C–H Bond Strengths. To construct high-performing blue phosphorescent emitters, we first sought to identify the key factor that could affect the degradation of the device. Considering the observations from previous studies mentioned above, it is clear that multiple factors contribute to the operational degradation of the emitter material with the most likely reactive components being the aromatic amines, carbazoles, hydrocarbons, and metal complexes.23,25,55–56 Whereas it is currently impossible to precisely identify the most disabling decomposition pathway, we can assess in more general terms the vulnerabilities that develop as the emitter molecule undergoes excitation. The triplet excited state in the Ir(III)-dopants are typically dominated by the metal-to-ligand-charge-transfer (MLCT) excitations, which can be formally envisioned as a reduction of the ligand. Among the many chemical reactions that this process may accelerate, we envisioned that the C–H activation and subsequent abstraction of hydrogen from the dopant is most likely. It is easy to imagine that the abstracted hydrogen atom can be transferred to an acceptor [A+], as outlined in eqn 1, following an exciton-polaron annihilation mechanism, in which the hydrogen transfer from the excited triplet state of the dopant to a nearby receptor, e.g. the host material, takes place. The dehydrogenated Ir-dopant, which contains a carbon-centered radical, is likely to undergo further rearrangement and decomposition leading to unrecoverable loss of device performance.
To identify the C–H bond that is most vulnerable to such a transformation, we chose a series of homoleptic Ir-phenylimidazole emitters Ir1–4 and calculated the adiabatic bond dissociation energies of all C–H bonds in the excited triplet state using density functional theory (DFT) calculations, as summarized in Table 1. To account for the screening environmental effect in the host material, a polarizable continuum solvation model was employed using a dielectric constant of toluene (e = 2.38). The computed C–H bond dissociation energies range from ~60 to as low as ~29 kcal/mol, with the benzylic C–H bonds showing the lowest bond dissociation energies. The benzylic C–H bonds in the ortho-positions (3,10) are calculated to require 31–28 kcal/mol in all Ir-complexes considered. The pyrimidyl (1,2) and phenylic (4–7) C–H bonds are also somewhat activated, but are unlikely to break at ~60 and ~50 kcal/mol, respectively. Given that the benzylic C–H bonds are also the weakest in ground state molecules with tabulated bond energies being ~90 kcal/mol compared to the phenylic bond being worth 113 kcal/mol, these calculated values are intuitively understandable. The calculated energy difference of the benzylic vs. phenylic C–H bonds of ~30 kcal/mol is also consistent with standard bond energies and indicate that all C–H bonds are activated by a similar amount in the MLCT state and the benzylic C–H bond becomes vulnerable simply because it is the weakest among the C–H bonds present in the phenyl-imidazole ligand.
Thus, the benzylic C–H bond is most vulnerable towards hydrogen abstraction, which may trigger the chemical decomposition of the device. DFT calculations were employed to estimate the barrier of the hydrogen abstraction reaction, where Ir1 was chosen as a model. In these calculations, a cationic phenyl-carbazole moiety was used as the hydrogen atom acceptor, representing one possible acceptor functionality of a host-localized hole, as illustrated in Figure 1a. Our calculations show that the barrier of the H-abstraction reaction is 23.7 kcal/mol, which is sufficiently low to take place even at mild conditions. The resulting benzyl radical and carbazolium species (3) were located at a relative energy of 21.5 kcal/mol, indicating the reaction is highly endergonic, and suggests that the transition state should be late and resemble the electronic structure of the product state according to the Hammond postulate.57 As shown in Figure 1b, the benzylic hydrogen in the TS is located near the nitrogen with the length of C–H and N–H bonds being 1.52 and 1.19 Å, respectively.
