3.1 Trend characteristics of the temperature changes
According to Figure 2, over the past 179 years, the temperature tendency rate in the Qinling Mountains reaches 0.013℃/10 a on the northern slope and 0.010℃/10 a on the southern slope, and the increase rate on the northern slope is slightly higher than that on the southern slope. The temperature anomaly indicates that the temperature fluctuation range on the northern slope is generally larger than that on the southern slope. Except for a large difference in individual years, the temperature on both the southern and northern slopes exhibits a nonlinear and nonsteady increase trend, and the temperature experiences a fluctuation process of increase - decrease - increase - decrease - increase - increase. Since the beginning of this century, there has occurred a notable increase in the number of years with an average temperature 0.5°C higher than the average temperature during the study period, which indicates that the probability of extreme temperature events in the Qinling Mountains has considerably increased. Traditional linear trend analysis cannot reflect the true conditions of the temperature fluctuations during the study period. Therefore, a nonlinear research method different from traditional methods should be adopted when studying temperature change in this area.
3.2 Multiscale changes in the temperature
With the use of MATLAB2014a software as the platform, the signal-to-noise ratio between the white noise-disturbed and original signals reaches 0.2, and the number of samples is 100. During the 179-year study period, the average temperature on the southern and northern slopes of the Qinling Mountains from February to April is multiscaled based on the EEMD method, and 5 IMF components and trend item RES are obtained for both the northern and southern slopes. The eigenmode components of temperature decomposition on the northern slope are denoted as IMFn, and those on the southern slope are denoted as IMFs. These two sets of IMF components in turn reflect the multiscale changes in temperature from a high frequency to a low frequency on the southern and northern slopes of the Qinling Mountains from February to April (Figure. 3). The change in the amplitude indicates the strength of the cycle, which is the result of the joint action of internal movement and external factors of the climate system (Xue et al. 2013). The residual trend item RES reflects the overall trend over time of the temperature changes during the study period.
Figure 3 shows that the early spring temperature in the Qinling Mountains exhibits periodic oscillations at the various time scales, such as interannual, interdecadal, and quasi-century oscillations. On an interannual scale, the northern and southern slopes attain average periods of quasi 3 a (IMFn1 and IMFs1), quasi 7 a (IMFn2), and quasi 8 a (IMFs2). The cyclical temperature changes on the northern and southern slopes are roughly the same at the interannual scale, but the beginning and ending years and the amplitudes of the changes are different.
At the interdecadal scale, the temperature on the northern slope experiences periodic fluctuations of quasi 17 a (IMFn3) and 43 a (IMFn4), while the temperature on the southern slope experiences periodic fluctuations of quasi 19 a (IMFs3) and 37 a (IMFs4). The cycles on the northern and southern slopes are not very different, but the amplitudes are dissimilar. The 1859–1880 and 1925–1963 periods on the northern slope belong to the strong IMFn3 period. The trend for the southern slope is relatively flat, and the amplitude is significantly lower than the average amplitude from 1894–1924, which is the weaker IMFs3 period. The amplitude of IMFn3 on the northern slope is generally higher than that on the southern slope. Except for the period from the 1940s to the 1990s, the amplitude of IMFn4 on the northern slope is slightly lower than that of IMFs4 during the rest of the period. The difference in amplitude indicates that the temperature on the northern slope at the quasi-18–19 a scale is more cyclical, while that on the southern slope at the quasi-37–43 a scale is more cyclical.
On a quasi-century scale, the periods of IMFs5 and IMFn5 are similar. Except for the large fluctuations in the temperature cycle and amplitude on the southern slope from 1839–1871 and 1902–1950, the temperature change periods and amplitudes on the southern and northern slopes are similar during the remainder of the period. The trend items RESn and RESs reveal that over the past 179 years, the temperatures on the northern and southern slopes exhibit a nearly linear but actually nonlinear rising - gentle - rising trend.
