Synergetic Effect of Lipoprotein(a) and Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 on Functional Outcomes in Patients with Ischemic Stroke

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-934262/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Synergetic Effect of Lipoprotein(a) and Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 on Functional Outcomes in Patients with Ischemic Stroke

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-934262/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background:

The relationship of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and stroke functional outcomes was conflicting. The relationship of Lp(a) and Lp-PLA₂ levels to functional outcomes is unclear. The aim was to clarify whether high Lp(a) is associated with poor functional outcomes and examine the relationship of Lp(a) and Lp-PLA₂ to functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke.

Methods：

A total of 10,422 individuals from the third China National Stroke Registry cohort were recruited. Plasma level of Lp(a) at admission was measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The cut-off was set at the median for Lp(a). Functional outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months after stroke. The association between Lp(a) and stroke functional outcomes was evaluated using a multivariate Cox regression model.

Results：

The median age was 63.0 years, and 31.6% participants were women. Patients in higher Lp(a) group had higher incidences of poor functional outcome at 3 months (P<0.0001). In multivariate cox regression model, elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with poor functional outcomes at 3 months (Q4 vs. Q1: hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.11-1.75). Subgroup analysis showed the significant effect of interaction of Lp-PLA₂ level with Lp(a) level on functional outcomes (p=0.008). After stratification by Lp(a) and Lp-PLA₂, the Lp(a) high/ Lp-PLA₂ high group showed the highest incidence of poor functional outcomes at 3 months.

Conclusions:

Elevated Lp(a) level is associated with poor functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke. Lp(a) has a synergetic effect with Lp-PLA₂ on functional outcomes after ischemic stroke.

Neurobiology of Disease

Lipoprotein(a)

Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2

Synergetic Effect

Inflammation

Functional Outcomes

Ischemic Stroke

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is composed of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle and apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB), which is linked to apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] by disulfide bond. The pathogenic characteristics of Lp(a) include proinflammatory, proatherogenic, and prothrombotic. The pro-inflammatory of Lp(a) is partially mediated by oxidized phospholipids attached to apo(a).¹ Lp(a) has attracted considerable attention because of its several large clinical genetic observation studies, which confirmed that plasma Lp(a) level is positively correlated with increased risks of sroke,² myocardial infarction,^{3, 4} and aortic valve stenosis.^{1, 5, 6}

Inflammation is involved in the occurrence and development of poor functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke.⁷ Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A₂ [Lp-PLA₂], an inflammatory marker, is an independent predictor of ischemic stroke and coronary heart disease.^{8, 9} More importantly, Lp-PLA₂ is intimately associated with Lp(a) in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease.¹⁰ Although previous studies examined the association of Lp(a) with risk of poor functional outcome in patients with ischemic stroke,^11,12,13 rare studies have conducted the relationship of Lp(a) and Lp-PLA₂ levels to stroke functional outcomes.

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the hypothesis that a high level of Lp(a) is associated with poor functional outcome and Lp(a) high/ Lp-PLA₂ high have a synergistic effect on functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke from the third China National Stroke Registry (CNSR-III) database.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Study population

We used the CNSR-III, a nationwide, prospective, multicenter, observational registration study based on etiology, imaging, and biology markers from patients with ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) between August 2015 and March 2018 in China.¹⁴ Specific information about the database has been described in detail in our previous studies.¹⁴ In brief, a total of 15,166 consecutive patients from 171 hospitals were recruited, among which 93.3% with ischemic stroke (n = 14,146) and 6.7% with TIA (n = 1020). All patients were enrolled within 7 days after symptom onset. We included 10,422 individuals with complete information on plasma Lp(a) measurements. According to the principles mentioned in the Declaration of Helsinki, the ethics committees of Beijing Tiantan Hospital and all other recruited participating centers approved the study protocol.¹⁵ Written informed consent was obtained from all participants (or guardians of participants) in this study.

Baseline data collection

An electronic data capture system by face-to-face interviews was used to collect CNSR-III clinical baseline data. The subsequent data were gathered from the registry database, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and smoking status; medical history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and lipid metabolism disorders; systolic blood pressure (SBP), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglyceride (TG), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), Lp(a), and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A₂ [Lp-PLA₂]; stroke subtypes, classified as large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), and non-LAA according to the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria,¹⁶ discharge medication rate of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs, and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission.

