3.1 Characteristics of potentially toxic elements in sediment and water
The variation of different PTEs in sediment samples of Wainivesi River, Fiji is presented in Table 2. The average analysis of data (in mgkg−1) depicted an order of heavy metals accumulation in sediment that was Fe (50417 ± 16773) > Zn (1013 ± 1286) > Pb (112 ± 62) > Mn (89 ± 29) > Cr (58 ± 22) > Ni (49 ± 26) > Cu (28 ± 25) > Co (23 ± 8) > Cd (10 ± 13) respectively. The data indicated that Cd was marginally accumulated in the sediments, while Fe got extreme enrichment in the river basin. The percentage of relative standard deviation (%RSD) for the heavy metals distribution in sediments at different sampling points showed that abundance of Co, Fe and Mn did not significantly vary, while the rest of the metals (i.e., Cd, Zn, Co, Pb, Ni and Cr) significantly varied (%RSD: 39-128%). This study showed the metals were heterogeneously distributed at different sampling points suggesting the sources of these metals in sediments were mainly anthropogenic. The concentrations of the studied PTEs in the sediment samples were compared with the threshold values of the sediment quality guidelines (SQGs): Probable Effect Level (PEL), Threshold Effect Level (TEL), Severe Effect Level (SEL), Effect Range Low (ERL), Lowest Effect Level (LEL), and the Effects Range Medium (ERM) values (Persuad et al., 1993; Macdonald et al., 1996; US-EPA, 1999).
Table 2
Potentially toxic elements (mg kg−1) in sediment samples of Wainivesi River, Tailevu, Fiji are characterized in terms of sediment quality guidelines (SQG) and are compared with those of previous literature studies.
| Cr | Mn | Fe | Co | Ni | Cu | Zn | Cd | Pb |
This work | | | | | | | | | |
Mean (n=24) | 58.5 | 89.0 | 50417.1 | 23.4 | 49.7 | 28.7 | 1013.4 | 10.2 | 112.8 |
SD (1σ) | 22.5 | 29.3 | 16773.0 | 8.0 | 26.7 | 25.0 | 1286.6 | 13.0 | 62.9 |
RSD (%) | 38.5 | 33.0 | 33.3 | 34.2 | 53.6 | 87.0 | 127.0 | 128.2 | 55.7 |
Median | 51.3 | 85.7 | 52743.8 | 21.7 | 45.5 | 18.8 | 386.1 | 3.0 | 106.1 |
Min. | 28.1 | 32.6 | 10720.5 | 11.7 | 14.9 | 7.9 | 175.5 | 1.3 | 42.8 |
Max. | 110.4 | 139.6 | 85015.2 | 42.1 | 94.0 | 103.2 | 4693.9 | 45.9 | 252.2 |
Error (%)a | 0.5-2.0 | 1-2 | 0.5-1.5 | 1-3 | 2-8 | 2-4 | 2-5 | 2-9 | 5-10 |
SQG Threshold values | | | | | | | | | |
LELb | 26 | 460 | 20000 | | 16 | 16 | 120 | 0.6 | 31 |
SELb | 110 | 1100 | 40000 | | 75 | 110 | 820 | 10 | 250 |
TELc | 52.3 | | | | 15.9 | 18.7 | 124 | 0.68 | 30.2 |
PELc | 160 | | | | 42.8 | 108 | 271 | 4.21 | 112 |
ERLd | 81 | | | | 20.9 | 34 | 150 | 1.2 | 46.7 |
ERMd | 370 | | | | 51.6 | 270 | 410 | 9.6 | 218 |
TRVe | 26 | | | | 16 | 16 | 110 | 0.6 | 31 |
SQG-Characterization (%)f | | | | | | | | | |
<LEL | 0 | 100 | 4.2 | | 0 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
LEL-SEL | 95.8 | 0 | 20.8 | | 87.5 | 66.7 | 25 | 75 | 95.8 |
>SEL | 4.2 | 0 | 75.0 | | 12.5 | 0 | 75 | 25 | 4.2 |
<TEL | 58.3 | | | | 8.3 | 45.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
TEL-PEL | 41.7 | | | | 33.3 | 54.2 | 29.2 | 62.5 | 50 |
>PEL | 0 | | | | 58.3 | 0 | 70.8 | 37.5 | 50 |
<ERL | 79.2 | | | | 50 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 12.5 |
ERL-ERM | 20.8 | | | | 8.3 | 25 | 54.2 | 75 | 79.2 |
>ERM | 0 | | | | 41.7 | 0 | 45.8 | 25 | 8.3 |
Lit. data | | | | | | | | | |
UCCg | 92 | 775 | 39000 | | 47 | 28 | 67 | 0.09 | 17 |
ASVh | 90 | 850 | 47200 | | 68 | 45 | 95 | 0.3 | 20 |
Buriganga river, Bangladeshi | 788 | 508 | 25000 | 10.5 | | 45 | 101 | | 25 |
Turag river, Bangladeshj | 70 | 768 | 29000 | 12.0 | | | 780 | | |
Pearl river, Chinak | 71.4 | 908 | 19600 | 16.2 | 37.7 | 54.5 | 202 | | 97.1 |
Amur river, Russial | 36.3 | 768 | 25400 | 6.34 | 25.6 | 7.43 | 43.4 | 0.21 | 19.2 |
Ilinois river, USAm | 98.1 | 483 | | | 25.7 | 31.0 | 117 | 0.61 | 60 |
Buyukmelen river, Turkeyn | 169 | 1007 | 45500 | 20.7 | 323 | 30.6 | 63.7 | 0.12 | 12.1 |
Catumbela river, Angolao | 26 | 620 | 26800 | 9 | 20 | | | | 19 |
Elbe river, Germanyp | 386 | 1230 | 33400 | 13 | 58 | 206 | 1190 | 7.3 | 122 |
Brahmaputra river, Bangladeshq | 96.2 | 752 | 35500 | 10.5 | 30.4 | 17.2 | 54.1 | 0.7 | 19.5 |
Godavari-Krishna river, Indiar | 129 | 800 | 63500 | 30 | 84 | 91 | 151 | | |
Kumho river, Koreas | 99.7 | | | 20.9 | 97.6 | 125 | 298 | 1.67 | 149 |
Liffey river, Irelandt | | 496 | 26900 | 7 | 29 | 220 | 666 | 3.25 | |
Linggi river, Malaysiau | 33.3 | | 17710 | | 10.3 | 14.6 | 102.7 | 0.29 | 30.5 |
Lubumbashi river, Congov | 86.8 | 2920 | 45418 | 3774 | 55.4 | 14822 | 1415 | 42.9 | 1549 |
aAnalytical errors from replicate measurements (n=3, in %, 1σ); bPersuad et al., (1993); cMacdonald et al., (1996); dLong et al., (1996); eUS-EPA (1999); f% of sample fall in different category; gRudnick and Gao, (2014); hTurekian and Wedepohl, (1961); iTamim et al., (2016); jKhan et al., (2020); kZhang and Wang, (2001); lSorokina and Zarubina, (2011); mMathis and Cummings, (1973); nPehlivan, (2010); oSilva et al., (2016); pBrügmann, (1995); qGarzanti et al., (2010); rPattan et al., (2008); sKim et al., (2010); tJones and Jordan, (1979); uElias et al., (2018); vAtibu et al., (2016). |