3.3 Reconstructing the multiscale characteristics of the air temperature
This paper reconstructs the interannual, interdecadal, and quasi-century scale periodic changes in the temperature in the Qinling Mountains (Figure. 4). Among these changes, the interannual temperature change is obtained by adding the first and second IMF components, the interdecadal scale temperature change is determined by adding the 3rd and 4th IMF components, and the quasi-century scale temperature change is obtained by adding the 5th IMF component and the RES trend term.
According to Figures 2 and 4, the reconstructed interannual scale change trend can describe the fluctuation state of the original temperature sequence during the study period. The interdecadal change fully reflects the variation in the original temperature anomaly during the different periods of the climate patterns, and the quasi-century scale changes explain the general trend of the temperature changes during the study period. On an interannual scale, the temperature amplitude on the northern slope is generally higher than that on the southern slope. However, since the late 1990s, the interannual scale amplitude on the southern slope is higher than that on the northern slope. At the interdecadal scale, the amplitude on the northern slope is higher than that on the southern slope during the entire study period, and the temperature on the southern slope changes slowly. On a quasi-century scale, before 1940, the amplitude on the northern slope was higher than that on the southern slope, and the temperature change on the northern slope was more severe than that on the southern slope. After 1940, the temperature amplitude on the southern slope was higher than that on the northern slope, and the fluctuations intensified.
At the interannual and interdecadal scales, the amplitude of the temperature on the northern slope of the Qinling Mountains is generally higher than that on the southern slope. The possible reason is that the Qinling Mountains are located in the tail region of the East Asian monsoon. Hence, the northern slope area is more greatly affected by the alternation between the East Asian and northwest monsoons and the complex changes in global climate circulation. The northern slope is shaded by the Qinling Mountains, the underlying surface, including vegetation, topography and other factors, is more sensitive to climate changes, and vegetation growth imposes a more obvious modulating effect on the temperature. The northern slope exhibits a large temperature difference between the morning and evening and between the months. In the months with sufficient heat, the climate change is similar to that on the southern slope, but the difference is obvious in the other months. Due to many factors, the temperature amplitude on the northern slope of the Qinling Mountains is higher than that on the southern slope.
Table 2 Qinling temperature trend rate from February to April 1959–2013
Propensity rate (℃/10 a)
|
Original sequence
|
Interannual scale
|
Interdecadal scale
|
Quasi-century scale
|
Northern slope
|
0.18
|
0.003
|
0.09
|
0.10
|
Southern slope
|
0.13
|
-0.003
|
0.04
|
0.09
|
Numerous studies have demonstrated that the temperature in the Qinling Mountains has been on the rise over the past 50 years (Li et al. 2018; Qi et al. 2019). A linear analysis of the reconstructed temperature changes at the different scales over the past 50 years is carried out. The early spring temperature in the Qinling Mountains has been rising over the past 50 years, which is mainly reflected at the interdecadal and quasi-century scales. The temperature growth rate on the northern slope is higher than that on the southern slope, which is mainly manifested in the dramatic changes in temperature on the northern slope on an interdecadal scale (Table 2).
The variance contribution rate constitutes the basis to evaluate the degree of influence of the frequency and amplitude of each component on the overall characteristics of the original temperature series (Bai et al. 2017). Table 3 provides the variance contribution rate of the air temperature components (IMFn and IMFs) on the southern and northern slopes of the Qinling Mountains after decomposition and calculates the correlation coefficient with the original air temperature series. The contribution rate to the interannual variance on the northern slope is 47%, the decadal variance contribution rate is 31.64%, and the quasi-century scale variance contribution rate is 21.36%. The sum of the contribution rates to the interannual variance on the southern slope is 52%, the sum of the decadal variance contribution rates is 21.22%, and the sum of the quasi-century scale variance contribution rates is 26.78%. Both the southern and northern slopes reveal the most significant temperature changes at the interannual scale. The difference is that the decadal contribution on the northern slope exceeds the quasi-century scale contribution, while the quasi-century scale contribution on the southern slope is greater than the decadal contribution.
Through the significance test, it is found that except for IMFn2 on the northern slope of the Qinling Mountains, which falls on the 0.05 confidence line, the other components occur above the 0.05 confidence line, and the significance test is passed. Each component on the southern slope passes the significance test and is significantly higher than that on the northern slope (Figure. 5). The test results correspond to the variance contribution rate and correlation coefficient of the original series.