Functional outcomes of stroke evaluation

The severity of ischemic stroke was evaluated using the NIHSS score at admission. Functional outcome was assessed with the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months and 1 year after stroke separately. The mRS scale ranges from 0 to 6, and the score parallels the severity of ischemic stroke. An mRS score of 0 was defined as no residual stroke symptoms; 5, severe disability; and 6, death.

Laboratory analyses

Fasting blood specimens from 11,261 patients were collected using EDTA anticoagulation tubes within 1 day after admission and were centrifuged on-site within 2 h of collection to separate plasma for subsequent testing. Standard hospital assays were used on fresh plasma samples to measure plasma FPG, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, hsCRP, and Lp-PLA₂.

Lp(a) measurement

Lp(a) ELISA (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden) detects human Lp(a) and in terms of isoforms, is size-independent in terms of the kringle IV type 2 domain. The Mercodia ELISA is a solid phase two-site enzyme immunoassay and include a 5-point calibrator. The coefcient of variation (CV) was 7%.

Statistical analyses

Baseline characteristics categorized by Lp(a) levels were compared. Data on basic characteristics are presented as medians (interquartile ranges) for continuous variables. Categorical variables are presented as percentages. Nonparametric Wilcoxon test and chi-square test were used for comparisons of continuous and categorical variables between groups separately. The associations of Lp(a) with mRS at 3 months and 1 year were examined using a logistic regression model. We adjusted the potential confounders measured at baseline in the analysis. The model was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, FPG, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, hsCRP, Lp-PLA₂, TOAST subtype, and NIHSS score at admission. The strength of the associations was demonstrated using hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The sensitivity analysis was used to rule out the effects of recurrence and TIA on the association between the levels of Lp(a) and outcomes at 3 months. Two-sided p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The above statistical analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina).

In the CNSR-III cohort of 15,166 patients with ischemic stroke or TIA, 12,603 patients from 171 sites were entered into a subgroup analysis of Lp(a) levels and functional outcomes. Blood samples from 11,261 of the 12,603 patients were collected and examined at the laboratory. According to the inclusion criteria, a total of 10,422 patients were included in the study, and the remaining 839 patients were excluded (Figure S1). In Table S1, the comparison of the included and excluded patients is shown. Compared with the excluded patients, the included patients showed significantly higher levels of LDL-C, Lp-PLA₂, lower rate of current smoker, and higher discharge medication rates of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs.

Baseline characteristics

Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the 10,422 individuals stratified by Quartiles of baseline plasma Lp(a) levels. With the increment in plasma Lp(a) levels, patients tended to be older and had lower levels of BMI and TG, a higher proportion of LAA, and higher LDL-C, HDL-C, hsCRP, and Lp-PLA₂.

Association between the levels of Lp(a) and stroke outcomes at 3 months and 1 year

Figure S2 demonstrates a positive correlation between the levels of Lp(a) and functional outcomes of stroke at 3 months. In the unadjusted model, elevated levels of Lp(a) were positively correlated with the poor clinical outcomes of stroke as evaluated using mRS score ≥ 3 at 3 months [Quartile 4 vs. Quartile 1, HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.35-1.86, p<.0001] (Table 2). Furthermore, elevated Lp(a) levels were significantly associated with the poor clinical outcomes of stroke as evaluated by mRS score ≥ 3 at 1 year [Quartile 4 vs. Quartile 1, HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.25-1.74, p<.0001]. After adjustment for age, sex, BMI, FPG, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, hsCRP, Lp-PLA₂, TOAST subtype, and NIHSS score at admission, similar results were observed. Elevated levels of Lp(a) were positively correlated with the poor clinical outcomes of stroke as evaluated by mRS score ≥ 3 at 3 months [Quartile 4 vs. Quartile 1, HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.11-1.75, p<.0001] and at 1 year [Quartile 4 vs. Quartile 1, HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.02-1.59, p<.0001]. Distribution of mRS scores at 3 months according to Lp(a) levels showed similar trends (Figure 1).

Subgroup analysis for the association between Lp(a) levels and mRS ≥3 at 3 months

Among all the subgroup detection indexes, only the variable Lp-PLA₂ was associated with both Lp(a) levels and functional outcomes of stroke (Table 3). We then used Lp-PLA₂ for subgroup analysis to further evaluate the relationship between Lp(a) levels and functional outcomes of stroke assessed using mRS ≥3 at 3 months.

