The primary safety outcome
No acute allergic reactions, such as itchy rash, swelling of the throat or tongue, shortness of breath, vomiting, lightheadedness, and low blood pressure were observed within two hours after the nebulization treatment. Secondary allergic reaction was also not observed post treatment. No adverse events were reported.
MSCs therapy is considered safe for lung diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (20, 21). Numerous completed phase I trials have demonstrated that no serious, acute, adverse events were reported in MSC therapy (22, 23). Several studies have been conducted on the safety of MSCs exosomes therapy. The findings of these studies suggested that MSC-derived exosomes could be safely and easily used in the treatment of lung diseases (24). However, the route of administration of MSC-derived exosomes in most of studies was through intravenous injection. Our results demonstrated that nebulization of MSC-derived exosomes was safe and could be employed in the treatment of lung diseases.
The efficacy outcome
The plasma C-reaction protein (CRP) levels decreased from 88.4 mg/L (Feb 17) to 4.3 mg/L (Feb 28) and 0.4 mg/L (Mar 1) in patient 1. In patient 2 (severe type), it decreased from 30.8 mg/L (Feb 23) to 18.9 mg/L (Feb 28) and 3.5 mg/L (Mar 2). In patient 3, it decreased from 5.7 mg/L (Feb 15) to 0.5 mg/L (Mar 3). In patient 4 (severe type), it decreased from 31.8 mg/L (Feb 25) to 11.4 mg/L (Mar 9). The nebulization treatment in patients 1, 2 3, and 4 started from Feb 27. In patient 5, the CRP levels were found to be 0.5 mg/L (Mar 28) and 0.5 mg/L (April 4), without any change in its level. In patient 6, the CRP levels decreased from 2.2 mg/L (Mar 30) to 0.5 mg/L (April 8). The nebulization treatment for patients 5 and 6 started from April 1 and April 4, respectively. In patient 7, the CRP levels were found to be 1.9 mg/L (Aug 21), 5.4 mg/L (Aug 25) and 3 mg/L (Aug 29) (Table 2). Although the CRP value before the nebulization treatment (23.00 ± 31.87) was comparatively higher than that after the treatment (5.92 ± 6.92), there was no significant difference between the two values (p = 0.178).
Table 2
The efficacy outcomes (C-reactive protein, total white blood cell count, total lymphocyte count, the respiratory rate, the fever and shortness of breath) before and after the nebulization treatment.
Laboratory index
|
Patient 1
(common type)
|
Patient 2
(severe type)
|
Patient 3
(common type)
|
Patient 4
(severe type)
|
Patient 5
(common type)
|
Patient 6
(common type)
|
Patient 7
(common type)
|
|
Before
|
After
|
Before
|
After
|
Before
|
After
|
Before
|
After
|
Before
|
After
|
Before
|
After
|
Before
|
After
|
C-reactive protein (mg/L)
|
88.4
|
0.4
|
30.8
|
3.5
|
5.7
|
0.5
|
31.8
|
11.4
|
0.5
|
0.5
|
2.2
|
0.5
|
1.9 5.4
|
White cell count (*109 per liter)
|
5.28
|
4.96
|
5.99
|
5.02
|
7.28
|
6.87
|
6.38
|
3.95
|
8.16
|
5.26
|
6.02
|
8.41
|
4.34 5.63
|
Lymphoma count (*109 per liter)
|
3.6
|
2.91
|
1.36
|
2.03
|
2.87
|
2.62
|
1.17
|
1.1
|
2.77
|
2.36
|
2.08
|
2.08
|
3.08 2.95
|
Respiratory rate (/min)
|
12
|
13
|
32
|
25
|
15
|
14
|
22
|
20
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
15
|
13 14
|
Fever (°C)
|
36.5
|
36.6
|
36.7
|
36.5
|
36.3
|
36.4
|
37.1
|
37
|
36.5
|
36.6
|
36.4
|
36.5
|
37.6 36.5
|
Shortness of breath
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No No
|
Before :Before nebulization treatment. |
After : After nebulization treatment. |
No: No shortness of breath. |
Yes: Presence of shortness of breath. |
In patient 1, oxygen saturation without supplementation rose from 95% (Feb 26) to 98% (Mar 2). In patient 2 (severe type), oxygen saturation increased from 95% (Feb 26) to 98% (Mar 3). In patient 4 (severe type), oxygen saturation rose from 95% (Feb 26) to 100% (Mar 1). In patient 3, 5, 6 and 7, there was no significant change in oxygen saturation post nebulization treatment. Therefore, we found that there was no significant difference in oxygen saturation before and after nebulization MSCs exosomes (p>0.05).