Table 3 Period, correlation coefficient and variance contribution rate of the IMFn and IMFs components of the temperature series from February-April 1835–2014 on the northern and southern slopes of the Qinling Mountains
IMFn component
|
IMFn1
|
IMFn2
|
IMFn3
|
IMFn4
|
IMFn5
|
RESn
|
Period (a)
|
quasi 3
|
quasi 7
|
quasi 17
|
quasi 42
|
quasi 80–100 a
|
|
Correlation coefficient
|
0.58**
|
0.43**
|
0.44**
|
0.54**
|
0.45**
|
0.26**
|
Variance contribution rate (%)
|
35.33
|
18.12
|
15.36
|
10.08
|
11.40
|
9.35
|
IMFs component
|
IMFs1
|
IMFs2
|
IMFs3
|
IMFs4
|
IMFs5
|
RESs
|
Period (a)
|
quasi 3
|
quasi 8
|
quasi 19
|
quasi 37
|
quasi 70–100 a
|
|
Correlation coefficient
|
0.49**
|
0.54**
|
0.49**
|
0.53**
|
0.46**
|
0.36**
|
Variance contribution rate (%)
|
24.01
|
29.95
|
8.17
|
14.31
|
14.31
|
16.46
|
** indicates P<0.01
|
|
Under global warming, temperatures worldwide have experienced a nonlinear and complex change process (Ji et al. 2014; Bai et al. 2014; Wang and Li 2011), which suggests that the nonlinear and complex process of the temperature changes in the Qinling Mountains is not an accidental phenomenon but an inherent reflection of the climate system. There occurs a certain correlation with the climate cycle changes in other regions. In this paper, the quasi-period of the temperature in the Qinling Mountains is compared to the multiscale periods of the May-July temperature decomposed via EEMD in central Qinling (Hu et al. 2018), the early summer temperature in the northern part of the Western Sichuan Plateau (Li et al. 2015), and the average temperature over the past 100 years in China (Tang and Ren 2005). Several change patterns exhibit similar quasi-periods, which are the most obvious at the interannual scale and slightly different on the interdecadal and quasi-century scales (Table 4). Although the periods of the temperature fluctuations in the various regions are similar at the interannual scale, the correlation between the interannual temperature fluctuations in the various regions is low due to the frequent periodic conversions and complex fluctuations at the high-frequency (smaller) scale. Comparing the reconstructed interdecadal and quasi-century scale cycles, it is found that, with the exception of the quasi-century scale average temperature over the past 100 years in China, there exists a significant positive correlation with the Qinling temperature in this paper at the corresponding time scale (Table 4), which indicates a better synchronization trend. The insignificant quasi-century scale correlation with the average temperature in China over the past 100 years may be attributed to the short temperature series over the past 100 years and the fewer quasi-century scale fluctuations, which reflects the changes above the quasi-century scale. In contrast, since the 1950s, the warming trend thereafter is similar to that of the other series.
Figure 6 shows the comparison results of the reconstructed Qinling area temperature in this paper to the three sets of temperature series at the interdecadal and quasi-century scales. On an interdecadal scale, several series reveal similar fluctuation trends. On a quasi-century scale, the temperature trend in the Qinling region decomposed in this paper attains the highest correlation with the temperature fluctuation trend in central Qinling from May to July, indicating that the periodicity of the temperature in the Qinling region from February to April is representative for the study of the periodicity of the temperature in the region during other periods. Since 1950, the quasi-century-scale fluctuation trends of the four series are almost the same, revealing a trend of falling first and then rising. This trend has been confirmed by many scholars (Jiang et al. 2013; Duan et al. 2014), indicating that the quasi-century-scale changes in the temperature in the Qinling area are similar to those in the other regions. The similarities between the above regions further verify that the reconstructed quasi-century scale changes can better reflect historical-future climate trends than can traditional linear changes. In addition, the temperature cycle in the Qinling Mountains was compared to that in Northwest China, as decomposed by Chen et al. through the EEMD method over the past 100 years, and that in the Northern Hemisphere and the Beijing area over the past two thousand years, as decomposed by Yang Zhou et al (Table 4) (Chen et al. 2017; Shi Feng et al. 2015). Although there were slight differences, the average periods of quasi 3 a, quasi 7–8 a, quasi 17–19 a, quasi 37–43 a, and quasi 70–100 a with the temperature in the Qinling Mountains were also observed in the northwestern region of China, Beijing and the Northern Hemisphere. This demonstrates that the average periodic change in the temperature decomposed in this paper can more truly reflect the characteristics of the temperature in the region at the different time scales, and this feature exhibits a certain spatial representativeness.