The average Cr concentration in sediment samples was noticed to be higher than LEL (Persuad et al., 1993), TEL (Macdonald et al., 1996), TRV (US-EPA, 1999), while lower than the SEL (Persuad et al., 1993), PEL (Macdonald et al., 1996), ERL (Long et al., 1996) and ERM (Long et al., 1996). This study revealed that 95.8% samples were fallen between the LEL and SEL, while 58.3% sample were below the TEL. Therefore, it could be suggested that the present levels of Cr in the study area does not have significant impact on the ecological health. However, if higher level of Cr would appear, then this could have adverse impact on the microbial community (Fashola et al., 2016). Nonetheless, the average Cr concentration was below than the maximum acceptable Cr concentration in surface soil and the reported Cr level (486 mg kg−1) in gold mine tailing in Oman (Abdul-Wahab, S.; Marikar, 2012). Subsequently, the average Cr concentration in sediment samples was lower than the several rivers sediments reported in literature (Tamim et al., 2016; Khan et al., 2020; Zhang and Wang, 2001; Mathis and Cummings, 1973; Pehlivan, 2010; Garzanti et al., 2010; Pattan et al., 2008); Kim et al., 2010), which indicating that the sediment in Wainivesi River, Fiji was not severely contaminated with Cr.
This study revealed that the 100% Wainivesi River sediment for Mn concentration was much lower than the two SQGs threshold values (LEL and SEL) (Table 1), which was consistent with the reported results for different river sediment in the world: Bangladesh (Tamim et al., 2016), China (Zhang and Wang, 2001), Russia (Sorokina and Zarubina, 2011), Turkey (Pehlivan, 2010), Angola (Silva et al., 2016), Germany (Brügmann, 1995), Ireland (Jones and Jordan, (1979), Malaysia (Elias et al., 2018), Congo (Atibu et al., 2016). Therefore, it has been suggested that the sediments in the study area were free from Mn contamination with respect to the SQG threshold values.
Nickel (Ni) concentration in 12.5% and 58.3% of the samples were exceeded the SEL and PEL thresholds respectively Moreover, 87.5% of the samples were between LEL and SEL threshold and 33.3% of the samples were between TEL and PEL thresholds (Table 2). The average Ni concentration was much higher than all the threshold values (LEL, SEL, TEF, PEL, ERL, ERM and TRV) for the SQGs (Persuad et al., 1993; Macdonald et al., 1996; Long et al., 1996; US-EPA, 1999). These results showed that Ni may potential harmful to the sediment-dwelling organisms. It is noteworthy to mention that Ni have been shown to adversely interfere with the bacterial cells. Studies have shown that Ni can damage the bacterial cell by (1) substituting fundamental metal in metalloproteins; (2) connecting to synergist deposits of non-metalloenzymes; (3) and by inducing oxidative pressure that enhance DNA fragmentation (Fashola et al., 2016). However, the average Ni concentration for this study was found to be higher than the reported results for sediments in many countries in the world (Tamim et al., 2016; Zhang and Wang, 2001; Sorokina and Zarubina, 2011; Pehlivan, 2010; Silva et al., 2016; Brügmann, 1995; Jones and Jordan, 1979; Elias et al., 2018; Atibu et al., 2016). The higher level of Ni was observed in the study area because of gold mining as well as Ni exist in gold bearing ore as pyrrhotite (Fe(1−x)S), which can contain up to 5% of Ni (Fashola et al., 2016). In addition to gold mining, Ni may be acquired from the synthetic industry waste, burning, metallurgy, and metal plating (Palansooriya et al., 2020).
The average Cu concentration in the sediment samples was observed to be higher than LEL (Persuad et al., 1993), TEL (Macdonald et al., 1996), TRV (US-EPA, 1999), while lower than the SEL (Persuad et al., 1993), PEL (Macdonald et al., 1996), ERL (Long et al., 1996) and ERM (Long et al., 1996). This study revealed that 95.8% samples were fallen between the LEL and SEL thresholds, while 58.3% sample were below TEL thresholds. The average Cu concentration in the sediments for this study was in line with the reported mean concentration of unpolluted soil (5 to 70 mg kg−1) (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias, 2001) and lower than the Cu level (92.2 mg kg−1) in the gold mine tailings in Ghana (Bempah et al., 2013). However, the average Cu levels in Wainivesi River sediment (Fiji) was lower than the reported results of the river sediments in several countries in the world (Turekian and Wedepohl, 1961; Zhang and Wang, 2001; Sorokina and Zarubina, 2011; Mathis and Cummings, 1973; Silva et al., 2016; Garzanti et al., 2010; Pattan et al., 2008; Kim et al., 2010; Elias et al., 2018; Atibu et al., 2016).