To predict the effect of replacing C–H by C–D, we estimated the difference of the zero-point vibrational energy variation (ΔΔZPE) between Ir1 and Ir1’ where the benzylic hydrogen participating in the reaction was replaced by a deuterium. ΔZPE is the difference between the zero point vibrational energies at the TS and the reactant. The calculated ΔΔZPE is 0.74 kcal/mol. Assuming Arrhenius-like dependence of the forward reaction rate on the barrier, the KIE can be estimated as:
where k and T are the Boltzmann constant and temperature, respectively. At room temperature the KIE can be estimated to be 3.5 for Ir1, suggesting that the deuterated dopant would undergo the H-abstraction reaction notably slower than in the original dopant. Details of ZPE calculations are given in Table S1.
Taken together, these calculations highlight that the benzylic C–H bonds are potentially vulnerable functionalities and deuterating them may notably reduce the reaction rate of the dehydrogenation reaction. As predicted in the computational model, we sought to prepare a series of Ir-complexes with various degrees of deuterium incorporation and study the effect of the deuterium incorporation experimentally.
Synthesis and Characterization. The synthetic procedure for accessing Ir1–4 and Ir1D–4D are shown in Figure 2. The ligands L1–4 and L1D–4D were prepared using a palladium catalyzed cross coupling procedure.40 Deuterium incorporation can be achieved by using deuterium oxide (D2O) instead of water (H2O) during the synthesis of L1D–4D. Ir(Ⅲ) complexes were prepared via a one-pot reaction of Ir(COD)2(BF4) and the different ligands in a NMP (1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone). All Ir(Ⅲ) complexes were purified by column chromatography and sublimation, and their structure were confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR, MALDI-TOF and elemental analysis. All complexes are identified as facial structures by straightforward NMR spectra due to C3 symmetry.54 The total deuterium content of each complex is confirmed by 1H NMR and MALDI-TOF. Not surprisingly, the deuteration is not quantitative. Special attention was given to the degree of deuteration of the benzylic C–H bonds. Deuterium/protium ratios of Ir1D–4D were assigned by 1H NMR and quantified by comparing the integration of the corresponding NMR signals to an internal standard, the 5 or 6-position of the 3-cyanophenyl moiety that cannot be deuterated (Figures S1–S8).
Our experiments indicate that all methyl groups of Ir1D–3D are deuterated to ~90 %. The methyl and hydrogen of the isopropyl functionality in Ir4D show substitution levels of ~48 % and ~85 % and the hydrogen at the 4-position of the diisopropylphenyl of Ir4D is deuterated at ~74 %. The 2, 3-positions of the imidazole fragment in Ir1D–4D are confirmed to carry deuterium at ~69 % to 88 %. MALDI-TOF measurements of Ir1D–4D also show consistently that the molecular weight has increased by deuteration (Figure S9), fully consistent with the conclusions drawn from the NMR analysis.
Photophysical properties. With the Ir-complexes in hand, the photophysical properties were studied. As expected, Ir1–4 and Ir1D–4D have practically identical absorption and emission spectra, and display the same electrochemical and thermal properties, as detailed in Table 2. The UV-vis absorption and photoluminescence (PL) spectra are shown in Figure 3. The absorption spectra of all compounds feature an intense absorption band at 260–330 nm that can be assigned to the spin-allowed π-π* (LC) transition of the phenylimidazole ligand. The broad low-energy absorption band in the region of 360–450 nm is an admixture of the 1MLCT and 3MLCT transitions. When excited for emission at 360 nm, the emission spectra of all complexes in DCM solution show blue emission with maximum peaks displayed at 456–462 nm. The UV-vis edge of Ir3 and Ir3D were blue-shifted by 0.3–0.4 eV and the PL were blue-shifted by 6 nm when compared to Ir2 and Ir2D that do not contain the methyl substituent on the 3-cyanophenyl fragment. The UV-vis and PL spectrum of Ir1–4 and deuterated Ir1D–4D iridium complexes are almost identical, confirming that the deuteration has a minimal impact on the photophysical properties.