Table 4 Multiscale periods of the temperature in the other regions and their correlation at the different scales in the Qinling area
Area
|
Central area of Qinling (Hu et al. 2018)
|
Western Sichuan Plateau (Li et al. 2015)
|
China (Tang and Ren 2005)
|
Northwestern region (Chen et al. 2017)
|
Beijing area (Shi et al. 2015)
|
Northern Hemisphere (Shi et al. 2015)
|
Time span
|
1814–2007
|
1854–2010
|
1905–2009
|
1901–2013
|
1–1979
|
1–1979
|
IMF1
|
quasi 3 a
|
quasi 3 a
|
quasi 3 a
|
quasi 2–3 a
|
quasi 3 a
|
quasi 6 a
|
IMF2
|
quasi 8 a
|
quasi 6 a
|
quasi 8 a
|
quasi 6–7 a
|
quasi 6 a
|
quasi 11 a
|
IMF3
|
quasi 20 a
|
quasi 14 a
|
quasi 18 a
|
quasi 14 a
|
quasi 11 a
|
quasi 21 a
|
IMF4
|
quasi 39 a
|
quasi 40 a
|
quasi 63 a
|
quasi 20 a
|
quasi 21 a
|
quasi 43 a
|
IMF5
|
quasi 71 a
|
quasi 68 a
|
quasi 105 a
|
quasi 70 a
|
quasi 42 a
|
quasi 86 a
|
IMF6
|
quasi 84 a
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
quasi 80 a
|
quasi 247 a
|
IMF7
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
quasi 166 a
|
quasi 914 a
|
IMF8
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
quasi 459 a
|
-
|
Interdecadal scale
|
0.22**
|
0.18*
|
0.31**
|
|
|
|
Quasi-century scale
|
0.80**
|
0.37**
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
* indicates P<0.05; ** indicates P<0.01
3.4 Multiscale response of the early spring Qinling temperature to the climate signals
The multiscale temperature oscillation in the Qinling Mountains not only reflects the nonlinear feedback within the climate system but also reflects the periodic evolution of the climate system under external forcing. To identify the response of the Qinling Mountain temperature to ocean oscillations and atmospheric circulation at different time scales based on the periodic changes in the early spring temperature and to provide a basis for the prediction of regional climate evolution, this paper selects seven climate signals to study the response of the multiscale periodic changes in the early spring temperature in the Qinling Mountains to global climate change (Table 1). Through the Pearson correlation analysis method, the time series of the average value of each climate signal from February to April in the current year and the monthly value in the previous year from May to April in the current year were correlated with the early spring temperature in the Qinling Mountains (considering that the response of the inland air temperature to the climate signals may exhibit a time lag), thereby selecting those months with significant correlations. Through the EEMD method, the time series of the months with significant correlations between the climate signals are decomposed at multiple scales, and the bivariate correlation between the IMF components of the climate signals and the IMF components of the Qinling early spring temperature with similar periods is established to study the response of the Qinling area temperature to the climate signals at the different time scales.