Iron (Fe) concentration was found to be higher than many river sediments in the world: Bangladesh (Tamim et al., 2016), China (Zhang and Wang, 2001), Russia (Sorokina and Zarubina, 2011), Turkey (Pehlivan, 2010), Angola (Silva et al., 2016), Germany (Brügmann, 1995), Ireland (Jones and Jordan, (1979), Malaysia (Elias et al., 2018), Congo (Atibu et al., 2016). Subsequently, SQGs threshold values showed that 75% of the samples were higher than SEL and 20% were between LEL to SEL, which indicating that Fe may likely cause potential harm to sediment-dwelling organisms. High level of Fe might be resulting from industrial activities, especially mining industry.
Zinc (Zn) concentration in sediment samples was ranged from 175.5 to 4693.9 mg kg−1 with an average value of 1013.4 mg kg−1, which was much higher than the entire threshold values (LEL, SEL, TEF, PEL, ERL, ERM, TRV) for sediment quality guidelines (Table 2). However, Zn concentration in 75%, 71% and 46% of the samples were exceeded the SEL, PEL and ERM thresholds respectively. Moreover, 29.2% of the samples were between TEL and PEL threshold and 54.2% of the samples were between ERL and ERM thresholds. Zinc speciation is significant in deciding its harmfulness to microorganisms (Fashola et al., 2016). High concentrations of Zn show diverse inhibitory or harmful impact on cell activity and bacterial cells development. Furthermore, it was reported the present of high Zn concentration, nitrification processes catalized by Nitrosospira sp. was reduced 20% (Mertens et al., 2007). Therefore, it has been suggested that Zn has significant impact on the environment and ecological health. The average Zn concentration in sediments for this study was several folds higher than the reported results (8.9 to 65.7 mg-Zn kg−1) in the gold mine tailings in South Africa (Mitileni et al.,2011) and 77.56 mg-Zn kg−1 in Ghana (Bempah et al., 2013). Further, the average Zn concentration for this study was found to be higher than the reported results for the river sediments in many countries in the world (Tamim et al., 2016; Zhang and Wang, 2001; Sorokina and Zarubina, 2011; Pehlivan, 2010; Silva et al., 2016; Brügmann, 1995; Jones and Jordan, 1979; Elias et al., 2018; Atibu et al., 2016). This may have occur due to possible Zn leaching from gold ore bodies (Fashola et al., 2016), as Zn occurs in gold ore bodies in the form sphalerite (ZnS), which is often associated with galena; and thereby accumulating in the sediments (Emenike et al., 2020).
A wide range of Cd concentration (1.3 to 45.9 mg kg−1) was found in the study area with an average value of 10.2 mg kg−1, which was higher than the typically Cd concentration (1 mg kg−1) in unpolluted soil (USEPA, 2001); and the reported Cd concentration (6.4 to 11.7 mg kg−1) in gold mine tailings in Tanzania (Bitala et al., 2009). On the other hand, the average Cd concentration was found to be higher than the entire threshold values (LEL, SEL, TEF, PEL, ERL, ERM, TRV) for the SQGs (Persuad et al., 1993; Macdonald et al., 1996; Long et al., 1996; US-EPA, 1999) guidelines (Table 2). Furthermore, Cd concentration surpassed the SEL, PEL and ERM standards in 25%, 37.5% and 43% of the samples, respectively. Subsequently, 62.5% of the samples were between ERL and ERM thresholds; and 75% of the samples were between ERL and ERM. The outcomes represent the probability of destructive impacts caused by Cd on the biota. Cadmium is a harmful heavy metal to most organisms and it influences numerous metabolic activities of soil microorganisms like nitrogen mineralization, carbon mineralization, CO2 evolution and protein activities (USEPA, 2001). It was observed that the average Cd concentration for this study was found to be higher than the reported results for the sediments in many countries in the world (Tamim et al., 2016; Zhang and Wang, 2001; Sorokina and Zarubina, 2011; Pehlivan, 2010; Silva et al., 2016; Brügmann, 1995; Jones and Jordan, 1979; Elias et al., 2018; Atibu et al., 2016). A few anthropogenic exercises bring Cd into the environment. Gold mining activities is one of them as well as it occurs in gold bearing ore bodies as an isometric minor component in sphalerite and its focus relies upon the grouping of the sphalerite in the mineral body (Fashola et al., 2016).
The average Pb concentration in sediment was found to be lower than the threshold values of SEL, ERM, while higher than that of the LEL, TEL, PEL, ERL, and TRV. Pb concentration in 50% of the samples was greater than the PEL threshold; while 95.8% of the samples were between LEL and SEL thresholds. Moreover, 50% of the samples were between TEL and PEL thresholds and 79.2% of the samples were between, ERL and ERM thresholds (Table 2). Like as other fundamental divalent metals (Mn2+ and Zn2+), Pb2+ might interfere with nucleic acids, proteins, and the alterations of the osmotic balance in the bacterial cells (Fashola et al., 2016). Therefore, excessive Pb in sediments might have adverse impact on ecological health (Rahman et al., 2014; Rahman et al., 2021). The average Pb concentration for this study was found to be higher than the Pb in surface soils (32 mg kg−1) worldwide average (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias, 2001) but was in line for Pb concentration (80 to 510 mg kg−1) in gold mine tailing (Ogola et la., 2002). The average Pb concentration was found to be greater than the river sediments in Bangladesh (Tamim et al., 2016), China (Zhang and Wang, 2001), Russia (Sorokina and Zarubina, 2011), Turkey (Pehlivan, 2010), Angola (Silva et al., 2016), Germany (Brügmann, 1995), Ireland (Jones and Jordan, (1979), Malaysia (Elias et al., 2018) and Congo (Atibu et al., 2016). This high Pb could be due the excessive use of gasoline additives, pesticides, as well as chemical fertilizers (Aboud and Nandini, 2009), sand extraction (Madzin et al., 2015) and mining activities (Emenike et al., 2020). The excessive Pb in the study area may be attributed to the gold mining since Pb occurs in the form of galena (PbS) in gold ore (Ogola et la., 2002).
