In this study, we demonstrated that CLO causes in vivo brain glucose hypometabolism and alters the brain metabolic network. We also found that CLO decreases GLT-1 immunocontent and mRNA expression along with functional changes, including a reduction in glutamate uptake in cortical slices, and a decline in glucose and glutamate uptake in astrocyte cortical cultures. Importantly, no differences were found in cultures of cortical neurons.
Animals treated with CLO exhibited a significant widespread reduction in FDG-PET signal in the cortex (~20%) and hippocampus. Consistently, those brain regions are the ones presenting a high content of GLT-1 [49]. Additionally, we found that CLO selectively reduced cortical GLT-1 protein levels, but did not alter GLAST levels, confirming the effect originally seen by Melone et al [50]. We also identified a reduction in cortical GLT-1 mRNA expression, suggesting that CLO may act at the transcriptional level. In parallel, CLO reduced GLT-1 and GLAST protein levels in cortical astrocyte cultures. Quite importantly, we corroborated these findings with the functional reduction of astroglial glutamate transport, measured by D-[3H]Asp uptake, in cortical slices and astrocyte primary cultures. We did not find changes in synaptosomal glutamate release from cortical preparations, or in glutamate, aspartate and glutamine concentrations in the CSF, which suggests that the glutamate-glutamine recycling process remains functional.
The in vitro evaluation using primary astrocyte cultures treated with CLO also showed a reduction of glucose uptake, while no difference was found in cultures of cortical neurons. These results suggest that astrocytes, not neurons, are the main target cells responsible for the phenomenon observed in vivo, i.e CLO-induced FDG-PET signal reduction. Importantly, the reduction of [3H]2DG uptake by CLO in cortical astrocyte cultures was only observed when stimulated by glutamate. Astrocytes increase their glucose uptake in situations of neuronal activation [5], i.e, during high energetic demand. Accordingly, a similar outcome was also demonstrated in vivo in a two-photon microscopy study in mice, which also showed that glucose uptake is elevated in astrocytes during activation but remains close to basal levels in neurons [14]. Our data showing that reducing GLT-1 expression decreases activity-dependent [3H]2DG accumulation is also in agreement with another study performed with GLT-1 KO mice showing that invalidation of GLT-1 prevents the whisker-stimulated increase in [14C]-2-deoxyglucose accumulation in the somatosensory cortex of developing animals [18].
It is important to emphasize that the FDG-PET uptake phase in our experiments was conducted in freely moving animals and thus, FDG-PET signal here represents glucose metabolism in an awake brain. Our present data should be also put in perspective with previous results obtained with a completely different drug. Ceftriaxone is an antibiotic that was shown to cause an increase in astrocyte GLT-1 expression and activity [51]. Treatment of primary cultures of cortical astrocytes with ceftriaxone was shown to enhance both glutamate transport and glutamate-stimulated glucose uptake through its effect on GLT-1 [30]. But quite strikingly, ceftriaxone increased brain FDG-PET signal in rats proportionately to the density of GLT-1 expression in different brain regions [30]. These results are simply a mirror image of the data obtained with CLO. Altogether, results with CLO and ceftriaxone reinforce the notion that astrocytes, through glutamate-stimulated glucose uptake, represent an important source of the FDG-PET signal in vivo, as postulated exactly 25 years ago [24].
Besides its effects on glutamate transport presented above, it is also known that CLO interacts with serotonin, dopamine and histamine receptors [52]. However, serotoninergic, dopaminergic and histaminergic systems contribute very little to brain energetics [53]. Therefore, it is very unlikely that changes in glucose uptake result from these interactions. In fact, there are several studies showing that brain energy metabolism is driven predominantly by glutamatergic and, to a minor extent, GABAergic systems (for review see [54, 55]), with contributions of other neurotransmitters being so small that it can be disregarded in the overall scenario. However, we could not ignore the possibility of a direct neuronal effect independent of the influence of serotoninergic, dopaminergic and histaminergic systems. To rule out a direct effect on neuronal energy metabolism, we tested CLO impact on neuronal cortical cultures under resting and stimulated conditions. Clearly, CLO did not change neuronal glucose metabolism in both situations, thus, strengthening the conclusion of astrocytes being at the origin of the observed hypometabolism. It is important to mention that cortical FDG-PET hypometabolism is a signature of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia, which is interpreted as an index of neurodegeneration [34]. Since CLO does not induce neuronal death [56–59], one could argue we recapitulated cortical FDG-PET hypometabolism seen in people with dementia by only reducing glutamate transport in astrocytes.
A potential limitation to this conclusion would pertain to behavioral changes such as sedation or freezing that could have contributed to the effects observed with CLO and might jeopardized our interpretation of the cellular origin of the FDG-PET signal [60]. However, we did not observe changes neither in the open field task nor in a more complex behavioral task such as the NOR. Thus, it seems that CLO-induced FDG hypometabolism is not related to major behavioral changes.
In summary, our results provide microPET evidence that a treatment with CLO causes a reduction in FDG-PET signal. Primary culture data indicate that astrocytes, not neurons, are the cells responsible for this phenomenon. These results corroborate the notion that FDG-PET signal might reflect not only neuronal activity but also astrocyte metabolism. These findings reinforce the need for a renewed interpretation of FDG-PET data in brain imaging studies. Finally, as a clinical perspective, CLO is an important antipsychotic drug widely used in patients with schizophrenia who are either intolerant or refractory to classical neuroleptics [61]. CLO mechanisms of action are yet not fully understood; therefore, the effect on brain energetics observed in our study might be of importance and should be better studied in this perspective. As matter of fact, a FDG-PET hypometabolism in the frontal cortex of CLO-responsive patients has been reported a few years ago [62–64]. We believe this phenomenon deserves further investigation in clinical research.