B.M = Bohr Magneton.
Based on the previously described chemical and spectral analyses, it may be possible to suggest the structural formula of chelate complexes as illustrated in Figure 9.
3.9. X-ray diffraction study (XRD)
X-ray diffraction provides direct information about the molecular or atomic arrangement in solid-state materials (El-Boraey and El-Domiaty 2021; Begum, Hussain, and Rahman 2012). The X-ray diffractograms were determined for ligand (6-MBTAMB), [Ag(L)H2O].H2O, [Pt(L)Cl3].H2O and [Au(L)Cl]Cl.H2O, respectively. The intensity of diffracted CuKα radiation was calculated in 2Ѳ between (0° to 80°), λ = 1.54060 Å and the generator settings (30 mA/40 kV). The Xpert High Score computer program measures parameters of diffraction spectra using peaks identified by diffraction peaks (Cardona et al. 2017). The results showed their semi crystalline nature (Figure 10).
Using Bragg's equation (Al-Hussainawy and Kyhoiesh 2019), major refluxes were calculated and corresponding d-spacing values were measured; \(\text{n}{\lambda }= 2\text{d}\text{s}\text{i}\text{n}\text{Ѳ}\), where (d) is the spacing between the crystalline levels, (n) is an integer (1,2,3 ..), (λ) is the wavelength of X-ray CuKα = 1.540598 A°, (Ѳ) is the diffraction angle. The patterns of the ligand (6-MBTAMB), Ag(I), Pt(IV) and Au(III) complexes show many peaks with maximum intensities at 2Ѳ = 15.6408, 16.1045, 15.6597 and 15.5974 which correspond to d-spacing (5.66581, 5.04920, 5.65901 and 5.68148 A°), respectively.
The Debye-Scherrer equation (Mustapha et al. 2019) was used to determine the average crystallite size of the particles and their size distributions; \(\text{D}=\text{k}{\lambda }/{\beta }\text{C}\text{o}\text{s}{\theta }\), where (D) is the average diameter of the crystallite, (k) is the shape factor (0.891), (λ) is the X-ray wavelength (0.15405 nm), (Ѳ) is the diffraction angle, and (β) is line broadening at half the maximum intensity (FWHM) in radian of a reported peak. Experimental average sizes were 27.51 nm for 6-MBTAMB, 36.73 nm for Ag(I), 38.52 nm for Pt(IV), and 42.96 nm for Au(III). Compounds are shown to have nanostructure properties based on their crystallite size (Serafińczuk et al. 2020). The crystallographic parameters for (6-MBTAMB) and chelate complexes are shown in Table 6.
Table 6
Crystallographic data and structure refinement details for (6-MBTAMB) and chelate complexes.
Characteristic | 6-MBTAMB | Ag(I)-Complex | Pt(IV)-Complex | Au(III)-Complex |
Chemical Formula: | C17H15N3O3S | C17H18N3O5SAg | C17H16N3O4SCl3Pt | C17H16N3O4SCl2Au |
Formula weight: | 341.38 | 484.27 | 659.83 | 626.26 |
Crystal system: | Cubic | Tetragonal | Monoclinic | Monoclinic |
Space group: | Fd3m | P4/nmm | P21/c | P12/m1 |
Space group number: | 227 | 129 | 14 | 10 |
a (A°): | 23.2500 | 4.5050 | 8.4050 | 6.6380 |
b (A°): | 23.2500 | 4.5050 | 10.1830 | 6.8260 |
c (A°): | 23.2500 | 10.2300 | 13.7310 | 16.3690 |
Alpha (°): | 90.0000 | 90.0000 | 90.0000 | 90.0000 |
Beta (°): | 90.0000 | 90.0000 | 97.2400 | 92.1500 |
Gamma(°): | 90.0000 | 90.0000 | 90.0000 | 90.0000 |
Calculated density(g/cm^3): | - | 9.53 | 1.81 | 1.04 |
Measured density (g/cm^3): | - | - | - | - |
Volume of cell (10^6pm^3): | 12568.08 | 207.62 | 1165.84 | 741.17 |
Z: | 8.00 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 2.00 |
RIR: | - | - | - | - |
Start Position [°2Th.] | 9.9250 | 3.0000 | 9.9250 | 9.9250 |
End Position [°2Th.] | 80.0750 | 80.0750 | 80.0750 | 80.0750 |