Concurrent assessment of Lp(a) levels and Lp-PLA₂ on stroke outcomes

Table 4 shows concurrent analysis stratifying Lp(a) and Lp-PLA₂ into low vs. high levels (<median value vs. ≥median value). Good outcomes were observed among patients with Lp(a) low/ Lp-PLA₂ low group, whereas poor outcomes were observed among patients with Lp(a) high/ Lp-PLA₂ high group.

Sensitivity analysis

Association between the levels of Lp(a) and outcomes at 3 months after removing patients with recurrent stroke and TIA

To rule out the effect of recurrence and TIA on the association between the levels of Lp(a) and outcomes at 3 months, we excluded the 3 months recurrent stroke and TIA population for further analysis. As shown in Table S2, in the unadjusted model, elevated levels of Lp(a) were positively correlated with the poor clinical outcomes of stroke as evaluated by mRS score ≥ 3 at 3 months. After adjustment for age, sex, BMI, FPG, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, hsCRP, Lp-PLA₂, TOAST subtype, and NIHSS score at admission, similar results were observed. Elevated levels of Lp(a) were positively correlated with the poor clinical outcomes of stroke as evaluated by mRS score ≥ 3 at 3 months.

In the CNSR-III cohort study, we investigated the association between plasma Lp(a) levels and the functional outcomes of ischemic stroke. The results demonstrated a positive correlation between the levels of Lp(a) and functional outcomes evaluated by mRS at 3 months and 1 year after stroke. The association remained after excluding patients with recurrence of stroke and TIA at 3 months. More importantly, Lp(a) levels and Lp-PLA₂ showed a synergistic effect on functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke.

In recent years, several small clinical studies have demonstrated that elevated Lp(a) levels are positively correlated with poor functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke. In a clinical study by Wang et al. who included 232 consecutive patients with an acute ischemic stroke diagnosis complicated with type 2 diabetes, higher Lp(a) levels at admission are associated with increased risk of poor functional outcomes at 3 months according to mRS scores.¹¹ Similarly, in a study conducted by Wang et al., who investigated 153 patients with acute ischemic stroke and 120 controls, an increased risk of poor functional outcomes was associated with Lp(a) levels.¹² In another study that recruited 100 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke and 120 controls, a positive relationship is suggested between Lp(a) levels and poorer long-term prognosis of stroke.¹⁷ By contrast, Kooten et al. failed to find any association of stroke prognosis with Lp(a) levels.¹³ The association of stroke prognosis with Lp(a) level remains unclear. Therefore, a large sample cohort study is warranted to further clarify the relationship of ischemic stroke prognosis with Lp(a) levels. The current results demonstrated a positive correlation between the levels of Lp(a) and functional outcomes evaluated by mRS at 3 months and 1 year after stroke. To remove the effect of stroke recurrence and TIA on the conclusion, we further analyzed the relationship between Lp(a) levels and functional outcomes after excluding patients with stroke recurrence and TIA at 3 months, the relationship still existed. Our study confirmed a positive association between plasma Lp(a) levels and functional outcomes at 3 months and 1 year after ischemic stroke.

The mechanism through which Lp(a) levels are associated with functional outcomes of ischemic stroke remains unclear until now. Inflammation runs through the onset, process, and progression of acute ischemic stroke. In acute ischemic stroke, microglial activation and cell death products trigger an inflammatory cascade, which damages the brain and affects functional outcomes.⁷ The pathogenic effect of Lp(a) is partly due to its pro-inflammatory effect, which is harmful to the progression of ischemic stroke. The pro-inflammatory effect is mediated partially by its oxidized phospholipid content.¹⁸ In addition, other molecules are related to the effect of Lp(a) pro-inflammatory. Our study revealed that Lp(a) levels and Lp-PLA₂ have a synergistic effect on functional outcomes. As a pro-inflammatory indicator, Lp-PLA₂ is mainly expressed on the surface of inflammatory cells enriched in plaques, and it promotes the secretion of inflammatory mediators by degrading oxidized phospholipids to cause endothelial dysfunction.¹⁹ Endothelial dysfunction aggravates functional outcomes of ischemic stroke.^{20, 21} In a recent study, Schnitzler et al. demonstrated that oxidized phospholipids carried by Lp(a) drive endothelial inflammation.¹⁸ Lp-PLA₂ may be considered as the synergistic molecule mediator for pro-inflammatory properties of Lp(a). We also found that with the increase in Lp(a) levels, hsCRP levels also increased. Combining the results of the present study with the conclusions of previous studies further indicates that elevated Lp(a) levels disrupt functional outcomes after ischemic stroke mainly through inflammatory pathways.

