1 Mattys, S. L., Davis, M. H., Bradlow, A. R. & Scott, S. K. Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review. Lang. Cogn. Process.27, 953-978 (2012).
2 Benard, M. R. & Başkent, D. Perceptual learning of interrupted speech. PLoS One8, e58149, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058149 (2013).
3 Borrie, S. A., McAuliffe, M. J. & Liss, J. M. Perceptual learning of dysarthric speech: a review of experimental studies. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.55, 290-305, doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0349) (2012).
4 Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K. & McGettigan, C. Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.134, 222-241, doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.222 (2005).
5 Dupoux, E. & Green, K. Perceptual adjustment to highly compressed speech: effects of talker and rate changes. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.23, 914-927, doi:10.1037//0096-1523.23.3.914 (1997).
6 Green, T., Rosen, S., Faulkner, A. & Paterson, R. Adaptation to spectrally-rotated speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.134, 1369-1377, doi:10.1121/1.4812759 (2013).
7 Greenspan, S. L., Nusbaum, H. C. & Pisoni, D. B. Perceptual learning of synthetic speech produced by rule. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.14, 421-433, doi:10.1037//0278-7393.14.3.421 (1988).
8 Stacey, P. C. & Summerfield, A. Q. Comparison of word-, sentence-, and phoneme-based training strategies in improving the perception of spectrally distorted speech. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.51, 526-538, doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/038) (2008).
9 Orr, D. B. & Friedman, H. L. Effect of massed practice on the comprehension of time-compressed speech. J. Educ. Psychol.59, 6 (1968).
10 Goldstone, R. L. Perceptual learning. Annu. Rev. Psychol.49, 585-612, doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.585 (1998).
11 Green, C. S., Banai, K., Lu, Z.-L. & Bavelier, D. Perceptual learning in Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience (ed J.T. Wixted) 1-47 (2018).
12 Hawkey, D. J., Amitay, S. & Moore, D. R. Early and rapid perceptual learning. Nat. Neurosci.7, 1055-1056, doi:10.1038/nn1315 (2004).
13 Ortiz, J. A. & Wright, B. A. Contributions of procedure and stimulus learning to early, rapid perceptual improvements. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.35, 188-194, doi:10.1037/a0013161 (2009).
14 Banai, K. & Lavie, L. Rapid perceptual learning and individual differences in speech perception: The good, the bad, and the sad. Auditory Perception & Cognition3, 201-211, doi:10.1080/25742442.2021.1909400 (2021).
15 Rotman, T., Lavie, L. & Banai, K. Rapid perceptual learning: A potential source of individual differences in speech perception under adverse conditions? Trends Hear24, 2331216520930541, doi:10.1177/2331216520930541 (2020).
16 Tarabeih - Ghanayim, M., Lavner, Y. & Banai, K. Tasks, talkers, and the perceptual learning of time-compressed speech. Auditory Perception & Cognition3, 33-54, doi:10.1080/25742442.2020.1846011 (2020).
17 Ahissar, M., Nahum, M., Nelken, I. & Hochstein, S. Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.364, 285-299, doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0253 (2009).
18 Kleinschmidt, D. F. & Jaeger, T. F. Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel. Psychol. Rev.122, 148-203, doi:10.1037/a0038695 (2015).
19 Rönnberg, J. et al. The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Front. Syst. Neurosci.7, 31, doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031 (2013).
20 Barcroft, J., Spehar, B., Tye-Murray, N. & Sommers, M. Task- and talker-specific gains in auditory training. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.59, 862-870, doi:10.1044/2016_jslhr-h-15-0170 (2016).
21 Green, T., Faulkner, A. & Rosen, S. Computer-based connected-text training of speech-in-noise perception for cochlear implant users. Trends Hear23, 2331216519843878, doi:10.1177/2331216519843878 (2019).
22 Karawani, H., Bitan, T., Attias, J. & Banai, K. Auditory perceptual learning in adults with and without age-related hearing loss. Front. Psychol.6, 2066, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02066 (2016).
23 Song, J. H., Skoe, E., Banai, K. & Kraus, N. Training to improve hearing speech in noise: biological mechanisms. Cereb. Cortex22, 1180-1190, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr196 (2012).
24 Burk, M. H. & Humes, L. E. Effects of long-term training on aided speech-recognition performance in noise in older adults. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.51, 759-771, doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/054) (2008).
