1. Edwards MA, Roy S. Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition. Environ Eng Sci. 2017;34: 51–61. doi:10.1089/ees.2016.0223
2. Moore S, Neylon C, Paul Eve M, Paul O’Donnell D, Pattinson D. “Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence. Palgrave Commun. 2017;3: 16105. doi:10.1057/palcomms.2016.105
3. Alberts B, Kirschner MW, Tilghman S, Varmus H. Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111: 5773–5777. doi:10.1073/pnas.1404402111
4. Bylieva D, Nordmann A, Shipunova O, Volkova V. Knowledge in the Information Society: Joint Conferences XII Communicative Strategies of the Information Society and XX Professional Culture of the Specialist of the Future. Springer Nature; 2021. Available: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=R-IUEAAAQBAJ
5. Tijdink JK, Schipper K, Bouter LM, Maclaine Pont P, de Jonge J, Smulders YM. How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers. BMJ Open. 2016;6: e008681. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008681
6. Wilsdon J, Allen L, Belfiore E, Campbell P, Curry S, Hill S, et al. The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2015. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363
7. Glick WH, Chet Miller C, Cardinal LB. Making a life in the field of organization science. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2007. pp. 817–835. doi:10.1002/job.455
8. Walker RL, Sykes L, Hemmelgarn BR, Quan H. Authors’ opinions on publication in relation to annual performance assessment. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10: 21. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-10-21
9. McKiernan EC, Schimanski LA, Nieves CM, Matthias L, Niles MT, Alperin JP. Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations. doi:10.7287/peerj.preprints.27638
10. van Dalen HP. How the Publish-or-perish Principle Divides a Science: The Case of Academic Economists. Scientometrics. 2021;126: 1675–1694. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03786-x
11. Miller AN, Taylor SG, Bedeian AG. Publish or perish: academic life as management faculty live it. Career Development International. 2011. pp. 422–445. doi:10.1108/13620431111167751
12. Hangel N, Schmidt-Pfister D. Why do you publish? On the tensions between generating scientific knowledge and publication pressure. Aslib Journal of Information Management. 2017. pp. 529–544. doi:10.1108/ajim-01-2017-0019
13. Woolf PK. Pressure to publish and fraud in science. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104: 254–256. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-254
14. Youn TIK, Price TM. Learning from the Experience of Others: The Evolution of Faculty Tenure and Promotion Rules in Comprehensive Institutions. The Journal of Higher Education. 2009. pp. 204–237. doi:10.1353/jhe.0.0041
15. van Dalen HP, Henkens K. Intended and Unintended Consequences of a Publish-or-Perish Culture: A Worldwide Survey. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1983205
16. Blumenthal D, Campbell EG, Gokhale M, Yucel R, Clarridge B, Hilgartner S, et al. Data Withholding in Genetics and the Other Life Sciences: Prevalences and Predictors. Academic Medicine. 2006. pp. 137–145. doi:10.1097/00001888-200602000-00008
17. Davis MS, Riske-Morris M, Diaz SR. Causal Factors Implicated in Research Misconduct: Evidence from ORI Case Files. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2007. pp. 395–414. doi:10.1007/s11948-007-9045-2
18. Ioannidis JPA. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. CHANCE. 2019. pp. 4–13. doi:10.1080/09332480.2019.1579573
19. Fanelli D. Do pressures to publish increase scientists’ bias? An empirical support from US States Data. PLoS One. 2010;5: e10271. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010271
20. Jaremka LM, Ackerman JM, Gawronski B, Rule NO, Sweeny K, Tropp LR, et al. Common Academic Experiences No One Talks About: Repeated Rejection, Impostor Syndrome, and Burnout. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020;15: 519–543. doi:10.1177/1745691619898848
21. Gallea JI, Medrano LA, Morera LP. Work-Related Mental Health Issues in Graduate Student Population. Front Neurosci. 2021;15: 593562. doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.593562
22. Abbott A. Stress, anxiety, harassment: huge survey reveals pressures of scientists’ working lives. Nature. 2020;577: 460–461. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-00101-9
23. Araújo FJ de O, de Lima LSA, Cidade PIM, Nobre CB, Neto MLR. Impact Of Sars-Cov-2 And Its Reverberation In Global Higher Education And Mental Health. Psychiatry Res. 2020;288: 112977. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112977
24. Matulevicius SA, Kho KA, Reisch J, Yin H. Academic Medicine Faculty Perceptions of Work-Life Balance Before and Since the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4: e2113539. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13539