The present study is the largest by far to evaluate the clear association between plasma Lp(a) levels and functional outcomes after ischemic stroke. However, it has several limitations. First, we only measured Lp(a) at admission, and no serial measurement of Lp(a) levels was performed. For this reason, we could not conclude any causal relationship of functional outcomes with high Lp(a) levels. We only demonstrated a positive association of poor functional outcomes after ischemic stroke with high Lp(a) levels. Second, the study samples comprised Chinese individuals, limiting the application of its conclusions to other races and populations. Third, genetic data were lacking because of the observational nature of the study. Future studies are warranted to further investigate the effect of these factors on Lp(a) and functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke.

Elevated Lp(a) level is associated with poor functional outcomes evaluated by mRS at 3 months and 1 year after ischemic stroke. Lp(a) has a synergetic effect with Lp-PLA₂ on functional outcomes after ischemic stroke. Further studies should be carried out regarding the inflammation mechanism between increased Lp(a) levels and poor functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke.

Lp(a)=lipoprotein(a); CNSR-III=the third China National Stroke Registry; mRS=the modified Rankin scale; NIHSS=the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; TIA=transient ischemic attack; BMI=body mass index; TOAST=Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; LAA=large artery atherosclerosis; SBP=systolic blood pressure; FPG=fasting plasma glucose; LDL-C=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C=high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG=triglyceride; hsCRP=high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; Lp-PLA₂=lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A₂.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

According to the principles mentioned in the Declaration of Helsinki, the ethics committees of Beijing Tiantan Hospital and all other recruited participating centers approved the study protocol. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants (or guardians of participants) in this study.

Consent for publication

All authors have approved this manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding
This work was supported by grants from the capital health research and development of special (2020-2Z-20411), National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0901002, 2017YFC1310901, 2018YFC1312903), Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (D171100003017002), National Science and Technology Major Project (2017ZX09304018)， National Natural Science Foundation of China (81970425, 81770272), China National Key R&D Program (2020YFA0803700), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M692248), Beijing Postdoctoral Research Foundation (2021-ZZ-020).