The PTEs concentrations in surface water of Wainivesi River, Fiji were analyzed by AAS-based analytical technique and the statistics data (i.e., minimum, median, mean, maximum, standard deviation) for the each studied metal was presented in Table 3, in comparison with the different reported results in the literature and the threshold values set by different recommended bodies (ECR, 1997; WHO, 2011; EU, 2003; USEPA, 2001; EPA, 2001. The average metal contents in the water samples were showed the following increasing trend: Cd (12 ± 10) < Co (34 ± 15) < Mn (45 ± 32) < Cu (47 ± 38) < Cr (104 ± 24) < Ni (115 ± 20) < Zn (183 ± 295) < Pb (190 ± 16) < Fe (1632 ± 1335) µg L−1 respectively. The %RSD for the heavy metals distribution in water samples at different sampling points in Wainivesi River, Fiji showed a wide ranged (45-161%) for the metals of Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb; whereas %RSD values for rest of the metals (Cr, Mn and Fe) were not varied significantly. However, it has been observed that the sources of most PTEs were anthropogenic origin. Moreover, our results indicated that the most of heavy metals were not homogeneously distributed in the study area.
Table 3
Potentially toxic elements (µg L−1) in water samples of Wainivesi River, Tailevu, Fiji are compared with those of threshold values and previous literature studies along with the water quality appraisal (entropy water quality index, EWQI).
| Cr | Mn | Fe | Co | Ni | Cu | Zn | Cd | Pb | EWQI |
This work | | | | | | | | | | |
W-1 | 55.0 | 96 | 610 | 4.0 | 140 | 93.0 | 753 | 18 | 153 | 206 |
W-2 | 80.0 | 77 | 870 | 23 | 125 | 74.0 | 553 | 6.0 | 204 | 185 |
W-3 | 105 | 5.0 | 610 | 27 | 72.0 | 10.0 | 32.0 | 5.0 | 194 | 148 |
W-4 | 118 | 58 | 4260 | 35 | 105 | 107 | 35.0 | 25 | 199 | 468 |
W-5 | 113 | 10 | 570 | 44 | 117 | 14.0 | 22.0 | 8.0 | 189 | 160 |
W-6 | 118 | 27 | 1720 | 49 | 113 | 21.0 | 21.0 | 5.0 | 204 | 224 |
W-7 | 122 | 32 | 1400 | 45 | 119 | 31.0 | 22.0 | 3.0 | 189 | 191 |
W-8 | 122 | 55 | 2940 | 46 | 128 | 24.0 | 23.0 | 26 | 189 | 390 |
Mean (n=8) | 104 | 45 | 1623 | 34 | 115 | 46.8 | 183 | 12 | 190 | 247 |
SD (1σ) | 24 | 32 | 1335 | 15 | 20 | 38.5 | 295 | 10 | 16 | 117 |
RSD (%) | 23.2 | 71.3 | 82.3 | 45.1 | 17.6 | 82.3 | 161.7 | 79.2 | 8.6 | 47.5 |
Median | 116 | 44 | 1135 | 40 | 118 | 27.5 | 27.5 | 7.0 | 192 | 199 |
Min. | 55.0 | 5.0 | 570 | 4.0 | 72 | 10.0 | 21.0 | 3.0 | 153 | 148 |
Max. | 122 | 96 | 4260 | 49 | 140 | 107 | 753 | 26 | 204 | 468 |
Error (%, RSD of n=3)a | 3-7% | 5-8% | 2-5% | 5-10% | 4-9% | 7-10% | 3-8% | 8-12% | 3-5% | |
Threshold values | | | | | | | | | | |
ECRb | 50 | 100 | 300-1000 | | 100 | 1000 | 5000 | 5 | 50 | |
WHOc | 50 | 100 | 300 | | 70 | 2000 | 3000 | 3 | 10 | |
BISd | 50 | 100 | 300 | | 20 | 50 | 5000 | 3 | 10 | |
EUe | 50 | 50 | 200 | | 20 | 2000 | 5000 | 5 | 10 | |
USEPAf | 100 | 50 | 300 | | 52 | 1300 | 5000 | 5 | 15 | |
EPAg | 50 | 50 | 200 | | 20 | 2000 | | 5 | 10 | |
MHCh | 50 | 100 | 300 | | 20 | 1000 | 1000 | 5 | 10 | |
Lit. Data | | | | | | | | | | |
Han River, Chinai | 8.1 | 30.7 | 30.6 | | 1.7 | 13.4 | | 2.3 | 9.3 | |
MKSTPR River, Bangladeshj | 27.7 | 233.8 | 2475.8 | | 13.5 | | 53.2 | 6.2 | 12.4 | |
Buriganga River, Bangladeshk | 114.0 | 157.0 | 612.0 | 199.0 | 150.0 | | 332.0 | 59.0 | 119.0 | |
Halda River, Bangladeshl | 30.0 | 160.0 | | 50.0 | 410.0 | | 35.0 | 40.0 | 30.0 | |
Major Rivers, Chinam | 6.5 | 2.3 | | 0.1 | 2.0 | | 0.8 | | 0.2 | |
Huaihe Rivers, Chinan | 23.1 | 49.0 | 441.0 | 42.5 | 46.2 | | 10504 | 61.7 | 155.0 | |
Dan River, Chinao | 0.1 | 6.7 | 2.7 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 7.8 | 0.7 | | |
Tarim River, Chinap | 0.43 | 16.5 | 61.9 | 0.1 | 1.8 | | 7.1 | | 0.5 | |
Subarnarekha River, Indiaq | 0.89 | 12.0 | 134.0 | 0.6 | 25.2 | 16.6 | | | | |
Lich River, Vietnamr | 2.9 | 216.2 | | | 7.6 | 4.5 | 51.1 | | 8.1 | |
Benue River, Nigerias | 38.1 | 181.0 | 751.0 | | | | 78.7 | 52.0 | 207.0 | |
Tigris River, Turkeyt | <5 | 467.0 | 388.0 | 111.0 | 72.0 | 165.0 | 37.0 | 1.4 | 0.3 | |
Sava River, Croatiau | 0.3 | 3.4 | 12.6 | 0.064 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 2.27 | 0.011 | 0.055 | |
Hawkesbury-Nepean River, Australiav | | 52.0 | 268.0 | 0.2 | 0.26 | 0.8 | 0.88 | 0.045 | 0.111 | |
Manchar Lake, Pakistanw | 7.64 | 72.6 | 2960 | 38.94 | 35 | 18.9 | 730 | 5.3 | 82.4 | |
Parameters for EWQI | | | | | | | | | | |
Standard data (Sj)c | 50 | 100 | 300 | | 70 | 2000 | 3000 | 3 | 10 | |