The quantum yield (Ф) of all complexes measured in PMMA film employing the integrating sphere method were in the range of 0.94 to 0.99. Although it was reported previously that C-H vibrational oscillators suppressed by C-D replacement can enhance luminescent quantum efficiency and lifetime,58–59 we were unable to observe such a differential effect, presumably because the heavy transition metal overrides and minimizes the impact of the deuterium on the reduced mass relevant for the vibrations.53 The emisson lifetimes of 2.15–2.69 μs for all complexes measured in PMMA film confirm the expected phosphorescence emission. The methyl functionality introduced in Ir3 and Ir3D shift the excited state characteristics away from MLCT more towards the LC character, which results in reduced spin density on the iridium atom in the excited state and suppresses of the spin-orbit coupling between singlet and triplet manifolds, resulting in the decrease of the radiative decay rate compared to Ir2 and Ir2D (Figure S14 and Table S2).
The HOMO and LUMO levels of the iridium complexes were determined by cyclic voltammetry and optical band gap (Table 1 and Figure S10). The HOMO energy levels were estimated from the onset of the oxidation potential and the LUMO energy levels were derived by adding the optical bandgaps to the HOMO energy levels. The HOMO for all complexes were in the range of –5.25 to –5.34 eV, and the adding the methyl groups to the 3-cyanophenyl moiety in Ir3 and Ir3D gave rise to a shift of the HOMO/LUMO levels due to their electron-donating inductive nature. As the methyl groups are closer to the LUMO geometrically, the destabilizing effect is greater for the LUMO than the metal-centered HOMO, resulting in a greater HOMO-LUMO gap and a blue-shift of the emission. This finding is consistent with DFT calculations that showed a more pronounced blue-shift of Ir3 and Ir3D. The thermal properties were investigated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The deposition temperatures at 5 % weight loss (Td5) were found to be 415–475 oC (Figure S11), which is consistent with other phenylimidazole-based iridium complexes.
Device performances. To evaluate the effect of deuteration, OLED device were fabricated as follows: Indium tin oxide (ITO, 150nm) / p-doped (3wt%, NDP series, Novaled AG) N-([1,10-biphenyl]-4-yl)-9,9-dimethyl-N-(4-(9-phenyl-9Hcarbazol-3-yl)phenyl)-9H-fluoren-2-amine (BCFA) (10nm) / BCFA(135nm) / H1(10nm) / H1:H2:Ir complexes (2,2'-di(9H-carbazol-9-yl)-1,1'-biphenyl (H1), 9-(3'-(9H-carbazol-9-yl)-5-cyano-[1,1'-biphenyl]-3-yl)-9Hcarbazole-3-carbonitrile (H2), 5:5:10%, 40nm) / mCP-CN(10nm) / codeped NET:NDN series, Novaled AG (5:5, 30nm) / Al.60-61
The Ir complexes Ir1–4 and Ir1D–4D were studied in the same device structure and a detailed energy level diagram is shown in Figure 4a. A p-doped layer was used to achieve effective hole injection from ITO into hole transfer layer (HTL). For the enhancement of exciton confinement in the emission layer (EML), we employed the exciton and hole blocking layer (HBL) with high triplet energies (T1 of H1: 3 eV, T1 of HBL: 3.02eV). The EQE versus luminance, normalized electroluminance (EL) spectra and lifetime curves (LT70@1000cd/m2) are plotted in Figures 4b–d. EML is composed of cohost system with H1 and H2 doped with the Ir complexes. H1 is the modified 3,3'-di(9H-carbazol-9-yl)-1,1'-biphenyl (mCBP) which has twisted structure by adopting ortho-liker bridge and can achieve higher triplet energy (3 eV) and higher hole mobility. H2 has the CN modified carbazole unit and biphenyl contributing to deep HOMO/LUMO levels and afford enhanced electron acceptor characteristics. H1 and H2 have effective HOMO/LUMO levels to enhance the hole and electron carrier injection, respectively, which improve the device performance. In particular, this cohost combination can form the stable exciplex at ~421 nm to efficiently support the triplet state of the Ir-dopant.62