Table 5 indicates that the Qinling average temperature from February to April attains the strongest correlation with AMO during the same period (0.33), and AMO attains a significant correlation with the Qinling temperature in most months. There exists a significant positive correlation between the Niño 3.4 regional sea temperature in May of the previous year and the average temperature in Qinling from February to April. Moreover, SOI achieves a significant negative correlation in May and September of the previous year, with the strongest correlation in May of the previous year. NP attains a significant negative correlation with the Qinling temperature in May of the previous year. The NAO index reaches a significant positive correlation with the Qinling temperature in December of the previous year. PDO and GATA exhibit no significant correlation with the Qinling temperature in any month.
Table 5 Correlation between the temperature and climate signals in Qinling from February to April
Month
|
Nino3.4
|
SOI
|
NP
|
NAO
|
AMO
|
PDO
|
GATA
|
2–4
|
0.05
|
0.00
|
0.08
|
0.02
|
0.33**
|
0.01
|
0.06
|
1
|
0.09
|
-0.05
|
0.09
|
0.12
|
0.31**
|
0.06
|
0.03
|
2
|
0.05
|
-0.05
|
0.13
|
-0.04
|
0.29**
|
0.03
|
0.05
|
3
|
0.03
|
0.04
|
0.11
|
-0.04
|
0.30**
|
-0.04
|
0.04
|
4.
|
0.06
|
0.00
|
-0.14
|
0.13
|
0.27**
|
0.03
|
0.08
|
P5
|
0.16*
|
-0.21*
|
-0.25**
|
0.07
|
0.32**
|
0.08
|
0.06
|
P6
|
0.15
|
-0.11
|
-0.11
|
-0.11
|
0.26**
|
0.06
|
0.08
|
P7
|
0.13
|
-0.02
|
-0.10
|
-0.07
|
0.22**
|
0.13
|
0.09
|
P8
|
0.12
|
-0.13
|
0.09
|
-0.03
|
0.24**
|
0.14
|
0.09
|
P9
|
0.11
|
-0.17*
|
0.04
|
-0.08
|
0.17*
|
0.08
|
0.11
|
P10
|
0.11
|
-0.04
|
-0.01
|
0.00
|
0.14
|
0.04
|
0.16
|
P11
|
0.10
|
-0.13
|
0.00
|
0.07
|
0.16
|
0.00
|
0.11
|
P12
|
0.09
|
-0.05
|
-0.03
|
0.16*
|
0.24**
|
-0.01
|
0.02
|
P indicates the month of the previous year; * indicates P<0.05, and ** indicates P<0.01
Table 6 reveals the multiscale periodic oscillations during the period when the climate signals achieve the strongest correlation with the Qinling temperature. The quasi-period of the temperature attains similar periods for most climate signals. Further analysis of the correlation between the temperature and various climate signals at the different time scales (Table 7) demonstrates that although each index attains a significant correlation with the Qinling temperature, the degree of the temperature response to the various climate signals varies between the different time scales. At the interannual cycle scale, the Qinling early spring temperature at the quasi 3 a scale only attains a significant positive correlation with the sea temperature of the previous May in the Niño 3.4 area, and a good response to GATA is observed. At the quasi 6 a scale, the Qinling early spring temperature is significantly negatively correlated with SOI and significantly positively correlated with Niño 3.4 and NAO. Among these climate signals, the correlation with NAO is the highest, reaching 0.40. On an interdecadal cycle scale, the quasi 17–19a scale is only significantly correlated with AMO. At the quasi 37–43a scale, the number of climatic factors that are significantly related to the Qinling early spring temperature increases. All climate signals, except NAO and NP, attain a significant correlation with the Qinling early spring temperature. Among these climate signals, SOI and Niño 3.4 are negatively correlated with the Qinling temperature. Niño 3.4 attains a significant positive correlation with the Qinling temperature at the other scales, so the negative correlation at this scale also reduces the correlation with Niño 3.4 across the entire time scale. At the quasi-century scale, there exists a significant correlation between the Qinling temperature and the various climate signals. The response to GATA is the strongest among the two scales (0.50), indicating that the early spring temperature in the Qinling Mountains exhibits a greater response to global temperature fluctuations under large-scale periodic changes than that under small-scale changes. The possible reason is that the small-scale periodic changes in the temperature are affected not only by global climate change but also by other factors (such as changes in topography, clouds, aerosols, sunspots, and solar irradiance). The changes in these factors are complex and yield a more direct impact on the local temperature at the interannual scale, leading to an insignificant response to large-scale climate circulation on a smaller scale. In contrast, the temperature in the Qinling Mountains on a larger scale exerts an impact on global climate change, and the response is more obvious and positive. IMF2 and IMF3 of the Qinling early spring temperature are negatively correlated with the global average early spring temperature or an important influencing factor causing these two components to be uncorrelated during the entire study period. This further indicates that the Qinling early spring temperature exhibits a unique change cycle at this scale.