Information entropy (ej) | 0.919 | 0.836 | 0.668 | | 0.925 | 0.755 | 0.384 | 0.755 | 0.930 | |
Entropy weight (ωj) | 0.045 | 0.090 | 0.182 | | 0.041 | 0.134 | 0.337 | 0.134 | 0.038 | |
aAnalytical errors from replicate measurements (n=3, in %, 1σ); bECR (Environment Conservation Rules, Bangladesh), (1997); cWHO (World Health Organization), (2011); dBIS (Bureau of Indian Standard), (2012); eEU (European Union), (2003); fUSEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2009); gEPA (Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland), (2001); hMHC (Ministry of Health of PR China), (2007); iLi and Zhang, (2010); jMKSTPR (Meghna, Kartoya, Sitalakha, Teesta, Pashur, Rupsha river): Islam et al., (2020); kBhuiyan et al., (2015); lBhuyan and Bakar, (2017); mGao et al., (2019); nWang et al., (2017); oMeng et al., (2016); pXiao et al., (2014); qGiri and Singh, (2014; rThuong et al., (2013); sEneji et al., (2012); tVarol and Şen, (2012); uDragun et al., (2009); vMarkich and Brown, (1998); wKazi et al., (2009). |
The pH of the water samples was within the standard level set by the WHO (pH: 6.5-8.5), showing alkaline in nature (Table S1). The low organic components may trigger the probable high pH values at these respective locations in the designated area. The average electrical conductivity (EC) (our work: 0.10; limit values: 0.25-2.5 mS cm−1) and total dissolved solids (TDS) (our work: 0.065; limit values: 1 g L−1) were compared to those of suggested standard limit values set by international laws (WHO, 2011; ECR, 1997; EU, 1998; EPA, 2001) while dissolved oxygen (DO) (our work: 9.49; limit values: 6 mg L−1) were comparatively greater than the permissible levels (ECR, 1997). The comparison of PTEs in the Wainivesi River, Fiji with the baseline values of the current work river and other rivers across the globe are displayed in Table 3.
The maximum Cr concentration (122 µg L−1) was found at the sampling points of W7 ranging from 55-122 µg L−1. This study showed that Cr concentration for 100% of the sampling points in Wainivesi River was exceeded the threshold values recommended by Environment Conservation Rules, Bangladesh (ECR, 1997), World Health Organization (WHO, 1996), Bureau of Indian Standard (BIS, 2012), European Union (EU, 2003), Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland (EPA, 2001) and Ministry of Health of PR China (MHC, 2007). Subsequently, the average Cr concentration was observed higher than the reported results for river water in Bangladesh (Islam et al., 2020; Bhuyan and Bakar, 2017), China (Li and Zhang, 2010; Gao et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2017; Meng et al., 2016; Xiao et al., 2014), India (Giri and Singh, 2014), Vietnam (Thuong et al., 2013), Nigeria (Eneji et al., 2012), Turkey (Varol and Şen, 2012), Crotia (Dragun et al., 2009), Pakistan ( Kazi et al., 2009). Therefore, it has been suggested that Wainivesi River is not suitable for drinking purposes. A reasonable cause of Cr in these locations might be disintegrated in ultramafic volcanic stone by enduring and diagenesis measures, which prompted to the elevated Cr levels (Zhitkovich, 2011).
The average Mn concentration (45 µg L−1) in surface water samples of Wainivesi River was found to be below than the threshold values recommended by the several organizations (ECR, 1997; WHO, 1996; BIS, 2012; EU, 2003; EPA, 2001; MHC, 2007). However, the maximum Mn concentration was found at the sampling point of W1, which is near to mine area and 50% water samples (W8, W4, W2, and W1) contained higher Mn concentration than that of the recommended bodies. However, the current climatic condition in this area upholds Mn transport as manganese hydroxide by framing carbonate layers (Maata and Singh, 2008). While pH esteems from 6.62 to 7.83 in a large portion of the waters, the dissolvability of Mn will in general improve (Islam et al., 2020b). In view of this proof, higher Mn concentrations found in surface waters may have a geogenic beginning, related with chemical weathering and disintegration of mineral in the bedrocks (Kumara et al., 2021). The ranking order of the average Mn concentration in surface water was W3 < W5 < W6 < W7 < W8 < W4 < W2 < W1 respectively ranging from 5 to 96 µg L−1. The average Mn concentration in surface water was in line with the reported result for the Nasivi River (Fiji), which is located near the Vatukoula Goldmine region (VGR), Fiji (Kumara et al., 2021).