25 Henshaw, H. & Ferguson, M. A. Efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training for people with hearing loss: a systematic review of the evidence. PLoS One8, e62836, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062836 (2013).
26 Saunders, G. H. et al. A randomized control trial: Supplementing hearing aid use with Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) auditory training. Ear Hear.37, 381-396, doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000283 (2016).
27 Eisner, F. & McQueen, J. M. Perceptual learning in speech: stability over time. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.119, 1950-1953, doi:10.1121/1.2178721 (2006).
28 Samuel, A. G. & Kraljic, T. Perceptual learning for speech. Atten. Percept. Psychophys.71, 1207-1218, doi:10.3758/APP.71.6.1207 (2009).
29 Bradlow, A. R. & Bent, T. Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition106, 707-729, doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.005 (2008).
30 Casserly, E. D. & Pisoni, D. B. Auditory learning using a portable real-time vocoder: Preliminary findings. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.58, 1001-1016, doi:10.1044/2015_jslhr-h-13-0216 (2015).
31 Hervais-Adelman, A. G., Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Taylor, K. J. & Carlyon, R. P. Generalization of perceptual learning of vocoded speech. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.37, 283-295, doi:10.1037/a0020772 (2011).
32 Huyck, J. J., Smith, R. H., Hawkins, S. & Johnsrude, I. S. Generalization of Perceptual Learning of Degraded Speech Across Talkers. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.60, 3334-3341, doi:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-16-0300 (2017).
33 Manheim, M., Lavie, L. & Banai, K. Age, hearing, and the perceptual learning of rapid speech. Trends Hear22, 2331216518778651, doi:10.1177/2331216518778651 (2018).
34 Dale, G., Cochrane, A. & Green, C. S. Individual difference predictors of learning and generalization in perceptual learning. Atten. Percept. Psychophys.83, 2241-2255, doi:10.3758/s13414-021-02268-3 (2021).
35 Roark, C. L., Paulon, G., Sarkar, A. & Chandrasekaran, B. Comparing perceptual category learning across modalities in the same individuals. Psychon. Bull. Rev.28, 898-909, doi:10.3758/s13423-021-01878-0 (2021).
36 Yang, J. et al. General learning ability in perceptual learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.117, 19092-19100, doi:10.1073/pnas.2002903117 (2020).
37 Banai, K. & Lavner, Y. The effects of training length on the perceptual learning of time-compressed speech and its generalization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.136, 1908-1917, doi:10.1121/1.4895684 (2014).
38 Banai, K. & Lavner, Y. Effects of stimulus repetition and training schedule on the perceptual learning of time-compressed speech and its transfer. Atten. Percept. Psychophys.81, 2944-2955, doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01714-7 (2019).
39 Wright, B. A., LeBlanc, E. K., Little, D. F., Conderman, J. S. & Glavin, C. C. Semi-supervised learning of a nonnative phonetic contrast: How much feedback is enough? Atten. Percept. Psychophys.81, 927-934, doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01741-4 (2019).
40 Altmann, G. & Young, D. Factors affecting adaptation to time-compressed speech, in EUROSPEECH'93, 333-336, (1993).
41 Fiorentini, A. & Berardi, N. Perceptual learning specific for orientation and spatial frequency. Nature287, 43-44, doi:10.1038/287043a0 (1980).
42 Hussain, Z., McGraw, P. V., Sekuler, A. B. & Bennett, P. J. The rapid emergence of stimulus specific perceptual learning. Front. Psychol.3, 226, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00226 (2012).
43 Banai, K. & Lavner, Y. Perceptual learning of time-compressed speech: more than rapid adaptation. PLoS One7, e47099, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047099 (2012).
44 Lehet, M. I., Fenn, K. M. & Nusbaum, H. C. Shaping perceptual learning of synthetic speech through feedback. Psychon. Bull. Rev.27, 1043-1051, doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01743-6 (2020).
45 Loebach, J. L., Pisoni, D. B. & Svirsky, M. A. Effects of semantic context and feedback on perceptual learning of speech processed through an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.36, 224-234, doi:10.1037/a0017609 (2010).
46 Adank, P. & Janse, E. Perceptual learning of time-compressed and natural fast speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.126, 2649-2659, doi:10.1121/1.3216914 (2009).