Step Size [°2Th.] | 0.0500 | 0.0600 | 0.0500 | 0.0500 |
Scan Step Time [s] | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
Scan Type | Continuous | Continuous | Continuous | Continuous |
Offset [°2Th.] | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
Divergence Slit Type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed |
Divergence Slit Size [°] | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
Specimen Length [mm] | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
Receiving Slit Size [mm] | 0.1000 | 0.1000 | 0.1000 | 0.1000 |
Measurement Temperature [°C] | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 |
Anode Material | Cu | Cu | Cu | Cu |
K-Alpha1[A°] | 1.54060 | 1.54060 | 1.54060 | 1.54060 |
K-Alpha2 [A°] | 1.54443 | 1.54443 | 1.54443 | 1.54443 |
K-Beta [A°] | 1.39225 | 1.39225 | 1.39225 | 1.39225 |
K-A2 / K-A1 Ratio | 0.50000 | 0.50000 | 0.50000 | 0.50000 |
Generator Settings | 30 mA, 40 kV | 30 mA, 40 kV | 30 mA, 40 kV | 30 mA, 40 kV |
Diffractometer Type | Undefined | Undefined | Undefined | Undefined |
Diffractometer Number | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Goniometer Radius [mm] | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 | 240.00 |
Dist. Focus-Diverg. Slit [mm] | 91.00 | 91.00 | 91.00 | 91.00 |
Incident Beam Monochromator | No | No | No | No |
Spinning | No | No | No | No |
Reference code: | 00-043-0316 | 00-037-1301 | 00-031-1996 | 00-029-1773 |
3.10. Thermogravimetry Analysis
The thermal stabilities of ligand and its metal complexes were investigated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA-DTA), under N2 atmosphere at a heating rate of 10°C min−1 in the temperature range RT to 900°C using Pt crucible (Figure 11). The nature of the proposed chemical change with temperature and the percent of metal oxide obtained (Bowman and Rogers 1966; Turan et al. 2021; Ammar et al. 2018; Al-Maydama et al. 2006; Sabir, Malik b, and Iftikhar 1994) are given in Table 7.
The TGA curve of the ligand (6-MBTAMB) shows three steps of weight loss within the temperature range of 31.70-837.95°C. The first step at 31.70-299.92ºC (Cal./Found% 61.58/61.79) associated with DTA peaks at 69.77, 99.97°C that is assigned to the release of (C10H14N2O3). The second step at 299.92-470.96 ºC (Cal./Found% 14.95/15.51) corresponds to the loss of (C3HN). The third step at 470.96-837.95 ºC (Cal./Found% 7.97/7.71) due to loss of (C2S0.1), residual carbon atoms.
The thermogram of the Ag(I)-Complex gives a decomposition pattern of two steps within the temperature range of 38.07-837.59°C. The first decomposition within the temperature range of 38.07-200.53°C (Cal./Found% 15.29/15.47) corresponds to the loss of (C3H6O2). The second decomposition within the temperature range of 200.53-837.59 ºC (Cal./Found% 35.55/35.65) corresponds to the loss of (C10H8N2O). The DTA curve begins at 127.25°C (endothermic) and ends at 197.82, 224.75, and 313.10°C, which are exothermic peaks.
The thermal degradation of the Pt(IV)-Complex shows two decomposition steps at the temperature range of 25.85–838.24°C. The first step occurs within the temperature range 25.85-296.49°C (Cal./Found% 53.13/53.06) corresponds to the loss of (C13H14N3O2Cl3). The second step corresponds to the removal of the (C4H2SPt0.29) molecule with mass loss of (Cal./Found% 21.01/21.16). These steps are accompanied by endothermic peaks at 128.95, 230.16°C, respectively.