The Ni concentration in 8 different sampling points was found in a wide range (72 to 140 µg L−1) and > 90% water sample contained higher Ni concentration compared to the threshold values set by the ECR (1997), WHO (1996), EU (2003), EPA (2001). The finding of this study is consistent with the reported result for the Nasivi River (Fiji), which is located near the Vatukoula Goldmine region (VGR), Fiji (Kumara et al., 2021). Similar to Mn, the highest Ni concentration was found at the sampling point of W1, which was 2 times higher than the drinking water guideline value set by WHO (1996). Furthermore, the average Ni concentration was found to be higher than the several river waters in the world: China (Han River: Li et al., 2010; Major Rivers: Gao et al., 2019; Huaihe River: Wang et al., 2017; Dan River: Meng et al., 2016; Tarin River: Giri et al., 2014), India (Giri and Singh, 2014), Vietnam (Thuong et al., 2013), Nigeria (Eneji et al., 2012), Turkey (Varol and Şen, 2012), Crotia (Dragun et al., 2009), Pakistan ( Kazi et al., 2009). The high level of Ni in Wainivesi River water could be sue to leaching of Ni from gold bearing ore as pyrrhotite (Fe(1−x)S), which can contain up to 5% of Ni (Fashola et al., 2016).
The highest Zn concentration (753 µg L−1) in surface water found at the sampling point of W1, while the lowest Zn concentration (21 µg L−1) was found at the sampling point of W6 having an average value of 183 µg L−1. The ranking order for Zn concentration in the study area was W8 < W2 < W4 < W1 < W6 < W7 < W3 < W5 respectively. The average Zn concentration in Wainivesi River waters found to be below than the threshold values set by the ECR (1997), WHO (1996), BIS (2012), EU (2003), EPA (2001) and MHC (2007). This finding suggested that the surface water in the study area might be free form Zn contamination as well there is no coal combustion and waste incineration in the study area, which might be prime sources of Zn in surface water/environment (Rahman et al., 2021).
This study revealed that >90% and >100% water samples of Wainivesi River, Fiji contained higher Cd and Pb level compared to the threshold values (Table 2) set by the ECR (1997), WHO (1996), BIS (2012), EU (2003), EPA (2001) and MHC (2007). Among all the studied heavy metals, these two elements were serious concerning as a result of its excessive presence in water sample, and both metals and their compounds are generally toxic pollutants. The main sources of these two elements are natural. For instance, normally a huge amount of Cd (~around 25,000 tons per year) is released into the environment. Nearly 50% of this Cd delivered into streams through enduring of rocks and some Cd is released through jungle fires and volcanoes. The rest of the Cd is delivered through anthropogenic inputs. Cd can be transported over significant stretches when it is absorbed by sludge. This Cd-rich sludge can contaminate surface waters just as soils (Islam et al., 2020a). Furthermore, water contamination containing Pb compounds resulting from Pb minerals in the mining activities. Additionally, with mining, Pb compound "tetra-ethyl lead" is applied as an added substance in gasoline in numerous nations (Rahman et al., 2019). This natural Pb compound is immediately converted to inorganic lead, and winds up in water, in some cases even in drinking water.
3.3 Eco-environmental appraisals of PTEs in sediment
Figure 3a outlined the EF values of the studied PTEs from the sediments of the Wainivesi River system in Fiji. The calculated EFs of the selective PTEs contents like Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb are 1.298, 1.028, 1.0, 1.369, 2.793, 2.119, 2.936, 3.303, and 1.838, respectively, presented in Table S4. We can organize the EFs of the PTEs according to their mean in the following order: Cd > Zn > Ni > Cu > Pb > Co > Cr > Mn > Fe. Our result shows that except for Cr, Mn, Fe, and Co, the remaining PTEs had EF values greater than 1.5 (1.5 ≤ EF < 3), demonstrating minor enrichment of the PTEs in sediment and implying anthropogenic origins (Ustaolu and Islam, 2020; Islam et al., 2020a). On the contrary, metals like Cr, Mn, Fe, and Co had low EF values, implying geogenic inputs as the key factors of these toxic elements (Ustaolu and Islam, 2020; Varol and Sen 2012; Gao and Chen 2012). Wang et al. (2008) reported that EF values of 0.5 EF 1.5 indicate that the origin of the elements is purely geogenic, but an EF value of >1.5 indicates that the elements are from anthropogenic sources. Shirani et al., (2020) reported that dysprosium (Dy), Pb, and Ni is highly enriched compared to other metals, indicating an intense anthropogenic activity in the study area which was similar to our study.
Igeo is a critical ecological index that is used to differentiate between natural and human-caused metal sources, as well as to assess the contamination level of sediment samples (Islam et al., 2020a). The analyzed Igeo values of the considered PTEs were included in supplementary Table S5 and delineated in the following descending order based on their mean (relative to the background dataset): Ni (0.748) > Pb (0.138) > Cu (0.016) > Co (-0.061) > Zn (-0.077) > Cr (-0.119) > Cd (-0.142) > Fe (-0.466) > Mn (-0.533) (Fig. 3b). The highest Igeo value was found for Cd (3.801), while the lowest Igeo value was found for Fe (-2.455). Cd and Zn were observed as “strongly contaminated” in sampling sites 1 and 2 while Cu was observed as “moderately to heavily contaminated” in sampling sites 1and 2 while Ni was investigated as “moderately contaminated” in some sites 4, 6, 7 and 8. To compare with other studies, Song et al. (2019) observed similar findings in China's Zhauyuan city goldmine. The river sediments were regarded as contaminated with Cd, Pb, Zn, and Ni, which already exceed the acceptable levels considering the background values in an earlier section (Table 2). Moreover, the Igeo values for the majority of the PTEs indicated that the studied locations were moderately to severely contaminate. Previous studies from Souza et al., (2017) and (Huang et al., 2020) found a significant content of PTEs in sediments and tailing dams in gold mining and processing regions which was consistent with our findings. According to Müller (1981), the sediments of the Wainivesi River system was unpolluted to moderately polluted (0 <Igeo< 1) for all PTEs.