25. Toronto Science Policy Network. The Early Impacts of COVID-19 on graduate students across Canada. 2020 Aug. Available: www.toscipolicynet.ca/covid19-report/
26. Watchorn D, Esther H. Locked Down, Burned Out: Publishing in a Pandemic – the Impact of Covid on Academic Authors. De Gruyter; 2020 Dec. Available: https://blog.degruyter.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Locked-Down-Burned-Out-Publishing-in-a-pandemic_Dec-2020.pdf
27. OECD Science, Technology and Industry. Reducing the precarity of academic research careers. OECD Publishing; 2021 May. Report No.: 113. doi:10.1787/0f8bd468-en
28. Suart C, Suart TN, Graham K, Truant R. When the labs closed: graduate students’ and postdoctoral fellows’ experiences of disrupted research during the COVID-19 pandemic. FACETS. 2021. pp. 966–997. doi:10.1139/facets-2020-0077
29. Haven TL, de Goede MEE, Tijdink JK, Oort FJ. Personally perceived publication pressure: revising the Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ) by using work stress models. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4: 7. doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0066-6
30. Haven TL, Bouter LM, Smulders YM, Tijdink JK. Perceived publication pressure in Amsterdam: Survey of all disciplinary fields and academic ranks. PLoS One. 2019;14: e0217931. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217931
31. Joshi A, Kale S, Chandel S, Pal D. Likert scale: Explored and explained. Br J Appl Sci Technol. 2015;7: 396–403. doi:10.9734/bjast/2015/14975
32. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Glossary of Funding-Related Terms. In: Canadian Institutes of Health Research [Internet]. 14 May 2007 [cited 18 Aug 2021]. Available: https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/34190.html#r14
33. Stubb J, Pyhältö K, Lonka K. Balancing between inspiration and exhaustion: PhD students’ experienced socio-psychological well-being. Studies in Continuing Education. 2011. pp. 33–50. doi:10.1080/0158037x.2010.515572
34. Devine K, Hunter K. Doctoral Students’ Emotional Exhaustion and Intentions to Leave Academia. International Journal of Doctoral Studies. 2016. pp. 035–061. doi:10.28945/3396
35. Gabster BP, van Daalen K, Dhatt R, Barry M. Challenges for the female academic during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet. 2020. pp. 1968–1970. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31412-4
36. Deryugina T, Shurchkov O, Stearns J. COVID-19 Disruptions Disproportionately Affect Female Academics. 2021. doi:10.3386/w28360
37. Parlak S, Cakiroglu OC, Gul FO. Gender roles during COVID‐19 pandemic: The experiences of Turkish female academics. Gender, Work & Organization. 2021. pp. 461–483. doi:10.1111/gwao.12655
38. Myers KR, Tham WY, Yin Y, Cohodes N, Thursby JG, Thursby MC, et al. Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists. Nat Hum Behav. 2020;4: 880–883. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0921-y
39. Swenor BK, Munoz B, Meeks LM. A decade of decline: Grant funding for researchers with disabilities 2008 to 2018. PLoS One. 2020;15: e0228686. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228686
40. Brown L, Boardman FK. Accessing the field: Disability and the research process. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72: 23–30. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.050
41. Tregaskis C, Goodley D. Disability Research by Disabled and Non‐Disabled People: Towards a Relational Methodology of Research Production. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005. pp. 363–374. doi:10.1080/13645570500402439
42. Fisher D, Rubenson K, Bernatchez J, Clift R, Jones G, Lee J, et al. Canadian Federal Policy and Postsecondary Education. Vancouver, BC: Centre for Policy Studies in Higher Education and Training, University of British Columbia; 2006. Available: https://books.google.com/books/about/Canadian_Federal_Policy_and_Postsecondar.html?hl=&id=deeiGQAACAAJ
43. Government of Canada, Natural Sciences Engineering Research Council of Canada. Canada Graduate Scholarships-Master’s award allocations. In: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [Internet]. 28 Jun 2016 [cited 31 Aug 2021]. Available: http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/students-etudiants/cgsallocations-quotasbesc_eng.asp
44. Canada Research Coordinating Committee. Strengthening Canadian Research: Progress Report 2018-2019. 2020. Available: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/crcc-ccrc/documents/SSHRC_CRCC_progress_report_2019-eng.pdf
45. Mitchell J, Walker V, Annan R, Corkery C, Goel N, Harvey L, et al. The 2013 Canadian Postdoc Survey: Painting a Picture of Canadian Postdoctoral Scholars. Canadian Association of Postdoctoral Scholars and Mitacs; 2013. Available: https://www.mitacs.ca/sites/default/files/caps-mitacs_postdoc_report-full_oct22013-final.pdf