Authors' contributions

Y.J.W., and L.M.Z. contributed to the conception and design of the study. All authors (Y.J.W., L.M.Z., X.J., J.X., X.W.H., J.X., K.L., A.M.J., J.X.L., and X.M.) contributed to the acquisition and analysis of data. X.J., Y.J.W., and L.M.Z. contributed to drafting the text, preparing the tables and figures.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Nordestgaard BG, Langsted A. Lipoprotein (a) as a cause of cardiovascular disease: insights from epidemiology, genetics, and biology. J Lipid Res. 2016;57:1953–75.
Langsted A, Nordestgaard BG, Kamstrup PR. Elevated Lipoprotein(a) and Risk of Ischemic Stroke. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:54–66.
Clarke R, Peden JF, Hopewell JC, Kyriakou T, Goel A, Heath SC, Parish S, Barlera S, Franzosi MG, Rust S, Bennett D, et al. Genetic variants associated with Lp(a) lipoprotein level and coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2518–28.
Kamstrup PR, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Steffensen R, Nordestgaard BG. Genetically elevated lipoprotein(a) and increased risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2009;301:2331–9.
Kamstrup PR, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Elevated lipoprotein(a) and risk of aortic valve stenosis in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:470–7.
Bouchareb R, Mahmut A, Nsaibia MJ, Boulanger MC, Dahou A, Lepine JL, Laflamme MH, Hadji F, Couture C, Trahan S, et al. Autotaxin Derived From Lipoprotein(a) and Valve Interstitial Cells Promotes Inflammation and Mineralization of the Aortic Valve. Circulation. 2015;132:677–90.
Fu Y, Liu Q, Anrather J, Shi FD. Immune interventions in stroke. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11:524–35.
Oei HH, van der Meer IM, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Stijnen T, Breteler MM, Witteman JC. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 activity is associated with risk of coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation. 2005;111:570–5.
Lp PLASC, Thompson A, Gao P, Orfei L, Watson S, Di Angelantonio E, Kaptoge S, Ballantyne C, Cannon CP, Criqui M, et al. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) and risk of coronary disease, stroke, and mortality: collaborative analysis of 32 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375:1536–44.
Tsimikas S, Tsironis LD, Tselepis AD. New insights into the role of lipoprotein(a)-associated lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:2094–9.
Wang H, Zhao J, Gui Y, Yan H, Yan Z, Zhang P, Liu L, Chang L, Zhang J. Elevated Lipoprotein (a) and Risk of Poor Functional Outcome in Chinese Patients with Ischemic Stroke and Type 2 Diabetes. Neurotox Res. 2018;33:868–75.
Zhang W, Zhang XA. Prognostic value of serum lipoprotein(a) levels in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Neuroreport. 2014;25:262–6.
van Kooten F, van Krimpen J, Dippel DW, Hoogerbrugge N, Koudstaal PJ. Lipoprotein(a) in patients with acute cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 1996;27:1231–5.
Wang Y, Jing J, Meng X, Pan Y, Wang Y, Zhao X, Lin J, Li W, Jiang Y, Li Z, et al. The Third China National Stroke Registry (CNSR-III) for patients with acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack: design, rationale and baseline patient characteristics. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2019;4:158–64.
Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhao X, Liu L, Wang D, Wang C, Wang C, Li H, Meng X, Cui L. et al, Johnston SC and Investigators C. Clopidogrel with aspirin in acute minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:11–9.
Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE 3. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993;24:35–41. rd. .
Chakraborty B, Vishnoi G, Goswami B, Gowda SH, Chowdhury D, Agarwal S. Lipoprotein(a), ferritin, and albumin in acute phase reaction predicts severity and mortality of acute ischemic stroke in North Indian Patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22:e159-67.
Schnitzler JG, Hoogeveen RM, Ali L, Prange KHM, Waissi F, van Weeghel M, Bachmann JC, Versloot M, Borrelli MJ, Yeang C, et al. Atherogenic Lipoprotein(a) Increases Vascular Glycolysis, Thereby Facilitating Inflammation and Leukocyte Extravasation. Circ Res. 2020;126:1346–59.
Thompson A, Gao P, Orfei L, Watson S, Di Angelantonio E, Kaptoge S, Ballantyne C, Cannon C, Criqui M, Cushman M, et al. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) and risk of coronary disease, stroke, and mortality: collaborative analysis of 32 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375:1536–44.
Hoffmann CJ, Harms U, Rex A, Szulzewsky F, Wolf SA, Grittner U, Lattig-Tunnemann G, Sendtner M, Kettenmann H, Dirnagl U, et al. Vascular signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 promotes angiogenesis and neuroplasticity long-term after stroke. Circulation. 2015;131:1772–82.
Fan Y, Shen F, Frenzel T, Zhu W, Ye J, Liu J, Chen Y, Su H, Young WL, Yang GY. Endothelial progenitor cell transplantation improves long-term stroke outcome in mice. Ann Neurol. 2010;67:488–97.

Due to technical limitations, table 1 to 4 is only available as a download in the Supplemental Files section.

Download PDF

Editorial decision: Major Revision
18 Oct, 2021
Review #2 received at journal
17 Oct, 2021
Review #3 received at journal
11 Oct, 2021
Review #1 received at journal
11 Oct, 2021
Reviews received at journal
06 Oct, 2021
Reviewer #3 agreed at journal
05 Oct, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed at journal
04 Oct, 2021
Reviewers invited by journal
28 Sep, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
28 Sep, 2021
Editor assigned by journal
28 Sep, 2021
Submission checks completed at journal
27 Sep, 2021
Editor invited by journal
27 Sep, 2021
First submitted to journal
24 Sep, 2021

You are reading this latest preprint version

Synergetic Effect of Lipoprotein(a) and Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 on Functional Outcomes in Patients with Ischemic Stroke

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Data availability

Study population

Baseline data collection

Functional outcomes of stroke evaluation

Laboratory analyses

Lp(a) measurement

Statistical analyses

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Tables

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1