The analyzed contamination factor (CF) values for the PTEs were depicted in Fig. 3. The average CF values for all metals were organized in the following order: Cd (4.628: significant contamination) >Zn (4.065: significant contamination) > Ni (3.149: significant contamination) > Cu (2.734: moderate contamination) > Pb (2.201: moderate contamination) > Cr (1.558: moderate contamination) > Co (1.525: moderate contamination) > Fe (1.287: moderate contamination) > Mn (1.209: moderate contamination) (Fig. 3c). In most sites, the CF values for Cd and Zn were > 2.5, indicating a high degree of contamination, while the CF values for other PTEs were 1 ≤ CF < 3, indicating a moderate level of contamination at all sites. The CF values for the examined PTEs at all sites showed a moderate to a high level of contamination, which could be attributed to the Wainivesi River system in Fiji absorbing a substantial volume of municipal, residential, and gold mine effluent. A significant level of Cd was observed a few sites such as sites 1 and 3 (> 10.0), indicating a high level of contamination which could be attributed to the station receiving a large amount of municipal, agricultural, household, and factory effluent (Fu et al. 2009). Moreover, Cd could be attributed to the study area from the existence of a-large-scale gold mine and wastewater drainage in the vicinity. Islam et al. (2015a, b) conducted a similar investigation in a developing country's urban river and reported that the CF value of Pb in sediment samples was 4.3 and 3.7 during the winter and monsoon seasons, respectively. Domestic wastewater drainage, industrial effluents such as mine effluents, and atmospheric deposition are the main sources of the higher level of Pb in the sediment. However, our CF records were higher than that of Hossain et al., (2021) who reported that Halda river sediment remained in uncontaminated condition except for Pb.
Figure 4a summarizes the derived pollution load index (PLI) values of PTEs in sediments. The PLI value is greater than one, then the investigated region can be considered to be contaminated (Tomlinson et al. 1980) (Table S2). The PLI values for all sampling sites in the study site varied from 1.00 to 2.46, indicating that the sediment in the study river had a high level of pollution (PLI > 1). PLI values estimated from the six PTEs ranged from 0.8 to 3.9, with a mean of 1.95. PLI values for all sampling locations were calculated and displayed in Figure 4a to comprehend the actual distributions of the integrated PTEs loads to assess the sequential contamination status. The PLI can provide some insights into the sediment quality to the general public. It also provides crucial information to policy-makers on the state of pollution in the study region (Suresh et al., 2012).
The findings of the ecological risk index (RI) are displayed in Table S7. The value of RI in sediments according to descending order of Cd > Ni > Cu > Pb >Zn> Cr > Co > Mn and the RI for sole PTE was observed in the low to very high-risk category. Cadmium (18.35-627.22) was noticed as the highest and noteworthy PTE in all sites and the risk factors of it was low to very high risk category for the aquatic environment, where the remaining PTEs were observed a considerable risk for the aquatic environment. After integrating the RI of each PTE (Fig. 4b) with its ranking category, it is observed that the analyzed PTE revealed considerable to very high risk group. In general, the major sources of Cd and Ni in surface sediment are the intense uses of phosphate fertilizers to the agro-farming site beside the river basin and waste disposal material from the rural area (ATSDR 2008). The RI values were 40.9 to 733.8, which show moderate to very high ecological risk in the sampling sites, (Fig. 4b).
Similar to the PLI and RI, Cd and mCd exhibited similar spatial patterns (Figs. 4c and d) in the studied sites. The higher amount of Cd was noticed at sites 1 and 2 (> 40.00) indicated a very extreme degree of contamination which might be due to receiving the enormous amount of rural waste, agro-farming practices, and mine-derived wastewater at these sites (Fu et al. 2009) (Table S6).
Cd values ranged from 8.0 (7.1) to 62.4 (2.1) with a mean value of 22.36, which suggested that the Wainivesi river basin possess considerable to high level of contamiantion in the northwestern site (Fig. 4c). In contrast, values mCd varied from 0.9 (7.1) to 6.9 (2.1) with a mean value of 2.48 (n=24), which impliyed that the tested river system were slightly to moderate heavily contaminated in mostly norwestern part near the gold mine where Cd, Zn and Ni were the key contributors (4d).
3.4 Quantifying source apportionment of water and sediment
In this research, to quantify plausible sources of PTEs in the surface water and sediment from the Wainivesi River, Fiji, hierarchical cluster heat map (HCHM) and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed in Fig. 5. To confirm the appropriateness of the dataset for PCA, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s sphericity (BS) tests were validated before performing PCA. The KMO test score was 0.69 and 0.73 for water and sediment samples and the confidence level of BS test at p< 0.05, indicating the both dataset in this study was appropriate for PCA. For water sample dataset, three PCAs which elucidated 89.75% of the total variance were attained via PCA (Table S8 and Fig. 5a). The first component (PC1) responsible for 54.22% of the variance and had weak positive loading on Zn (0.41), and Mn (0.43) while weak negative loading on Cr (-0.41) and Co (-0.40). Zn showed noteworthy spatial variation, while Mn did not show noteworthy spatial changes and the highest contents of Zn was found at W-1 due to the lithogenic origin and wastewater release from mine effluent from gold mining activities. Results showed that Co and Cr may be derived from geogenic contents (Guan et al., 2018). The runoff from the hilly region may be a plausible transport way of these contaminants into river water. Zn and Mn concentrations are mostly driven by geogenic sources. Hence, PC1 was contributed to natural sources.