On the other hand, the TGA curve of the Au(III)-Complex shows two steps of decomposition during thermal degradation within the temperature range of 28.04–823.17°C. The first decomposition step occurs in the range 28.04-299.90°C (Cal./Found% 70.98/70.92) and corresponds to the loss of (C17H16N3O2SCl2Au0.24) molecule. The final decomposition step occurs in the temperature range 299.50-823.17 ºC (Cal./Found% 28.98/29.06) and corresponds to the loss of (Au0.76O2). The DTA curve shows two endothermic peaks were observed first 128.95°C, second 230.16°C.
However, the TGA curves beyond 900°C have been observed in all the complexes indicating further weight loss, implying that a metal oxide may be the final product.
Table 7
Thermal analysis data of the (6-MBTAMB) and metal complexes.
Compound | Decomposition | TG Range (°C) | Mass loss% | Total mass Loss % | DTA(°C) | Evolved moieties | Metallic Residue |
Ti | Tf | Tmax | Nature of peaks |
Found (Calculated) |
6-MBTAMB C17H15N3O3S 341.38 | 1st Step 2nd Step 3rd Step Residue | 31.70-299.92 299.92-470.96 470.96-837.95 >837.95 | 61.79(61.58) 15.51(14.95) 7.71(7.97) 16.01(15.48) | 83.99 | 81.96 110.21 | 91.35 116.47 | 69.77 99.97 | Endothermic (+) Endothermic (+) | Loss of [C10H14N2O3] Loss of [C3HN] Loss of [C2S0.1] Loss of a part of the ligand | |
Ag(I)-Complex [Ag(L)(H2O)].H2O C17H18AgN3O5S 484.27 | 1st Step 2nd Step Residue | 38.07-200.53 200.53-837.59 >837.59 | 15.47(15.29) 35.65(35.55) 49.42(49.14) | 50.58 | 120.78 165.66 208.46 289.08 | 135.04 208.47 274.35 341.39 | 127.25 197.82 224.75 313.10 | Endothermic (+) Exothermic (-) Exothermic (-) Exothermic (-) | Loss of [C3H6O2] Loss of [C10H8N2O] Loss of a part of the ligand | 1/2Ag2O |
Pt(IV)-Complex [Pt(L)Cl3].H2O C17H16PtN3O4SCl3 659.83 | 1st Step 2nd Step Residue | 25.85-296.49 296.49-838.24 >838.24 | 53.06(53.13) 21.16(21.01) 25.85(25.84) | 74.15 | 118.36 167.24 | 160.71 286.76 | 128.95 230.16 | Endothermic (+) Endothermic (+) | Loss of [C13H14N3O2Cl3] Loss of [C4H2SPt0.29] Loss of a part of the ligand | PtO2 |
Au(III)-Complex [Au(L)Cl]Cl.H2O C17H16AuN3O4SCl2 626.26 | 1st Step 2nd Step Residue | 28.04-299.80 299.80-823.17 >823.17 | 70.92(70.98) 29.06(28.98) 0.02(0.03) | 99.98 | 109.23 214.26 | 148.33 272.22 | 120.71 235.17 | Endothermic (+) Endothermic (+) | Loss of [C17H16N3O2SCl2Au0.24] Loss of [Au0.759O2] Loss of a part of the ligand | 1/2Au2O3 |
Ti = Initial temperature, Tf = Final temperature. |
3.11. FE-SEM Analysis
Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) of the ligand (6-MBTAMB) and metal complexes studies the surface morphology and shape of the particles and aggregation, in addition to the distribution of these particles. The field emission scanning electron microscope technique was employed at a cross-sectional distance of (200 nm) and a magnification force of (Mag = 20.00 KX). FE-SEM images of the 6-MBTAMB and its complexes can be seen in Figure 12. Using the Image J software, particle sizes were calculated (Tyuftin et al. 2021). The (FESEM) image of the ligand (6-MBTAMB) analysis is shown as spherical crystals with an average particle size of 90.54 nm and a ratio of less than totality. Furthermore, FE-SEM of the Ag(I)-Complex revealed the particles to be spherical with an average size of 87.67 nm. Pt(IV)-Complex and Au(III)-Complex micrographs were faceted with granular and spherical particles of different sizes of 80.08 and 40.57 nm, respectively. The FE-SEM micrographs of 6-MBTAMB and its chelates complexes vary considerably because metal ions coordinate to donor sites (Baraka, Hall, and Heslop 2007). Show that the grains of the prepared compounds are smaller than (100) nm, It is within the nanoscale range. Where the surface area increases effectively and thus enters the (Quantitative effect) to create new energy levels that move the electron more free. Characteristics of the ligand and its complexes enabled us to study in medicine and the susceptibility of these compounds to the inhibition of many types of cancers (Al-adilee and Hessoon 2019). Various conditions have been used to synthesize nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes e.g. irregular multilateral shapes (1.5-2 μm), aggregate particles (600-700 nm), isolated particle (100-150 nm), porous structure (40 nm), and nanoparticles (28-32 nm) (Amschler et al. 2014).