Table 6 Multiscale cycles of the various climate signal
Cycle (a)
|
SOI
(P5)
|
Nino3.4
(P5)
|
PDO
(2–4)
|
AMO
(2–4)
|
NAO
(P12)
|
NP
(P5)
|
GATA
(2–4)
|
IMF1
|
3.08
|
3.12
|
3.07
|
2.98
|
2.71
|
2.98
|
2.88
|
IMF2
|
6.72
|
5.69
|
6.67
|
6.37
|
5.60
|
6.97
|
5.95
|
IMF3
|
14.10
|
13.83
|
15.24
|
14.74
|
12.34
|
13.55
|
12.77
|
IMF4
|
32.89
|
29.00
|
35.56
|
35.00
|
27.54
|
32.86
|
34.00
|
IMF5
|
49.33
|
79.50
|
65.00
|
70.00
|
71.60
|
57.50
|
72.00
|
Although the Qinling early spring temperature and the Niño 3.4 regional sea temperature were only significantly correlated in May of the previous year, analysis of the correlation between the combined months indicates that there remains a significant correlation between the April-July average sea temperature and the Qinling early spring temperature (0.16). The change in sea temperature in the Niño 3.4 area is an important indicator for the assessment of the ENSO phenomenon and an important indicator of the mutual modulation of the atmosphere and ocean systems. ENSO usually causes changes in atmospheric circulation and thus affects climate anomalies in certain parts of the world on an interannual scale (Timilsena et al. 2008; Chen et al. 2013; Zhu et al. 2007). This affects the temperature changes in northern China through Asian monsoon activity (Cai and Liu 2013; Raspopov et al. 2004), and the early spring temperature in the Qinling Mountains responds well to Niño 3.4 on multiple scales, indicating that this area may be affected by the multiscale effects of ENSO periodic activities (Jiang and Li 2011).
Table 7 Correlation between the temperature in Qinling and the climate signal components
|
SOI
|
Nino3.4
|
PDO
|
AMO
|
NAO
|
NP
|
GATA
|
IMF1
|
-0.15
|
0.23**
|
0.11
|
-0.11
|
0.08
|
-0.08
|
0.30**
|
IMF2
|
-0.17**
|
0.17**
|
0.03
|
-0.01
|
0.40**
|
-0.09
|
-0.10
|
IMF3
|
0.09
|
-0.13
|
-0.01
|
0.41**
|
0.07
|
-0.01
|
-0.14
|
IMF4
|
-0.37**
|
-0.33**
|
0.19*
|
0.39**
|
0.01
|
0.14
|
0.23**
|
IMF5
|
-0.26**
|
0.19*
|
-0.25**
|
0.40**
|
0.49**
|
-0.20*
|
0.50**
|
RES
|
-0.78**
|
0.99**
|
0.74**
|
-0.01
|
0.27**
|
-0.35**
|
0.99**
|
* indicates P<0.05; ** indicates P<0.01
Overall, as shown in Figure 7, compared to the other climate signals (such as NAO, SOI, NP, and PDO), AMO achieves a closer relationship with the changes in the Qinling early spring temperature. Moreover, this relationship is reflected at the different time scales, which is consistent with the conclusion that the relationship between AMO and the temperature in China is stronger than that with the other climate signals, as reported by Wang et al. (Wang et al. 2013). This stable relationship between these two variables may be one of the main influencing factors of the multiscale change in the early spring temperature in Qinling. There are many possible reasons for the mechanism by which AMO affects the temperature. Tung et al. proposed that the multidecadal temperature oscillation is a change mode reflected by AMO that affects the internal changes in the climate system (Ka-Kit and Zhou 2013). Lu et al. acknowledged that AMO affects the multidecadal changes in the climate of the Eurasian continent by causing a feedback mechanism of the atmosphere and ocean in the western Pacific (Lu et al. 2006). In addition, studies have found that most areas in China experience a warm winter when the AMO phenomenon occurs in the positive (warm) phase (Qu et al. 2006). This conclusion has also been confirmed by different scientists. The interdecadal variation in AMO and the East Asian monsoon still yields an obvious modulation effect. When AMO occurs in the positive phase, the East Asian summer monsoon will increase, the winter monsoon will weaken, and the cold phase will be reversed (Li et al. 2009). Therefore, the change in AMO at the interdecadal scale may be an important factor leading to the increase in the early spring temperature in the Qinling area.