The second component (PC2) explained for 25.52% of the variance and had moderate positive loadings on Fe (0.64) and Cd (0.55) (Table S8). In majority of water samples, contents of Fe and Cd were five times and four times greater than the WHO standard limit values. Fe is among the most abundant elements in Earth’s crust, thus may be derived from weathering of the rock-water interaction (Bodrud-Doza et al., 2016). The mean concentrations of Fe, and Cd exhibited significant variations among the sampling sites, implying that there can be both mixed sources (geogenic and anthropogenic) for these PTEs along the river to change their spatial patterns. Indeed, the highest concentrations of Fe were recorded at site W4 due to both geogenic and anthropogenic sources such as mine wastes discharge and farming activities. The recorded Cd at site W1 was due to atmospheric deposition and electroplating effects (Islam et al., 2015). Long-term use of Cd as a component in fungicides and algaecides (Bodrud-Doza et al. 2016) has also been observed to be beneficial to agro-farming field. Mining industry, for example, generate and discharge wastages containing high levels of Cd in the effluent (Islam et al. 2015). Fe and Cd are controlled by both geogenic sources and anthropogenic inputs. Hence, the PC2 was attributable to diverse sources.
The third component (PC3) accounted for 9.99% of the variance had strong positive loadings on Ni (0.73) and weak negative loadings on Pb (-.36) and Cu (-0.38) (Table S8). Ni, and Cu derived from anthropogenic inputs, especially, waste, and agro-farming fields (Cheng et al., 2020; Islam et al., 2020a). Ni and Pb concentrations were two times and nineteen times higher than the guideline values for threatening aquatic organisms and for drinking water purpose (Table 3). Motor exhaust contributes a significant amount of Pb to the water body, in addition to oil leakage from boats and steamers (Namngam et al., 2021). These findings indicated that these PTEs are mainly controlled by anthropogenic processes. Hence, PC3 was attributable to anthropogenic sources. Overall, the PCA showed two main sources of PTEs contamination in the aquatic environment were human-induced and geogenic contents.
For sediment sample dataset, three PCAs which explained 93.96% of the total variance were attained via PCA (Table S8 and Fig. 5b). The first component (PC1) responsible for 55.20% of the variance and had weak positive loading on Mn (0.40), Cu (0.40), Zn (0.39), Cd (0.38) and Pb (0.42). In most of sampling sites, Zn, Pn and Cd were about fifteen times, five times and thirty-four times higher than their guideline values. Fertilizers, electroplating, Cd containing alloys, foils, oils, and other applications use Cd that deposited into riverbed sediment (Namngam et al., 2021). Pb can come into the river sediments from urban waste leach out comprising Ni-Cd batteries from automobile factories, batteries, and smelting electroplants (Fang et al. 2019). Earlier cited work revealed that Pb and Zn in the riverine basin were likely attributed to release from industrial sewages and wastes (Islam et al., 2020a; Namngam et al., 2021). Currently, this is occurring daily at the study site near the gold mine as a dumpling sites for their wastewater materials. This finding is in line with sediment pollution in other regions of the world (Emenike et al., 2020). On the other hand, the sources of Mn and Cu could be related with lithogenic inputs including soil erosion than enhances during the wet period due to the surficial run-off (Islam et al., 2020b). Mn may be discharged into the water via biogeochemical process of pyroclastic sediment (Ahmed et al., 2019). Hence, PC1 was contributed to mixed sources.
The second component (PC2) explained for 31.25% of the variance and had moderate loadings on Co (0.51), Cr (0.48) and Ni (0.50) (Table S8). In sediment samples, their mean contents were lower than the standard values for protecting aquatic lives (Table 3). This finding suggested that these PTEs are mainly controlled by geogenic processes viz. municipal and mine waste releases (Emenike et al., 2020; Hence, this component was contributed to geogenic sources.
The third component (PC3) accounted for 7.51% of the variance had strong negative loading on Fe (-0.75) and weak positive loadings on Co (0.43) and Pb (0.39) (Table S8). Fe is related to a likely blend of organic matter overlapped on geogenic content (Emenike et al., 2020). Co may be originated from geogenic sources (Guan et al., 2018). In this study, Pb showed significant spatial variation and Co did not show noteworthy spatial changes. The mean content of Pb was about five times greater than guideline value. This was due to substantial anthropogenic inputs. Furthermore, the 90th percentile contents of Cu and Pb were below the standard limit values for safeguard of freshwater aquatic system and for consumption purpose (Table S8). Pb has a long history of use as an anti-corrosive element in steels and gold industry, as well as an anti-knocking ingredient in gasoline and diesel fuels (Emenike et al. 2020). These outcomes showed that Fe, and Co concentrations are influenced by geogenic source while Pb is driven by substantial anthropogenic sources. Thus, this last component was contributed to mixed sources. Overall, the PCA results suggested two major sources of PTEs contamination in the sediment.
The two-way hierarchical cluster heat map (HCHM) and dendrogram were generated in this research using the Ward linkage technique with Euclidean distance, and the outcomes are displayed in Fig. 6. The HCHM is often applied to verify the PCA findings. In this research, for water samples, the HCHM grouped the 9 PTEs into three clusters (Fig. 6a) in the vertical portion. The first (Pb, Fe, Cr and Ni) containing Sites 1, and 2 and second clusters (Co, Mn, Cd and Cu) consisting of sites 3, 5, 6 and 7 could be ascribed to the mixed sources of both geogenic and human-induced sources. The third (Zn) cluster represented sites 4 and 8 indicate anthropogenic sources. Thus, the HCA results were in good agreement with the PCA outcomes.
For sediment samples, in the vertical portion, the dendrogram presented two clusters: cluster 1 was limited to Fe and Cu which consisted of sites 1, and 2 indicating geogenic source, while cluster two represent Cr, Zn, Cd, Co, Pb, Ni and Mn contained the remaining sites, indicating intense anthropogenic sources (Fig. 6b). Such findings verified a comparable source of the selected PTEs in PCA results.