Additionally there was no significant difference in the total white blood cell count, total lymphocyte count, fever and shortness of breath before and after the nebulization treatment (p>0.05). Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in Patient 2, a severe case with liver function damage, decreased from 168 u/l (Feb 26) to 92 u/l (Feb 28), and 52 u/l (Mar 2).
Computed tomography (CT) of the chest revealed that the nebulization of MSC-derived exosomes was beneficial to the absorption of pulmonary lesions. On Apr 3, the first CT scan of Patient 6 (minor case of COVID-19 pneumonia, received nebulization of MSC-derived exosomes from Apr 4) showed an isolated nodule outside the left lower lobe of the lung. On April 10, the second CT examination showed that the density of the left inferior lobe nodule was significantly lower with a narrow range. On April 21, the third CT examination showed that the lesions in the lower left lung were completely absorbed. The time taken for complete absorption of pulmonary lesions in patient 6 was 18 days. The absorption time of similar lung lesions in another patient (a minor case of COVID-19 pneumonia, that did not receive the nebulization treatment) was 27 days. There was significant difference in time of complete absorption of pulmonary lesions (16.00 ± 5.23 vs 20.85 ± 3.57) between the patients received nebulization of exosomes from the beginning of treatment and other patients (did not received nebulization or received nebulization at the end of treatment) in minor cases of COVID-19 pneumonia (p = 0.033). Patients with severe cases of COVID-19 pneumonia received nebulization treatment at the later stage of treatment. Compared to the patients who did not receive the nebulization treatment, patient 2 showed obvious absorption of pulmonary lesions. In patients who did not receive the nebulization treatment, there were presence of fibrous shadows in the lung lesions (Fig. 3).
Several studies have demonstrated that bone marrow-derived exosomes can reduce lung inflammation, alleviate pulmonary edema and post-inflammatory complications in animal models of acute lung injury, ARDS, asthma and other inflammatory diseases. (25–27). MSC-derived exosomes usually contain bioactive substances such as mRNA, miRNA and protein (28). These substances have been shown to effectively reduce inflammatory processes and modulate airway remodeling (13, 29). We also demonstrated that MSC-derived exosomes can reduce the CRP level in different degrees of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, which was similar to the findings of a previous study (18). Although there was a decrease in CRP level after the nebulization treatment, it did not achieve statistical significancedue to the small number of cases and large standard deviation. The patients who received nebulization treatment at an earlier stage showed more benefecial effects in terms of the absorption of pulmonary inflammation. Our results showed that nebulization of MSC-derived exosomes is also beneficial to the absorption of pulmonary lesions in minor cases of COVID-19 pneumonia and the reduction of cellulose residues in severe cases of COVID-19.
