The suspicion of Plasmodium presence in domestic animals arose because malaria cases in those two villages remained high even though many efforts, including insecticide-treated bed nets, have been applied. This study identified 32 of 270 animal blood (11.9%) contained Plasmodium, known as human parasites.
The previous studies found Plasmodium relictum in avian (19), P. cephalophi in ungulate (20), P. traguli in mousedeer (21), P. brucei in gray duiker (22, 23), P. bubalis in water buffalo (24), and P. odocoilei in white-tailed deer (25, 26). In ruminant, P. caprae was found in goat (27), in Rodentia was P. bergei (28), and in primates were found P. cynomolgi, P. inui, and P. fragile (29). The five Plasmodium that infect humans were originally parasites in primates (1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 30). In this study, we found P. falciparum in buffalo, goats, dogs, P. vivax in buffalo, goats, dogs, and horses. At first, we were not so sure about the presence of Plasmodium in these animal erythrocytes. However, the Nested PCR showed the same results for all positive samples. The sequencing results of the positive bands in Nested 2 showed that the bands were P. falciparum and P. vivax (Fig. 7). This is the first investigation reporting human Plasmodium in domestic animals (ruminant, ungulate, and carnivore).
We have considered the possibility of contamination. Therefore, we re-extracted DNA from the same filter paper's blood, and the results were no different from the first Nested PCR. We also performed PCR using other primers, namely rPF1, rPF2, and primers rPV1, rPV2 (31) to detect P. falciparum and P. vivax, and the results were still positive.
The discovery of Plasmodium in buffaloes, goats, horses, and dogs in malaria-endemic areas raises the following questions. How did P. falciparum and P. vivax live in these pets? Are they intermediate hosts for this parasite? Did these Plasmodium species evolve to live in ruminants, ungulates, and carnivores? As a result of repeated exposure, have these animals become more permissive to Plasmodium, which generally lives in humans? Is this parasite pathogenic in animals? As is known, P. knowlesi is a commensal microbe in primates but is pathogenic in humans (1, 2, 3). In P. knowlesi, migration from primates to humans can be caused by loss of forests or human invasion of primate habitat (11). It might be possible that the proximity between animals and humans makes it easier for mosquitoes to transfer human parasites to animals and vice versa.
Although both Fakfak and West Sumba have high API, only animals in West Sumba (Gaura village) have human Plasmodium. This difference may be due to the distance between the human house and animal cages. In Fakfak, the cages are separated approximately 50–500 meters from the main house, while in Gaura, people generally live in a stilt house where the ground floor functions as animal sheds. This condition allows microbial to be transferred by mosquitoes between humans and animals. Unlike in Gaura, the sampling locations in Fakfak are far from each other, and the steep geographical conditions in Fakfak made it difficult for us to collect as many samples as we got from Gaura. This may indirectly lead to the absence of Plasmodium found in Fakfak domestic animals.
Although the use of a microscope can detect Plasmodium's presence well, due to the size of erythrocytes, which are generally smaller in animals than humans, the molecular method becomes significant in detecting the presence of Plasmodium. In this study, Nested PCR was used to detect Plasmodium because its sensitivity was as high as Real-Time PCR and its relatively lower cost (32, 33). For further studies, the recommended microscopic method of using a double fluorescent dye with Giemsa's stain may need to be considered (34).