The main findings of this present study were twofold. Firstly, our data showed that increased of the SP-ET index was relationship with the risk of developing chondromalacia patella. Secondly, the SP-ET index might be a better indicator to define the vertical position of the patella relative to femoral trochlear than the Insall–Salvati ratio in chondromalacia patella patients. These findings supported our hypothesis and indicated that the SP-ET index may be a useful complement parameter to define the vertical position of the patella relative to the femoral trochlear, and a higher position of patella might play a role in the pathogenesis of chondromalacia patella.
The previous researches have analyzed the influence of patellofemoral malalignment on chondromalacia patella or patellar cartilage defects [5, 8, 10, 12, 17, 23]. Duran S et al[10] suggested that abnormal trochlear morphology was increased the risk of chondromalacia patella in women and, in particular, women with a shallow trochlea and/or flattened lateral trochlea, this conclusion was similar to the result of Tuna BK et al[5]. In addition, the study of Tuna BK et al also found that patellar tilt was related to the presence of chondromalacia patella. Some studies found that a higher position of patella was an important influencing factor of chondromalacia patella[8, 12, 17], and in addition to the standard measurements of patellar height, some other measurements were analyzed, such as modified Insall-Salvati index[12, 17, 24], patellotrochlear index and patellophyseal index[17, 24]. Overall, patellofemoral malalignment and structural abnormalities of the patellofemoral joint leaded to pathologic pressure on the patellofemoral joint might be an important pathogenesis of chondromalacia patella[17, 24].
The Insall-Salvati ratio was defined as the length of the patellar tendon divided by the length of the patella, which was a validated and widely used index for evaluating the position of patella[20, 25]. The Insall-Salvati ratio can be measured on both lateral radiographs and sagittal MR image of knee. A higher position of patella might result in failure of the patella to engage the trochlear groove early in knee flexion [14], and decreased the contact area between the patellar articular surface and trochlea[7, 13]. Previous studies have shown that patella alta was associated with patellofemoral joint pain, instability, chondromalacia, and osteoarthritis [1, 7, 26, 27]. In this study, although the Insall–Salvati ratio was significantly higher in the chondromalacia patella group than that in the control group, there were just 24.2% (24/99) of patients in the chondromalacia patella group showed a pathologic Insall–Salvati ratio of >1.2, which coincided with the results of Ambra LF et al[8]. Moreover, Ali SA et al[28] found that the Insall-Salvati ratio did not correlate with the severity of patellotrochlear articular cartilage defected. In our opinion, the Insall–Salvati ratio in most patients with chondromalacia patella were in the normal range, which might reduce the instruction of this parameter in practical clinical work. Therefore, it was of great clinical impact to find more effective and direct evaluation indicators.
In the present study, the SP-ET index was used to defione the position of the patella relative to the femoral trochlear, and SP-ET index showed a moderate correlation with the Insall–Salvati ratio. Ali SA et al[28] and Mehl J et al[17] had used the patellophyseal index to assess patella height in their studies, this parameter was calculated as the distance from the most superior point of the patellar cartilage to the most superior point of the femoral cartilage divided by length of patellar articular cartilage, there were some similarities between the SP-ET index and patellophyseal index. However, the measurement of the SP-ET index only needed to be done at one plain (the sagittal plain with the greatest longitudinal diameter of the patella), and without the effect of axial displacement of patella. Therefore, we thought that the SP-ET index had a good practicability, and the intra and inter-reader reliability of this parameter were also good in our study.
Despite Mehl J et al[17] suggested that no significant difference of the patellophyseal index between the patellar cartilage defect group and control group. But different from the study of Mehl J et al[17], the study of Ali SA et al [28] have found that there was statistically significant difference in the patellophyseal index between normal group and severe patellar cartilage defect group. In the present study, we found that the SP-ET index in chondromalacia patella group was significantly higher than that in control group, and the AUC of the SP-ET index was significantly higher than that of Insall–Salvati ratio. The difference of the results might be related to the different severity of the included participants in these studies, and the strict control of the flexion angle of the knee in our study. Because in our practical measurement process, it was found that the flexion angle of the knee had a great impact on the value of the SP-ET index. According to the results of these studies, we thought that the correlation of the SP-ET index and patellophyseal index with the occurrence and severity of chondromalacia patella/ patellar cartilage defect required prospective and biomechanical studies to explore this further.
Our study has several limitations. First, this was a retrospective study, and the selection of participants in the chondromalacia patella group were based on MR images without histologic or pathologic evidence. Second, because of the measurement errors might be caused by the formation of patella spurs, only patients with grade 1-2B chondromalacia patella (based on the modified Noyes classification system) were included in the patient group, therefore, patients with severe chondromalacia patella were excluded in this study. Third, the flexion angle of the knee has a great influence on the SP-ET index, so the measurement of the SP-ET index needs to strictly control the flexion angle of the knee. In addition, there were no strict age and gender matching between the two groups of participants. Future research efforts should focus on the relationship between the SP-ET index and patellofemoral osteoarthritis using a prospective longitudinal study, and the role of the SP-ET index in different grades of chondromalacia patella.