47 Banai, K. & Lavie, L. Perceptual learning and speech perception: A new hypothesis, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, Vol.7: Auditory Learning in Biological and Artificial Systems Vol. 7 (eds A. Kressner et al.), 53-60 (The Danavox Jubilee Foundation, 2020).
48 Prior, A. & Bentin, S. Differential integration efforts of mandatory and optional sentence constituents. Psychophysiology43, 440-449, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00426.x (2006).
49 Verhelst, W. & Roelands, M. in 1993 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Vol. 2 554-557 (IEEE, 1993).
50 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (Vienna, Austria, 2019).
51 Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67, 1-48 (2015).
52 Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S. & Pisoni, D. B. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.94, 1242-1255, doi:10.1121/1.408177 (1993).
53 Stacey, P. C. & Summerfield, A. Q. Effectiveness of computer-based auditory training in improving the perception of noise-vocoded speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.121, 2923-2935, doi:10.1121/1.2713668 (2007).
54 Loebach, J. L., Bent, T. & Pisoni, D. B. Multiple routes to the perceptual learning of speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.124, 552-561, doi:10.1121/1.2931948 (2008).
55 Wechsler, D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III) Administration and Scoring Manual. 4 edn, (The Psychological Corporation, 2008).
56 Luthra, S., Mechtenberg, H. & Myers, E. B. Perceptual learning of multiple talkers requires additional exposure. Atten. Percept. Psychophys.83, 2217-2228, doi:10.3758/s13414-021-02261-w (2021).
57 Wade, T., Jongman, A. & Sereno, J. Effects of acoustic variability in the perceptual learning of non-native-accented speech sounds. Phonetica64, 122-144, doi:10.1159/000107913 (2007).
58 Baese-Berk, M. M., Bradlow, A. R. & Wright, B. A. Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.133, EL174-180, doi:10.1121/1.4789864 (2013).
59 Molloy, K., Moore, D. R., Sohoglu, E. & Amitay, S. Less is more: latent learning is maximized by shorter training sessions in auditory perceptual learning. PLoS One7, e36929, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036929 (2012).
60 Tye-Murray, N., Spehar, B., Barcroft, J. & Sommers, M. Auditory training for adults who have hearing loss: a comparison of spaced versus massed practice schedules. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.60, 2337-2345, doi:10.1044/2017_jslhr-h-16-0154 (2017).
61 Tzeng, C. Y., Nygaard, L. C. & Theodore, R. M. A second chance for a first impression: Sensitivity to cumulative input statistics for lexically guided perceptual learning. Psychon. Bull. Rev.28, 1003-1014, doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01840-6 (2021).
62 Wright, B. A., Wilson, R. M. & Sabin, A. T. Generalization lags behind learning on an auditory perceptual task. J. Neurosci.30, 11635-11639, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1441-10.2010 (2010).
63 Nygaard, L. C. & Pisoni, D. B. Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Percept. Psychophys.60, 355-376, doi:10.3758/bf03206860 (1998).
64 Karawani, H., Lavie, L. & Banai, K. Short-term auditory learning in older and younger adults, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, Vol. 6: Adaptive Processes in Hearing Vol. 6 (eds S. Santurette et al.) 1-8 (The Danavox Jubilee Foundation, Nyborg, Denmark, 2017).
65 Borrie, S. A. & Lansford, K. L. A perceptual learning approach for dysarthria remediation: An updated review. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.64, 3060-3073, doi:10.1044/2021_jslhr-21-00012 (2021).
66 Borrie, S. A., Lansford, K. L. & Barrett, T. S. Generalized adaptation to dysarthric speech. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.60, 3110-3117, doi:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-17-0127 (2017).
67 Borrie, S. A., Lansford, K. L. & Barrett, T. S. A clinical advantage: Experience informs recognition and adaptation to a novel talker with dysarthria. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res.64, 1503-1514, doi:10.1044/2021_jslhr-20-00663 (2021).
68 Kennedy-Higgins, D., Devlin, J. T. & Adank, P. Cognitive mechanisms underpinning successful perception of different speech distortions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.147, 2728, doi:10.1121/10.0001160 (2020).
69 McLaughlin, D. J., Baese-Berk, M. M., Bent, T., Borrie, S. A. & Van Engen, K. J. Coping with adversity: Individual differences in the perception of noisy and accented speech. Atten. Percept. Psychophys.80, 1559-1570, doi:10.3758/s13414-018-1537-4 (2018).