46. McGee EO. Interrogating structural racism in STEM higher education. Educ Res. 2020;49: 633–644. doi:10.3102/0013189x20972718
47. Moore KK, Cid-Martinez I, Toney J, Smith JA, Kalb AC, Shin JH, et al. Who climbs the academic ladder? Race and gender stratification in a world of whiteness. Rev Black Polit Econ. 2018;45: 216–244. doi:10.1177/0034644618813667
48. Joice W, Tetlow A. Baselines for Improving STEM Participation: Ethnicity STEM data for students and academic staff in higher education 2007/08 to 2018/19. The Royal Society; 2020 Oct. Available: https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/Publications/2021/trends-ethnic-minorities-stem/Ethnicity-STEM-data-for-students-and-academic-staff-in-higher-education.pdf
49. Crooks N, Smith A, Lofton S. Building bridges and capacity for Black, Indigenous, and scholars of color in the era of COVID-19 and Black Lives Matter. Nurs Outlook. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2021.03.022
50. Tseng M, El-Sabaawi RW, Kantar MB, Pantel JH, Srivastava DS, Ware JL. Strategies and support for Black, Indigenous, and people of colour in ecology and evolutionary biology. Nat Ecol Evol. 2020;4: 1288–1290. doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1252-0
51. Bell MP, Berry D, Leopold J, Nkomo S. Making Black Lives Matter in academia: A Black feminist call for collective action against anti‐blackness in the academy. Gender, Work & Organization. 2021. pp. 39–57. doi:10.1111/gwao.12555
52. Althubaiti A. Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9: 211–217. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S104807
53. Larson RB. Controlling social desirability bias. International Journal of Market Research. 2019. pp. 534–547. doi:10.1177/1470785318805305
54. Celis-Morales C, Livingstone KM, Woolhead C, Forster H, O’Donovan CB, Macready AL, et al. How reliable is internet-based self-reported identity, socio-demographic and obesity measures in European adults? Genes Nutr. 2015;10: 28. doi:10.1007/s12263-015-0476-0
55. Kalimeri K, Bonanomi A, Beiro M, Rosina A, Cattuto C. Traditional versus Facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information. Demographic Research. 2020. pp. 133–148. doi:10.4054/demres.2020.42.5
56. Safer MA, Keuler DJ. Individual differences in misremembering pre-psychotherapy distress: personality and memory distortion. Emotion. 2002;2: 162–178. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.2.2.162
57. Levine LJ, Lench HC, Safer MA. Functions of remembering and misremembering emotion. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2009. pp. 1059–1075. doi:10.1002/acp.1610
58. Smith D, Loewenstein G, Jepson C, Jankovich A, Feldman H, Ubel P. Mispredicting and misremembering: patients with renal failure overestimate improvements in quality of life after a kidney transplant. Health Psychol. 2008;27: 653–658. doi:10.1037/a0012647
59. Smith DM, Sherriff RL, Damschroder L, Loewenstein G, Ubel PA. Misremembering colostomies? Former patients give lower utility ratings than do current patients. Health Psychol. 2006;25: 688–695. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.25.6.688
60. Looker ED. 44th Statistical Report, 2018 Part I. Canadian Association for Graduate Studies; 2018. Available: https://bba.0c2.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/2019-44th-Statistical-Report-Part-1-Englishoct2.pdf
61. Powell K, Terry R, Chen S. How LGBT+ scientists would like to be included and welcomed in STEM workplaces. Nature. 2020;586: 813–816. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02949-3
62. Aguilar R. Breaking the binary by coming out as a trans scientist. Nature. 2021. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00521-1
63. Windsor EJ, Lucal B. Genderqueer,* Successful, and Over 40: Lessons from Two Academics. In: Spark: Elevating Scholarship on Social Issues [Internet]. National Center for Institutional Diversity; 4 Jun 2019 [cited 30 Aug 2021]. Available: https://medium.com/national-center-for-institutional-diversity/genderqueer-successful-and-over-40-lessons-from-two-academics-97889c8502af
64. Medeiros M, Forest B, Öhberg P. The case for non-binary gender questions in surveys. PS Polit Sci Polit. 2020;53: 128–135. doi:10.1017/s1049096519001203
65. Frohard-Dourlent H, Dobson S, Clark BA, Doull M, Saewyc EM. “I would have preferred more options”: accounting for non-binary youth in health research. Nurs Inq. 2017;24. doi:10.1111/nin.12150
66. Statistics Canada. Visible Minority and Population Group Reference Guide, Census of Population (2016). Statistics Canada; 2017 Oct. Available: https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/ref/guides/006/98-500-x2016006-eng.cfm