All OLED devices showed high efficiency and relatively long device lifetime at CIE < 0.3, and all relevant EL characteristics are summarized in Table 3. The devices incorporating Ir1, Ir2 and Ir4 show an EL emission at 462 nm, whereas Ir3 displays slightly blue-shifted emission at 457 nm associated with a deep blue color characterized by CIE coordinates of (0.172, 0.258). Ir1, Ir2 and Ir4 show good device performance with EQE > 22 %, LT70 > 140 h. Ir1 has the highest EQE of 22.5 % and a device lifetime LT70 of 182 hours, which may be attributed to the sterically bulky tert-butyl groups that inhibit intermolecular interaction that may lead to triplet-triplet annihilation.63 The Ir3 device shows the lowest device performance among the dopants tested. Because the HOMO levels are relatively shallow, holes are easily trapped in the Ir3 devices and the operational voltage must be increased from ~4V to 4.5 V. Moreover, since the Ir3 shows a blue-shifted emission peak, the energy transfer from cohost exciplex might not be sufficient. The Ir3 device shows a relatively long decay time of ~2.69 µs and a roll-off increase of ~10 %, which is slightly higher than what is seen in the other dopants Ir1 (7.9%), Ir2 (5.4%), and Ir4 (4.8%), resulting in the reduced EQE. Consequently, Ir3 has device lifetime LT70 of ~51 hours at 1000cd/m2 that is notably shorter than what is found with Ir2 that exhibited a lifetime of over 140 hours, but the color of the emission was shifted to a deeper blue, indicated by CIE coordinates of (0.172, 0.258).
Not surprisingly, the EQE values of the Ir1–4 and their deuterated analogues Ir1D–4D are almost identical, but the device lifetimes are dramatically enhanced by deuteration, confirming that inhibiting the C–H bond activation is a viable strategy for enhancing the lifetime of the OLED devices. Remarkably, the LT70 of Ir1D, Ir2D, and Ir3D doubled to 355, 290, and 92 hours, respectively, whereas the lifetime enhancement of Ir4D to 192 hours is relatively low due to the lower levels of methyl deuteration (48%) of the isopropyl group in Ir4D. Of particular interest is the observation that Ir1D displays highly efficient and stable device performance with a maximum EQE of 25.1 %nd the LT70 being 355 hours emitting a deep blue color characterized by CIE coordinates of (0.175, 0.285) over high brightness of 1000cd/m2. These device characteristics are found to be almost the best of the reported performances of blue phosphorescent materials.
To relate these KIE-based improvements of the lifetime to the calculated KIE mentioned above, we must account for the fact that deuterium incorporation was not quantitative, which will of course lower the experimentally observable KIE. To estimate the effective KIEeff the fractional deuterium incorporation can be accounted for by:
where r is typical deuteration ratio. The KIEeff becomes 3±0.2 for a deuteration ratio in the range of 85–90 % that was observed in Ir-complexes, which is in reasonably good agreement with the experimentally observed value ~2.
Isothermal experiment was performed to confirm that the stability enhancement originates from increased stability of the deuterated dopants. The purity change of Ir1–4 and Ir1D–4D after the isothermal process applying a constant temperature ~280 °C for 1 hour is shown in Table 4. The impurities of each hydrogenated and deuterated dopant have similar patterns, but in the case of the deuterated dopants, the purity change after the isothermal process is notably smaller compared to the undeuterated analogues. For example, Ir3 has a purity change of 5.37% after being exposed to the isothermal conditions, but the deuterated analogue Ir3D shows a much improved behavior at 1.44%. The mass of major impurities was found to be oxidation products (see Figure S15), which is worrisome, as device degradation can be affected by oxidized material during electro- and photo-chemical processes.55,65 These isothermal experiments offer further support for the proposal that the durability of the Ir-dopants can be significantly enhanced by deuteration.