3.12. Antimicrobial activity of azo dye ligand (6-MBTAMB) and all complexes
The antimicrobial activity of ligands (6-MBTAMB) and their metal complexes Ag(I), Pt(IV) and Au(III) have been studied by diffusion method against microorganisms representing Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus), Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli) and antifungal (Aspergillus niger) at the concentration 0.2 mg/ml presented in Table 8 and Figure 13. Antibiotics (Novobiocin) and (Cycloheximide) have traditionally been used. A study has shown that ligand and some transition metal complexes exert good antimicrobial activity against bacteria and fungi tested. Thus, benzothiazole moiety compounds may have an advantage since they target more severe clinical conditions than bacteriostatic agents (Egorova et al. 2021). The antibacterial activity from the result obtained clearly that the Ag(I)-Complex has exhibited good activity against both bacteria (Gram-negative & Gram-positive) as compared to ligand (6-MBTAMB) and standard drug (Novobiocin). The antifungal activity result revealed that the ligand (6-MBTAMB) show highly active as compared to metal complexes and standard antifungal drugs (Cycloheximide). In an inhibition zone test with DMSO, there were no inhibition zones. A comparative study of values indicated that the metal complexes exhibited promising antimicrobial activity as compared to free ligand, the enhanced activity of the complexes can be rationalized based on Tweedy’s chelation theory (Mishra et al. 2021). The chelation theory suggests that this makes sense. Chelation reduces the polarity of the metal ion, primarily due to its partial sharing of its positive charge with the donor groups and delocalization of π-electron on the whole chelate ring. A chelate can reduce not only the polarity of the metal ion, but it can also increase the lipophilic character of the chelate, facilitating the interaction between the metal ion and the lipid. Cellular processes may be interfered with due to the breakdown of the permeability barrier. Geometry and charge distribution around the molecule must match those around the pores of the bacterial cell wall to prevent penetration through the wall by the toxic agent and the toxic reaction within the pores. Therefore, carboxylate, methyl, and methoxy substituents on the benzothiazole moiety and the phenyl ring impart good antibacterial activity. However, the activity has always been greater for the metal complexes than the free ligands (Pitchumani Violet Mary, Shankar, and Vijayakumar 2019; Ekennia et al. 2017; Pramanik et al. 2015; Joshi and Kumar 2014).
Table 8
Antimicrobial activity data of ligand (6-MBTAMB) and its complexes (inhibition zone mm).