Time of hospitalization
The average time of hospitalization was 18.74 ± 4.72 days for all the COVID-19 patients, 18.29 ± 4.60 days for minor cases of COVID-19, and 22.6 ± 4.3 days for severe cases of COVID-19. The time of hospitalization for patients 5, 6 and 7, with minor cases of COVID-19 (received nebulization of exosomes from the beginning of treatment) were 15.3 ± 1.33 days (14, 17 and 15 days, respectively). The time of hospitalization for patients 1 and 3, with minor cases of COVID-19 (received nebulization of exosomes at the end of treatment) were 22 and 31 days, respectively. There was significant difference in time of hospitalization between the patients received nebulization of exosomes from the beginning of treatment and other patients (did not received nebulization or received nebulization at the end of treatment) in minor cases of COVID-19 pneumonia (p = 0.035). The time of hospitalization for patients 2 and 4, with severe cases of COVID-19 (received nebulization of exosomes at the end of treatment) were 22 and 38 days, respectively. The patients who received nebulization treatment at an earlier stage showed more benefecial effects in terms of the time of hospitalization.
COVID-19 nucleic acid detection
RT-PCR was performed using the genomic DNA of COVID-19 pneumonia patients. In all patients, the nucleic acid has changed from positive to negative before the treatment of exosomes nebulization.
Serum immune Factor Analysis
Patient 6 was tested for immune factors (IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNFα, IFN-γ, IL-17A, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD4/CD8, TH19 and NK) (Table 4). The largest difference was observed in case of IFN – γ post nebulization treatment. There was a two-fold increase in IFN – γ, IL-17A and TH19 after the nebulization treatment. However, NK cells showed a two-fold decrease after the treatment (Table 3).
Table 3
Analysis of serum immune factors (IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNFα, IFN-γ, IL-17A, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD4/CD8, TH19 and NK) in Patients 6. The time of nebulization was April 4.
Date
|
IL-2
|
IL-4
|
IL-6
|
IL-10
|
TNF-α
|
IFN-γ
|
IL-17A
|
CD3
|
CD4
|
CD8
|
CD4/CD8
|
TH19
|
NK
|
Before
(Mar 30)
|
2.19
|
2.05
|
3.25
|
2.76
|
1.94
|
0.63
|
0
|
55.5
|
25.88
|
23.13
|
1.12
|
7.56
|
31.04
|
After
(April 8)
|
No
|
No
|
3.54
|
0.83
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
67.62
|
33.52
|
27.64
|
1.21
|
14.40
|
14.68
|
After
(April 13)
|
0.51
|
3.65
|
4.57
|
2.13
|
1.01
|
41.23
|
4.73
|
64.91
|
33.98
|
25.72
|
1.35
|
15.15
|
15.20
|
Before: Before nebulization treatment. |
After: After nebulization treatment. |
No: No data. |
Although several therapeutic approaches have been proposed for COVID-19 pneumonia, only few of them are effective. At present, it is believed that reducing the lung injury may be the key to save patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Our results suggested that nebulization of MSC-derived exosomes can promote the absorption of pulmonary lesions, and reduce the time of hospitalization for minor cases of COVID-19 pneumonia. Nebulization of MSC-derived exosomes from the beginning of the treatment could be more beneficial to the patients.
Drug nebulization is an effective way to treat lung diseases. In case of nebulization, exosomes can act directly on the lungs and show a faster effect. However, there are only a few reports on the nebulization of MSC-derived exosomes. Our results indicate that nebulization of MSC-derived exosomes is safe and feasible therapeutic approach for the treatment of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. After the extraction of exosomes, they can be stored up to a week in a 4 °C refrigerator and could be added to the existing atomizer, as and when required. The convenience of drug storage and its use is very crucial for COVID-19 pneumonia therapy, especially in countries and regions with lacking advanced health-care facilities.
However, our research has obvious shortcomings. Due to the short duration of the outbreak in China, only seven COVID-19 pneumonia patients were included in this study. Additionally, only 3 patients underwent the nebulization of MSC-derived exosomes from the beginning of treatment. It also should be noted that we have not compared the exosomes nebulization treatment to various other administration methods in this study, such as intravenous injection.
In conclusion, nebulization MSCs exosomes is a novel method that could be used in the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia. Our clinical study involving a small sample size, shows that this method is safe, effective and simple especially for minor cases of COVID-19 pneumonia. Nebulization of MSC-derived exosomes from the beginning of the treatment may benefit patients more effectively.