the TB pathophysiology.
Noteworthy, three articles did not find any evidence for a significant association between SNP rs2569190 and TB development – Ayaslioglu et al [25], Druszczyñska et al [27] and Pacheco et al [9]. There was no significant difference in terms of genotype frequency and allele distribution between TB patients and controls, or between distinct TB clinical forms. Moreover, no association was found between the CD14-159C/T polymorphism and TB clinical severity in studies that evaluated Turkish, Caucasian Polish or White and Mestizo Colombian patients. In the Turkish study, one hypothesis described for the lack of association was the small sample size (88 TB cases and 116 controls) [25]. Moreover, Druszczyñska et al [27] have not specified whether TB patients and controls enrolled were from the same region, which could possibly have influenced the findings. Discrepancies related to ethnicity or other epidemiologic or environmental characteristics among the diverse populations investigated may have contributed to these conflicting results.
Additional investigations evaluating the CD14 SNP rs2569191 revealed significant associations with odds of TB in 2 distinct publications from China [22, 23]. Both studies reported that the G allele of A-1145G was more prevalent in TB cases than in controls, indicating an increased TB risk. In one of these studies [22], individuals with the GG genotype of A-1145G were more likely to present with TB (OR = 2.78, 95% CI = 1.79–4.32; p = 0.016). Paradoxically, the second investigation [23] suggested that the frequencies of genotypes AG and AA were lower in TB cases than in controls, arguing for a protective role against TB (OR = 0.60 and 0.44, respectively; 95% CI = 0.44–0.83 and 0.29–0.65). Therefore, CD14 SNP rs2569191 may play an important role in TB vulnerability in persons from China through either being associated with increased or decreased susceptibility, depending on the genotype.
The others CD14 SNPs (rs3138078, rs2915863, rs2569192, rs3138076, rs5744455 and rs5744454) were evaluated by only one study [22]. In such investigation, the alleles significantly associated with TB were only the G allele of rs2915863 and the G allele of rs3138078. For the SNPs rs2569192; rs3138076; rs5744455 and rs5744454 there were no statistically relevant associations. Since no other study has analyzed these SNPs, it is not possible to conclude whether they have a potential influence on susceptibility to TB.
NOD2 polymorphisms and TB
In regard to the NOD2 gene, the results from the studies were very diverse, with the SNPs being associated with either increased or decreased susceptibility to TB in each one of the study populations based on ethnicity, age group or biological sex. In such studies, a total of 2085 TB cases and 2347 controls were investigated. These studies were performed in different countries including China, Uganda and North America, with the latter being focused on African Americans.
Two publications reported data on NOD2 SNPs in China [29, 30], with a total of 2651 individuals. Zhao et al [29], demonstrated that the frequency of the TG genotype in rs1861759 SNP was substantially associated with TB (OR = 2.16; 95% CI = 1.31–3.58; p = 0.0023) in the Han population. Interestingly, the same study did not identify this relationship between the TG genotype and TB in Chinese participants from Kazak or Uygur ancestry. A different study investigating Han Chinese individuals [30] identified the NOD2 SNP rs7194886 as a risk factor for TB. Patients with the SNP rs7194886 who presented the CT or TT genotypes were more likely to present with the disease when compared to individuals with the CC genotype, with an OR of 1.35 (95% CI = 1.05–1.72). In addition, this same study found that the frequency of the rs7194886 T allele was associated with TB risk (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.00–1.57). Furthermore, the study evaluated that the effects of the rs7194886 polymorphism seems to be greater in either smokers or men [30], with an OR of 1.53 (95% CI = 1.07–2.18) and 1.44 (95% CI = 1.08–1.92) respectively. In addition, the Haplotype rs9302752 C– rs7194886 T was linked with a higher risk of presenting with sputum culture-positive TB (p = 0.039).
The study involving African American patients [31] reported an association between rs2066842, rs2066844, and rs5743278 NOD2 SNPs and odds of TB. The study participants who were carriers of the CC genotype in rs2066842 and rs2066844 SNPs were less likely to have TB, with an OR of 0.55 (95% CI = 0.32–0.94) and 0.27 (95% CI = 0.08–0.88), respectively. In converse, individuals who were heterozygous (CG) in rs5743278 exhibited an increased chance of having TB (OR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.01–4.72).
Furthermore, in the adult African population from Uganda [28], presence of the SNP rs17313265 seemed to increase the susceptibility to TB (OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.23, 3.19). Notably, increased frequency of the rs6500328 and rs2111234 SNPs was found in persons who did not TB, suggesting that such SNPs may be linked to resistance against Mtb infection, with OR of 2.44 (95% CI = 1.01. 5.88) and 1.56 (95% CI = 1.07, 2.28), respectively.