Compound | Bacteria | Fungi |
Gram-Positive | Gram-Negative |
Staphylococcus aureus | Escherichia coli | Aspergillus Niger |
6-MBTAMB | +++ | + | +++ |
Ag(I)-Complex | +++ | +++ | +++ |
Pt(IV)-Complex | +++ | ++ | + |
Au(III)-Complex | +++ | ++ | - |
Novobiocin | + | - | ــــــــ |
Cycloheximide | ــــــــ | ــــــــ | - |
DMSO | - | - | - |
Highly active = + + + (inhibition zone > 20 mm) |
Moderately active = + + (inhibition zone 15-20 mm)
Weakly active = + (inhibition zone 10-15 mm)
Inactive = - (inhibition zone < 10 mm
3.13. Molecular docking studies
In silico molecular docking was conducted to further assess the anticancer activities of these compounds. The molecular docking study of synthesized compounds was used to examine biomolecular interactions of new compounds, which supports the design and reconstruction of drugs as effective inhibitors for the development of diseases (Manju, Kishore, and Kumar 2011). Molecular docking was performed further on compounds to interpret theirs in vitro activities against FGF Receptor 2 (FGFR2) kinase domain harboring the pathogenic gain of function K659E mutation identified in endometrial cancer based on their ligand-protein interactions (Chen et al. 2013; Bian and Xie 2018). Molecular docking analyses (PDB ID: 4J97) have been conducted to predict the affinity and preferred orientation of each docking pose. Results of the docking study are expressed in terms of enzyme binding free energy (ΔG). Figures 14, 15 and 16 displayed the intermolecular interactions of FGFR2 inhibitors with the active site of amino acid residues from the best docking pose in 3D and 2D predictions. Based on the binding energy of FGFR2 inhibitors, the penetration through protein holes of compounds is shown in Tables 9 and 10. Various intermolecular interactions with amino acid residues determined the binding affinity of ligands. The ligand (6-MBTAMB) were able to reveal diverse noteworthy interactions with the active site amino acids (Ala 567, Asp 644). The Ag(I)-Complex exhibits two H-bond interactions represented (Figure 15b) with the active site amino acids (Val 495, Asp 644). Moreover, Pt(IV)-Complex also exhibits seven H-bond with residues of (Gly 490, Ala 491, Gly 493, Lys 517, Arg 630, Asn 631). In another hand, Au(III)-Complex has interactions with active site amino acids (Leu 487, Val 495, Ala 567 and Asn 571), respectively. Compounds like these interact strongly with residues that tightly bind to complexes, which prevent their functions from being carried out by the ligand, which stops the metabolism of cancerous cells (Varghese et al. 2021). Molecular docking is a tool used in modern drug design to analyze how drugs interact with their receptors (Abdolmaleki, B Ghasemi, and Ghasemi 2017). Normal cells contain FGFR, which is involved in embryogenesis, tissue homeostasis, tissue repair, wound healing, and inflammation. As a result, inhibiting the FGFR signalling pathway presents a promising therapeutic option for cancer (Chaudhary and Mishra 2016; Liu et al. 2020). According to Do-Hee et al. (Kim et al. 2016), FGFR2 would serve as an efficient target for inhibiting the migration and/or invasion of endometrial cancer cells harboring FGFR2-activating mutations. Taken together, this is undoubted that AP24534 possesses excellent inhibitory ability against FGFR2-deregulated endometrial cancer cells. In addition, the antitumor effect of AP24534 against endometrial cancer cells with activating FGFR2 mutations might be mainly associated with the blockade of ERK, PLCg and STAT5 signal transduction.
Table 9
Binding energy values of FGFR2 protein.
Compound | S (Kcal/mol) | RMSD_refine | E.conf | E. place | E. score1 | E. refine | E. score2 |
6-MBTAMB | -6.4561 | 0.7306 | 3.0706 | -96.5378 | -10.0700 | -26.9137 | -6.4561 |
Ag(I)-Complex | -6.8556 | 2.3956 | -258.6523 | -67.9934 | -10.2981 | -47.0924 | -6.8556 |
Pt(IV)-Complex | -5.8246 | 1.4380 | -150.4951 | -66.9427 | -11.4781 | -25.9739 | -5.8246 |
Au(III)-Complex | -6.0690 | 1.0906 | -7.5073 | -78.8561 | -9.7973 | -30.7756 | -6.0690 |
S = the final score is the score of the last step, RMSD_refine = the mean square deviation between the laying before refinement and after refinement pose, E_conf = energy conformer, E_place = score of the placement phase, E_scor1 = score the first step of notation, E_refine = score refinement step and number of conformations generated by ligand E_scor2 = score the first step notation, number of poses = Number of conformations.
