1. Albantow, C., et al., Comparison of 3D printed nose bolus to traditional wax bolus for cost-effectiveness, volumetric accuracy and dosimetric effect. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 2020.
2. Bassi, S., Langan, B., and Malone, C., Dosimetry assessment of patient-specific 3D printable materials for HDR surface brachytherapy. Physica Medica, 2019. 67: p. 166-175.
3. Burleson, S., et al., Use of 3D printers to create a patient-specific 3D bolus for external beam therapy. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2015. 16(3): p. 166-178.
4. Canters, R.A., et al., Clinical implementation of 3D printing in the construction of patient specific bolus for electron beam radiotherapy for non-melanoma skin cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2016. 121(1): p. 148-153.
5. Clarke, S., 3D printed surface applicators for high dose rate brachytherapy. MSc Thesis, 2016. Dalhousie University.
6. Fujimoto, K., et al., Efficacy of patient-specific bolus created using three-dimensional printing technique in photon radiotherapy. Physica Medica, 2017. 38: p. 1-9.
7. Harris, B.D., Nilsson, S., and Poole, C.M., A feasibility study for using ABS plastic and a low-cost 3D printer for patient-specific brachytherapy mould design. Australassian Physical & Engineering Scinces in Medicine, 2015. 38(3): p. 399-412.
8. Jones, E.L., et al., Introduction of novel 3D-printed superficial applicators for high-dose-rate skin brachytherapy. Brachytherapy, 2017. 16(2): p. 409-414.
9. Kim, S.W., et al., A customized bolus produced using a 3-dimensional printer for radiotherapy. PLoS ONE, 2014. 9(10).
10. Schumacher, M., et al., 3D-printed surface mould applicator for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. SPIE Medical Imaging, 2015. 9415: p. 91452E.
11. Zhao, Y., et al., Clinical applications of 3-dimensional printing in radiation therapy. Medical Dosimetry, 2017. 42(2): p. 150-155.
12. Arenas, M., et al., Individualized 3D scanning and printing for non-melanoma skin cancer brachytherapy: a financial study for its integration into clinical workflow. Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy, 2017. 9(3): p. 270-276.
13. LeCompte, M.C., et al., Simple and Rapid Creation of Customized 3-dimensional Printed Bolus Using iPhone X True Depth Camera. Practical Radiation Oncology, 2019. 9(4): p. e417-e421.
14. Maxwell, S., et al., Assessing the fit of 3D printed bolus from CT, optical scanner and photogrammetry methods. Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2020: p. 1-7.
15. Park, J.W., et al., Fabrication of malleable three-dimensional-printed customized bolus using three-dimensional scanner. PLoS ONE, 2017. 12(5).
16. Douglass, M.J.J. and Caraça Santos, A.M., Application of optical photogrammetry in radiation oncology: HDR surface mold brachytherapy. Brachytherapy, 2019.
17. Westoby, M.J., et al., 'Structure-from-Motion' photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology, 2012. 179: p. 300-314.
18. Javernick, L., Brasington, J., and Caruso, B., Modeling the topography of shallow braided rivers using Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry. Geomorphology, 2014. 213: p. 166-182.
19. Remondino, F., Heritage recording and 3D modeling with photogrammetry and 3D scanning. Remote Sensing, 2011. 3(6): p. 1104-1138.
20. Remondino, F., Guarnieri, A., and Vettore, A., 3D modeling of close-range objects: Photogrammetry or laser scanning? Proc. SPIE, 2005. 5665: p. 216-225.
21. Fedorov, A., et al., 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2012. 30(9): p. 1323-1341.
22. Bridger, C.A., et al., Evaluation of camera settings for photogrammetric reconstruction of humanoid phantoms for EBRT bolus and HDR surface brachytherapy applications. Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2021.
23. Blender Online Community (2020) Blender – a 3D modelling and rendering package. Blender Insititute, Amsterdam: Blender Foundation. https://www.blender.org/
24. CloudCompare (2020) CloudCompare – 3D point cloud and mesh processing software. Open source project. http://cloudcompare.org/
25. Besl, P.J. and McKay, N.D., A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1992. 14(2): p. 239-256.
26. Shrinkwrap Modifier. Blender Manual 2020 [cited 2020 5 March]; Version 2.82:[Available from: https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/latest/modeling/modifiers/deform/shrinkwrap.html.
27. Iwańczyk, M. The Complete Guide: How to Avoid Warping in Your 3D Prints. 2018 [cited 2020 12 March]; Available from: https://zortrax.com/blog/reducing-warping-in-3d-prints/.
28. Dancewicz, O.L., et al., Radiological properties of 3D printed materials in kilovoltage and megavoltage photon beams. Physica Medica, 2017. 38: p. 111-118.
29. Van der Walt, M., Crabtree, T., and Albantow, C., PLA as a suitable 3D printing thermoplastic for use in external beam radiotherapy. Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2019. 42(4): p. 1165-1176.
30. Beaulieu, L., et al., Report of the Task Group 186 on model-based dose calculation methods in brachytherapy beyond the TG-43 formalism: Current status and recommendations for clinical implementation. Medical Physics, 2012. 39(10): p. 6208-6236.
31. Ballester, F., et al., Technical note: Monte-Carlo dosimetry of the HDR 12i and plus 192Ir sources. Medical Physics, 2001. 28(12): p. 2586-2591.
32. Boman, E.L., et al., Dosimetric comparison of surface mould HDR brachytherapy with VMAT. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 2018. 65(4): p. 311-318.