This report highlights the findings of a patient who was diagnosed with Leriche syndrome after severe multiple trauma, and we could save his life through multidisciplinary treatment including blood purification therapy and lower limb amputation. In this case, it was necessary to continue intermittent evaluation by frequent arterial palpation and Doppler measurement of the lower limbs during acute hemodynamic instability. Based on this experience, in the initial treatment strategy for trauma, even endogenous chronic diseases should be correctly and continuously evaluated, and flexible treatment strategies including early surgical intervention should be considered to improve the patient’s quality of life after lifesaving.
Leriche syndrome, also commonly referred to as aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD), is a subset of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and a complication of atherosclerosis affecting the distal abdominal aorta, iliac arteries, and femoropopliteal vessels [1]. AIOD is classified as embolism and thrombosis. In general, the frequency of thrombosis is 20-30%, which is lower than that of embolism, and the patient may have intermittent claudication to begin with, followed by well-developed collateral circulation [4]. However, patients with PAD may be asymptomatic (10%); therefore, the exact prevalence and incidence of Leriche syndrome are unknown. The prevalence of PAD increases in the aging population and is associated with other lifestyle-related diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, nicotine, hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, and homocysteine [2, 5]. There are several cases of Leriche syndrome discovered after surgery or isolated trauma, but those discovered after multiple trauma are very rare. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on Leriche syndrome discovered after multiple trauma [6, 7].
AIOD is diagnosed using CT angiography or conventional angiography. The severity classification of acute lower limb arterial occlusive disease, similar to AIOD, is proposed in TASC II, as shown in Table 2 [8]. In category I, the patient did not require treatment. In category II, especially IIb, the patient required urgent revascularization, and in category III, the lesion could not be cured. (Figure 3) The standard therapy is intravenous unfractionated heparin [8]. Based on the results of randomized trials, there is no clear superiority between thrombolysis and surgery for 30-day limb salvage or mortality [9]. Although the revascularization approach that has shown better long-term results is the aortobifemoral bypass, the implementation of endovascular techniques has shown superior results, thereby reducing the surgical time, morbidity, and mortality in recent decades [10].
Table 2 Severity Classification of Acute Lower Limb Arterial Occlusive Disease
Class
|
Description / Prognosis
|
Findings
|
Doppler signals
|
Sensory loss
|
Muscle weakness
|
Arterial
|
Venous
|
Ⅰ: Viable
|
Not immediately threatened
|
None
|
None
|
Audible
|
Audible
|
Ⅱ: Threatened
a: Marginal
b: Immediate
|
Salvageable if promptly treated
|
Minimal (toes) or none
|
None
|
(Often) inaudible
|
Audible
|
Salvageable with immediate revascularization
|
More than toes, associated with rest pain
|
Mild, moderate
|
(Usually) inaudible
|
Audible
|
Ⅲ: Irreversible
|
Major tissue loss or permanent nerve damage inevitable
|
Profound, anesthetic
|
Profound, paralysis (rigor)
|
Inaudible
|
Inaudible
|
In our case, because the patient initially had no complaints of pain in the lower limbs and there was blood flow on Doppler, the lesion was categorized as category Ⅰ. However, it progressed to category IIb. We suggest that a combination of factors, such as decreased collateral blood flow and coagulopathy associated with hemorrhagic shock, possible accidental collateral blood vessel injury during DCS, and increased intra-abdominal pressure associated with laparotomy closure, may have triggered the exacerbation of Leriche syndrome. We tried to improve blood flow with alprostadil (Prostaglandin preparation) and continuous intravenous heparin administration. The blood flow deteriorated from the third day of hospitalization after the OAM was completed, but urgent revascularization was not possible because bypass surgery would have required revision of the abdomen, with a high risk of infection and bleeding, and endovascular treatment showed uncertain results in the acute phase of trauma. There were also concerns related to distal embolization. Consequently, the right lower limb was amputated on the fifth day. In hindsight, amputation may have been avoided if the OAM period had been prolonged with intensive care to stabilize the circulation and break out of the coagulopathy. The risk of suture failure increases when fascial sutures are performed after more than 5 days, and planned colostomy should be considered [6].
With the aging of the population in many countries, there is a possibility that the number of Leriche syndrome cases will increase, especially in elderly patients with traumatic injuries where aortoiliac occlusion is discovered incidentally or where PAD is present and worsens with difficulty in communication.
We believe that it is important not only to save the life of patients with severe multiple trauma but also to ensure their quality of life after treatment as much as possible. It is important to include the evaluation of chronic disease management over time as part of the treatment strategy in the acute phase of trauma.