Table 10
The binding residues of receptors in the binding site for compounds.
Compound | Active site residues | Interactions |
6-MBTAMB | Ala 567 | Greasy (backbone donor) …..O |
Asp 644 | Acidic (side chain donor) …...S |
Ag(I)-Complex | Val 495 | Greasy (backbone donor) benzene ring |
Asp 644 | Acidic (side chain donor) ……H2O |
Pt(IV)-Complex | Gly 490 | Polar (side chain accepter) ……Cl |
Ala 491 | Greasy (backbone donor) ……Cl |
Gly 493 | Polar (side chain accepter) ……O |
Lys 517 | Basic (backbone accepter) …..O Basic (backbone accepter) …..Cl |
Arg 630 | Basic (backbone accepter) ...…S |
Asn 631 | Polar (side chain accepter) ...…S |
Au(III)-Complex | Leu 487 | Greasy (backbone donor) thiazole ring…H |
Val 495 | Greasy (backbone donor) benzene ring…H |
Ala 567 | Greasy (backbone donor) …..S |
Asn 571 | Polar (side chain accepter) .....Cl |
3.14. DPPH Scavenging Activity
DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) becomes a free radical by the spare electron delocalizing over the whole molecule, which means that the molecule does not dimerize, unlike most other free radicals (Purushotham et al. 2019). Hydrogen donors serve as antioxidants, this method identifies compounds that act as radical scavengers. The DPPH• can accept hydrogen from an anti-oxidant. A DPPH• radical is one of the few stable and commercially available organic nitrogen radicals. The antioxidant effect in a test sample is proportional to the disappearance of DPPH• (Parisi et al. 2016). Using ascorbic acid as a standard, all synthesized compounds were evaluated for their free radical scavenging activity. For each compound and ascorbic acid, IC50 values were calculated and summarized in Table 11 and shown in Figures 18, 19. Based on the low IC50 values, it is evident Ag(I) metal complex has the highest antioxidant activity in this DPPH assay. IC50 values at higher concentrations were noted for the remaining compounds with medium to lower activity. This study determined the mechanism of free radical scavenging activity shown in Figure 17 (Kyhoiesh and Al-Adilee 2021).
Table 11
Antioxidant activity from the analysis in vitro for ligand (6-MBTAMB) and its metal complexes.
DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity % |
Concentration (µg/ml) | Ascorbic Acid | 6-MBTAMB | Ag(I)-complex | Pt(IV)-complex | Au(III)-complex |
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD |
12.5 | 80.290456 | 1.0373443 | 26.661985 | 2.9346315 | 32.412523 | 1.6921063 | 29.579472 | 0.9347738 | 32.634032 | 2.8408597 |
25 | 85.580912 | 1.8758445 | 37.617041 | 1.2331055 | 40.906998 | 2.0420668 | 35.257780 | 0.61451732 | 42.494172 | 1.1997304 |
50 | 92.773167 | 5.4500907 | 49.953183 | 0.8494965 | 71.500920 | 0.7700611 | 46.923259 | 3.29902686 | 64.522144 | 1.0886055 |
100 | 99.031811 | 0.3169139 | 64.700374 | 1.2047855 | 86.901473 | 0.7254121 | 59.158945 | 1.35985631 | 85.011655 | 0.9442717 |
200 | 99.446749 | 0.0598911 | 74.227528 | 2.3679375 | 88.236648 | 1.9743813 | 79.472558 | 0.37715628 | 93.263403 | 0.3976392 |
400 | 99.515905 | 0.0598911 | 85.065543 | 1.9816979 | 93.162983 | 0.0690607 | 89.159657 | 1.23453371 | 93.682983 | 0.6646423 |
R2 | 0.9950 | 0.9964 | 0.9836 | 0.9813 | 0.9905 |
IC50 | 3.152 | 47.79 | 26.76 | 49.62 | 27.82 |
3.15. Anticancer effect