Table 7 demonstrates that at the different time scales, the relationship between AMO and the Qinling early spring temperature is not unique. These two variables are positively correlated on certain scales and negatively correlated on other scales. During the entire study period, the correlation between the original temperature series and the AMO index was lower than that with the decomposed components. It may be that the positive correlation on certain scales may be offset by the negative correlation at the other scales. Alternatively, within the same IMF, the positive correlation during certain periods may be offset by the negative correlation during other periods. Figure 7 shows that the phase changes of the air temperature and AMO at the different time scales are the same during certain periods but are the opposite during the other periods. For example, IMF2 exhibits the opposite phase of the temperature and AMO from 1940–1970, and IMF5 exhibits the same phase from 1920–1958. Figure 7 shows that there occurs an alternating phenomenon in the correlation between the air temperature and AMO for each IMF component. To analyze the relationship between these two variables, it is necessary to conduct a dynamic correlation analysis of the region.
Traditional correlation analysis indicates that the longer the time span is, the more unstable factors occur, and the temperature and climate signals experience nonlinear changes, which makes it difficult to accurately characterize the correlation. To quantify the relationship between these two aspects locally, dynamic correlation analysis should be carried out (Rodó et al. 2006; Scafetta N 2014). When performing dynamic correlation analysis to study the relationship between two time series with multiscale features, it is necessary to perform local correlation analysis by selecting an appropriate sliding window.
TDIC analysis is performed between the IMFs components of the two time series with a similar periodicity, and a TDIC analysis chart is generated by adaptively selecting the sliding window size (to ensure the stability of the sliding window, rather than the stability of the entire time domain). The first four IMF components with a clear significance were selected with the TDIC method to analyze the correlation between AMO and air temperature (Figure. 8). The abscissa in the figure represents the year, and the ordinate represents the size of the sliding window for these two data columns.
Figure 8 shows that AMO attains a correlation with alternating positive and negative air temperatures in the IMF1 component, and a significant negative correlation is obtained from 1940–1975, while the IMF2 component achieves no significant correlation in most years. Except for the two ends of the sliding window, the IMF3 and IMF4 components are significantly positively correlated throughout the entire study period. AMO and the temperature also attain a significant correlation at the quasi 3 a scale, but this correlation varies over time, which leads to a lower correlation during the entire study period. The reason for this reversal is currently unclear. This may be attributed to the many years of lead-lag correlation between the temperature and climate signals and the complexity of the internal interaction between the ocean and the atmosphere.
The terrain of the Qinling Mountains is complex, and the temperature response to the AMO climate signal may be different in the various regions. Figure 9 shows the spatial correlation between the temperature and AMO at various scales. Under the IMF1 component, there occurs no significant correlation between the temperature and AMO in any region. Under the IMF2 component, the response of the temperature in the west Qinling area is more significant, while under the IMF3 and IMF4 components, the temperature in most of the Qinling Mountains attains a significant correlation with AMO. The trend item achieves a negative correlation between the air temperature and AMO in most high-altitude areas and a positive correlation at lower altitudes. This suggests that the early spring temperature in the Qinling Mountains responds differently to the AMO climate signal in the various regions at the different time scales.