Cell lines from cancerous tissues can be used to study human cancer both in vitro and in vivo. According to statistics, endometrial cancer is the fourth most common kind of cancer in women (Ying et al. 2021). There are two subtypes of endometrial cancer. Type I (endometrioid histology) and type II (serous or clear cell histology) exhibit vastly different clinical and pathologic features (Liu, Enriquez, and Ford 2021; Johnatty et al. 2021). Using a cell viability assay, the cytotoxic activity of the ligand (6-MBTAMB) and Au(III)-Complex against endometrial cancer cells (MFE-296) and the effect of normal cells human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) at different concentrations (25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 µg/mL) were studied (MTT assay). The ligand (6-MBTAMB) inhibited tumor cell death at a concentration of 400 µg/ml, with a cytotoxic efficacy of (89.12%). On the other hand, the Au(III)-complex inhibited (MFE-296) to (97.40%) at a concentration of 400 µg/mL, whereas the normal cellular cell (HUVEC) had no effect at the same concentration. Similarly, all compounds tested were inhibited the most when concentrations of (400 µg/ml) were incubated for 24 hours, while concentrations of (25 µg/ml) inhibited the least. The selectivity index (SI), which indicates cytotoxicity of the compound against cancer cells while it is relatively safe against normal cells, was calculated by comparing the IC50 values for each cell line. Au(III)-complex showed selective cytotoxicity against cancer cell lines with IC50 = 43.44 µg/ml, but was very healthy against normal cells with IC50 = 148.20 µg/ml. Tables 12 and 13 give the viability rate values for selected compounds after 24 hours of treatment with various concentrations of MFE-296 and HUVEC cells and calculate the 50% inhibitory concentration.
Table 12
Evaluation of cytotoxicity of (6-MBTAMB) against MFE-296 cancer cell line after incubation (24 hours) at (37oC) and HUVEC cell line.
Concentration (µg/mL) | 6-MBTAMB |
Cancer line cells | Normal line cells |
MFE-296 | HUVEC |
Cell Viability | % Cell Inhibition | Cell Viability | % Cell Inhibition |
Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
0 | 100.0000821 | 1.916969709 | 100.0049425 | 1.606326455 |
25 | 86.82381317 | 4.084800092 | 13.17618683 | 87.60739734 | 1.286090448 | 12.39260266 |
50 | 76.64401662 | 3.47428312 | 23.35598338 | 74.79797356 | 3.343074078 | 25.20202644 |
100 | 48.1570053 | 3.737808647 | 51.8429947 | 63.7184398 | 2.639560109 | 36.2815602 |
200 | 27.46903166 | 5.098662992 | 72.53096834 | 46.70785452 | 2.780409215 | 53.29214548 |
400 | 10.87733299 | 0.924348782 | 89.12267653 | 39.83039866 | 1.464293909 | 60.16961087 |
IC50 | 100.4 | 189.6 |
Table 13
Evaluation of cytotoxicity of Au(III)-Complex against MFE-296 cancer cell line after incubation (24 hours) at (37oC) and HUVEC cell line.
Concentration (µg/mL) | Au(III)-Complex |
Cancer line cells | Normal line cells |
MFE-296 | HUVEC |
Cell Viability | % Cell Inhibition | Cell Viability | % Cell Inhibition |
Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
0 | 100.0000821 | 1.916969709 | 100.0049425 | 1.606326455 |
25 | 74.42744802 | 1.513202834 | 25.57255198 | 86.45413732 | 1.388831113 | 13.54586268 |
50 | 44.75005726 | 2.300495488 | 55.24994274 | 67.96078916 | 1.858937204 | 32.03921084 |
100 | 26.11446196 | 4.212728393 | 73.88553804 | 54.98661395 | 2.374650571 | 45.01338605 |
200 | 13.80019194 | 2.155290431 | 86.19980806 | 45.73170229 | 2.705228629 | 54.26829771 |
400 | 2.594206218 | 1.913010387 | 97.40579378 | 34.84575147 | 1.871216556 | 65.15424853 |
IC50 | 43.44 | 148.2 |